Some thoughts on race

One weekend a month, I run a special educational program, in cooperation with the local public library, that helps low income high school students prepare for getting into college.  Some are white.  A few are black.  Most are Latino.

Two weekends ago, a student who happens to be Latino started acting out during a test.  Clearly frustrated by his inability to master the subject matter, and showing off to a couple of girls sitting next to him, the student began surreptitiously throwing pieces of broken pencil at me.    

I was not sure how to respond at first. I didn’t want to disrupt the class in the middle of the test, so I decided to wait until the break to talk to him.  Not happy with my seeming lack of interest in his antics, the student then started making funny noises that sounded amazingly like drops of water in a bucket.

It was then I noticed an earnest and extremely muscular student on the other side of the room staring daggers at the noise maker.  I knew I had to do something to quell the disturbance right there, not only for the sake of a class but also for the sake the disruptive student’s physical well being.

I asked the student pick up his belongings and follow me into the hall, where I told him that he was free to leave, but if he wanted to stay his misbehavior would have to stop.  

Then the student called me a racist. He claimed I was picking on him because he was Latino, and that I wouldn’t be pulling him out of the class if he were White.

I explained to the student that his race had nothing to do with my disciplining him, but that his behavior was simply unacceptable and disturbing to his classmates.

Of course, my protestations had no absolutely no effect on the student’s opinion that I was indeed a racist, an opinion which he continued to declare loudly and repeatedly as he confidently strutted out of the building.

Was the student race baiting? You bet he was. He was making specious and unsupported claims of racial victimization in order to distract from his own obnoxious behavior.

Was it extremely hurtful to me personally?  Right again.  Not to mention how I felt walking back into that classroom.

I tell this story not as an allegory for the unfortunate events of the other day, but to lend context to my argument that race baiting is a very real and insidious tactic used by opportunists of every color to cover for their alternate agendas.

Of course, that is NOT to deny that prevalent and often virulent racist attitudes do indeed exist practically everywhere humans with even slightly different skin pigments commingle, but when charges of racism are recklessly hurled without solid foundation and good faith belief, this ‘cry wolf’ behavior serves both to undermine the credibility of those with genuine claims and to alienate many who might otherwise be sympathetic to those claims.

Which brings me to my main point.

To be a truly color blind society, we need to consider everyone’s opinion and experience with race on its own individual merits, and not automatically assume anyone has the moral advantage simply because of that person’s skin color or ethnic background.

Let me show you an example of what I’m talking about.

Clue one: If a person of color says you are acting like a racist, it is incumbent on you to sit down and take a good hard look at your self.

For me, this statement completely ignores the substance behind the person’s accusations, and instead automatically assumes the credibility of those allegations based solely on the color of the accuser’s skin.  Taken to its logical extreme, this statement says I need to internalize my recalcitrant Latino student’s unfounded accusations, regardless of context or motive, simply because he is a ‘person of color’.

Here’s the deal. We are ALL people of color. Mine happens to be what most people call White – although my half-Mediterranean background gives my skin a distinctly olive tint.  I am neither proud nor ashamed of the pigment of my skin, nor, with the exception of an ability to achieve a remarkably deep tan, do I have any control over its hue.

So while I do not contend that the color of my skin provides me with any special privileges when it comes to substantive arguments about race, neither should it place me at an automatic disadvantage. My unique experiences as an individual dealing with race issues in this country are my own, and to discount or diminish these experiences solely on the basis of my skin tone is a racially-based argument I as a Progressive wholly reject.

Of course, that is not say that the color of a person’s skin does not help to inform him or her on the merits of a racial accusation, but those accusations need to be considered rationally and fairly based on individual facts and circumstances – without preweighting the scales in sympathy of any favored racial group.

I know this argument may be hard for some people to accept, especially for those who grew up believing that non-whites should automatically be accorded special advantages when it comes to discussions of race.  But no one can ever argue credibly for racial fairness and respect if they themselves are not willing to accord the same fairness and respect to those whom they are attempting to convince.

Instead, the assumption that any group has a morally superior claim to the racial high ground inevitably creates resentment within people of the ‘inferior’ group, which reactionary demagogues exploit to create further racial divisions. These divisions become even more exacerbated when well meaning but misguided ‘anti-racists’, in their frustration at the backlash, attempt to brow beat their ‘opponents’ into righteous submission with claims of racial guilt and demands of apologies for politically incorrect forms of expression.

The result is that those who might otherwise be amenable to considering serious and well founded claims of racial inequality simply withdraw, resentful of what they perceive to be unfair treatment and self-censoring for fear expressing themselves outside of the accepted orthodoxy.

And then people wonder why we can’t have a decent discussion about race in this country….

Update: Just to be clear about the program.  These kids all come in for a one off session and there is rarely if ever any repeats.  I had never met the student in question before that day, nor had I had ever spoken to or about him before the incident.  This is a voluntary program for the students and I do not take attendence, so there was no reason to even say his name.   To my knowledge and belief, there was absolutely no reason for the student to make the claim he did other than for the reasons I’ve already stated.  End of story.

112 comments

Skip to comment form

    • Armando on November 30, 2007 at 00:01

    I think hoever, that there is a lot wrong with this essay.

    I want to start with this:

    Then the student called me a racist. He claimed I was his picking on him because he was Latino, and that I wouldn’t be pulling him out of the class if he were White. I explained to the student that his race had nothing to do with my disciplining him, but that his behavior was simply unacceptable and disturbing to his classmates.

    Of course, my protestations had no absolutely no effect on the student’s opinion that I was indeed a racist, an opinion which he continued to declare loudly and repeatedly as he confidently strutted out of the building.

    Was the student race baiting? You bet he was. He was making specious and unsupported claims of racial victimization in order to distract from his own obnoxious behavior.

    How can you possibly know if the student did not feel singled out because he was Latino? I think it is clear to you that you do not believe his being a Latino had any effect on your actions. I take you at your word. But I can not take you at your word when you claim to know what that student was thinking. I find your description and assurance very troubling.

    You then write:

    Let me show you an example of what I’m talking about.

    Clue one: If a person of color says you are acting like a racist, it is incumbent on you to sit down and take a good hard look at your self.

    For me, this statement completely ignores the substance behind the person’s accusations, and instead automatically assumes the credibility of those allegations based solely on the color of the accuser’s skin.  Taken to its logical extreme, this statement says I need to internalize my recalcitrant Latino student’s unfounded accusations, regardless of context or motive, simply because he is a ‘person of color’.

    You make illogical leaps that are extremely troubling. First the advice does not say ignore the substance. It says take a good hard look. It assumes nothing automatically. Rather it acknowledges something that SHOULD be automatic – the hisoptry of racism and bigotry in this country.

    As for internalizing the Latino student’s accusations, no, it means listening to them and examining where they are coming from. Perhaps it is merely trying to guilt trip you. But before you jump to that conclusion, would a good hard look have been too much to ask of you? You see, you are SURE you werre right in your perception of that student’s motivations. Even now, rather especially now, after having read you on this subject, it is not at all clear to me that he was wrong.

    I believe you carry some baggage on this issue. I do not know, but I do have suspicions about your thinking after reading your comments previously and this diary.

    Finally, this paragraph seems almost parody:

    I know this argument may be hard for some people to accept, especially for those who grew up believing that non-whites should automatically be accorded special advantages when it comes to discussions of race.

    Special advantages!!!! Would that the sufferers of pernicious, institutional and cultural racism did NOT have such advantages.

    Frankly, I am shocked, truly shocked, to read those words at this site.

    It makes these words particularly bitter to swallow:

    The result is that those who might otherwise be amenable to considering serious and well founded claims of racial inequality simply withdraw, resentful of what they perceive to be unfair treatment and self-censoring for fear expressing themselves outside of the accepted orthodoxy.

    Are you describing yourself? Are you suggesting we coddle that type of perverted thinking?

    I repeat, I am glad you wrote this essay.

    I think it sheds a great deal of light on what I have been talking about.

    • on November 30, 2007 at 00:32

    and surprised that you came back. I’m a lurker who wrote a comment thinking you were gone after reading what happened to you over the past few days.

    I hope that you will continue to write these thoughtful and well-reasoned essays.

    Back to lurking, reading and enjoying your post.

  1. That is very admirable, I’m not sure I would have in the same circumstances, my ego being what it is.

    Second:

    So while I do not contend that the color of my skin provides me with any special privileges when it comes to substantive arguments about race, neither should it place me at an automatic disadvantage.

    I disagree. Especially to the extent of the quote of mine you used:

    Clue one: If a person of color says you are acting like a racist, it is incumbent on you to sit down and take a good hard look at your self.

    White people…IN GENERAL….are the undoubted oppressors and beneficiaries when it comes to issues of race. We never can experience racism (in this country) because we are ‘the majority’ and have lived in a racially blind culture all of our lives.

    Due to that cultural fact…..We simply cannot judge ourselves objectively enough to determine whether we have engaged in racist behavior or not. We can try our absolute best, but imo, we must ALWAYS take that sort of observation of our behavior VERY seriously and never assume that we are in the right.

    The culture conditions us to racism, and it is our individual responsibility to make sure we haven’t and don’t fall into the cultural traps. No matter how good our intentions and no matter how much we have done in the past to combat it within ourselves.

    And besides…why is sitting down and taking a good hard look at yourself vis a vis racism such an odious task that it should be avoided?

  2. but its interesting to me that you brought up this experience in working with young people of color in the library.

    We are beginning to work with our local public libraries due, in part, to situations like this. With the advent of computers at libraries, many young people who’ve never used them before are starting to spend time there. We’ve seen that librarians are ill-equipped to handle some of the challenging behavior these kids display and things have gotten so out of control that several of them have started hiring off-duty armed police officers in reaction.

    Some of our staff spent time at one of the libraries where things have gotten the worst and observed that the librarians tend to avoid interacting with these kids and wait until things get out of control – then call the cops. As one of our staff says all the time – when you have a relationship with a kid – they tend to listen to what you say.

    Where racism tends to enter the picture in an obvious way is that most, if not all, of the library staff are white and have learned in this culture to be afraid of these kids. And out of that fear, they tend to over-react to the behavior challenges.

    So, while I would never allow a child to get off the hook for bad behavior by calling someone racist, they feel the tension their presence causes and, when challenged, react.

    I have no idea if this plays any role in the situation you were in Night Owl, but I offer it to you as a possibility.  

    • pico on November 30, 2007 at 02:18

    To be a truly color blind society

    It’s not that I’m cynical about racism, it’s that racism may be a natural consequence of living in a society with a large “default” culture.  When the power, money, and influence rest predominantly with one group of people, mainstream culture begins to reflect that to the exclusion of other people.  You don’t even have to be conscious of it to recognize it happening, because if you belong to the dominant subset it isn’t striking to you that the majority of movies are about your people or the majority of tv shows have your face, etc.  It’s actually really easy for white people in this country to be colorblind: it’s impossible for anyone non-white.

    By way of illustration, I can only use my own experience as a gay man.  Anywhere from 2 to 20% of the population is gay (and a heckuva lot more are bisexual or sexually fluid).  But think about the stories we read our children: we expect, without thinking about it, that the prince will try to rescue a princess.  It’s not that we’re heterosexually fixated, it’s that our history and the dominance of a particular worldview are so deeply embedded that we don’t even realize it when it’s happening around us.

    It’s not just our feelings of shame and disgust about alternative sexualities: it’s a default expectation about the way things ‘should’ be.  As anyone, even a gay man or lesbian, to improvise a fairy tale and odds are good it will involve a prince and a princess, but not a same-sex loving pair of either.    

    It takes a lot of hard work simply to become conscious of the process – but I’d argue it’s far to Quixotic to suggest that we can free ourselves from it entirely.  If you asked me, “why can’t we just drop our assumptions about sexuality?”, I’d say, “Because it’s on my mind everywhere, in ways that straight people don’t even recognize.  Anytime I’m walking down the street and see a straight couple holding hands, it’s an immediate reminder that I don’t enjoy that kind of social freedom.”  Little things that straight people don’t consider sexualized are persistently, necessarily sexualized for me.

    I can’t speak for people of color, but I’d assume that the dynamics are somewhat the same there: colorblindness isn’t really an option.

    • Armando on November 30, 2007 at 03:28

    You wrote:

    To my knowledge and belief, there was absolutely no reason for the student to make the claim he did other than for the reasons I’ve already stated.  End of story.

    Can you not imagine something outside of the interaction with YOU might have led to the accusation?

    Are you really this insensitive to the Latino experience?

    Wow, just wow.  

  3. Let’s see if I can explain it relatively quickly.

    Some SF. Imagine another planet.

    Imagine two species evolving to our level of intelligence at the same time.

    Imagine one of the two being just a step or two ahead on the military scale. This species enslaves the other. For let’s say 500 years.

    Then, finally, the species evolves enough morally to realize it is wrong, and stops enslavement.

    Now, the first generation on both sides is born post enslavement.

    A person from one species is misbehaving in the class of the other, just as you describe above.

    The teacher, from the original enslaving species, is a good egg. The teacher discliplines the individual from the other species as you outline above. Exactly the same way.

    And the dude from the 2nd species reacts the same way as your student.

    Do you think the student in this case would be wrong. Would he be ‘species baiting’ as you suggest your student was race baiting?

    If yes, you are being intellectually consistent. If you think, well maybe not, then I’d be interested if you think this little excercise was worthwhile.

    Or perhaps a complete waste of your time.

  4. Here’s the deal. We are ALL people of color. Mine happens to be what most people call White – although my half-Mediterranean background gives my skin a distinctly olive tint.  I am neither proud nor ashamed of the pigment of my skin

    A riddle for you:

    Which members of the European race are more “contaminated” with racial admixtures from other continental ancestry:

    – The Swedish Olympic bikini team?

    OR

    – A swarthy southern Italian?

    You already know the answer from the way the question was asked.  Any who do not, should ought to worry a lot about their concept of race, among other things.

    My only complaint, Night Owl, with your wonderful essay is that you never once mentioned anything to do with race.

    Race is in your very DNA.  It is what you are born with as much as heart or hands or liver.  It just is.

    The rest is what you do with it.

    If you fill your heart with hate, then that is what you have made of it.  If you choose to fill your heart with understanding, then that is also your choice.

    As near as I can tell, you chose well, Night Owl.

    Best,  Terry

Comments have been disabled.