Bill Moyers talks with MSNBC host Keith Olbermann
Click on pic or Click Here
BILL MOYERS: One of my closest friends always watched your nightly sportscast. And he remembers to this day, just got a word from him this morning, he remembers your saying about hockey is the most boring sport he’s ever seen. And you went on to say, “Nevertheless, here without further comment are the game results for whatever they’re worth.” But you don’t do that with politics. You don’t– you don’t just give the scores. You have some strong things to say about politics.
KEITH OLBERMANN: It became necessary.
BILL MOYERS: Why?
KEITH OLBERMANN: I was sitting on a plane in Los Angeles reading in August of 2006 about Don Rumsfeld talking to the veterans and talking about how every– everyone who was in opposition to the Iraq War policy, the so-called war on terror, even to some degree the Bush administration, was the equivalent in his mind to the Nazi appeasers of the 1930s. And he went on at length about how, you know, here’s the– we’re doing the Churchillian role. And I thought, you know, sir, I took history classes. Your group is not Churchill. Your group is Neville Chamberlain because Neville Chamberlain minimized and marginalized anybody who disagreed with him. Reading this ridiculous remark and waiting to see somebody respond to it. And no one did. I’m thinking, well, you know, somebody with a platform ought to be talking about this. Somebody with a– with an avenue to respond should be– oh, yeah, I have a platform.
Snip
Get rid of the Barbies and Kens, plastic faces and bodies with empty heads, get Back to Real Journalists, like the Two above, and Real Investigative Journalism!
4 comments
Skip to comment form
I missed this, so it is much-appreciated, Jim 🙂
I’m glad to see it posted here, it’s great.
Thanks!
this reminds me that I missed last night’s show
Countdown is an anonymous outlet for people inside the corporations like GE that own MSNBC to “blog anonymously” (in a sense) nationally about their dissatisfaction with and their understanding of a skewed economic system?
If so, this seems to me to be a “crack in the foundation” – the kind of crack that, in the foundation of a house, especially a house of cards, can bring the whole thing crashing to the ground eventually…