Joe Trippe, Dean’s former campaign guy and

now, the campaign guy for John Edwards, in an appearance on Chris Matthew’s Soap Box today, floated an idea that, apparently, the Edwards campaign will use to prod fellow Democratic candidates. The idea: Unhook all Democratic Presidential candidates (indeed all Democrats running for office) from the inside the beltway lobbyist. The purpose, in Trippe’s view, is to raise the Democratic candidates to a higher moral plane and put the Republicans on defense, defending what most American’s view as immoral, probably the fraudulent injection of lobbying money into the various campaigns. Trippe thinks that this will strike a harmonious chord with the voting public and thus gain the high road for Democrats. Maybe it would, but I doubt that he will get many takers.

The one fact certain is that political campaigns cost money. He (or she) who most efficiently collects and spends the most is likely to be elected. Elections are successfully purchased when clever candidates deliver clever campaigns, clever advertisements (especially attack Ads), clever spokespeople make clever speeches depicting the wrongs of the opposition, and when all this is paid for by a clever campaign finance manager supplied by the clever contributors …in national elections, more often than not, the K Street lobbyist. The two operable requirements are cleverness and money. Cynical, yes, probably, but very close to the truth. Hillary’s view that “lobbyist are people too” should not be the motto of the Democratic presidential campaign. Democrats should help America to eliminate this unfortunate destruction of our political system.

Some would argue that spurning money (any body’s money) is political suicide. I don’t think so. Accepting every dollar, no matter the taint associated, is destroying our democracy. Shall we continue that destruction or take a risk and maybe find a better way.

Though I am not a supporter of John Edwards, necessarily, I think he is onto something. The American people assume that politics equals sleaziness. Both our political parties have given our people every reason to come to that conclusion. Edwards, in advocating (and practicing) the elimination of lobbyist money, puts himself on a moral high-ground pedestal. He has invited the other Democrats to join him. I think it is high time that they do so. Let the Republicans defend why they are taking large sums of money from the American Petroleum Institute, Exxon, BP, Shell and others as they continue to advocate the war in Iraq.

A growing number of American’s are not stupid. 

8 comments

Skip to comment form

  1. real health care advocates and countless others use lobbyists in WAshington.

    Are you ready to cut teachers and unions out of  the political process?

    And John Edwards has no moral high-ground, he has a bundling problem.

    You just havent heard about it yet, some people wait till December for those types of stories.

  2. the concept of a body of persons seeking to influence legislators on behalf a particular interest, sounds in theory reasonable. Access to government is a good thing. What has happened is that the influence is dependent on the amount of money that is offered. I believe thats called peddling.

    A good place to start would be to at least take this money out of the electoral process entirely and get the corporate influence back to where it is not actually writing laws and policy. Unions, teachers, environmental groups are not the problem it’s having Exxon, Haliburton, Big Pharma, etc. being the powerful interests that chart our course.

    I still think Edwards is articulating this the best. He is however running in the here and now so in order to be at all competitive he must at on some level play within the current situation. Our government needs a major “swamp drain” and while I’m not neive enough to believe it will come overnight at least Edwards would have us move in that direction. 

  3. and say that the first candidate to run a no-cash campaign would actually have a chance at winning.  It would take a lot of extremely dedicated people.  But the press would grant a lot of coverage to a no-cash campaign simply because it hasn’t been done before on a national level.

    Free press releases, free viral videos, free viral cartoons, supporter download kits, and an excellent website would be a great start.

Comments have been disabled.