A deep bow of respect for Judge Phelan!
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/…
From the article
Canadian Judge Invalidates Country’s Refugee Treaty With U.S.
By Joe Schneider
Nov. 29 (Bloomberg) — Canada’s treaty with the U.S. on the treatment of refugees is illegal because the U.S.
doesn’t comply with conventions protecting asylum seekers and sometimes sends people to countries where
they may be tortured, a Canadian judge said.
Canada entered into an agreement on the treatment of refugees with the U.S. in 2004, as part of the two
countries’ “Smart Borders Declaration.” The accord bars Canada from considering refugee applications from
people who arrive in the country from the U.S. by land. Canada is required to send those asylum seekers back
to the U.S.
Canada’s Parliament approved the law, subject to some conditions, including that the U.S. comply with
international cconventions designed to prevent asylum seekers from being sent back to countries where they
may be persecuted, or to countries that engage in torture.
“The United States’ policies do not meet the conditions,” Judge Michael Phelan said in a 126-page ruling
released today in Ottawa by the Federal Court of Canada.
The judge cited the case of Maher Arar, a Canadian citizen who in 2002 was mistakenly identified as a terror
suspect during a stop in New York. U.S. officials sent him to his native Syria where he was jailed and tortured,
according to a Canadian inquiry that found Arar was not linked to terrorism.
The Canada-U.S. asylum treaty also is unconstitutional, Phelan said, because it treats people in identical
refugee situations differently by applying only to land crossings.
….
It will be interesting to see if this is beneficial for cases of war resisters who seek residency in Canada:
http://www.resisters.ca/index_…
And don’t miss Valtin’s essay on the APA “on the road to Damascus” regarding its position on torture:
http://valtinsblog.blogspot.co…
5 comments
Skip to comment form
Author
🙂
Now if more countries would do this, maybe our law makers would quit allowing the law to be broken and demand accountability. (yeah, I know, I’m dreamin)
Author
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/t…
or the complicit part of the Canadian government will honor the judge’s ruling? Is it okay for me to be cynical?