The Legacy of the US in Iraq

(2 pm. – promoted by ek hornbeck)

Cross posted from The Stars Hollow Gazette

Warning: The video below the fold in this article contains very disturbing pictures that may be difficult for many to watch.

It is now ten years since the the United States launched its illegal invasion of Iraq based on a string of lies about non-existent weapons of mass destruction and wild accusations of Sadaam Hussein’s connection to Al Qaeda, Osama bin Laden and 9/11, all for control of Iraq’s oil riches by one evil man, Richard “Dick” Cheney. What the US has left behind is a devastated country:

Ten years ago, Iraqis, even if they had originally opposed them, hoped that the US invasion and occupation would at least bring an end to the suffering they had endured under UN sanctions and other disasters stemming from defeat in the first Gulf War in 1991. Today, people in Baghdad complain that they still live in a permanent state of crisis because of sectarian and criminal violence, pervasive corruption, a broken infrastructure and a dysfunctional government. Many Iraqis say that what they want in 2013 is the same as what they wanted in 2003, which is a visa enabling them to move to another country, where they can get a job.

But even worse, the US left a health care crisis that will last for generations, not just the lack of care and hospitals but a legacy of horrific birth defects and cancer that has been caused by depleted uranium (DU) contamination. DU, along with lead and mercury, was contained in the armor plating and ammunition used in attacks in Iraq and Afghanistan. The high rates of double and triple cancers, as well as miscarriages, still births and bizarre birth defects, in the cities of Basra and Falluja, have been blamed on DU by researchers. A study published in the Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology (pdf) that focused on maternity hospitals in the cities of Basra and Fallujah opens with this stunning paragraph:

Between October 1994 and October 1995, the number of birth defects per 1,000 live births in Al Basrah Maternity Hospital was 1.37. In 2003, the number of birth defects in Al Basrah Maternity Hospital was 23 per 1,000 livebirths. Within less than a decade, the occurrence of congenital birth defects increased by an astonishing 17-fold in the same hospital.  A yearly account of the occurrence and types of birth defects, between 2003 and 2011, in Al Basrah Maternity Hospital, was reported. Metal levels in hair, toe-nail, and tooth samples of residents of Al Basrah were also provided. The enamel portion of the deciduous tooth from a child with birth defects from Al Basrah (4.19 lg/g) had nearly three times higher lead than the whole teeth of children living in unimpacted areas. Lead was 1.4 times higher in the tooth enamel of parents of children with birth defects (2,497± 1,400 lg/g, mean±SD) compared to parents of

normal children (1,826± 1,819 lg/g).

The article concludes:

Present knowledge on the effects of prenatal exposure to metals, combined with our results, suggests that the bombardment of Al Basrah and Fallujah may have exacerbated public exposure to metals, possibly culminating in the current epidemic of birth defects. Large-scale epidemiological studies are necessary to identify at-risk populations in Iraq. The recognition that birth defects reported from Iraq are mainly folate-dependent offers possible treatment options to protect at-risk populations.

From Mike Ludwig at Truthout, there are currently over 300 contaminated sites that are in need of decontamination.

In 2012, European researchers visited a scrap metal site in Al Zubayr, an area near Basrah in southern Iraq. A local police officer told them that the site had at one time held military scrap metal from the bloody battles waged during the American invasion. A local guard told the researchers that children had been seen playing on the scrap during that time, and both adults and children had worked disassembling the military leftovers. At one point, the guard said, members of an international organization with equipment and white suits showed up, told guards that the site was very dangerous and “quickly ran off.” [..]

There are between 300 and 365 sites where depleted uranium contamination was identified by Iraqi authorities the years following the 2003 US invasion, with an estimated cleanup cost of $30 million to $45 million, according to a report recently released by IKV Pax Christi. Iraqi authorities are currently cleaning up the sites, mostly located in the Basrah region, and 30 to 35 sites still need to be decontaminated.

In an op-ed for Al Jazeera, Dr Mozhgan Savabieasfahani, a native of Iran and an environmental toxicologist, noted what must be done

These observations collectively suggest an extraordinary public health emergency in Iraq. Such a crisis requires urgent multifaceted international action to prevent further damage to public health.

In regards to the epidemic of birth defects alone, the recognition that congenital birth defects in Iraq are mainly folate dependent offers treatment possibilities for at-risk populations. Folate and vitamin supplementation may prove to be useful in dealing with this crisis. In addition, chelation therapy, or the administration of chelating agents to remove heavy metals from the body, may be explored for appropriate candidates.

Most urgently needed is comprehensive large-scale environmental testing of the cities where cancer and birth defects are rising. Food, water, air, and soil must be tested to isolate sources of public exposure to war contaminants. This is a necessity to discover the source, extent, and types of contaminants in the area followed by appropriate remediation projects to prevent further public exposure to toxic war contaminants.

Dr. Savabieasfahani also said, “Silence will cost more lives.” Yes, silence kills.

Ten Years Later, U.S. Has Left Iraq with Mass Displacement & Epidemic of Birth Defects, Cancers

Al Jazeera reporter Dahr Jamail discusses how the U.S. invasion of Iraq has left behind a legacy of cancer and birth defects suspected of being caused by the U.S. military’s extensive use of depleted uranium and white phosphorus. Noting the birth defects in the Iraqi city of Fallujah, Jamail says: “They’re extremely hard to bear witness to. But it’s something that we all need to pay attention to … What this has generated is, from 2004 up to this day, we are seeing a rate of congenital malformations in the city of Fallujah that has surpassed even that in the wake of the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki that nuclear bombs were dropped on at the end of World War II.” Jamail has also reported on the refugee crisis of more than one million displaced Iraqis still inside the country, who are struggling to survive without government aid, a majority of them living in Baghdad.

Transcript can be read here


Skip to comment form

  1. TMC
  2. tahoebasha3

    and ultimately lost because of a “word check” — makes me sick.  Anyway, will try to recreate tomorrow!  In my view, there cannot be enough said about this entire subject!

  3. tahoebasha3

    Iraq was already a nation suffering for a long time from our sanctions imposed after 1991.  Children were dying before the age of 5.  Medication and medical supplies were limited, if any.  Food supplies scare, as well. The infrastructure was badly in need of repairs.  

    Prior to the actual commencement of the so-called war, which it never was, as there was no declaration of war, only a Congressional O.K. to use military force, if necessary.  We flew some 21,000 plus sorties over Iraq, bombing their agriculture lands, bombing water supplies and certain infrastructures.

    As is our usual and characteristic style, we go into a country(ies) where it is already down and suffering.  So, we went into Iraq and devastated the country. We killed their doctors, professors, archaeologists, scientists and any and all learned people possible.  We destroyed art and architectural heritages.  We killed over a million people and caused some 4.5 million to be displaced, both inside and outside of Iraq, and most of those people suffer for want of jobs, adequate food, etc.  Many of the children become prostitutes to help their families who are in want a job.  

    The dust of depleted uranium remains in the air ad infinitum,so it will continue to cause cancer and grotesque deformities as time goes on and as the dust travels.

    Other than the white phosphorus, many point to depleted uranium (DU), a radioactive element which, according to military engineers, significantly increases the penetration capacity of shells. DU is believed to have a life of 4.5 billion years, and it has been labelled the “silent murderer that never stops killing.” Several international organisations have called on NATO to investigate whether DU was also used during the Libyan war. AMERICA’S FALLUJAH LEGACY: “WHITE PHOSPHOROUS, DEPLETED URANIUM: THE FATE OF IRAQ’S CHILDREN.”

    We used weapons of mass destruction on the peoples of Iraq.

    Let’s be very clear: White phosphorous, depleted uranium, napalm, cluster ammunition: they are all weapons of mass destruction, and only the US is using them, and according to numerous reports & witnesses, against Iraqi civilians.  “US occupation forces use WMD in Iraq”

    [Note:  The Brussels Tribunal has a wealth of information from just about any respect you can think of in terms of Iraq, laws, etc.  The website page I’ve shown is of the original version, it has since been updated, but it’s all the same.  The menu to the left shows lawsuits, etc., should you chose to peruse the site a bit. By clicking on the logo, it will bring you to the updated website, then click on Iraq in the menu.]

    What didn’t we do to Iraq and its people?  A people who didn’t do one GD thing to us!


    I’m ashamed to be considered an American.

    “Everyone Knew that Iraq Didn’t Have WMDs” (Posted on November 26, 2009 by WashingtonsBlog)

    David Swanson, has a very long summary (with all details) that is worth reading, as well.  Iraq War Among World’s Worst Events  By davidswanson – Posted on 17 March 2013

  4. TMC

    Look at what we did to Native Americans alone since the country was discovered.

    The rates of cancer in Iraq have surpassed Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

  5. tahoebasha3

    It was horrific what we did to the native Americans and they suffer to this day, as a result.

    We have perpetrated a genocide on the Iraqi people.  There is no other way to look at it.  

    And, supposedly, we went to Iraq because they had WMD’s, (which, they did, at a point and time in history, sold to them by Donald Rumsfeld, which were used against the Kurds, but they do have a shelf life) and we turn around and use WMD’s on these people.  

    What floors me is that we have done and continue to perpetrate and visit our evil in so many places in the world and nothing is done to stop us.  But, I fear the day will come when some country(ies) will find a way . . . . . !


  6. TMC

    for selling this war. They had the same information that most of us who were opposed did and in some cases even more. Chris Matthews would have been a hero if he had exposed Cheney for outing Plame. Richard Armistad, who later said he did it, should have been tried for treason.

    Yes, I am still really angry at this government and the media.

  7. tahoebasha3

    I have a list, if you’re interested, but I’m sure you know who owns the media.

    But, still, someone on the f..king earth should have had the guts and fortitude to decry this undeclared war.  Back around the time, before and at the time we invaded Iraq, a number of us blogged on Cong. John Conyers’ blog.  We were all fairly pleased with the ability to express ourselves openly and honestly, up to the point Nancy Pelosi*, was to become the Speaker of the House, who, and even before being seated, declared that “impeachment” (which we were all seeking so heartily) “was off the table.”  I have never to this day understood how the Speaker of the House could declare that “impeachment” was off the table.  Impeachment is provided for in our Constitution and, in measure, our Bill of Rights.  What right has anyone to remove that provision from within our Constitutional grasps?  

    And, so, here we are today!

    *(her rationale was that it would be too divisive and there was an election coming up, etc. . .. . blah, blah, blah).

Leave a Reply