Idiots Made Me Rich

( – promoted by buhdydharma )

Via RawStory yesterday, one hedge fund manager’s story about the roots and causes of the current financial crisis, and his long term prescription for what it will take fix to the economy:

Retiring hedge fund manager: Idiots made me rich

Sunday October 19, 2008

“May meritocracy be part of a new form of government, which needs to be established,” wrote a multimillionaire retiring in his 30s in an open letter to those “stupid enough” to make him rich, which condemns the practices that did so and the system whose injustices he struggled with to get to where he is. Furthermore, he’s leaving the business, content to “sit on the sidelines” and wait to see how the markets play out through the crisis, noting that “sitting and waiting” helped the subprime crash prove profitable.

“Today,” Lahde Capital Management’s Andrew Lahde wrote on Friday, “I write not to gloat. Given the pain that nearly everyone is experiencing, that would be entirely inappropriate. Nor am I writing to make further predictions, as most of my forecasts in previous letters have unfolded or are in the process of unfolding. Instead, I am writing to say goodbye.”

“I was in this game for the money,” he continued. “The low hanging fruit, i.e. idiots whose parents paid for prep school, Yale, and then the Harvard MBA, was there for the taking. These people who were (often) truly not worthy of the education they received (or supposedly received) rose to the top of companies such as AIG, Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers and all levels of our government.

“All of this behavior supporting the Aristocracy only ended up making it easier for me to find people stupid enough to take the other side of my trades. God bless America.”

Lahde has enough money of his own to manage, he said, and furthermore, he’d be forgotten in fifty years like those who seek ever greater wealth, but whose lives “suck.” “Appointments back to back, booked solid for the next three months, they look forward to their two week vacation in January during which they will likely be glued to their Blackberries or other such devices.”

“Give up on leaving your mark,” he added. “Throw the Blackberry away and enjoy life.”

Lahde also called on billionaire George Soros to start a new system of government. “Since Thomas Jefferson and Adam Smith passed, I would argue that there has been a dearth of worthy philosophers in this country,” he wrote, “at least ones focused on improving government. Capitalism worked for two hundred years, but times change, and systems become corrupt…My suggestion is that this great man start and sponsor a forum for great minds to come together to create a new system of government that truly represents the common man’s interest, while at the same time creating rewards great enough to attract the best and brightest minds to serve in government roles without having to rely on corruption to further their interests or lifestyles. This forum could be similar to the one used to create the operating system, Linux, which competes with Microsoft’s near monopoly. I believe there is an answer, but for now the system is clearly broken.”

Lahde closed by advocating hemp as an energy source. “The original American flag was made of hemp fiber and our Constitution was printed on paper made of hemp,” he said. “It was used as recently as World War II by the U.S. Government, and then promptly made illegal after the war was won…At a time when rhetoric is flying about becoming more self-sufficient in terms of energy, why is it illegal to grow this plant in this country?

“Ah, the female. The evil female plant – marijuana. It gets you high, it makes you laugh, it does not produce a hangover. Unlike alcohol, it does not result in bar fights or wife beating. So, why is this innocuous plant illegal? Is it a gateway drug? No, that would be alcohol, which is so heavily advertised in this country. My only conclusion as to why it is illegal, is that Corporate America, which owns Congress, would rather sell you Paxil, Zoloft, Xanax and other addictive drugs, than allow you to grow a plant in your home without some of the profits going into their coffers. This policy is ludicrous. It has surely contributed to our dependency on foreign energy sources.”

“I now have time to repair my health,” he added, “which was destroyed by the stress I layered onto myself over the past two years, as well as my entire life – where I had to compete for spaces in universities and graduate schools, jobs and assets under management – with those who had all the advantages (rich parents) that I did not.”

The entire letter is available to read at the Financial Times.

50 comments

Skip to comment form

    • Edger on October 20, 2008 at 17:41
      Author
    • OPOL on October 20, 2008 at 18:05

    Where are they now?  ðŸ™‚

  1. “All of this behavior supporting the Aristocracy only ended up making it easier for me to find people stupid enough to take the other side of my trades. God bless America.”

    heh.

  2. of government, and a new system of monetary policy.

    _Tax the rich_

    Shortly after I woke up, the NPR news was on, with Cindy McCain demonizing Obama’s “spread the wealth around” comment.

    Well, of course the 1%er Cindy wouldn’t like that idea.  But Paul Krugman has, on his blog, repeatedly run bar graphs showing how much better the U.S. economy has performed under Democrats (who actually tax the rich and thereby share the wealth) than under the GOP.  Even when you exclude Herbert Hoover, the stock market has outperformed under Dems than under the GOP.  Some links (naturally I can’t find all the ones I was looking for, but here’s a taste of it):

    On job creation:

    http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c

    From 2003:

    Although financial reporters have started to realize that Mr. Bush is out of control — he has ”lost his marbles,” says CBS Market Watch — the sheer banana-republic irresponsibility of his plans hasn’t been widely appreciated.

    http://query.nytimes.com/gst/f

    Also from 2003, and this is prescient:

    It’s no secret that right-wing ideologues want to abolish programs Americans take for granted. But not long ago, to suggest that the Bush administration’s policies might actually be driven by those ideologues — that the administration was deliberately setting the country up for a fiscal crisis in which popular social programs could be sharply cut — was to be accused of spouting conspiracy theories.

    Yet by pushing through another huge tax cut in the face of record deficits, the administration clearly demonstrates either that it is completely feckless, or that it actually wants a fiscal crisis. (Or maybe both.)

    http://query.nytimes.com/gst/f

    He was on a roll in 2003:

    Third world countries typically suffer from institutional weaknesses. They have poor corporate governance: you can’t trust business accounting, and insiders often enrich themselves at stockholders’ expense. Meanwhile, cronyism is rampant, with close personal and financial links between powerful politicians and the very companies that benefit from public largesse. Luckily, in America we don’t have any of these weaknesses. Oh, wait. . . . (Isn’t that all history? No. According to The Wall Street Journal, we are again hearing warnings that ”optimism is based on massaged earnings.”)

    http://query.nytimes.com/gst/f

  3. . . . we need George Soros to invent a better socio-economic system than capitalism.  We already have one–or, I should say, one has already been invented.  It’s called democratic socialism.  Those who make more than they need are taxed to support those who make less than they need.

  4. …around the corner on the eve of the Reagun Revulsion (sic) (in addition to the Harvard business school study of “Rat-Like-Cunning”) occured with the 1980ish publication of two books by Robert J. Ringer.  

    Ringer was an investor, an analyst, and an author of books and a newsletter of tips on how to make money on the market.   He published two books on the cusp of the Reagan Adminstration which indicated the direction of the ship of state.

    The books  LOOKING OUT FOR NUMBER ONE    and

               WINNING THROUGH INTIMIDATION.

    The latter title matches the Webster definition of a terrorist, someone who wins through intimidation.

  5. The only reason why folks are reading Lahde rather than me or one of you is that he has more money than me and you.  A lot more.  Do you think my observations on the good life could appear in Raw Story, let alone the Financial Times? Or even generate an essay on docuDharma? I guess not, not if I didn’t write it.

    One elite fades (or begins to) so we pick another to take its place.  And in place of the old aristocracy, we pick somebody who has lots of money and who sounds bitter to me, like he figured out just now that money can’t buy you love.

    Oh, and I’m for legalizing weed and help, too.  Thanks for asking.

    • Edger on October 21, 2008 at 01:10
      Author
    • robodd on October 21, 2008 at 02:30

    “Blackberry?  I prefer Blueberries.”

  6. la nuit en attendent mes nouveles.  ðŸ˜‰

    D’abord, ici sont deux messages que j’ai te laissez depuis un peu de temp maintenant:

    des mots qui sont pas lire

    Maintenant, les choses que je penses va peut-etre t’interesse.  Il y a un revue qui s’appelle “National Wildlife” et il y a toujours des photos par tout le monde qu’il gagner par les meilleurs des photos et aussi par le titre de le photo.  Je penses bien que tu devrais faire s’inscrire plusieurs des tes photos a cette revue.  Je penses que tu pouvoir gagner facilement avec tes photos si extraordinaire!!!!  Ici, c’est le site:  National Wildlife  Que penses tu?

Comments have been disabled.