Global Warming Ghettos!

For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.  For every ying there is a yang, for every neo-con there is a neo-lib.  When the global war of terror becomes unpalatable by the masses it’s replacement shall be the global war on your assumption of your right to use energy and maintain a modern lifestyle.  More people should own horses because it is the source of horse sense.

Anyway, this one is from Kurt Nimmo.  He speaks to the carbon tax scam well.  I have also openly told people here I work for a global company.  The company over a year ago started promoting future life scenarios that included “mega-cities.  I still view it as the delusions of a very small percentage of people who think it is their manifest destiny to screw up the lives of as many people as they can.  It is as simple as good vs evil so the best hope we have is that the electronic information grid will be the first casualty in the post modern world.

If you have problems with the United Nations’ scheme to frighten the rabbits and herd them into global warming ghettos, take heed in the words of Mr. Green, Al Gore.

On Sunday, Leslie Stahl will interview Gore on 60 Minutes, an interview that coincides with Gore’s “major advertising campaign to raise awareness of global warming,” according to David Edwards and Muriel Kane of Raw Story. In a teaser for the show (see video here), Gore compares those of us who have big problems with dismantling civilization – in other words, forcing millions to accept a New Stone Age lifestyle – with “the ones who still believe that the Moon landing was staged in a movie lot in Arizona and those who believe the world is flat.”

In fact, the enviro-crusaders, funded over the years by the Rockefeller foundation, are the flat-earthers, unable to accept alternative theories to their junk science. Instead of debating the opposition, followers of the climate change orthodoxy continue to slander and attempt to minimize them.

Somebody needs to question the “solutions” proffered to mend climate change proposed by the enviro-fascists. One such “solution” entails “geoengineering,” that is the deliberate change of the climate with sulfate aerosols, the same stuff that comes out volcanoes (see Can We Offset Global Warming By Geoengineering The Climate With Aerosols?). Such a harebrained scheme, even if possible, would increase “global dimming” and reduce the amount of light and solar energy that reaches the planet. Never mind the resultant acid rain and massive impact of agriculture. Starvation is an effective way to scale back carbon emissions, as there will be a lot less people breathing.

Another crazy idea is ocean iron fertilization, also known as the “Geritol solution,” and involves seeding the oceans with iron to increase phytoplankton populations. The thought here is that the iron will encourage phytoplankton growth and the phytoplankton will suck up the CO2 as part of photosynthesis. Nobody knows if this will work but why let that stop the eco-fascists from polluting the oceans with heavy metals?

“Other wacky ideas under consideration include artificial trees, giant space mirrors, painting city buildings / roads white, etc., etc.,” notes Global Warming Hoax. “Some of these ideas are scarier than others as some are easy to undo. However the earth warms over time and once we spend a trillion dollars on a space mirror and cool the earth 5°C it will take time to rewarm the oceans, it will also be so embarrassing that it could take decades to convince politicians to scrap such an expensive system. Painting all buildings and roads white would take far longer to undo. Ocean fertilization has unknown consequences and could trigger a chain of events that could go on for decades.”

It doesn’t help that Al Gore is allowed to go on television and scare little children and the dim-witted. Our rulers are determined to cull the population – considered by the elite to be useless eaters – by rolling back civilization and technology and eventually cramming us in Agenda 21 cities. Once stacked one upon another in our rabbit warrens, the scientific elite can begin the culling process through malnutrition, starvation, and disease.

I know… some probably think this is just another conspiracy theory, even though our rulers are mostly dedicated eugenicists and an unbiased reading of Agenda 21 – if you can cut through the turgid prose – states exactly that: we are to be moved off the land and into crowded cities. It will not happen tomorrow or next year. even with the best effort of Al Gore and a complaisant corporate media. It is a long term plan that needs to be incrementally implemented, as our rulers consider us a dangerous sleeping giant, capable of up-ending their globalist apple cart at any moment, and that’s why they are boiling us slowly like the frog in a sauce pan. It will be too late by the time we see hot water bubbles rising.

In the meantime, we will endure Al Gore, the new Tomás de Torquemada, the Grand Inquisitor. Naturally, CBS will offer no rebuttal, no counterpoints to Al’s propaganda, as the idea is sell you on poverty, starvation, disease, the culling of the herd, although it will not be billed as such.

John Coleman, the founder of the Weather Channel, wants to sue Al Gore because a courtroom may be the only place to get a hearing. “Since we can’t get a debate, I thought perhaps if we had a legal challenge and went into a court of law, where it was our scientists and their scientists, and all the legal proceedings with the discovery and all their documents from both sides and scientific testimony from both sides, we could finally get a good solid debate on the issue,” Coleman told Fox News. “I’m confident that the advocates of ‘no significant effect from carbon dioxide’ would win the case.”

Sorry, John. But this is not likely to happen. Even if it did the corporate media would twist and turn the outcome, as the corporate media is owned by our rulers and they have an agenda all ready for us.

Call if the Death Agenda, the eugenicist’s dream come true… if we let them realize it.  

9 comments

Skip to comment form

  1. because i thought this: why didn’t Al run? How much bigger of a platform does one need than president of the US to exert leadership in sensible approaches to climate change. There’s something not right there.

    i have learned one thing: do not let yourself get stuck to conventional wisdom. to question Mr. Gore, for some, is like questioning Bush, to those on the other side. And I don’t dig it one bit.

    I want everybody to take a breath. And we should debate the issues. And use our fucking common sense.  i’m not riding band wagons anymore. and i’m believing in what my senses are telling me.

    and that’s why, LHM, i’m glad you’re here. you’re DD’s punk rock, heavy metal, grunge… all in one. outside the norm. it’s a good thing.

  2. But the discussion certainly has to be based on sound science. From an article by Alexander Cockburn last year:

    In a couple of hundred years, historians will be comparing the frenzies over our supposed human contribution to global warming to the tumults at the latter end of the tenth century as the Christian millennium approached. Then, as now, the doomsters identified human sinfulness as the propulsive factor in the planet’s rapid downward slide.

    Then as now, a buoyant market throve on fear. The Roman Catholic Church was a bank whose capital was secured by the infinite mercy of Christ, Mary and the Saints, and so the Pope could sell indulgences, like checks. The sinners established a line of credit against bad behavior and could go on sinning. Today a world market in “carbon credits” is in formation. Those whose “carbon footprint” is small can sell their surplus carbon credits to others, less virtuous than themselves.

    The modern trade is as fantastical as the medieval one. There is still zero empirical evidence that anthropogenic production of CO2 is making any measurable contribution to the world’s present warming trend. The greenhouse fearmongers rely entirely on unverified, crudely oversimplified computer models to finger mankind’s sinful contribution. Devoid of any sustaining scientific basis, carbon trafficking is powered by guilt, credulity, cynicism and greed, just like the old indulgences, though at least the latter produced beautiful monuments. By the sixteenth century, long after the world had sailed safely through the end of the first millennium, Pope Leo X financed the reconstruction of St. Peter’s Basilica by offering a “plenary” indulgence, guaranteed to release a soul from purgatory.

     

  3. And then there’s this:

    Planetary engineering projects to cool the planet could backfire quite spectacularly: a new model shows that a “sulphate sunshade” would punch huge holes through the ozone layer above the Arctic.

    To make matters worse, it would also delay the full recovery of the Antarctic ozone hole by up to 70 years.

    Pumping tiny sulphate particles into the atmosphere to create a sunshield that would keep the planet cool was first suggested as a solution to global warming by Edward Teller, a physicist was best known for his involvement in the development of the hydrogen bomb.

    Simone Tilmes of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Colorado, US, used computer models to see how a sulphate sunshade would affect the ozone layer, which protects us from harmful UV rays. She says it could have “a drastic impact.”

Comments have been disabled.