(9 am – promoted by ek hornbeck)
Whenever people talk about getting back to the good old days in this country I get confused. I immediately wonder what days they’re talking about. I think that what we refer to as “good” is all too often in the eye of the beholder.
Most times the pull to some mythical wonderful past in this country takes us to the glory days of WWII and its aftermath in the 50’s. Those were the years of my childhood, and yes, there were certainly some good things about that time.
But when we open our eyes to historical facts, we learn a different story of those years and the reality that they were anything but the “good old days” for far too many.
I just recently read an article by Tim Wise that was written in the aftermath of the Jeremiah Wright controversy. He has a powerful story to tell us about how we think of history. Its titled Of National Lies and Racial America.
Wise opens by addressing the insincerity of the outrage most Americans felt when they heard Rev. Wright’s words.
For most white folks, indignation just doesn’t wear well. Once affected or conjured up, it reminds one of a pudgy man, wearing a tie that may well have fit him when he was fifty pounds lighter, but which now cuts off somewhere above his navel and makes him look like an idiot.
Indignation doesn’t work for most whites, because having remained sanguine about, silent during, indeed often supportive of so much injustice over the years in this country–the theft of native land and genocide of indigenous persons, and the enslavement of Africans being only two of the best examples–we are just a bit late to get into the game of moral rectitude. And once we enter it, our efforts at righteousness tend to fail the test of sincerity.
But here we are, in 2008, fuming at the words of Pastor Jeremiah Wright, of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago…for merely reminding us of those evils about which we have remained so quiet, so dismissive, so unconcerned. It is not the crime that bothers us, but the remembrance of it, the unwillingness to let it go–these last words being the first ones uttered by most whites it seems whenever anyone, least of all an “angry black man” like Jeremiah Wright, foists upon us the bill of particulars for several centuries of white supremacy.
After walking through exactly what Wright said and providing some historical context, Wise zeros in on the different way 9/11 was viewed by white people and people of color in this country.
What Jeremiah Wright knows, and told his flock–though make no mistake, they already knew it–is that 9/11 was neither the first, nor worst act of terrorism on American soil. The history of this nation for folks of color, was for generations, nothing less than an intergenerational hate crime, one in which 9/11s were woven into the fabric of everyday life…No, to some, the horror of 9/11 was not new. To some it was not on that day that “everything changed.” To some, everything changed four hundred years ago, when that first ship landed at what would become Jamestown. To some, everything changed when their ancestors were forced into the hulls of slave ships at Goree Island and brought to a strange land as chattel. To some, everything changed when they were run out of Northern Mexico, only to watch it become the Southwest United States, thanks to a war of annihilation initiated by the U.S. government. To some, being on the receiving end of terrorism has been a way of life. Until recently it was absolutely normal in fact.
Wise then does an amazing job of tying these lies we have been taught about our history to the current delusional thinking about our place in the world.
Whites refuse to remember (or perhaps have never learned) that which black folks cannot afford to forget…Most white people desire, or perhaps even require the propagation of lies when it comes to our history. Surely we prefer the lies to anything resembling, even remotely, the truth. Our version of history, of our national past, simply cannot allow for the intrusion of fact into a worldview so thoroughly identified with fiction. But that white version of America is not only extraordinarily incomplete, in that it so favors the white experience to the exclusion of others; it is more than that; it is actually a slap in the face to people of color, a re-injury, a reminder that they are essentially irrelevant, their concerns trivial, their lives unworthy of being taken seriously. In that sense, and what few if any white Americans appear capable of grasping at present, is that “Leave it Beaver” and “Father Knows Best,” portray an America so divorced from the reality of the times in which they were produced, as to raise serious questions about the sanity of those who found them so moving, so accurate, so real. These iconographic representations of life in the U.S. are worse than selective, worse than false, they are assaults to the humanity and memory of black people, who were being savagely oppressed even as June Cleaver did housework in heels and laughed about the hilarious hijinks of Beaver and Larry Mondello.
…
No, it is not the pastor who distorts history; Nick at Nite and your teenager’s textbooks do that. It is not he who casts aspersions upon “this great country”…it is the historic leadership of the nation that has cast aspersions upon it; it is they who have cheapened it, who have made gaudy and vile the promise of American democracy by defiling it with lies. They engage in a patriotism that is pathological in its implications, that asks of those who adhere to it not merely a love of country but the turning of one’s nation into an idol to be worshipped, if not literally, then at least in terms of consequence.
It is they–the flag-lapel-pin wearing leaders of this land–who bring shame to the country with their nonsensical suggestions that we are always noble in warfare, always well-intended, and although we occasionally make mistakes, we are never the ones to blame for anything. Nothing that happens to us has anything to do with us at all. It is always about them. They are evil, crazy, fanatical, hate our freedoms, and are jealous of our prosperity. When individuals prattle on in this manner we diagnose them as narcissistic, as deluded. When nations do it–when our nation does–we celebrate it as though it were the very model of rational and informed citizenship.
Some pretty powerful words for us all to hear and absorb. And all I can say in closing is that my hope is that our “good old days” are still to come.
242 comments
Skip to comment form
Author
It’s not just Jeremiah Wright — I also think of Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, and how they are critiqued at, say, Daily Kos.
It’s almost a “given” that Sharpton and Jackson will be put down as clowns or otherwise not criticized in the same way as white people.
I have no problem critiquing either Sharpton, Jackson or Wright. It’s the unspoken assumptions that bother me, the language used to put them down.
Jackson is arrogant, loud, embarrassing, same with Sharpton. It’s not their words or actions that are criticized but their demeanor, their personalities, and I find it really annoying and offensive when I see that kind of critique.
Well, just riffin’ off your essay, NL.
and I’m with you when you say you hope the Good Old Days are still in our future. I’m hoping for the near future.
Thanks, NL.
Author
a bit wider in an essay by Nezua at The Unapologetic Mexican that, as Wise refers to in his essay, Mexicans are not “immigrants” to the southeast part of this country.
Damn, can’t help myself.
Good essay, NL, those words are indeed powerful. And I resonate with most of what he says. But I have a problem with one aspect of them. I bring this problem here, where presumably most people are thoroughly imbued with self-criticism of the country and are distinctly not racist. I wouldn’t muddy the water in some other venues.
So, Wise seems, in his own way, to be “nationalistic,” i.e., able and willing to see matters only from the point of view of his people. Criticizing whites for watching Leave it to Beaver? Please, give me a break. Weren’t some blacks wasting their lives on drugs during this same period? Or is that the fault of the white overlords, too?
My point is not a crass one, or defensive one. It is that people, black or white, have the same tendencies, and dividing along clear-cut lines leads only to polarization, conflict, and finally war. Poor people are not made virtuous by being poor. If economic status could be completely reversed in one day, we would find the same kind of greed, institutionalized injustice, and protection of the haves from the have-nots we have today. Different faces, same human nature. And speaking of re-writing favorable history, have you ever seen the glittering glorification that passed as black history when the discipline was first born? Does anyone want to mention the black slave traders in Africa who sold their “brothers” to the whites?
There is a problem in human nature. The problem is not exclusive to the Europeans. It’s just that they won the fight. I embrace a lot of what Wise says–it’s brilliant in places–but I reject his self-satisfied and righteous critique of an entire culture. First, it has little chance of swaying people to his point of view given how defensive they would feel, but worse, it encourages an attitude which blames others, or a certain group, for the problems of human nature.
These days I’m feeling a desperate urgency around the need for people to get off their high horses and take a look at their own behavior and attitudes. To grapple with the things in them that prevent them from taking an expansive view of the world which wants what is best for every single being in it. Take the demonization out, and I love Wise’s essay.
… insofar as the notion that the words of Tim Wise will somehow add to polarization of Americans or won’t “reach the ones who need to change.”
Let’s look at Tim Wise’s accomplishments.
While a student at Tulane, he was a leader in the campus anti-apartheid movement, using activism to get Tulane to divest in its investments in South Africa. This, of course, was going on at many campuses.
One of the effects of this group was that when informed of Tulane’s continuing investments in South Africa, Bishop Desmond Tutu declined an offer of an honorary degree from the school. Wise received the personal thanks of both Desmond Tutu and Nelson Mandela for his activism.
He also worked hard to defeat neo-Nazi David Dukes in his bid for the Senate in 1990 and the Governorship in 1991.
He has taught at hundreds of colleges and high schools across the nation and his scholarly book, Affirmative Action: Racial Preference in Black and White, (Routledge: 2005) “has received praise from academics and is also taught in dozens of educational institutions.”
He has spoken to hundreds of thousands of people, mostly young people.
His critics include David Duke, Dinesh D’Sousa (right wing blogger and writer) and the KKK.
It appears to me from his own work that Tim Wise has been quite successful in reaching out and having large audiences be willing to hear what he has to say.
I’m not a big fan of credentialism. This isn’t about credentials. This is the actual accomplishment of someone whose work is anti-racism, is about educating others as to the true history of this country, a history I’ve seen be illuminated in essay after essay here at Docudharma when it comes to our torture policies, our genocide of Native Americans and present ill-treatment of them (white rabbit writes excellent essays on this) and our imperialism, among others, all subjects rarely if ever taught in our public schools.
I think if the charge of polarization or “turning folks off” is to be made, I’d have to see some real proof of that. Thus far I haven’t. What I have seen is a large number of people who agree with what Wise has to say, from both white people and people of color, and a lot of real dialogue happening as a result. NL also has shown a real-life example of how showing a Tim Wise video at work resonated with the folks there.
There will always be people who don’t want to see the truth and who will hold to their biases no matter what anyone says. I have yet to see anyone who has successfully “reached” them, but I’m sure open to hearing about real, not theoretical, examples of people who have done so.
There are many others who want to know the truth and who are willing to hear what Tim Wise has to say. I don’t see any turn-off to that, quite the contrary.
if Tim talked about how we’ve all been lied to by the power mongers. and how we are ALL responsible to undo this harm. ALL OF US.
we’ve all been burned at the stake, killed in the millions, starved, beaten, hated. all of us have suffered at one time or another.
it’s time to stop blaming ordinary people for it. and find a way to counter the very successful tactics of power mongers to mobilize us ordinary people around hatred.
and, like the sig lines carried by so many from Ghandi and MLK, we need to find a way to draw us together over love of this planet. of our lives here. our children’s future.
not because history got twisted by the people in charge. and white people need to be lied to.
it seems like i’m reading thoughts about delivery and healing and everyone having a place at the table. not sure. 🙂
do we heal first, then come to the table? or come to the table unhealed and focus on delivery v facts? or do we come to the table, healed and unhealed and marginally healed and/or not caring about healed and unhealed and then proceed to fight about various speaker’s delivery? or do we just come to the table.
first of all, for me, i’m grateful for having a the seat at the table. 🙂 if there’s is food on the table i’m even more grateful, although i may be too chicken to try that weird looking stuff over by the German potato salad. and if someone is speaking, fine with me, i’m not too picky about styles of delivery, unless it gets insulting, then i’ll probably throw a ham hock at someone’s head. if i get fed, but no insight, well, it was a pretty nice spread, i’ll be back. maybe i’ll understand the speaker the next time and hey, can’t complain about the free food. i didn’t have to do the dishes, either!
healing? it’s my business. it is no one else’s business or responsibility.
delivery? we all got style, man. 😉
facts? like food, we all take in different amounts or none at all.
truth? truth belongs to the teller. just like stories belong to the teller. i can accept a truth or reject a truth, just like i can a story. if i respect the person telling their truth (and i respect action much more than i respect words and i respect words a lot), even if i can’t see their truth, i’m a bit more apt to hear them out again.
that’s my story and i’m sticking to it! there’s fresh coffee on the sideboard. ain’t got no eggs this morning, sorry.
People like certainty and feel stress when faced with ambiguity. We live at transition point a time of confusion but our needs are still the same. All cultural myths are myths and thus not “true” in the scientific sense. We need to find a new myth and you and I are in competition with the myths favored by the Fascists. Do we have something better? Not yet…but we better have some soon.
This one is for you, NL, in thanks for bringing this essay here so I could be blessed with a molecule of awareness and understanding. You began this essay with this idea and I want to end this essay with what I am assuming was your intention. Again, thanks.
Bruce Springsteen – Eyes On The Prize 2006
best essay i’ve read on the nets in years. i hope someday it can be discussed.
Good old days???? by: NLinStPaul on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 07:50:16 PDT
Thanks, NL. “Eyes on the Prize”