Colbert Arranges a Light Saber for Jedi Webmaster Obama

If you did not catch the Colbert Report on Comedy Central last night (Thursday, April 17th), you will probably find it worth your while to catch one of the scheduled reruns today or this evening. The show brought to a climax Colbert’s week in Pennsylvania in advance of the primary election next Tuesday.

Last night’s show was political satire at its best, but it was also political allegory at its most profound.

Stephen Colbert showed why he deserved that Peabody Award.

Here is a link to last night’s show.

Here is a quick synopsis below the break.

(1) The candidate who portrays herself as the detail-oriented policy wonk who can fix anything is given the opportunity to come in from New York to fix the broken down big screen. Hillary walks onstage and dutifully delivers her lines, and the audience remains under control and does not boo her (Colbert clearly made sure that the audience members would hold their fire during Hillary’s appearance.) Finally, with Hillary’s “expert” advice, the big video screen is up and running.

(2) Colbert then uses the big screen “fixed” by Hillary to run a devastating deconstruction of the shameless “gotcha” approach of ex-Clinton apparatchik George Stephanopoulos and ABC’s Charles Gibson during Wednesday night’s “debate,” i.e., inquisition. The circle of guilt-by-associations leading back through the Pope, who was a Nazi youth, all the way to Hitler is a particularly sharp thrust.

(3) Rep. Patrick Murphy, who was an Army Captain in the 82nd Airborne Division in Iraq, comes on to talk about why he has endorsed Obama for President. Murphy’s handling of past tense verbs is a little clumsy, but he is earnest, coherent, concise, and obviously knowledgeable about the realities of Iraq. Colbert gives Murphy essentially free rein, and Murphy brings up the point that Obama is a “once in a generation” kind of leader.

(4) A very relaxed John Edwards waltzes in to deliver his “Edwords” lines with good timing and grace, including a dig about worrying about getting bitten by James Carville–thereby reminding savvy viewers of Carville’s going nuclear and calling Bill Richardson “Judas” after Richardson endorsed Obama. Is Edwards hinting at how he is leaning?

(5) Using the wonders of 21st century technology, Jedi Webmaster Obama then appears behind Colbert on the same big screen that had earlier been “fixed” by Hillary and proceeds to put the media’s pointless faux “distractions” on notice at the very top of Colbert’s famous “On Notice Board”–to the great delight of the live audience, which roars its approval with sustained cheering.

This episode is political satire and allegory of the highest caliber. Hillary, seemingly unwittingly, lays the groundwork for Murphy, Edwards, and Obama to change and elevate the quality of the national discussion. Colbert serves as the medium for the transformation.

It is game, set and match–for Obama.

And Colbert, more than any other media figure (though Jon Stewart and Keith Olbermann make their fair contributions), seems to be the genuine Voltaire of our era.

16 comments

Skip to comment form

    • RiaD on April 18, 2008 at 10:37 pm

    we don’t have TV anymore… & colbert & the daily show are really about all i miss…

    your wonderful synapsis made me feel as if i’d seen it…

    thanks

    ♥~

  1. The Colbert clip of Edwards was “no longer available” when I tried to watch the embed above.  Found another one, from another site:


  2. hints at where he’s leaning… he made it really clear that the candidate he’ll support has to be behind universal health care for all (and appropriate lake vehicles the Edwards clan). The only “hint” I got was that he may – or may not – make a public endorsement in before North Carolina’s vote.

    Technically speaking, Clinton’s healthcare plan would actually cover more people that Obama’s. Her plan is closer to what Edwards proposed than what Obama has proposed (but still not comprehensive enough, IMO).

    I’m undecided between Obama and Clinton – I’ll strongly support the one who gets the nomination. My gut feeling is that people who are firmly behind one or the other candidate keep seeing “hints” that Edwards is leaning their way, and I think he’s been sitting on the sidelines for a reason – he’s not overly enthusiastic about either of them, and he wants to challenge them to put more emphasis on the needs of the poor and the uninsured/underinsured.

Comments have been disabled.