We were not meant for this

From The Culture of Make Believe by Derrick Jensen:

In the United States about forty-two thousand people die per year because of auto collisions, nearly as many as the total number of Americans killed in Vietnam. Everybody knows someone who has died or been seriously injured in a car crash, yet cars have insinuated themselves into our social life – and our psyches – so thoroughly that we somehow accept these deaths as inevitable, or not shocking, as opposed to perceiving them for what they are: a direct and predictable result of choosing to base our economic and social systems on this particular piece of technology.

His words hit me on two levels. First of all, he makes a good point about our acceptance of the loss of life as a price we are willing to pay for the freedom to drive wherever we want whenever we want (not to mention all of the other costs like dependence of foreign oil and all of the money and blood that has been wasted in that pursuit).

But on another level, this kind of thinking gets under my skin. How many others ways have we been conditioned to accept the idea of death and destruction in ways that we haven’t even been thinking about?

I actually had to stop reading Jensen’s book for awhile because I found that as I was reading it I was getting depressed to the point that it was affecting my ability to get through the day. I’ve promised myself that I’m just taking a break and will go back to reading when I feel strong enough again to take it. But this book is filled with other examples. Whether its our history of genocide against Native Peoples, slavery, racism, sexism or the examples of corporate mass murder (ie, Union Carbide in Bhopal, India) he is showing that our culture is actually rooted in destruction.

Jensen is trying in this book to understand the hate that breeds this destruction. And I think he’s on to something. Very early on in the book he writes about a conversation he had with a friend of his named John about the similarity between hate groups and corporations:

He said, “They’re cousins.”

I just listened.

“Nobody talks about this,” he said, “but they’re branches from the same tree, different forms of the same cultural imperative…”

“Which is?”

“To rob the world of is subjectivity.”

“Wait – ” I said.

“Or to put this another way,” he continued, “to turn everyone and everything into objects.”

Jensen goes on to talk about how these forms of objectifying everyone and everything (therefore leading to hatred and destruction) have become so transparent that we don’t even see them anymore. One of his examples of this is his surprise in finding out that, even though the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 defines hate crimes as “a crime in which the defendant intentionally selects a victim…because of the actual or perceived race, color, national origin, ethnicity, gender, disability, or sexual orientation of any person,” the FBI does NOT define rape as a hate crime. In other words, we have lived so long with the hatred of women as demonstrated by the crime of rape, that the hatred has become transparent.

This, it seems to me, is why so many men get so defensive when accused of being sexist and why so many white people get defensive when we are accused of being racist. We literally can’t see it anymore. Here’s how Jensen puts it:

The problem we have in answering (or even asking) these questions comes from the fact that hatred felt long enough and deeply enough no longer feels like hatred. If feels like economics, or religion, or tradition, or simply the way things are.

We’re fighting an uphill battle folks – trying like hell to maintian our subjectivity and connection to each other and the environment that sustains us in the face of tremendous odds. Trying to keep our eyes open to the objectification when everything around us is trying to blind us to its ever-present reality. Here’s how Jensen describes our challenge:

Although we pretend we don’t know, we know, and because we know we try all the harder not to know, and to eradicate all of those who do, cursing and enslaving those who see us as we are, and who dare to speak of our nakedness, and cursing and enslaving especially those parts of ourselves which attempt to speak. But speak they will…All of this causes what passes for discourse to quickly become absurd, frantically so, as people say everthing but the obvious.

We were not meant for this. We were meant to live and love and play and work and even hate more simply and directly. It is only through outrageous violence that we come to see this absudity as normal, or to not see it at all.

27 comments

Skip to comment form

  1. i have looked at this phenomenon (the disconnection) from a different angle…from the perspective of people living ‘in their heads’ and not in their bodies….rationalizing our ‘selves’ as separate, and being unable to identify ‘other’ as ‘brother’…if im making any sense…

    societally, we’ve managed to remove ourselves from our connections to the earth, each other, and even ourselves…and we call it ‘progress’…

    youre right…we were never meant for this…sigh..

    • Alma on March 13, 2008 at 02:43

    If feels like economics, or religion, or tradition, or simply the way things are.

    Explains some things for me.  

    Some people I know that seem like such good people and then you find out for example “That they don’t think there should be social security benefits for gay peoples partners”, or that they really, truley are against/hate/afraid of anyone that isn’t an white American born and bred.  These same people would give their last nickle to help a friend.

    I wonder what prejudice, or biases I have that I am unaware of.

  2. he and i have had some might agreements, and some mighty disagreements, but i haven’t seen him around the blogs for some time.

  3. when you think about the odds of us even being here. i mean, come on. perhaps only one planet in a possibly unending universe with life?

    this whole thing is absurd. no rules. and we have one thing that may let us define what happens next::: our intellect. like life evolving from cosmic goo, our ability to think is growing, changing, and fighting our dna and instincts that don’t work in the world we’ve created. our intellect makes me think we are perhaps made for this… but there’s no guarantee we will be successful. but it’s conflict that forces this changing…

    …that last quote perfectly describes BushCo types and why they can blithely dismiss scientific data or rework facts so they sing for them… they do not believe that there will be any consequences to their actions. That’s what makes them dangerous. The rules, hell physics, do not apply to them

    and BushCo and all those who came before and those we allow to be in control after excel at cursing and enslaving those who see us as we are, and who dare to speak of our nakedness, and cursing and enslaving especially those parts of ourselves which attempt to speak.

    we need to take a step back. and understand what the real battle is. it is fighting old mammoths for control. because they do NOT understand, can NOT understand how to live in the world they created and, with old thinking and misused instincts, they are destroying.

  4. is always the first step in fostering hatred. Naturally, most people feel empathy for others. The only way to stop that natural human emotion is to dehumanize those who we want to disassociate with. If you are concerned about the persuasive power of a particular group of people – say gay people, or smart women who speak their mind, or whomever – you have to dehumanize them. Question their humanity, their sincerity, their integrity. Mock them, exaggerate stereotypes and spread rumors. Make them seem less than worthy of human empathy.

    I’ve believed that this is a typical behavior employed by class in human society for ages. I’ve never thought about how corporations are using the same techniques against people and other competitors.

    I remember a couple decades ago when a relative who worked for a car company, flat out told us (in total disgust) how the car manufacturer would handle cost-effectiveness when it came to serious defects. They would literally weigh out the percentage of likely deaths in a known problem, calculate how much it would cost to settle lawsuits with victims/families rather than recall the defective product. It was so cold and calculating to realize that a corporation would do such a thing. Now, of course, no one blinks an eye at such a suggestion, as all corporations do this.

    A fascinating read. Thanks for sharing it. I’ll be thinking about this connection for a while.

  5. the FBI does NOT define rape as a hate crime

    Of course they don’t.  Our male-dominated society cannot conceive of rape as anthing but sexual in nature.  The weapon is, after all, a sexual organ.  The fact that it’s connected to a brain is too complicated to deal with so we go on accepting rape as the result of too much testosterone.

  6. The basic principles are very complex.

    The problems of globalization.  The “rising tide lifts all boats” theories suggest everyone will be better off.  But what is really meant is that “society,” defined in an abstract sense of the population in aggregate, will have more wealth over time.  Particular individuals are irrelevant, and the short term pain some fraction of the population feels must be endured for the long term gain of the society as a whole.  And the average may go up while the lower 20% in wealth really suffer.  The success metric is poorly defined for individuals.

    One of the drawbacks of evolutionary thinking is the loss of the soul.  What is it?  Why does it matter?  Where does it reside?  It’s hard to reconcile the notion of a soul and evolutionary biology.  (I highly recommend Dennett’s book “Darwin’s Dangerous Idea” for the biologist’s perspective.)  But the soul would seem to be what separates us from purely economic views of the world and our behavior in.  “There must be something more that this?” is the age old question.

    This strikes me as a very fundamental inquiry.  Thanks.

Comments have been disabled.