Gideon Rachman-Illuminati “Rapporteur”

Even Bush said if you repeat the propaganda enough people will believe, or didn’t somebody say that earlier in history, like maybe Herman Goebbels?

Gideon Rachman writes for the Financial Times,  One of Europe’s leading bastions of business bastardization.  It brings up a call for an “anti-democratic” world government, to “save” the world no less.  Please allow me to deconstruct.

Original article.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7a03…

I’ just going to do the cut and paste from this location.

http://www.informationclearing…

I have never believed that there is a secret United Nations plot to take over the US. I have never seen black helicopters hovering in the sky above Montana. But, for the first time in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world government is plausible.

Beautiful, he starts out by dissing,putting down, ie calling people paranoid delusionals based upon their beliefs and then comes across as a “normal” human trying to sell you something, world government.  They he goes on about the “sucess” of the European Union which is becoming less popular and less practical as Eastern European further diversify the mix.

Next up the big three.

First, it is increasingly clear that the most difficult issues facing national governments are international in nature: there is global warming, a global financial crisis and a “global war on terror”.

All three “problems” by the way have been intentionally created by those very same “Illuminati”, Globo-Corp supra-national COMMERCIAL interests.

Global warming.  Now in 1993 China and India who didn’t burn much fuel at the time were named “carbon emission” exempt.

Ah, wait a second, Big Al Gore only stumbled upon this “problem” very recently did he not?  Fine, believe what you want but be aware that your dog food, children’s toys and contaminated infant formula might not be reported to you in the future as that might “upset the profit margins” and affect “free” trade.

Global war on terror.  Do you really still believe in something as anal as that?  I should take a poll.  Actually I did.  I Googled Britney Spears and found definitively millions of “Af-merica-stanis are indeed wrong.

Financial crisis.  Again “they” did make it happen, knew exactly what day I should get laid off months ahead of time and continue to accellerate the process.

Second, it could be done. The transport and communications revolutions have shrunk the world so that, as Geoffrey Blainey, an eminent Australian historian, has written: “For the first time in human history, world government of some sort is now possible.” Mr Blainey foresees an attempt to form a world government at some point in the next two centuries, which is an unusually long time horizon for the average newspaper column.

Oh, the lite sell, it could be done.  Fuck you.

These are the kind of ideas that get people reaching for their rifles in America’s talk-radio heartland. Aware of the political sensitivity of its ideas, the MGI report opts for soothing language. It emphasises the need for American leadership and uses the term, “responsible sovereignty” – when calling for international co-operation – rather than the more radical-sounding phrase favoured in Europe, “shared sovereignty”. It also talks about “global governance” rather than world government.

Already well aware of the censorship of the internet and propaganda media that is everything in the English language.  I hear gun sales are up.

“Your” government didn’t impeach.

“Your” government tramples on human rights even domestically.

And you think a global entity might be better?

http://www.nwotruth.com/

http://www.projectcensored.org/

http://www.oldthinkernews.com/

Somewhere I had the links for two youtube videos of word for word speeches delivered in Canada and Austrailia about the global war of terror.  How is it the two “seperate” world leaders would come to the same conclusions and speak about it using the exact same words.  Were these speeches written by higher powers.