Western media, along with thousands of Iranians protesting around the world, have formed a rough consensus over the six days since Iran’s Presidential Election that Ahmadinejad’s victory was the result of widespread fraud.
However, a recent Op-Ed in the Washington Post references a rare public opinion poll in suggesting that the election may indeed have been fair.
While there is not enough information to determine whether or not the election was rigged, this poll certainly doesn’t rule out the possibility. If only because the poll’s authors concluded prior to the election that the very same data predicted a relatively close vote.
Yet today, those same authors are claiming that their figures demonstrate the validity of Ahmadinejad’s landslide victory.
Real News Network – June 18, 2009
Does U.S. poll rule out fraud in Iran?
Authors of heavily-quoted poll changed their conclusion to support validity of Ahmadinejad landslide
Jun 18 2009
5 comments
Skip to comment form
Author
doesn’t expect readers to actually READ their paper…
like this twitter report:
(The link at this point goes to facebook login)
Although this is just one unverified report, it does raise a question about how it would be possible to count ballots that may have been destroyed. In an election that was not monitored by trained independent international election monitors, there is no way to objectively determine whether all eligible voters got the opportunity to vote, whether all the marked ballots were secured, or whether all the secured ballots were counted and recorded accurately.
At this point, even a recount is not a real do-over of the election. There is no way to prove beyond a doubt that ballots weren’t destroyed in the interim. Only a new election, will all the abovementioned guidelines would answer the question of who really won the election. As we here in America learned in 2000 and even 2004-yet we still haven’t taken all the measures to ensure that everyone’s vote will be counted, even with the last 8 nightmare years to remind us of the costs of election tampering.
Walter R. Mebane Jr. who “is professor of political science and professor of statistics at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, ” says “something’s fishy” Background on Mebane:
about the results:
But, when all is said and done, as I said in the comment upthread, there’s no way to prove any of this. Because the ballots were not secured from the moment the voting began, even a total recount wouldn’t prove that all the ballots that were cast were being counted.
Why don’t we ask these folks?
https://www.docudharma.com/show…