There has always been a struggle….most likely there always will be.
It is human nature to struggle, in some that is expressed as full out rebellion. In others it is reduced to complaining under their breath. Or worse….being afraid to even do that.
On the other side of the struggle, there is the range of full time crackdown on the rebels….actively supporting supporting the crushing of rebellion by The People, to indifference and willful ignorance. Ignorance has two forms those who cannot get information….and those who ignore inconvenient or uncomfortable information. Cracking down on ‘rebels….even those who merely mutter is a full time struggle for the status qou-sters
The two biggest chunks of information that are being ignored right now, imo, are Climate Crisis which is literally off the charts in its acceleration….and the fact that not just America, but pretty much the entire planet, is now a Corporatocrasy.
It has been for some time of course, at a lower profile. But as with absolutely everything else any thinking person would condemn as evil or at least Wrong! …under Bushco it has not only flourished and thrived, but has also revealed itself much more nakedly. They are no longer trying to hide it, very much….the fact that they are out to buy up the worlds resources and control all distribution of said resources. Though I don’t get into it much here….the distribution part is critically important as well.
Chevron and Burma is just the latest example of corporations gone wild. Whether it is their intent to be evil or if they are just fulfilling the mission of corporations with brutal efficiency, regardless of consequence to People and to the planet, what they are actually doing to the planet is incredibly and fatally harmful. And certainly with the oil companies and insurance companies, it is VERY easy to ascribe evil intent. I sure do. It is hard not to do the same with many others as well, Coca-Cola buying up water rights worldwide and the chemical companies and Big Pharma etc. The MIC is of course a No-brainer, you can’t get much eviler than selling death.
But the real point is, is that these corporations….in a purely corporate self preservationist internal logic, are now openly buying governments. They then use these governments to obtain and control that countries resources. It seems that there is no limit on their behavior, their ‘business practices’ ….as long as the stockholders are making money.
If you control the worlds resources and the worlds governments you control the world. Though perhaps not a conscious conspiracy, it has become a defacto one. Especially when you factor in the interdependency of needing resources another corporation controls to make your corporations product. Not to mention….mergers.
I won’t try to hazard a guess as to what degree of control the corporations hold these governments or what percentage of the worlds resources they now own. It is not any where near 100%, of course. There is not much point to it since the numbers will just increase. After all, no one is stopping them. Or has any plans to. Hell, no one in power will even talk about it. Because of course….they are all to some degree or another, beholden to those very same corporations. Especially, the Media. And of course their is the money that fuels Americas political process and lobbying industry.
And to further muddy the waters….we are all beholden in various ways as well, whether we own stock, or we work for a corporation or are dependent on a corporation buying the product of our work or merely through consuming corporate products. We are all in the web. Which of course is part of ‘the plan.’ The corporations depend on the consumers. The consumers depend on the corporations. It would be the perfect relationship if it wasn’t for the consumption and waste and destruction it engenders.
And as long as most people are getting what they want….dividends, a paycheck or just Twinkies, it is perfectly ok. Until they start to shed their ignorance and see what the cost of their consumption is. And no, I am not purity trolling. I do not condemn people ….neither do I support people…profiting from corporations. It is the system we live under and condemning people for living under a system is silly. Especially since most people became invested in the system before it truly revealed its raw and destructive face. Or at least when they were young and had no knowledge of the true cost of the system we now live under.
George Bush and his policies didn’t come out of nowhere. They were shaped by two forces, the Religious Wrong and the Corporations….what used to be called Big Business. They got him elected so he would remove any restraints…moral or regulatory from them so that they then could…..go hog fucking wild on fucking everything up. Who was one of Bush’s biggest supporters? Ken Lay from Enron. All of this is old news of course.
But it can longer be denied….just as with Climate Crisis. The Corporatocracy has truly become an enemy of The People. ALL of the planets people. They are the ones who have shaped and are exploiting this world we live in. This world we all bemoan everyday. This is the root of the nearly all the problems we face. From War to Warming to SCHIP etc. But this is also the foundation on which our present society is built. And this is the society that the corporations are working so hard to spread to every corner of the globe, even as that society kills itself more rapidly the more it spreads and the bigger it gets. It is a race to see if we can use up the worlds resources before climate change caused by the consumption and waste products of those resources changes/destroys the world we know now.
Not to mention that the imposition of this society onto Islamic life and culture is, shall we say, proving problematic. Especially since the corporations want to steal their oil.
Many folks have known this for years, many are still coming to terms with it. But as we move forward we must stop pretending the situation does not exist.
The corporations now control our political process and thus to an extent our government, they also control our media. They have shaped our society into a suicidal cycle of consumption. Yet they are the basis of all of our financial structures. And much of our social structure….if you consider watching tv a social structure, but aside from tv, think how much corporations affect your everyday life. They are ingrained.
Mitigating Climate Crisis and taking control back from the corporations will both force massive changes on life as we know it. Just getting off oil will change our lives…dramatically. We either have to face up to the fact that we are committing slow suicide or that we MUST make dramatic changes. And at the rate climate change is proceeding….alarming even the alarmists…we have to make these changes sooner rather than later.
We must react to climate crisis, that means reacting to the corporations who, with our help, are fostering it.
Also, ending the cycle of eternal war for the oil corporations and the profits of the Military Industrial Complex seems like a good idea.
There has always been a struggle….this is the shape of ours. The People vs the Corporatocracy.
Now what do we do about it?
96 comments
Skip to comment form
Author
surrender is not an option. those are your parameters…you work out the details.. 😉
seriously, i lie awake nights trying to answer your question. short of bleeding corps dry one at a time, i dont know how to even attempt to push back.
and the more i think about a general strike, the more i naysay the naysayers. the effect, in this case, isnt nearly as important as the message. they live off our backs…and we control that to some extent. a general strike is a start…and a reminder…
I’m working on an essay along the same lines…probably post it tomorrow. My answers come down to organized resistance, waking more people up, peaceful revolution, marching and striking. The way I see it, if we don’t resist for all we’re worth, the America we all know and love is lost.
L.S.U.
L.S.U.
L.S.U.
L.S.U.
L.S.U.
L.S.U.
L.S.U.
L.S.U.
Just checking in. Gotta go.
We’re all typing on computers made by corporations, most of us heating our homes and driving our cars with fuel provided by corporations, feeding ourselves and our familes with food grown by them, etc., etc.
Very few of us are self sufficient anymore and depend on corporations simply to exist. I’m sure that’s fine with them!
Of course, some corporations are worse (and better) than others. But a typical corporation’s allegiances don’t lie with the “good of the people” but the good of their stockholders.
If that aspect or relationship is changed, it’s doubtful the corporation would remain competitive very long and would probably go under – eaten alive by a bigger, leaner, meaner corporation that isn’t so altruistic.
It would seem then that government is the only entity that could possibly intervene and when and if it does, it must be done in a very clever way.
While some may say Dumbya’s done a great job for the corporations (lowering if not eliminating their taxes, allowing them to offshore their workforce, looking away at human rights and environmental abuses, etc) who knows the long-term ramifications?
Thus, to me anyway, it remains to be seen if Dumbya’s policies have been “clever” or not in the long-term.
(For example if Global Warming kills us all, then it probably wasn’t wise for Uncle Sam to kiss the asses of Cheney’s Energy Task Force)
If we make the rather far-fetched assumption that Americans will elect good, honest and moral representatives who mean well and want to do the right thing for the people first and the corporations second, well, all bets are off that other governments will play along. (See China, India, Russia, etc.)
But it seems that’s the best we can hope for and it’s admittedly not much.
The squeaky wheel gets the grease and while I realize that’s a trite platitude, we should never stop letting our elected representatives know that we’re paying attention to these issues and voting accordingly. I think it’s all we’ve got, unfortunately.
Buhdy, did you home-brew that big-ass beer? 😉
what do we do? campaign finance reform is the most under-appreciated issue. but even if possible, that would be too slow. to take on climate change, with the urgency that is needed, would require a passion and focus that few active politicians have.
In the early ’90s I worked as a Plant Controller at a medium sized fruit processing org. in northern CA. During that period management decided that they needed to build a new “peach building”, the external building which housed all of the peach processing equipment. The price tag was in the millions … not a huge chunk of change for a company but substantial for this org.
Upon completion of the construction the company Prez was taken on a tour of the new building. My friend, the head of maintenance who knew every screw and bolt personally, proudly commented to the Prez that the building would stand for at least 20 years. In a typical verbal act of “I’m hot shit and don’t you forget it, PEONS!” old Prez. stated that all it had to last was 10 years … until the day after he retires. After that, he couldn’t care less. Of course this was stated in front of a bunch of employees who said nothing because they feared for their jobs, NOT in front of the “growers” who owned the co-op.
Take home lesson. You are dealing with a VERY SMALL number of people, in this case the Prez., who literally cares about nothing and no one other than himself. You might ask, “What about his wife, children?”. Had both. Typical story. Made it to Prez. Dumped wife who got him there. Married trashy trophy wife. Couldn’t give a damn about his son.
So, please stop labeling the problem as “corporations”. It’s just a few assholes with WAY too much power.
That’ll do for now. Wine kicking in. Who else has stories? This is right out of Dilbert.
of what shaped GWB’s policy – the neoconservatives.
Together they form the unholy trinity.
you know what I believe….
I attempted to begin setting the groundwork for those beliefs in my first two essays….
I had a second thought and offerred a real action….
controversial as it was….
and have been reluctant to continue to be a cloud here…..
I can feel the shifting of the global dynamic in my cognitve space…
my belly button…
and the soles of my feet…
no joke…
the thermocline will reach the hydrate stores in the artic in the next year or so…
we have five to seven years to prepare…
after that things are going get very very hot…
very hot……
after that will come sea level rise in a hypercyclic curve…..
three pulses as the dynamic drives three different stores of water into the worlds oceans…..
eventual sea level will be approx. 63 meters above its current elevation…
I believe that if action is to be taken it is not to be in relation to the oligarch….
it is in relation to the seeding of small oasisies with the means to maintain a small low level tech base and biological diversity….
mobile infrastructure…
seed banks….
information stores which will survive the loss of the system of industry that currently supports us….
many more things need to be done….
but as you know I am just a crank…..
so what could it possibly matter……
Like 73rd, I lie awake nights too trying to figure out exactly what it is going to take to get people to realize that we MUST stop consuming our planet like ravenous crows, picking our mother Earth apart layer by layer and spitting it out like a spoiled child.
I am lucky I guess, in a sense that we are out in the absolute, utter sticks that even the long arm of Mal-Wart doesn’t infect us. I am proud to say that I would have to drive an hour and a half, spend precious gasoline, my time, my kids time and try their patients in the car, just to get there-no fuckin’ thanks!
We really don’t have many large corporations here, one Wendy’s about 35 mins away, one somewhat large-ish grocery store (that I boycott because they treat their employees like crap) and I find that I buy only from small family-run businesses, and I know most of those families. I love that it’s like this here. I feel good about not supporting corporations.
But not everybody can do that, I know this. You can’t just up and ask a struggling family to buy their kids clothes at a small, family-run, but expensive boutique instead of
Target….
I wish there was an obvious solution to it all.
Corporate will kill us off far faster than climate change will.
Fortunately, some companies are actually changing and taking CSR seriously, changing policy, practice and investments. This is particularly the case on environmental sustainability, which actually offers opportunities to grow/refocus business. So, for example, we have major corporations pushing for regulations (or volentarally addopting global ones) since this helps to level the field and facilitate investment when competitors must compeate to achieve benchmarks.
As for the rest, eventually companies are in business to make money and regressive ones incresingly face sharholder pressure (forom institutional investors) or lawsuits when bad policy makes bad business.
Given the crisis situation the world faces, revolutionary changes in social and corporate policies are needed and the “how to” remains the same – Leverage.
As the influance of governments declines in the face of multinationalism, the focus of political activity must also change with increasing pressure put directly on companies/industries rather than government, which is often ineffective solving problems.
Military-Industrial Complex or Eco-Industrial Complex, take your choice, because corporations are more flexible than governments so who’s more likely to survive?
Inspired by the complete silence of Godfather-rated finance experts, I’ve been trolling FRB, FHA, “econosphere” and market wires for a whiff the business that could attract Energy Smart Community Bond (ESCB) money.
Yes, GCC management is the only value proposition worthy of pursuit. My hard money is on absolute GHG reduction at consumer level. It’s a hard sell, because the benefit requires sacrificing conveniences, simply doing nothing but not cooperating with “consumerism” and and being seduced by “sustainability” schemes.
My soft money is twisting tax easements out the feds to fuel distributed power generation with what’s left of disposable income. You’d think Democrats would tie cash and GHG savings to existing EE securities. But no. What’s left: The forecast is grim.
Gary North and Mish expose deflation, FRB’s ace.
Besides mandatory health insurance, HRC floated the promise of Baby Bonds to the CBC. Bribe or tin-ear funeral insurance?
MSFT “HealthSolutions Group” is launching Health Vault, an ASP server for consumer/patient electronic health records (EHRs). The developers list ought not inspire security confidence (for users, not investors).
Oh, and the Fannies financed ($8.9B) of Tishman-Lehman’s $22B LBO of Archstone deal last night. WWWall street says that’s no big deal. Apartment REITs are housing, no?
The gas, the gas is very painful …
I’ve been thinking about this issue intensely in researching the American oil companies in Burma.
I thought about the work Ralph Nader did in the past as a consumer advocate, how he took on the big corporations of his time – the auto industry – for the safety and rights of consumers.
We don’t seem to have such advocacy anymore, seeing how all the crap has come in from China, poisoning us. I think we need to revive that movement, but spread it out from products consumed to all the externalities we pay for that corporations no longer due thanks to all the deregulation.
That could be a strong grassroots movement. It relates to tangibles in people’s every day lives.
Whatever we do, we better get organzied pretty darn quick, and internationally, because time is not on our side, mama nature is not going to be on our side, for very much longer at all.
And now I MUST go open a beer, because that giant pitcher is staring at me as I type and I can’t take it anymore!!!
Excellent discussion BD, once I get my beer I’ll see what the restayas have to say.
(9) Florida 17, (1) LSU 7
Halftime
(4) Ohio State 17, (23) Purdue 0
3rd
link
#1 is Red Dog Ops of AK.
cancer, you must starve it!
Do we really, really NEED all that we buy? If we really, really wanted to change the scenario, we could do so by becoming less consumptive.
This, I believe, is the only way to show the corporations and their “greed” that we do not “buy” it!
We’re all over the map. If you put out a call for “the main issues” facing us, at least to a progressive community, you’re going to get some consistencies, but a huge number of different things. But whatever they might be, you can trace the fact that they are issues at all to the primary, profound, and deliberate shaping of public opinion done by Commercial Media.
If your issue, whatever it is–vote machine reform, impeachment, the Bush administration effort to establish a dictatorship of the Executive, deaths whether in Congo, or Burma, or Iraq, the treatment of individuals and minorities and women, the decay of every item in the quality of life inventory, the on-rushing collapse of climate, economy, and military….–whatever your issue is we come back to whether Commercial Media a) allows it to be heard, b) discredits it or advances it. If you know those two things, you can pretty realibly predict the progress on an item.
The de facto monopoly of programming content is the central and overriding feature to the current American political landscape. Without addressing this first, every other single issue is sure to be thwarted or delayed too long.
You do not even have a chance to run for office, unless you can buy a ticket. A ticket being advertising-time. You cannot afford that ticket without making arrangements with people who have the near billion dollars necessary to run the aggregate of campaigns. It’s that simple.
Every single feature of our political, psycological, and values-making landscape is determined by Big Media. (Not to dwell on how well the Right’s Agit/Prop-Big Media alliance divert the left into side-streets, a million minds on the shocking news that Rush, et. al said something offensive!).
The Media is much much more than the news. Tonight for instance I caught a moment of a comedian/ventriloquist whose dummy is a skeleton with Arabic headdress. Seems he’s a suicide bomber, and all the jokes revolve around that fact. (He exploded prematurely, for instance.) I’m seeing ads for History Channel and Science Channel spots that promote our “Vergeltungswaffen” (wonder weapons).
When I write about the need to break the stranglehold Commerical Media holds on debate I often get comments to the effect: “But the internet is going to beat it someday” or “We’re just starting to build a competing liberal media” etc.
These all suffer the fault that we don’t have the years needed to develop alternate and competing media. The internet, as demonstrated by Burma and China (which just this past month blocked another 18,000+ sites), can be made selectively inaccessible the moment the authorities consider it a direct threat. It’s willful denial to think, and more importantly, to plan, otherwise.
(The student of the 20th Century might also recall that the most thorough purging done by Mao followed upon the “Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom, Let a Thousand Schools of Thought Contend” reform. Which was a trap laid to identify his opponents so he could locate and eliminate them simply.)
But here is the greatest fault of the “we will build the alternative” approach: The mass media is the people’s property. I can see no warrant for simply ceding this unequaled-in-human-history communication network to those who do the public ill, simply because that’s the current state of things.
People just think “oh, the media’s too big to take on” but they are overlooking that 1) we still pretend to be a Democracy in America, and 2) the media-as-is is despised by every single politically/socially active faction of the American spectrum. I’ll not go into the myriad approaches available here, but if we made it a priority we could radically change the face of media in America in as little as a year. Consolidated Media is universally despised, as the reaction to the FCC’s last effort proved.
We would be wise to use the internet we have to break up the monopoly we don’t need, than to keep responding (a fundamentally passive act) to provocations of the Commercial Media bully and imagining “someday we’ll be able to kick sand in their face.“
I could rant on this for pages and pages, because I’m astonished that we have not yet, as a community, identified the obvious roadblock to democracy: the virtual monopoly on programming content held by a few. Let alone develop a actual program to force media to be used in the public interest.
My basic faith is that if you have a format where all the relevant facts and concerns can be raised, people will, from their own good sense, come to a liberal answer. It is the exclusion of ordinary Americans from Media content that allows all the bullshit we see to go on.
Picture Rush Limbaugh, or O’Reilly, in a room seated with 100 other adults of honest intent. Not on a podium, or a stage, but seated like the rest. Now listen to them put out their spiel. How long do you think before they would be mocked, proven fools or liars, and told to sit down? They just couldn’t get over in that setting. But Commercial Media will never permit that setting. Unless we force it.
as you said interdependency and interconnectedness….
‘x degrees of seperation/connections’……
these linkages come through recognition of the things all human beings and life itself share in common….
back to recognition of non seperation….
that makes corporations even more insidious. The world wide “free market.” Because we (or rather “our” corporations) are seen as being in competition with other country’s (not “our”) corporations, our government will not regulate “our” corporations. Neither will other countries. A race to the responsibility bottom at the same time that consolidation of corporate power is taking place is the net effect of deregulation.
The simple solution to this, which takes care both of the issue of corporations buying government and corporate power generally, is to take away corporate personhood. But for the reasons stated above, I don’t think it will happen.
Corporations and investor-class rich operate in tandem which each other. The investor-class rich scream for better profits, then the corporation(s) scurry off to find ways of increasing their profit margin — done in enumerable ways! Outsourcing, use of child labor, diminishing the work force to a skeleton base*, income tax evasion, avoiding the environmental laws, OSHA, etc., and doing everything immoral and unethical to satisfy the investor-class rich who are happy as a consequence, and do not give a damn as to how their profits increased. And there are no controls!
We all need money to live! But in our capitalistic society gone amok, the dollar has become the almighty God and the pursuit of it the goal of living, and the honorable, moral and ethical fibre has been allowed become lost, as a result.
*We continue to pay rising costs for services, while receiving the worst service in our history — ever spend an hour waiting to get through to this company or that, be reassured, yet lied to, only to turn around and recommence the process?
The crisis is over. It’s broken. The only things that see it as a crisis are us.
It will fix itself. We probably won’t like the result.
But it probably doesn’t care…