Liberte, Egalite, and the Unity of Humanity, Back to the Beginning

In an effort to discuss the intersection of morality, spirituality and politics I am going to reprint a few essays and when I can write a few new ones. Here is a (slightly edited) reprint as a jumping off point.

(Please don’t cut off my head for changing from “fraternite/brotherhood” to the Unity of Humanity! )

When it comes right down to it those are the principles or the ideology of “The Left.” Freedom for all, Equality for all, and a spirit of “brotherhood”…or, cooperation.

It cannot be said much better, and in a way, anything else is commentary, lol.

So let’s get to the commentary! As some have said, perhaps the term ‘The Left” should not enter the discussion at all, and I agree in principle. But we are stuck with the fact that there are a large group of people who believe that these principles should be the blueprint for the human race and a large group of people who don’t. We could just as easily call them Humanists and Corporatists but those don’t really cover it either…mainly because each is a somewhat archaic term with it’s own baggage.

So perhaps one of the things we need to do for the purposes of the discussion we are having herehere…and here is to define our terms. But everyone knows how boring that is, lol.

For me the message in my sig line has always served as shorthand for the state of the world…”Reality is the result of war between two rival groups of programmers.” These two forces that shape the world we live in have had many, many names in the history of the world. But there have always been basically two opposing forces.

What are they? How old are they? How basic, or intrinsic are they, to the Human condition? Here is my answer….

Photobucket

And now I get to use my favorite cheesy movie quote, from Big Trouble In Little China: “Even David Lo Pan cannot deny that all movement in the universe is produced from tension between the negative and positive furies!”

Translation! There are two forces in our world, one fighting for a world of freedom, equality and unity, the other for a world of domination by the strong and subservience by the weak.

Throughout history these two forces have worn different masks, been represented by different factions, been manifest as different movements…Left and Right are just their current names, also coined during the French Revolution and based on the earth shattering principle of…..no wait, they were based on which side of the room people sat on.

So yes, Left and Right are irrelevant. And if we can come up with better…more accurate and descriptive name for them we should. Perhaps that is in fact a key of moving the basic struggle of mankind forward. After all, one of the things we certainly need to do to move this struggle forward is to educate the seemingly vast majority of people who do not see the struggle for what it is…or perhaps do not see the struggle at all.

As with everything in modern politics, framing is everything….since the average attention span of the American voter now finds thirty second commercials to be an intolerable ordeal. Marketing is everything, and I don’t find it too incongruous that our modern world has reduced the grand scope of this primal conflict into a battle of sound bite messaging, squeezed between commercials for butter substitutes.

One does not go to war with the army (citizen, voter, consumer) one wants, etc.

So this is our generations battleground….marketing and framing.

And our task, in my estimation, is to market a world, or the idea of a world, where the principles outlined in the phrase Liberty, Equality and Unity have come to fruition.

To present that vision, and to educate and persuade along the way to obtaining that vision.

To paint a picture of that world as an alternative to our current world and to paint it well enough that not only will people want it….but that people will start asking (again?) why we don’t have it.

RFK wrote the companion piece to that phrase:

“There are those who look at things the way they are, and ask why… I dream of things that never were, and ask why not?”

Those “things that never were” are in effect a world where Freedom, Equality, and Unity rule the day…instead of greed, submission and death.

In order to market that dream, that world….and thus turn it into reality….we need to do the best we can at defining it. Defining it, describing it, painting it’s picture…and then embedding that picture in the mind and hopes and dreams…of a critical mass of The People.

Perhaps…only then can it be created.

We are at a pivot point in history. The old way, war, colonial dominance, the rape of the earths resources simply does not work any longer.

The world has lived through Bush and the Banksters and the corruption of government by the opposing forces has never been more apparent.

But The People are succeeding (somewhat, in a kind of a limited way for an off night) at influencing our government. The government, the establishment and the Ruling Class will do everything in their considerable power to maintain a status quo, a status quo that fights as hard as it can against the very concept of Liberte, Egalite, and the Unity of Humanity.

At the same time, powered by more information, leading to more disgust, leading to desperation, leading to an increasing willingness to make themselves impolitely heard, The People of the world ARE starting to fight back.

From this growing tension….There WILL be a new way that emerges.

The pendulum between light and dark IS in the process of swinging…but swinging to …what?

To where?

If we can help to define, to illuminate, to paint a picture of that where, that COULD be a basis for the new Way.

A basis that would spawn a new ethos, perhaps a new political party, perhaps eventually a new shared morality ….and perhaps eventually a new world.

The People want to change, the Planet wants to change….but what does it want to change into? And how will that change take place?

“It” needs a vision, or at least a set of principles, to guide that change.

If we build it, will they come?

If we can do a good enough job defining, describing and marketing these basic principles into a new morality based on common human principles, weaving all of the worlds traditions of spirituality into a new morality…..

…and thus changing the moral center of humans…

…and thus deeply affecting the arena and laboratory of politics…

Which IS where the weaknesses of Human Nature confronts the ideals of Human Nature…

Would that not be the change in the human race we are looking for?

Indeed is that not the only way to achieve the deep systemic change needed to literally save Humanity?

43 comments

Skip to comment form

  1. Photobucket

    • RiaD on October 27, 2009 at 19:16

    • Edger on October 27, 2009 at 19:27

    the terminology from left/right to rational/scared?

    Would that be a more realistic view of the world?

  2. God.

    Photobucket

    Let’s get on with it.

    • Inky99 on October 27, 2009 at 19:45

    I’ve always found that the basis for the traditional L vs. R is people versus property.

    We value people over property, the right wing values property over people.

    In America, property rights have won out over people rights for, oh I don’t know, generations.   That’s why we have corporate personhood and stupid shit like that.

    The greatest fear that the right wing instills regarding the left is that the left is gonna “take away” things.   Take away your guns, take away your property, take away your freedoms, take away your bibles, take away your gas guzzlers, etc.

    “You kids, get off my lawn!”

    The Left can be guilty of this.   Communism was an extreme example of how the left could go overboard, where they literally did appropriate all private property into the public realm, only to co-opt it for the party elites.  

    The existence and failure of these examples of Communism only provided a great deal of fodder for the right wing, something they could use as an example of what the left “really wants to do”.    They still do it with the whole “socialism” thing, now that communism is in the dustbin.

    What this country has been about, for a very long time, is finding a balance between these two things, which is I believe why a two-party system has existed for so long here.   Because there really was a dynamic of two opposing ideals at work.

    Now things have changed, to the point where corruption has taken over both parties, and the corporatists have done an end-run around the whole system, and they’ve taken over the media, which used to be part of The Commons, and they’ve taken over the Democratic Party as well by means of election finance, but also because there are just a lot of lying, scheming, asshole politicians out there on the Dem side.  

    Having them bump off JFK and RFK and MLK gave them just a TEENY bit of clout, as well.   The truth is that monsters have taken over the system.   It’s not just a game anymore between the right and the left.  

    The only way to fight a monster is through sheer numbers.   That is why a populist movement is the only way to deal with it.   Millions of people, more than they could ever fight, blackmail, and eliminate, must simply do what they have to do and build what THEY want, instead of choosing from what the Monster offers us as false “choices”.

    This is why we just have to ignore their choices and create our own.   Their choices for US are bogus, like Obama and McCain.   Hand-picked and trained by THEM.   Trojan horses.

    In a very real sense, we have to re-create the American political system from the bottom up.   The beast must be starved, it’s the only way to get rid of him, for we certainly can’t fight him on his own terms.  

    I’ve said it before and I’ve said it again, I think the “platform”, which is what you seem to be looking for here, is “Common sense for the common good”.

    How can anyone be against that?    Everything our government does now defies common sense and it is most certainly NOT for the common good but for the good of the elites, whether they be Dem or Repub, doesn’t matter, the Elites are the ones with the money and the power.    Corporations have completely taken over this country, like that Kudzu vines.  

    Once we agree on the Common Sense for the Common Good, we can talk in our traditional ways of how big it should be, should it come from the State or the Federal government, who should benefit from it, who should pay for it, and all that kind of stuff.  

    But it’s pretty simple, for instance, if you deal with something that has been (shockingly) transformed into a “left” vs “right” argument, such as the environment:   We need water.  We need clean water.    That is just a fact of life.   So let’s take action to make sure that we have adequate supplies of clean water in our lives.    Pure common sense and just “Duh!” type of a survival issue, but the right wing has SOMEHOW managed to turn this into a “left wing” “treehugger” issue, something they can actually oppose!   And they’ve successfully opposed!    “liberal environmentalists”.    I mean, just the term itself, “environmentalist” is so fucking STUPID.   We’re all environmentalists, we HAVE to be.   If our “environment” is poison, we don’t live.   If somebody is burning tires in our front yard, dumping shit into our bathtubs, and wiping their asses with our hamburgers, that’s our ENVIRONMENT that is poisoned.  

    We are all environmentalists whether we know it or not!

    We’ve got a long ways to go.    

    • TMC on October 27, 2009 at 19:53

    En tant que citoyen de France, je ne suis pas offensé.

    • robodd on October 27, 2009 at 20:12

    political belief is based in one’s belief about what constitutes fundamental human nature?

  3. all you need do is steer key events and decisions towards an “acceptable” conclusion.  Problem,reaction,solution.  If you own the media its all that much easier to create an illusionary Matrix world.

    Global slavery does not strike me as a positive uplifting world so I’m banking on the vaccine lethality.  911 proved people are gullible five year olds thus giving way to yet another false flag marketing meme the evil carbon footprints.  Living in fantasy is always unsustainable.

  4. life affirming….life disaffirming…….

    however it seems this continuum is coorelated with this dichotomy……..

    a self centered in life……….a life centered in self………

    but most telling is that the folks who are those others have conceptions of life and self whic are from the 11th to 12th century………

    and that is the greatest problem………

    more and more peoples conception of the world is becoming more and more simplistic………

    as the world fills up LIFE becomes life………

Comments have been disabled.