Diary title: fixing the crap detector
Diary title: So?
Seven degrees of crap
trail of deception
http://www.dailykos.com/storyo…
http://ebooks.du.ac.in/edu-res…
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04…
The Global War On Truth
John ashcroft – “pouring” vs. “forcing”
1. Plain stupid
2. Hunh? Enemies of rational thought / Just how stupid do you think I am, anyway?
3. Bullshit/lies
4. Callous/out of touch
5. Fear mongering
6. Plain criminal (actions, not just words)
7. Torture
You’ve read, of course, the New York Times story from last week, yes? The one about how retired military officers had been paid by the Pentagon to spout administration propaganda to the news media in order to sell the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq?
It was a breathtaking and horrifying accounting of the lengths this administration will go to to mislead and lie to the American public so that certain people (not you and me) can be made richer, and the level of disgrace that certain members of the military are willing to bring upon the uniform by prostituting themselves for an illegal war that has cost hundreds of thousands of lives.
As I read the article, I thought of a snippet from a book I had read and re-read in high school:
[I]n the early 1960s, an interviewer was trying to get Ernest Hemingway to identify the characteristics required for a person to be a ‘great writer’. As the interviewer offered a list of various possibilities, Hemingway disparaged each in sequence. Finally, frustrated, the interviewer asked, ‘Isn’t there any one essential ingredient that you can identify?’ Hemingway replied, ‘Yes, there is. In order to be a great writer a person must have a built-in, shockproof crap detector.’– Teaching as a Subversive Activity,
by Neil Postman and Charles Weingartner
(excerpt; PDF file)
What the Times article reminded us was that – by Hemingway’s standard, anyway – there are almost no great writers working in American journalism today.
It’s difficult to argue with that. Indeed, the art and science of crap detection has never been in a sadder state of decline in my lifetime. And that is no accident.
Take a look at what the article said:
Internal Pentagon documents repeatedly refer to the military analysts as “message force multipliers” or “surrogates” who could be counted on to deliver administration “themes and messages” to millions of Americans “in the form of their own opinions.”
It requires no great leap of the imagination to infer what Enemy these “force multipliers” were sent out to attack and destroy. It is the same Enemy that has proven to be such an inconvenient stumbling block for so many Republican plans over the past 35 years. The “powdered princes” (as they are known in some circles) were and are mercenaries – erm, security contractors – in the BushCheney administration’s Global War On –
Truth.
Or, as it is known in some circles, Reality.
The Enemy for Republicans is, was, and always will be The Truth. Reality. They and their plans don’t tend to do so well when subjected to Reality, so they prefer not to deal with it:
”That’s not the way the world really works anymore . . . We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality — judiciously, as you will — we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”
The technical term for the “reality” the BushCheney administration has “created” for itself and its followers is “bullshit” – or, to use Hemingway’s more polite coinage, “crap.”
Unfortunately, over the past 35 years Republicans have on the one hand developed crap proliferation to a high art, while on the other hand degrading the ability of and incentive for the American populace and the American media to exercise their respective crap detecting faculties. This result has been achieved incrementally, deliberately and without fanfare through the consolidation of corporate media, the rescission of the Fairness Doctrine and the intentional redirecting of school curricula away from the development of critical thinking skills.
All of which explains how it is that the current administration has been able for so long to sell so much crap to the American media and public; so few still had the ability to see the crap for what it was.
The results of the 2000 presidential election would seem to bear that out. Strongly encouraged by the corporate media, a lot of Americans just put their crap detectors in storage eight years ago, figuring, What do I need a crap detector for, when I can just have a beer with this guy?
The press – for so much of our nation’s history, the watchdog of our democracy, the unofficial “fourth branch” of government – evidently felt the call of Gee Dubya’s tall, cold one as well; here’s corporate media abandoning the field to Crap back in 1999, swallowing whole the “compassionate conservative” pitch:
[Bush says,] “I worry about the haves and the have-nots. [Mine] is a message that says nobody should be left behind.” . . .There are important differences between Reagan and George W. Bush. Reagan paid only lip service to maintaining a safety net for the poor. Bush seems determined to improve their lives. . . “People who adhere to the conservative philosophy better figure out how to make sure it includes everybody,” he warns. “Not just say it, but mean it.”
(Still nursing that beer? Or did reading that little gem nine years later make you lose it all over your monitor?)
It’s sad, really. Pathetic, in fact. Modern-day “news” gatherers have mistaken “access” for openness. Their crap detecting skills are so poor, and they are so desperate for what they stupidly believe is “access,” that they can’t even tell when they’re being shat upon – and, just as pathetically, they don’t care. Members of the modern corporate news media don’t even recognize crap when they’re being forced to eat it. Rapping with Karl Rove has been the least of their embarrassments, and the fact that they don’t even realize that is a sad commentary.
The irony, of course, is that many “news” gatherers believe they could not do their jobs without the golden-shower-masquerading-as-“access” that they are “granted” by the BushCheney administration, which no doubt would be true, if it weren’t that: (a) their “access” is no such thing; (b) they’re not doing their jobs anyway, with or without “access”; and (c) you don’t need the kind of “access” that puts you onstage with MC Rove in order to do real journalism.
The problem is that most “news” gatherers don’t understand Quality – or they don’t care about it. From amid the entire universe of facts out there waiting to be reported on and investigated, from amid the literally countless possible subjects that today’s corporate media “journalists” could choose to spend their time, money and talents on – the occupation of Iraq, food riots across the globe, an economy teetering on the edge of depression, the systematic destruction of the United States Constitution, the hunt for Osama bin Laden – out of all that, what do modern-day corporate journalists, those who would inherit the mantle of Edward R. Murrow, choose to give us?
Hannah Montana (her back!)!
Reverend Wright (he’s black!)!
Lapel pins (tie tack!)!
Corporate media? They’re hacks!
In his book Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, Robert Pirsig makes the case for the necessity of making decisions regarding Quality when processing all of the raw information that we as humans – and members of a democratic society – have to choose from. He cites the work of French mathematician, physicist and philosopher Jules Henri Poincaré. Poincaré was trying to figure out how it was that good scientists, out of literally an infinite number of possible hypotheses for a given phenomenon, knew which hypotheses to pursue. And Poincaré boils it down to a question of Quality:
Poincaré laid down some rules: There is a hierarchy of facts . . . Poincaré concluded, a scientist does not choose at random the facts he observes . . . Mathematics, he said, isn’t merely a question of applying rules, any more than science. It doesn’t merely make the most combinations possible according to certain fixed laws. The combinations so obtained would he exceedingly numerous, useless and cumbersome. The true work of the inventor consists in choosing among these combinations so as to eliminate the useless ones . . .
Pirsig – as the title of his book suggests – uses the maintenance of a motorcycle as a metaphor for life. In one of the book’s most telling passages, he deconstructs the problem-solving process of a mechanic confronted with a stuck crankcase-cover screw. Pirsig examines what will happen – or fail to happen – if the mechanic, faced with a universe of facts from which to choose – fails to bring the filter of Quality to his assessment of those facts:
We have been looking at that screw “objectively.” According to the doctrine of “objectivity,” which is integral with traditional scientific method, what we like or don’t like about that screw has nothing to do with our correct thinking. We should not evaluate what we see [, according to the doctrine of “objectivity”]. We should keep our mind a blank tablet which nature fills for us, and then reason disinterestedly from the facts we observe.But when we stop and think about it disinterestedly, in terms of this stuck screw, we begin to see that this whole idea of disinterested observation is silly. Where are those facts? What are we going to observe disinterestedly? The torn slot? The immovable side cover plate? The color of the paint job? The speedometer? The sissy bar? As Poincaré would have said, there are an infinite number of facts about the motorcycle, and the right ones don’t just dance up and introduce themselves. The right facts, the ones we really need, are not only passive, they are damned elusive, and we’re not going to just sit back and “observe” them. We’re going to have to be in there looking for them or we’re going to be here a long time. Forever. As Poincaré pointed out, there must be a subliminal choice of what facts we observe.
The difference between a good mechanic and a bad one, like the difference between a good mathematician and a bad one, is precisely this ability to select the good facts from the bad ones on the basis of quality. He has to care! . . .
By returning our attention to Quality [we can get] out of the noncaring subject-object dualism and back into craftsmanlike self-involved reality again, which will reveal to us the facts we need when we are stuck.
Read that last sentence again:
By returning our attention to Quality [we can get] out of the noncaring subject-object dualism and back into craftsmanlike self-involved reality again, which will reveal to us the facts we need when we are stuck.
“The facts we need when we are stuck.” Hmmm . . .
Let’s take what Pirsig says about scientists and mathematicians and see whether we can apply it equally to another pursuit:
The difference between a goodmechanicreporter and a bad one, like the difference between a good mathematician and a bad one, is precisely this ability to select the good facts from the bad ones on the basis of quality. He has to care! . . .
How often have you heard representatives of the corporate media talk about how all they’re doing is presenting “both sides” of an “argument”? Like, “both sides” of the global warming “argument”? Or “both sides” of the evolution “argument”?
As if there were an argument in the first place. As if “both sides” of such an illusory “argument” carried equal weight.
The reason we are bombarded 24/7 with crap in the corporate media is because no one involved in running corporate media – and way too few people involved in consuming corporate media content – gives a tinker’s damn about Quality.
As Pirsig would argue, what the corporate media have abandoned in their supposedly doe-eyed, innocent, fair and balanced presentation of the “facts” is an application of Quality. To give airtime and ink to the repeatedly and provably incorrect assertions and predictions of idiots like William Kristol and Doug Feith, or the global warming deniers, or those who would replace the teaching of evolution with the teaching of creationism, is to throw Quality out the window, and leave the consumer to decide what is valuable and what is, well, Crap. Caveat viewer.
violate the public trust, a trust that is codified in the Federal Communications Commission
as equivalent in merit to the demonstrably accurate assessments and prognostications of a Glenn Greenwald or
Whereas once upon a time in America, journalists served as a front line of Crap Detection against the onslaught of Crap emanating from the seats of government and the corridors of corporate power, now, if anything, most corporate media outlets serve their literal corporate masters; rarely does one see a decision about which content to present based on Quality – it’s up to consumers to sort that stuff out.
Hence it is still possible for a film such as Ben Stein’s recent laughfest, Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, to be made and marketed.
Hence the movie
TALK ABOUT MOVIE
how this abandonment of Quality is the only thing that makes such a film possible.
The difference between a goodmechanicstudent and a bad one, like the difference between a good mathematician and a bad one, is precisely this ability to select the good facts from the bad ones on the basis of quality. He has to care! . . .
The difference between a goodmechanicelectorate and a bad one, like the difference between a good mathematician and a bad one, is precisely this ability to select the good facts from the bad ones on the basis of quality. He has to care! . . .
youtube is the republics’ enemy. facts are anathema to them.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyo…
A skeptic hears a shill and thinks, “Bullshit! Prove it!” After making that demand enough times and receiving no reasonable response, that person becomes a cynic. A cynic is one who, upon hearing a Republican or corporate shill, respondents simply, “Bullshit!”
air force times: nearly a million sorties in GWOT, triple the number of RAF in WWII
By the time you get down to the Seventh Level, torture seems merely a natural extension of the first six. That is why Crap Detection at every level is so important: to call out the Crap for what it is, to remove the emperor’s clothes. Crap is the water that the little fishies who are the citizens of the United States of America swim in, and until we get yanked out of it, we are not even aware that it exists.
And we’re okay with that. Recite a list of things that were okay with now that we worked before: torture, outing of CIA agents, secret trials, renditions, illegal surveillance, national debt exceeding $30,000 per person, tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans while the rest of the country drowns in their de
INCREMENTALISM, CREEP, QUALITY
It wasn’t always just the big lie: an unending stream of little lies will derail the discourse just as well.
SEVEN YEARS
Seven years of political decisions based on fear ignorance and cynical power grabbing
Seven years of a snarling, mean-spirited, self-loathing vice president, the Willie Sutton of big oil, the president of the Senate who would tell another senator, Go Fuck Yourself, and who would say, “So?” when told that 70% of the American people oppose the war in Iraq.
Seven years of those who would deny the reality of global warming, the reality of evolution, the reality of contraception, the reality of hazardous mines, the reality of 2,000 people drowning in a major American city, and for that, linked to the Robert Siegel interview with Michael Chertoff
A Justice Department where being lesbian is even worse than being a Democrat.
Please, just shut up – you’re embarrassing us
How stupid do you think we are? How fearful do you think we are?
Seven years of are you asking kidding me?
Seven years of You Can’t Make This Shit Up has left me tired. Seven years of asking the question, Just Exactly How Dumb Do You Think I Am, Anyway? is enough already.
No Child left behind. Clear skies initiative. Patriot act. Protect America act. It’s part of the dumbing down of America; the effort to create, not well-informed voters, but over pressurized consumers. Operation Iraqi liberation didn’t make the cut, because it was The Truth (link to ISG/{PNAC diary). Bipartisanship becomes another word for appeasement.
Modern Republicans have learned well the lesson of Don Corleone: Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer. Truly independent, critical thinking journalists are considered the enemy – or at least an ally of the enemy; the real enemy is Truth. So when the administration invites journalists in, those journalists should be doubly wary. Unfortunately, when the current crop of slavering, lazy, spoonfed stenographers are with great fanfare given a peek behind the curtain chosen by the administration, they never bother to ask the obvious question: So, what is it you are choosing not to show me?
Is it just that we don’t pay attention to these guys anymore? Have we decided that they are insane and therefore we can safely ignore them, as long as we keep them away from sharp implements? Well, we haven’t kept them away from sharp implements. There’s still plenty of damage they can do to others, indeed to the entire world, in the time that they have left.
The layers of lies created over seven years, added to and embellished, built upon unchallenged by the corporate media, bought into and spouted by sheepish Democrats in Congress, cowed into submission and timid silence by the sheer weight and breathless audacity of the lives. Cowed, for the most part, into timid silence. Cowed, with a few notable exceptions, into timid silence.
The irony is, the Dick Cheney neocons have no respect for quality, either. Rather than the cooked-up so-called “social Darwinism” espoused by the Nazis to justify their self-serving doctrine of “Aryan supremacy,” the modern Republican elitist neocon espouses an ostensible belief in “the power of the marketplace” to validate virtue and value. (Of course, in a truly free market there would be no such thing as federal subsidies for corporations, but the cynical modern neocon Republican capitalist justifies such artificial measures as merely “part of the game”.)
Americans to a very large extent have lost the power to discern. This is the way the Republicans want it: it makes for more pliant consumers, more pliant subjects.
America over the past eight years has descended into a Night of hatred and violence, and a Fog of willful ignorance.
Thus a film like Ben Stein’s Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, about which (in spite of its unintentionally hilarious self-referential title) the right is in a fervor. And why wouldn’t they be? According to Scientific American (whose editors I am more inclined to believe than, say, those of The Washington Times),
Stein, however, is uninterested in paleontology, or any other science for that matter.
http://www.sciam.com/article.c…
So a film that über-seriously tries to blame the Holocaust on Charles Darwin (OMG, I can already see the sequel: Rick-Santorum-as-Arnold-Schwarzenegger-as-T1000 going back in time, only to prevent a buffed-out Ann-Coulter-as-Linda-Hamilton-as-Sarah-Connor from stowing away to the Galápagos on HMS Beagle and blowing away a bespectacled Darwin with a flintlock set to full auto as he looks up uncomprehendingly from scratching notes in his journal) is treated seriously instead of as the pitiful, expensive joke that it is.
Quality – Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance
It wasn’t just government that the Republicans wanted to drown in a bathtub; a bunch of other inconvenient ideas were getting in the way of unrestrained corporate profits: Compassion. Truth. Justice. Transparency. Accountability. Equality. Liberty. All of those things came in an awkwardly large American size that kept the corporatocracy from achieving its unfettered aims. The only thing they wanted to supersize was our fries and our SUVs.
Most of the news media in this country who have been out of the crap detection business for several years. With the end of the fairness doctrine and consolidation of media, they’ve decided instead that crap collection and crap dissemination are more profitable.
And even for those members of the media who want to to be in the crap detection business, or at least to say they want to be in a crap detection business, or who think they want to be in a crap detection business, they have, unfortunately, allowed their quality discernment muscles atrophy, if they ever had used them in the first place.
While right wing believers and blowhards like Rush Limbaugh and Bill O’Reilly make a great show of protesting “moral relativism,” the right wing itself, of course, engages in moral relativism to a degree unheard of by anyone on the left. Hookers, pedophilia, gay sex in bathrooms, torture, corruption, stealing presidential elections – all of these are okay if you’re a Republican “limited to the present circumstances”
And at the same time they supposedly eschew moral relativism, they are perfectly okay to live with relativism when it comes to science. Assertions that would have sent my classmates in eighth-grade earth science into paroxysms of laughter when I was a youngster nowadays often are accorded equal time with real science in the news media, in the halls of our deliberative bodies and, God help us, in our schools. An unwillingness to use the knife of quality when weighing scientific evidence is what makes possible a waste of time, energy and money such as Ben Stein’s film expelled. (And put in here the paragraph about the movie)
It’s a rhetorical question. It does need to be answered even though it’s always being asked
Although the American people might be tired of having a rhetorical question put to them, it sometimes seems as though Congress is intent upon answering it.
Not stupid venal lies like, “- but I never inhaled,” or, “depends on what the definition of ‘is,’ is,” or “depends on what the definition of ‘sniper fire’ is.” Those are little lives, not lies that make somebody rich or keep somebody out of jail or keep somebody in power
In tomorrow’s second installment, we’ll work together, you and I, to compile a catalog of the crap the BushCheney regime has tried to foist upon the American people over the past several years, and we’ll look (audaciously) for hope.
beacon of democracy
lady liberty
LAST PARAGRAPH BEFORE LISTING LIES:
these are not isolated – they happen over and over and over again, on a regular basis. that’s becuase that’s how these people are, this is what they truly believe, this is how they see the world.
and americans have turned off their crap detectors. they don’t have to parse these statements, or analyze them, or ponder their deeper meaning or divine some hidden truth – they just have to go, “Bullshit. What kind of an idiot do you take me for?” or, in the case of the callous statements, “What kind of a monster are you?”
1. PLAIN STUPID
“Can you really say that and still be allowed to procreate?” That is the definition of the plain stupid remarks
Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz both said the war would cost $50 billion. Oh – and we will be greeted as liberators, right, Mr. Vice President? Six days, six weeks – I doubt six months.
limbaugh not indicted because “being stupid is not a crime” – it’s a prerequisite for republicans
http://www.dailykos.com/story/…
lieberamn compares mccain to jfk
http://politicalticker.blogs.c…
2. HUNH? ENEMIES OF RATIONAL THOUGHT / JUST EXACTLY HOW STUPID DO YOU THINK I AM, ANYWAY?
– also known as, If it could be a Monty Python punchline,
There’s plain ol’ stupid, and then there’s “Just how stupid do you think I am?” stupid.
rahm emanuel’s line about iraq
http://www.dailykos.com/hotlis…
“We’ve put about $45 billion into Iraq’s reconstruction . . . and they have not spent their own resources,” said House Democratic Caucus Chairman Rahm Emanuel (Ill.). “They have got to have some skin in the game.”
Strict constructionalist: torture not “punishment,” therefore not banned. Habeas corpus not in the Constitution
boise only top 10 terrorist target on west coast
http://www.latimes.com/news/pr…
dhs report:
http://media.idahostatesman.co…
mccain wants clone of roberts, alito
http://blogs.abcnews.com/polit…
While Dick Cheney reminded us that he doesn’t give a rat’s ass what the public thinks about the occupation of Iraq (“So?”), he did go on to take the time to explain that that’s because no one understands that George Bush is like Abraham Lincoln.
Bush says that there is progress in the war in Iraq.
condi blames iraq on iraqis
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/…
condi Rice – dying for sadr
http://www.latimes.com/news/na…
“I guess it’s all-out war for anybody but him.
“His followers can go to their death and he will still be in Iran.”
rice on gun ownership
http://news.yahoo.com/s/mcclat…
But clearly, the prime minister has laid down some ground rules which any functioning democratic state would insist upon, having to do with, you know, arms belonging to the state, not to — not in private hands,
ohio resident spouting rightwing talking points upon hearing of the death of Staff Sgt. Keith “Matt” Maupin
http://www.latimes.com/news/na…
“I see these protesters in California and elsewhere on TV, talking about pulling out of Iraq, and it makes me furious,” said Barb Bruner, co-owner of the Batavia Heights Christian Child Care center. “I hear these politicians come here to Ohio, wanting our votes and talking about how Iraq was such a mistake. We’ve sacrificed too much to protect our country for you to tell me this was a mistake.”
Congressman Mike Pence wants us to know that a normal outdoor market in Indiana in the summertime features shoppers wearing bulletproof vests, 100 heavily armed American soldiers, armored Humvees, Apache helicopters and Army snipers on rooftops.
President Bush says the recent violence in Basra and Baghdad shows just exactly how Iraqi defense forces are standing up for themselves, particularly, like the Indiana outdoor market, in the way the Iraqi defense forces are standing up in their Apache attack helicopters, and their F-18s
http://www.dailykos.com/storyo…
admin – if we don’t give the telcos immunity, the terrorists win
bush – tv is a terror weapon
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news…
Prime Minister Maliki’s bold decision — and it was a bold decision — to go after the illegal groups in Basra shows his leadership, and his commitment to enforce the law in an even-handed manner. It also shows the progress the Iraqi security forces have made during the surge. Iraqi forces planned this operation and they deployed substantial extra forces for it. They’re leading the operation. Prime Minister Maliki has traveled to Basra to oversee it firsthand.
This offensive builds on the security gains of the surge, and demonstrates to the Iraqi people that their government is committed to protecting them. There’s a strong commitment by the central government of Iraq to say that no one is above the law. This operation is going to take some time to complete, and the enemy will try to fill the TV screens with violence. But the ultimate result will be this: Terrorists and extremists in Iraq will know they have no place in a free and democratic society. (Applause.)
yeah – u.s. “joins” basra fight
http://www.latimes.com/news/na…
“energy task force” divvies up Iraq (link diary)
missing e-mails bullshit
http://www.dailykos.com/story/…
bush – we’re not in a recession
3. BULLSHIT / LIES
Right off the bat? Yeah – the Pentagon would like us to believe they have “suspended” the very program we opened this little diary with.
hillary on tuzla, nafta
hillary on not going after texas delegates
mukasey lies about law, says we didn’t do anything about call before 9/11
http://www.nysun.com/news/nati…
Don’t micturate on my lower extremity and call it precipitation.
4. CALLOUS
I used to believe that the entire Republican philosophy could be summed up in as little as five words: “I’ve got mine – fuck you!” But Cheney has succeeded in shrinking it down to the point where it can be drowned in a thimble of crocodile tears: So?
If the BushCheney administration and its Republican enablers over the past eight years have accomplished anything in the past eight years, they have succeeded in stripping away the veneer of “compassion” that they felt it necessary to cloak their self-absorbed brand of conservatism in eight years ago when they were trying to convince the American people that the single placesetting just wasn’t enough; but they needed the whole set: terrine, gravy boat, salad bowl, and, for good measure, et cetera.
A Republican looks at rising unemployment and skyrocketing gas prices and thanks terrific my commute into work will be quicker
Diary title: mortgages: I got mine – F**k you. That will be the Republican response to the mortgage crisis.
Charlie Gibson “middle class” $200,000/yr
http://mediamatters.org/items/…
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04…
“I think that is what Congress people are supposed to do for constituents,” he said. “When you have a big, significant businessman like myself, why wouldn’t you want to help move things along? What else would they do? They waste so much time with legislation.”
. . .
Mr. Diamond is close to most of Arizona’s Congressional delegation and is candid about his expectations as a fund-raiser. “I want my money back, for Christ’s sake. Do you know how many cocktail parties I have to go to?”
Lindsey Graham knows what benchmarks matter in Iraq (“I bought five rugs for five bucks”).
And, frankly, Lindsey’s traveling partner, John McCain, doesn’t give a damn what anyone says about Iraq; neither, of course, does Dick Cheney: “So?”
After Katrina, George Bush was excited to rebuild Trent Lott’s porch, while Bush’ s mother reminded us how well things were going for the evacuees.
Laura Bush wants us to know that no one suffers more than the president and her while watching video footage from Iraq.
Donald Rumsfeld was irritated that soldiers didn’t think he did a good enough job equipping the army we went to war with; c’mon, he said, people are fungible.
Cheney reminds us that the president carries the biggest burden of anyone involved in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars – besides, all those soldiers, sailors and airmen volunteered.
Bush – my base
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v…
5. FEAR- AND HATE-MONGERING
cheney on iran’s nuclear program
http://www.latimes.com/news/na…
fear – the repubs traffic in that alone
mark’s fear of obama raising taxes – i tried to explain that the richest repubs have run up the family credit card, and then excused themselves from having to repay it
ellen’s fear of muslims – unreasoning, all-encompassing. it’s about the religion to her, not about the actions of a few. ironic, considering the republics’ supposed belief in individual responsibility
islamofascism awareness week
http://www.terrorismawareness….
I say this country needs an enema. Republicans say this country needs an enemy. Just as Adolf Hitler and the national socialists did during the 1920s and 1930s, the Republicans have done in this new millennium: Create an external enemy, an “Other,” who will serve as a convenient scapegoat in order to cover for all kinds of excesses and abuses. Domestic repression, gigantic buildup of the military to the benefit of private contractors, illegal invasion and occupation of foreign lands in order to control resources, torture,
Marx was wrong: the opiate of the masses is not religion, it is fear and hatred. The Republicans recognize this. Instead of relying merely on religion to hold Americans in thrall, they fomented fear of The Other, and part of the “otherness” of The Dreaded Enemy was their religion (Islam). The Other Others, inconveniently enough, were Christians coming across our southern border-but they conveniently had brown skin, also,; they were conveniently brown skinned.
And, so help me, the Republicans have succeeded. Through many years of trying, they have succeeded in convincing otherwise intelligent people that Islam is a Uniquely Violent Religion, and that brown-skinned Christians are The Enemy Of Democracy. I have heard these words come out of the mouths of people who should know much better.
6. PLAIN CRIMINAL
feinstein wants investigation of dismantling of l.a. u.s. attorney’s offices
http://www.dailykos.com/story/…
latimes story on it
http://www.latimes.com/news/lo…
my kos diary on it
fisa violations
plame outing
siegelman prosecuted
After failing miserably to prosecute “terrorists” in American courts, the Pentagon now wants to retry a suspect from a 1998 bombing in a military hearing, using the Military Commissions Act. Even the victims of the 1998 bombings themselves think it’s a dumb idea:
Said one former FBI official who helped build the criminal case against Ghailani and the 10 other suspected Al Qaeda members in 1998: “I’m shocked and amazed at this. He’s already been charged with all of that in federal court. Why the hell do they need to do this? Are they afraid of the court system?”Susan F. Hirsch, who was injured in the Tanzania bombing and whose husband was killed, said she was angry and disappointed that Ghailani would probably be tried in a military tribunal rather than in an open civilian court where the public can hear the case against him.
supreme court decides judges can punish acquitted defendants
http://www.latimes.com/news/na…
7. TORTURE
This is the category that most beggars imagination. How can top advisers to this administration blithely discuss, on national television, the legality of crushing children’s testicles, and not be challenged on it? How can top administration officials – including the president and vice president themselves – be known to have approved actions against prisoners which were crimes for which war criminals were put to death after World War II, and not be challenged on it?
This is the category, too, that combines elements from all of the other categories. Scalia stating that torture is not “punishment,” and therefore is constitutional. The Justice Department claiming that torture is legal under certain circumstances.
torture is now part of the american political lexicon
this administration has adopted the Nazi lexicon: enhanced interrogation, night and fog; all part of The Big Lie
And tell me: did you ever in your life think that we would be discussing torture? And don’t tell me, what we’ve never been attacked on our soil before with the deaths of 3000 Americans. We have been.
we have to borrow language from the Nazis “enhanced interrogation”
http://www.dailykos.com/story/…
torture came from the top
http://www.crooksandliars.com/…
ashcroft said,
“Why are we talking about this in the White House? History will not judge this kindly.” Why are we talking about this in the White House? WTF? Why are we talking about this in America? Why are we talking about this in the 21st century?
Ashcroft on “pouring is not forcing”
John Ashcroft tortures the language itself, insisting that “pouring” is not “forcing.”
John Yoo reminds us that it’s OK to crush children’s testicles (as long, presumably, as they’re not his own children’s testicles)
dhs seeks new torture device; incidents on planes
http://www.dailykos.com/story/…
sectys of state call for gitmo to be shut down
http://www.latimes.com/news/na…
a day in the life of gitmo detainee
http://www.latimes.com/news/na…
harpers article on torture
http://www.harpers.org/archive…
is life so dear
http://www.historyplace.com/sp…
Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?
Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just.
http://xroads.virginia.edu/~hy…
new yorker magazine on abu ghraib
http://www.newyorker.com/repor…
Check for the 81 page torture memo addressed to the Pentagon by John Yoo.
HOPE
American’s unwillingness to swallow crap is even being demonstrated now by one of our presidential candidates: and here put the Obama objection to the questions at the ABC debate.
Talking about unity and oneness and separation: and maybe that’s what Barack was talking about: this idea of oneness, of working together, of eliminating the differences between us.
There is hope. Americans are beginning in greater numbers to come to their senses. They are rejecting more and more the cooked-up “wedge” issues, the trumped-up stupidities that the Crap Purveyors would have them swallow whole. Reverend Wright? Not an issue. (etc.)
And there is a qualitative difference to these things. Can you even imagine Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton or John Edwards saying anything even remotely resembling any of these things? I can’t.
Compare Obama to Gandalf in Lord of the rings when he breaks the spell of Saruman. Saruman continues to try to weave his spell, and some still fall under it, but Gandalf speaks and everyone understands the distinction.
YouTube is the new “news” medium. Blogs such as this are part of the new “news” media. The true voice of the people is being heard, not at the network level, but at the grassroots level.
The real reason the New York Times story is news is that it demonstrates, in the typical behind-the-curve fashion of the modern corporate “news” media, that America and American citizens have begun to wake up. Beginning with Ronald Reagan in the 1980s, and the elimination of the fairness doctrine, and continuing to the Clinton administration of the 1990s, and a telecommute telecommunications act and its concomitant consolidation of corporate media, the fourth estate in this country has been on a long downhill slide into irrelevance, to the point where it has become-as the Times article so clearly demonstrates-simply an advertising outlet for corporate interests, or: in the case of Iraq, corporate interests which make their billions by selling war and oil.
Unrelated paragraph, put this somewhere else: it would be too much to expect every American to break through the fog of the corporate media, and that indeed has not occurred. But more and more Americans are becoming deeply skeptical of the corporate media and the corporate masters they represent,including those who run the Republican Party.
This is for the second part of the diary: one of the most fundamental tasks facing the new Democratic administration and Congress will be the long overdue restoration of this nation’s infrastructure. In addition to the old-school analog portions of infrastructure such as sewers, roadways, bridges, schools, and power distribution systems, it is long past time that the United States recognize that a key component of its national security and economic success is the maintenance and enhancement of its information infrastructure.
an enema called impeachment?
The AIPAC spying case: 15 high-ranking Bush administration officials have been subpoenaed; in cases will be dismissed in the next two weeks.
‘In 1492, Columbus discovered America….’ Starting from this disputed fact, each one of us will describe the history of this country in a somewhat different way. Nonetheless, it is reasonable to assume that most of us would include something about what is called the ‘democratic process’, and how Americans have valued it, or at least have said they valued it. Therein lies a problem: one of the tenets of a democratic society is that men be allowed to think and express themselves freely on any subject, even to the point of speaking out against the idea of a democratic society. To the extent that our schools are instruments of such a society, they must develop in the young not only an awareness of this freedom but a will to exercise it, and the intellectual power and perspective to do so effectively. This is necessary so that the society may continue to change and modify itself to meet unforeseen threats, problems and opportunities. Thus, we can achieve what John Gardner calls an, ‘ever-renewing society’.
So goes the theory.
In practice, we mostly get a different story. In our society as in others, we find that there are influential men at the head of important institutions who cannot afford to be found wrong, who find change inconvenient, perhaps intolerable, and who have financial or political interests they must conserve at any cost. Such men are, therefore, threatened in many respects by the theory of the democratic process and the concept of an ever-renewing society. Moreover, we find that them are obscure men who do not head important institutions who are similarly threatened because they have identified themselves with certain ideas and institutions which they wish to keep free from either criticism or change.
Such men as these would much prefer that the schools do little or nothing to encourage youth to question, doubt, or challenge any part of the society in which they live, especially those parts which are most vulnerable. ‘After all,’ say the practical men, ‘they are our schools, and they ought to promote our interests, and that is part of the democratic process, too. True enough; and then we have a serious point of conflict. Whose schools are they, anyway, and whose interests should they be designed to serve? We realize that these are questions about which any self-respecting professor of education could write several books each one beginning with a reminder that the problem is not black or white, either/or, yes or no. But if you have read our introduction, you will not expect us to be either professorial or prudent. We are, after all, trying to suggest strategies for survival as they may be developed in our schools, and the situation requires emphatic responses. We believe that the schools must serve as the principal medium for developing in youth the attitudes and skills of social, political and cultural criticism. No. That is not emphatic enough. Try this: in the early 1960’s, an interviewer was trying to get Ernest Hemingway to identify the characteristics required for a person to be a ‘great writer’. As the interviewer offered a list of various possibilities, Hemingway disparaged each in sequence. Finally, frustrated, the interviewer asked, ‘Isn’t then any one essential ingredient that you can identify?’ Hemingway replied, ‘Yes, there is. In order to be a great writer a person must have a built-in, shockproof crap detector.’
It seems to us that, in his response, Hemingway identified an essential survival strategy and the essential function of the schools in today’s world. One way of looking at the history of the human group is that it has been a continuing struggle against the veneration of ‘crap’. Our intellectual history is a chronicle of the anguish and suffering of men who tried to help their contemporaries see that some part of their fondest beliefs were misconceptions, faulty assumptions, superstitions and even outright lies. The mileposts along the road of our intellectual development signal those points at which some person developed a new perspective, a new meaning, or a new metaphor. We have in mind a new education that would set out to cultivate just such people – experts at ‘crap detecting’.
Any one of these should have provoked the journalistic equivalent of the journalistic equivalent of RU staffing hitting me?
It’s easy to be cynical about the proliferation of crap in American politics today. But many times-a lot of times-peoples lives literally are at stake. In my work researching the issue of the testing and procurement of body armor by the US military, there’s been no shortage of crap to go around. When the dust finally this when the dust finally clears on this matter, I fully expect that
But sometimes people’s lives are at stake, like when the crap is being spewed by the purveyors of inferior body armor. And there friends in high places. An important survival skill in life in general and society at large is the ability to know when you’re being lied to.
I have reserved the seventh and lowest level of crap for those who would lie about, defend, or somehow try to rationalize the practice of torture. (And put in here some of the other writings about torture.)
That the news media have not been screaming about the officially sanctioned use of torture and extraordinary rendition by this administration is nothing short of astonishing to me. While some argument theoretically can be made that corruption, incompetence, venality, and stupidity are nothing more than “business as usual” in a government, (albeit having been taken to new heights – or depths – by Republicans over the past 12 years), the use and sanctioning of torture is unprecedented in American history. The fact that into your put a blank is reflected in the fact that the language chosen – “enhanced interrogation techniques” – is exactly the same as that used by the Nazis. And even though the same language of night and fog was not chosen, the methodology of extraordinary rendition and disappearance is exactly the same as those practiced by the Nazis.
EXTRA STUFF EXTRA STUFF EXTRA STUFF EXTRA STUFF EXTRA STUFF
Y’know, I can’t even tell you the name of my high school librarian. But she m
When I heard of the New York Times story about how retired military officers had been paid by the Pentagon to spout administration propaganda to the news media in order to sell the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq,
The New York Times last week published a seminal article that detailed how, since before the start of the invasion of Iraq, the Pentagon had paid retired military officers to spout administration propaganda about the invasion and occupation to the news media. The officers did it, in spite of knowing much of the information was blatantly false. These officers were cited in many media – television, radio, print and online – as “experts” who had unique access to high-level information not available to civilian reporters.
The New York Times earlier this week ran an article that detailed how the Pentagon had paid retired military officers to lie and spread propaganda on behalf of the Bush Cheney administration in order to sell the Iraq invasion and occupation to the American public.
Besides being a breathtaking and horrifying accounting of the lengths this administration will go to to mislead and lie to the American public, and the amount of disgrace that certain members of the military are willing to bring to the uniform in order to prostitute themselves for an illegal war that has cost hundreds of thousands of lives,
the article was instructive in another sense: it shone a light on a different war, a war that Republicans have been waging much, much longer than the so-called war on terror.
The New York Times spent 11 pages detailing what anybody who’s been paying attention has known for many years: the White House has been paying people – in this case, retired military officers – to lie to the American people in order to sell a war so that military contractors and, in many cases, the liars themselves can make a ton of money.
This is news only to people who have not been paying attention. The invasion and occupation of Iraq was being planned long before George Bush took office.
Republicans, in contrast, have developed to a high art the proliferation of the opposite of Truth, or what I call simply, “Crap.” Whenever the two are arrayed on a field of battle on anywhere near equal terms, Truth will eventually prevail. What Republicans have succeeded in doing over the past four decades is to cause Truth to abandon the field or at the very least to prevent Truth from being able to take the field. They have achieved this slowly and deliberately, primarily through the consolidation of corporate media and the concomitant transformation of news into infotainment
Talk about why didn’t anybody in the media ask once the documents came out why Iraq had been partitioned a few weeks after the inauguration and why was a list of potential suitors for oil contracts being drawn up at that time?
· I could be wrong, but I’m gonna guess Papa used a rather more indelicate term
ironic that yoo teaches at berkeley, a publicly-financed institution
test