Are they going to Steal 2008?
by Greg Palast, www.gregpalast.com
Are they going to Steal 2008? Don’t worry: it’s already stolen. But you can steal it back. Ted Rall and I have teamed up for one of the first ever series of hard-edged investigative journalism – in ‘toon form. Steal this strip … and pass it on: VOTE THEFT FOR IDIOTS – PART 1 … (click here to download a pdf)
Analysis of an Electronic Voting System [.PDF]
Johns Hopkins University Information Security
Institute Technical Report TR-2003-19, July 23, 2003.
We discovered significant and wide-reaching security vulnerabilities in the version of the [Diebold] AccuVote-TS voting terminal found in [9] (see Table 1). Most notably, voters can easily program their own smartcards to simulate the behavior of valid smartcards used in the election. With such homebrew cards, a voter can cast multiple ballots without leaving any trace. A voter can also perform actions that normally require administrative privileges, including viewing partial results and terminating the election early.
We identify several problems… We conclude that this voting system is unsuitable for use in a general election.
Election night… I was startled to hear the reporter detail how Karen Hughes had earlier sat George W. Bush down to inform him that he’d lost the election. The exit polls were clear: Kerry was winning in a landslide. “Bush took the news stoically,” noted the AP report.
But then the computers reported something different. In several pivotal states.
“Exit Polls are almost never wrong,” Dick Morris wrote.
He added: “So, according to ABC-TVs exit polls, for example, Kerry was slated to carry Florida, Ohio, New Mexico, Colorado, Nevada, and Iowa, all of which Bush carried. The only swing state the network had going to Bush was West Virginia, which the president won by 10 points.”
Yet a few hours after the exit polls were showing a clear Kerry sweep, as the computerized vote numbers began to come in from the various states the election was called for Bush.
18 comments
Skip to comment form
Author
a clear
KerryObama sweep, as the computerized vote numbers began to come in from the various states the election was called forBushMcCain…Singing the Down-Ballot Blues
By Charlie Cook
The Cook Political Report
© National Journal Group Inc.
Stealing 1% is going to be no big deal.
And likely we will receive the McSame results in 2008.
Please give a round of applause for President McSame voter-fraud.
Diebold delivers Ohio (from CommonDreams 2003):
Diebold. The machine that votes so you don’t have to.
Diebold. Because democracy is too important to leave to chance.
Diebold. It’s not who votes that matters, but who counts the votes.
what should an individual do ?!?………
thanks ever so much!!
until we fix the voting process the whole system is broken 🙁