It seems a lot of folks think that change comes only via the Presidency.
And clearly that is not the case.
Since 2006, the Democrats have had the house, and the Senate, so in theory they controlled two out of three branches of government totally. They could have done anything.
They then claimed that they needed the Presidency too for real change, people believed them, and they were given that. Then they set another false goal up–they had to have 60 votes in the Senate, along with all the other branches of government to do any of the things they promise.
Their lies should be apparent to anyone and everyone now–hell they should have been apparent in 2006.
How to infuence them?
The Presidency:
major demonstrations, strikes, marches and the like (see Iran) could actually make slight moves there with the current administration. Maybe. But if people do nothing–as they have done the last 10 years and more–then expect nothing back. Remember as weak as it really was, we only got the New Deal because there was a real Socialist and Unionist movement then–and it scared the hell out of elite.
Overall, we need to reduce the power of the Presidency back to –or preferably far below the original intent; not hope for some ‘white hat’ to save us. There will never be one.
The Senate:
appears almost intransigent.
It’s ALL off the table.
These guys think they’re in for life. Essentially, they’re a waste of skin. Six years is too damn long in the first place, and 12 or 18 years is just outrageous. Need to close the whole place down. Get one guy and let him filibuster everything. Sanders?
(or we could all move to Utah or Alaska)
The Supreme Court:
(which today decided that there is no right to use DNA evidence to prove innocence)
Not going left. Not for decades. In fact with Sotomayer, I expect a slight rightward tilt.
The House:
is a long way from being progressive, but offers more hope than any of the other branches, and is the only branch where third parties could have a major influence. The targeting of Democrats by truly left parties in progressive areas could make major gains here and hurt the Democrats a lot –although Ralph Nader (Mr. ‘I’m running as a Green, but I’m not a green’) and others have set the third party movement back decades with their antics. If we could get some Greens, or better yet Socialists in there–they could force the Democrats left, if they want to keep their leadership positions. It’s a tough thing for third parties–they only get media attention if they go for the Presidency, but they only get a real shot of doing anything worth while if they go for The House in targeted areas instead.