Getting it

In the midst of the swirling changes occurring in the larger world, there is a little (pleasant) tornado of change moving through mine. A change that for some reason, seems to preclude sleep! Which is by way of saying that I am not the sharpest artichoke in the tool box right now. (Hmm artichoke in a tool box? See what I mean???) So as I shuffled through my mental e-mail from my muse on what to write today…it all seemed like spam, now….I want a bigger penis as much as the next guy or gal, but that doesn’t seem like a meaty enough topic to write about for a prestidigitous blog like Docudharma.

So I was relieved when, as I was doing my morning surf meditation I can across not only a topic that was worthy of my spiny yet delicious with a nice mayo and lemon pepper sauce green attention, but worthy of all of ours, worthy of the whole worlds. Plus(!) it is already practically written because there is not much more to add, either to the original quote, or to the analysis of it provided by SusanG over at the Great Orange Sasquatch Satan. (Damn I need a nap!)

So with out any adieu….but with massive hat tips and gratitude to SusanG and apologies for my own laziness…

 

Shoshana Zuboff, author of The Support Economy and former Charles Edward Wilson Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School, writing in Businessweek:

This column is dedicated to the top managers of American business whose policies and practices helped ensure Barack Obama’s victory. The mandate for change that sounded across this country is not limited to our new President and Congress. That bell also tolls for you. Obama’s triumph was ignited in part by your failure to understand and respect your own consumers, customers, employees, and end users. The despair that fueled America’s yearning for change and hope grew to maturity in your garden.

   Millions of Americans heard President-elect Obama painfully recall his sense of frustration, powerlessness, and outrage when his mother’s health insurer refused to cover her cancer treatments. Worse still, every one of them knew exactly how he felt. That long-simmering indignation is by now the defining experience of every consumer of health care, mortgages, insurance, travel, and financial services-the list goes on.

   Obama was elected not only because many Americans feel betrayed and abandoned by their government but because those feelings finally converged with their sense of betrayal at the hands of Corporate America. Their experiences as consumers and as citizens joined to create a wave of revolt against the status quo-as occurred in the American Revolution. Be wary of those who counsel business as usual. This post-election period is a turning point for the business community. It demands an attitude of sober reappraisal and a disposition toward fundamental reinvention. If you don’t do it, someone else will.

That, my friends….is getting it. Let us hope that she is not alone, and let us hope that others speak out as forcefully and honestly!

SusanG’s analysis is as usual, spot on:

And that’s only the opening. As she proceeds through the in-depth indictment, she explores decades of consumer and worker despair, ruthless bottom-line management, the erosion of citizen trust in big business, and, finally, citizens discovering the ability to educate and inform themselves in a new digital age. Even entrepreneurs in the new, cutting-edge technology sectors are not spared, as the Facebook and Google CEO’s are held up as warning signs of slippage, still focusing on monetizing “eyeballs” and devising “two classes of stock intended to insulate top management from investor pressures.”

Solutions to the economic crisis, it’s clear, are going to have to be long-term and systemic. It remains to be seen whether Zuboff’s advice to Wall Street corporations to take responsibility for the financial crisis will be followed in the wake of a change election … or whether that change is read by the CEO’s to apply to government only.

As I keep saying, and as I hope those folks who don’t think Obama is the messiah realize I am saying, lest I be accused of a patently false idol worship and sycophancy….Obama’s election was a symbol. Obama is a symbol. A symbol and a marker of change that is moving through the world. The change we are experiencing and the tidal wave of change to come in the next four years is not because of Obama………Obama is because of it.

It is INCREDIBLY heartening to see people getting it.

88 comments

Skip to comment form

    • robodd on November 15, 2008 at 20:13

    Where’s the tip jar Buhdyastic?

    • Edger on November 15, 2008 at 20:29

    rules the world. Now.

  1. I read SusanG’s diary and the linked article this morning. The author makes the point that after WWII corporations were seen as being a positive contributor to society and the community of America. Then greed got in the way and the focus became primarily, if not exclusively, monetary, and the relationship of corporation and community was lost. Now we have reached that point in time (which also has some very interesting astrological correlations) where the nature of capitalism itself will need to change, for it has reached it’s zenith as a philosophy focused exclusively on capital (money) without regard to the impact of actual actions and consequences in the world.

    You are also correct in pointing out that Obama is not the messiah, but merely one of many indicators or signs of change that are taking place at this time. The potential role he could play in the historical drama is large, but it will only work if he continues to include the citizens, and the internet at this time in history is the primary technology of inclusion.

    Obama, and his staff, must guard against thinking small or attempting to preserve capitalistic formats (big 3 car makers) that can no longer serve in the future that is now dawning. Their challenge is to chart a course into a future that has yet to be imagined, but will grow from the circumstances (peak oil, financial disorder, climate change- you know the litany) that form the current landscape of our political/social discourse.

    YOU get it too. And please, next time just delete the spam. 😉

  2. …beep…beep…

    When I read the original SusanG peice I could not help but wonder to what degree the whole consume-spend-debt model of society was, in fact, in question.  Whether — being the empire which has put this model forward — we are also on the leading edge of it’s demise.  Not that this demise is all that different from other empires — but that it might extend to the most basic aspects of our economic behavior.  Wondered this more strongly reading US Blues’ comment, above…

    …if you look at any self respecting european nation, they seem to have put some things in place that define “a country”.  An auto industry (My Opel is better than your Peugot, asshole!), banks, a health system.  To some degree, we have (for all our whining) the basic set of things here.  Emergent industrializing nations found the same institutions, get them rolling…

    But what if the basic model of growth-as-good is finally running up against the edges of the possible, and we’re the canary?  I don’t think that falls out as the revolution or “your last car” as some put forward on here and elsewhere.  I don’t think that necessarily means that the same expansive spirit applies to the green revolution, when in fact the underpinnings of said revolution are still oil based.  It does mean..huge changes, at the level of what being a person in the world amounts to.  

    Anyway…  

    • kj on November 15, 2008 at 21:48

    i only read at the other place when someone here posts an essay.

    the fascination with that site never ceases to amaze me.  i have long thought (and by ‘long-thought’ i mean since 2003) the place was significant only for an example of the lowest common denominator of thought and rant.  

    sue me (or wrong or hide rate me) for finally breaking silence and doing my bit to bash.

    why do so many of the dd admins bring that place here?  inquiring mind wants to know.

  3. …there is no empirical evidence supporting this theory.  None.  This entire quote strikes me as nothing more than a person choosing to fit events into their own particular worldview.

    You are correct: Obama’s election was a symbol.  But the applicability of that to the points quoted by Susan end there.  If nothing else, it should be obvious that like all symbols, Obama means very different things to different people.  The rest is noise.

    • kj on November 16, 2008 at 19:34

    Buhdy?  nevermind my ramblings.  it’s a great waterhole.  thanks.

    good luck with the move.  ðŸ™‚

Comments have been disabled.