The LA Times is today running a news story and an opinion piece that together make for an interesting contrast.
The news story is about congressional efforts to obtain copies of the two recently revealed secret Justice Department memos. These memos, it appears, reversed an earlier abstention from cruel and painful treatment of terrorism suspects.
The opinion piece is by Clive Stafford-Smith, a lawyer for detainees in Guantanamo Bay. He describes some of the things he sees every time he visits his clients. That is, things about which there is no dispute at all, unread memos aside.
Reading these two pieces side-by-side leaves the reader slightly dizzy, bewildered. Congress is demanding memos which may disclose that Justice is secretly allowing the infliction of inhuman, painful, or degreading treatment of prisoners.
Meanwhile, Mr. Stafford-Smith sees inhuman, painful, or degrading treatment of prisoners every time he visits Guantanamo. For example, he is not allowed to bring throat lozenges to an imprisoned journalist whose anti-hunger-strike feeding tubes are inserted and removed twice a day by Guantanamo guards, unnecessarily, increasing the discomfort and pain he endures.
Let’s read snips of these pieces, side-by-side.
Democrats demand interrogation memos
The secret Justice Department legal opinions reportedly allow painful tactics on terrorism suspects.
From the Associated Press
October 5, 2007WASHINGTON — Senate and House Democrats demanded Thursday to see two secret Justice Department memos that reportedly authorize painful interrogation tactics against terrorism suspects.
A lawyer for prison detainees is struck by how the immoral mistreatment of inmates has become so mundade.
By Clive Stafford Smith
October 5, 2007
GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA —— snip —
It is sometimes a minor rule change, imposed from far above, that inflames me. I always carry lozenges, and some months back, a hunger-striking client agreed to take one to soothe his sore throat. By my next visit, the list of “contraband” had expanded to bar this insignificant salve.
news story . . .
— snip —
White House Press Secretary Dana Perino told reporters: “This country does not torture. It is a policy of the United States that we do not torture, and we do not.”
Mr. Stafford-Smith . . .
— snip —
Sami looked very thin. His memory is disintegrating, and I worry that he won’t survive if he keeps this up. He already wrote a message for his 7-year-old son, Mohammed, in case he dies here.
news story . . .
— snip —
Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman John D. Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.) sent a letter to the acting attorney general saying the administration’s credibility was at risk.
The memos are “critical to an appropriate assessment” of tactics approved by the White House and the Justice Department, Rockefeller wrote to Acting Atty. Gen. Peter D. Keisler. “Why should the public have confidence that the program is either legal or in the best interests of the United States?” he asked.
Mr. Stafford-Smith . . .
— snip —
Tonight, I must plan tomorrow’s visit with Shaker Aamer. Shaker has never met his youngest son, Faris, who was born after his imprisonment and who waits in London, hoping to meet his father. I’d love to ask Shaker about the Speedos I supposedly gave him, but he was floridly psychotic the last time I saw him. He’s been on a hunger strike even longer than Sami — almost 300 days — and an interrogator told him I was Jewish to sow discord between us. He is fairly certain that I work with the CIA.
(Note, Mr. Aamer is the prisoner to whom Mr. Stafford-Smith allegedly smuggled speedos. Mr. Stafford-Smith denies the charge.)
news story . . .
— snip —
“The program, which has taken account of changes in U.S. law and policy, has produced vital information that has helped our country disrupt terrorist plots and save innocent lives,” Little said in a statement. “The agency has always sought a clear legal framework, conducting the program in strict accord with U.S. law, and protecting the officers who go face to face with ruthless terrorists.”
Mr. Stafford-Smith . . .
— snip —
In more than 20 years trying death-penalty cases, I have visited all the worst prisons in the Deep South, yet none compares to Camp Six here. To the military, this tribute to Halliburton’s profiteering is state-of-the-art; to the human being, it is simply inhumane.
— snip —
It is worth wondering, then, what exactly congress expects to discover that is not already well known.
Guantanamo must be closed.
13 comments
Skip to comment form
Author
The known is sufficient.
Human Rights and Documentation.
At last night’s keynote, Juan Mendez, an incredible man, torture survivor, lawyer, human rights worker, emphasized that there is no such thing as torture without a specific administrative policy in place. He emphasized over and over again that the “bad apple” narrative is a justificatory myth.
Indeed.
We already know all that we need to know to make the determination that the Bush “administration” has put into place a system of torture.
Listening to this conference, it is more than clear that BushCo needs to be prosecuted and punished.
Made me automatically think of the NSA/Telco suits, where the court and the parties are all proceeding under the patent fiction that the plans for wiring the ATT trunk line into the NSA office is a state secret, even though the actual documents are sitting out on the web for anyone to see.
How much longer must these purposeful delusions by our government go on? When are our officials going to finally start speaking the same truths that everyone else already knows?
Great piece, LC