Exactly Right!

As some of you know I frequent RedState myself on occasion but this particular gem I owe to TBogg.

From a discussion of McSame’s VP choices-

With respect, that’s (excluding former officials of the current administration- ek) just the wrong approach to take. We have to build up a farm team of Presidential prospects. It just does not do to create a Caste of Untouchables merely because their resumes indicate that they have been doing something fairly important at some point in time between January 20, 2001 and the present day. We deprive ourselves of talent that way. And again, we could pick the Angel Gabriel himself, the Heavenly Host could sound its approval and the Lord could issue his unqualified endorsement but at most, that would cause a 48 hour delay before the negative ads start coming in.

Additionally–and this issue cannot be emphasized enough–as much as you and I may be (and are) disappointed with various aspects of the Bush Administration’s job performance, let us remember that we are criticizing the Administration from the right. A critique from the right, however, may not emerge as the dominant critique of the Bush Administration and indeed, thus far, the dominant critique has come from the left.

If we allow the left to continue critiquing, allow that critique to become the dominant narrative and then declare that consideration of Bush Administration officials for high office is verboten, we are effectively silencing a very large portion of our counter-message against the left’s critique and allowing that critique to morph into a larger narrative against Republicans and conservatives in general. In other words, by our silence, by our cooperation in shunning very competent Bush Administration officials when it comes to considerations for high office merely because they served in the Bush Administration, we will allow George W. Bush and anyone who served with him–no matter how good–to be used as bludgeons against Republicans and conservatives for decades.

This is already happening; there have been any number of seminars and presentations on the Left that have argued that the “failures” of the Bush Administration constitute “failures” of conservatism proper. By practicing The Politics Of Leprosy when it comes to personnel decisions, we are implicitly giving running room to that critique. And don’t think it will stop there; there is no reason to think that Cabinet decisions will not be subject to The Politics Of Leprosy as well. Give the Left an inch and it will take the height of the Roman Empire.

Pejman Yousefzadeh

My emphasis.

The Politics of Leprosy.

Preach it and practice it.

21 comments

Skip to comment form

  1. They’ll sell us the rope.

  2. to have them use anyone from the Bush Admin. Because we have BIG opportunity to further hurt them.

    But only if we do it right. We can ask them the right questions and be prepared to blow apart their answers….

    we can let them make it personal and when they do, we can blow it apart. but we can’t fight it with defending character, but with compelling blow back as to why they use it.

    we can AND have to change the game. NOW. we can stop being like them. that’s the only way to beat them. be better. tell the truth. never stop. never stop. and get back into our school boards and planning boards. never stop.

    plus one little advantage here… they see the left as having some leverage. let’s not blow it. and let’s keep surprising these fuckers.

  3. but I think that if McSame had any political sense at all, he’d pick our MN Governor Pawlenty as his running mate. This guy does scare me as the potential new face of Republicanism. He’s young, working class background and articulate as hell. He has managed to ravage what was once a working state government all while smiling and making those sleeping suburbanites think everything that has gone wrong is the fault of the uncompromising rigid Democrats (by the way, anyone who doesn’t agree completely with him is uncompromising and rigid).

    While I really hate the guy, I have to admit that he’s good at what he does. And my fear is that some day, the Rethugs will notice just how good he is at destroying with a smile on his face.

  4. you might be interested in these folks…

    http://www2.freepress.net/acti

    • jim p on May 10, 2008 at 05:01

    and allowing that critique to morph into a larger narrative against Republicans and conservatives in general.

    When George Bush was doing his things, ’twere these very Republicans and conservatives in general who labelled someone a traitor if they dare hint at a failure by Bush of any kind.

    It isn’t by some contrivance that the Left critique has taken dominance. It was precisely the rights slavish cheering and happy compliance and threats to dissenters that allowed Bush & Buddies to become the full-spectrum disaster they’ve become. And nothing else.

    They are just shouting “Look there goes the thief” as they try to sneak off in the opposite direction.

    If it were a game, you’d say the Right had forfeited by never appearing on the field, not that the Left achieved dominance.

  5. http://www.publicintegrity.org

    looks like a good one.

Comments have been disabled.