Well this is rather interesting. Hat-tip to Cryptogon.
From Pilots for 9/11 truth dot org:
9/11: PENTAGON AIRCRAFT HIJACK IMPOSSIBLE —
FLIGHT DECK DOOR CLOSED FOR ENTIRE FLIGHT]
(PilotsFor911Truth.org) – Newly decoded data provided by an independent researcher and computer programmer from Australia exposes alarming evidence that the reported hijacking aboard American Airlines Flight 77 was impossible to have existed. A data parameter labeled “FLT DECK DOOR”, cross checks with previously decoded data obtained by Pilots For 9/11 Truth from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) through the Freedom Of Information Act.On the morning of September 11, 2001, American Airlines Flight 77 departed Dulles International Airport bound for Los Angeles at 8:20 am Eastern Time. According to reports and data, a hijacking took place between 08:50:54 and 08:54:11[1] in which the hijackers allegedly crashed the aircraft into the Pentagon at 09:37:45. Reported by CNN, according to Ted Olson, wife Barbara Olson had called him from the reported flight stating, “…all passengers and flight personnel, including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed hijackers…”[2]. However, according to Flight Data provided by the NTSB, the Flight Deck Door was never opened in flight. How were the hijackers able to gain access to the cockpit, remove the pilots, and navigate the aircraft to the Pentagon if the Flight Deck Door remained closed?[3]
Founded in August 2006, Pilots For 9/11 Truth is a growing organization of aviation professionals from around the globe. The organization has analyzed Data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) for the Pentagon Attack, the events in Shanksville, PA and the World Trade Center attack. The data does not support the government story. The NTSB/FBI refuse to comment. Pilots For 9/11 Truth do not offer theory or point blame at this point in time. However, there is a growing mountain of conflicting information and data in which government agencies and officials along with Mainstream Media refuse to acknowledge. Pilots For 9/11 Truth Core member list continues to grow.
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/c… for full member list.
Enjoy. Please pass along to others. If you doubt the credibility of this site, please check out that bottom link for the member list. It’s pretty impressive.
Pilots know the “official story” of 9/11 is a lie.
101 comments
Skip to comment form
Author
Whoa …..!
link
As a private pilot,Piper Cherokee with about 110 hours time in type. Let’s say the hijackers had similar flying lessons let me say this.
Given the controls of something as advanced as a 757 at really high cruising altitude (compared to the Piper) flying east and hitting the Atlantic Ocean would be an accomplishment. It is not just grabbing the wheel and going up, down,left or right. It is where are you, how high are you, what rate of decent must you set up to reach the destination. Hours upon hours of ground schooling, the systems of the airplane and particularly navigation. Yes the plane has all kinds of NAV systems requiring tons of study. Do I recall the flight instructors saying these guys should not be driving cars?
There is also the other one about the flight paths, the downed poles, the confiscated and never shown video security tapes taken from the Pentagon area 20 minutes after. Just another of the many holes in the official fairy tale.
Very big.
to the Pilots for 911 Truth thread linked to the blockquote in your essay:
Reminds me of another Big Lie told 30 years ago by the government. Not one but two supposedly ‘independent’ expert investigations found conclusively that all 69 of the 69 control rods in TMI-2’s reactor core had fallen into place during the 1979 accident to halt the fission reaction, thus enabling the Big Lie that the meltdown was caused by residual heat and operator error.
A few years later the public was informed that 8 of the 69 control rods had not fallen to halt the fission reaction. We produced an easy guide to document the original lie about 69 rods and contrast that to the new story about 61 rods. Gave it a simple title too – “69 – 8 = 61”.
Yet the Big Lie is still going strong despite 30 years and quite a few small-t truths having managed to become public in that time. Hardly anyone these days cares to examine things at that level of detail, and likely wouldn’t understand what it means even if they did acknowledge the official story directly contradicts the truth. If you don’t know what it means that the reactor was still fissioning, then the Big Lie will still serve its intended purpose.
The truth about 9-11 is much the same. People who know what they’re looking at per the information that flight 77’s flight deck door was never opened will be horrified and know for sure that the Big Lie must fall any day now. Those who don’t know won’t care, so the Big Lie will live on.
They don’t care what YOU believe, or even what you know. They care about what the automatons can be convinced to believe, and that’s easy. Their lies don’t have to be good – air tight or even water tight. They just have to serve the purpose for which they were designed.
“Whoa” is right.
Has this been posted in Orange yet, or is this bananable?
This was an attachment forwarded from Anthony Lawson to Dick Eastman which was subsequently forwarded to the Veterans for 9/11 Truth list. It makes for interesting reading.
top of the fuselage till they reached the cockpit windows. They could have gained admission by busting out a window, swinging inside like Tarzan, and quickly knocking out the astonished pilots. You know, kinda like Robert Redford did when he stopped the Union Pacific Flyer in Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid.
I think that makes about as much sense as a large Boeing 757 jet transport being hijacked and flown expertly by knife-wielding troglodyte pilot Hani Hanjour. According to Hanjour’s flight instructor, he could barely fly a 4-seat Cessna 172.
The Boeing 757 is a “Normal Category” aircraft. A Normal Category aircraft is not intended or designed to be used for acrobatic maneuvers of any sort. A further safety factor of 50% over these published G limits is designed into the airframe of aircraft in all three categories. The table below confirms the accuracy of the statement in the paragraph above.