an absurdity-based reality

Photobucketi imagine the word “reality”, when used, implies some baseline in agreement or objective consensus. or perhaps some kind of truth in being.

but lately, it seems reality has taken a sharp right turn into the absurd. i think, ladies and gentlemen, that while pink may be the new black, absurdity is the new reality.

it’s not just that Hank Paulson wants to push through a plan in which he can make decisions unchecked and unchallenged. or that our army crossed into Pakistan and started shooting or that politicians fly to natural disaster sites, lying about aid. it’s not just  a war with Iraq based on lies. or the lie of medicare and tax cuts. seriously, there was a time when i could click off all the outrages. but i’m buried in them now. and i can’t seem to excavate them all.

but maybe you get my drift. it’s the entire fucking package. i keep thinking that, as each new lie enforces absurdity in the great collective reality, there will be a tipping point. when people will take to the streets. or demand a recall of Congress. will this story be absurd enough to get people in the streets?

Older Americans with investments are among the hardest hit by the turmoil in the financial markets and have the least opportunity to recover.

now that. that is absurd, no? why would one of the largest segments of the American population, its baby boomers, not have its wealth stabilized as the first priority of any kind of bail out? why? in what universe does that make sense? in what economy should that be allowed as reality?

perhaps it is absurd to even ask: BUT then who gets the fucking bailout money???????????????????  

what’s really absurd is to continue talking about any bail out that does not address main street’s losses.

this is absurd: Harry Reid talking business as usual. How does he have the nerve to talk like this?

“Democrats in the Senate aren’t going to drag our feet,” he said in a speech on the Senate floor. “We’ll respond with the urgency of action that this situation demands, but after eight years of fiscal dereliction of duty, it’s time for accountability.”



“Should we resolve the issue in one day?” he asked. “I think not.”

where the fuck where you, harry? during these eight years of fiscal dereliction of duty? for what and to whom are you (and the rest of the no accounts in Congress) accountable? democrats aren’t going to drag their feet… it’s almost funny.

reality. i don’t know exactly what that means anymore. but if one plans on discussing going forward, my suggestion is this: maybe it’s time to move away from reality and embrace absurdity. it just might be time to stop making sense like it’s 1950 or even August 2001. a whole other mindset is required. and it is one that needs to be able to navigate absurdity.

cause we have some wild questions to face. is this part of a staged coup? is this incompetence? was it allowed to happen to wipe out money for social safety nets? there are lots of ideas and theories. and the only way to begin to  stabilize this situation is to decide who should and should not be part of the solution-making process.

any solution has to be staged, with short-term goals. because nobody, and i don’t care who they are, nobody has the long-term answers here. nobody knows exactly what will happen.

as Magnifico points out in his An alternative to bailing out Wall Street, we need to think outside the bank. not-for-profit. ha. and while we’re there, lets revert all energy back to public utilities. and how about not-for-profit health care? believe me. for some, we might as well turn the world upside down. these ideas are so blatantly absurd, but i like them.

and that, ladies and gentlemen, as absurd as it will strike the 1% of the American economy, is something worth considering.  

9 comments

Skip to comment form

    • pfiore8 on September 23, 2008 at 11:47
      Author

    x posted at daily kos

    • Edger on September 23, 2008 at 14:32

    really well, doesn’t he? And with such a straight face, too. Has he started wandering the halls of the capital in his pajamas yet?

    Anyway, back to reality.

    Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world.

    –Archimedes

    And till now I’ve always had the absurd idea that Archimedes was a Greek name. But maybe there was a Chinaman in his families woodpile?

    It appears this morning that not only does Magnifico have an alternative to the bailout coup, but so does China. And they just may have Archimedes lever as the motivational tool to beat some sense, or at least some fear, into some of the absurdities the western media calls “leaders” in the comedy shows they call “news”.

    China paper urges new currency order after “financial tsunami”

    BEIJING (Reuters) – Threatened by a “financial tsunami,” the world must consider building a financial order no longer dependent on the United States, a leading Chinese state newspaper said on Wednesday.

    The commentary in the overseas edition of the People’s Daily said the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc (LEH.P: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) “may augur an even larger impending global ‘financial tsunami’.”

    The People’s Daily is the official newspaper of China’s ruling Communist Party, and the overseas edition is a smaller circulation offshoot of the main paper.

    Its pronouncements do not necessarily directly reflect leadership views, but this commentary by a professor at Shanghai’s Tongji University suggested considerable official alarm at the strains buckling world financial markets.

    China’s central bank earlier this week cut its lending rate for the first time in six years, a move analysts said was aimed at bolstering the economy and the battered stock market.

    “The eruption of the U.S. sub-prime crisis has exposed massive loopholes in the United States’ financial oversight and supervision,” writes the commentator, Shi Jianxun.

    “The world urgently needs to create a diversified currency and financial system and fair and just financial order that is not dependent on the United States.”

    But Vice Premier Wang Qishan, on a visit to the United States, told U.S. trade officials in a meeting on Tuesday that China and the United States needed to maintain close economic ties with global markets going through such turbulence.

    “The Chinese government is well aware of the fact that the United States, which is the world’s largest developed country, and China, which is the world’s largest developing country, should have constructive and cooperative economic and trade relations,” he said.

    China is a major buyer of U.S. Treasury bonds, and through its sovereign wealth fund it has taken stakes in two large U.S. financial institutions.

    Ooops, fuck. It’s never a good idea to piss off your biggest creditor, I think. Unless Hank Paulson has some other absurdly bright ideas on where he can sell seven hundred billion dollars worth of US Treasury securities.

    If I was Harry I’d have a headache, and probably be babbling silly things too…

Comments have been disabled.