( – promoted by buhdydharma )
Sometimes, people read…
As president, I would pursue a new strategy, and begin by providing at least two additional combat brigades to support our effort in Afghanistan.
What they want to read…
As president, I would pursue a new strategy, and begin by providing at least two additional combat brigades to support our effort in Afghanistan.
Rather than what was intended.
As president, I would pursue a new strategy, and begin by providing at least two additional combat brigades to support our effort in Afghanistan.
Sometimes, people read…
Taken together, these additional American and international troops will allow us to accelerate handing over responsibility to Afghan forces, and allow us to begin the transfer of our forces out of Afghanistan in July of 2011. Just as we have done in Iraq, we will execute this transition responsibly, taking into account conditions on the ground.
What they want to read…
Taken together, these additional American and international troops will allow us to accelerate handing over responsibility to Afghan forces, and allow us to begin the transfer of our forces out of Afghanistan in July of 2011. Just as we have done in Iraq, we will execute this transition responsibly, taking into account conditions on the ground.
Rather than what was intended.
Taken together, these additional American and international troops will allow us to accelerate handing over responsibility to Afghan forces, and allow us to begin the transfer of our forces out of Afghanistan in July of 2011. Just as we have done in Iraq, we will execute this transition responsibly, taking into account conditions on the ground.
Read.
But under Republican questioning, Mr. Gates acknowledged that the surge troops could remain in Afghanistan longer if the American military and its NATO and Afghan allies failed to reverse the Taliban’s recent gains.
“It is our plan to begin this transition process in July of 2011,” Mr. Gates told the Senate Armed Services Committee. “But if circumstances dictate in December, I think the president always has the freedom to adjust his decisions.”
Sometimes, people read.
88 comments
Skip to comment form
it takes time and openmindedness.
Thank you Turkana, for stopping in here and for the heavy ligfting you’ve been doing lately over there.
Man, Ive got whiplash.
and sometime people read, and aren’t nearly as dumb as politicians are dumb enough to believe people are.
In Afghanistan, the Pentagon Digs in
I don’t ever watch Presidential addresses any more because I can write them. Once you see one Lyndon Johnson making a bullshit speech (which, God bless him, he knew was bullshit) you’ve seen them all.
I remember when the U.S. “lost” Vietnam — there was no comment from the media about lessons learned or anything. It was really, really weird (or was I just stoned then?). It was just quiet as I recall.
I remember thinking “we’re just going to do this thing all over again”. It took time with the media hand-wringing over getting rid of the “Vietnam syndrome” (which meant the U.S. was reluctant to invade countries at the whim of the media pundits) and finally after small incursions here and there we started on our new military ventures such that we now have a state of permanent war. Somebody was reading Orwell.
face of the Democratic Party over at dKos.
Scary stuff.
Looks like the big tent just up and hopped about 10 million people to the right.
They’ve got all the ‘undecideds’ now. An influx of braindead mainstream corporate media addicts who only know what the boob tells them to know.
I can’t believe it’s the same site.
There will be a powerful centrist party – Corporate Dems+Corporate Republicans and Corporate Media all pursuing the Corporate Agenda.
I think we’re doomed.
I’m going to say it… I think this might be worse for our long term future than President McCain.
I can’t believe I just said that…
Turk, you’re on fire!
Many here have asked if you would post your diaries here because they either can’t comment at DK because they are banned, because they would rather not give the site traffic or they would like to comment without be harassed by the likes of your mascot and his friends.
Great job today, not just this diary but your responses to Seneca Doane’s attempt to get you involved in a 9/11 CT discussion. I think that diary was a very thinly veiled attempt to get you banned.
To me, Afghanistan is just another Iraq. You know, go into an already oppressed (economically and otherwise) country and pummel the shit out of their country and their people — for its resources and to “move in” and control the country.
The boom in Afghanistan, is not too well known, but it’s been going on for sometime now, as you probably know. Afghanistan, while poor, literally is situated on a “hotbed” of wealth: oil (Northeastern Afghanistan, Afghan-Tajik Basin); natural gas, Amu Darya Basin, stemming from the Caspian Sea Region); minerals: barite, chromite, coal, copper, gold, iron ore, lead; gemstones and more!
Afghanistan and Iraq, were both being discussed for invasion well prior to 9/11, right away in the Bush Administration (right in alignment with the PNAC goals).
Obama’s speech was almost verbatim to that of any of Bush’s speeches on more troops for surges in Iraq, and in fact, seem to mirror much of what Bush said, just more articulately.
And, I loved this:
And then Gates! “We have to stay long enough to make sure Afghans can handle it!” (paraphrasing). Hummm! Where have we heard those same words before?
And, “We have benchmarks, as well. We’ll be reviewing the situation in 2010, for progress.” (paraphrasing) What? Like the hydro-carbon revenue law a/k/a Iraq oil-revenue sharing law? Still not signed! But progress is being made, afterall, Exxon won a contract for increasing oil production in one of Iraq’s most prized oil fields.
This is interesting and really doesn’t surprise me, in some ways!
Sorry this is so long! My anger is just too great! All this while our own people go jobless, homeless and are suffering.
And there are even a couple of bills in Congress that want to tax Americans for these wars in order to pay for them. So, on top of it, tax us so the select rich can #@!$#@!@!#$@!@#$!@#$??????????????????????????
David Swanson, reminds us — the decision for everything lies with Congress, not Obama:
There is something terribly sad about all these happy Obama supporters now feeling the need to turn hawkish, lest they let him down.
Congress authorized the use of force to go after terrorists, not countries, as I recollect. Whatever, both Iraq and Afghanistan, were and are wars of aggression — war crimes, in other words!
the United States. As we watch, there seems to be a consolidation of power/wealth and a correlative ossification and paralysis of government. To the extent that all three branches seek the public good, the only reason for a Democracy in the first place, there is a frightening void.
Lobbyists have literally swallowed the Legislative Branch of government like a Boa Constrictor. It is obvious in the HealthCare fiasco. The Lobbyists for the MIC, in all their new and innovative forms have done the same thing with the Executive; except they need lobby only one person, and they have the coincidental advantage of being integrally imbedded in that branch.
And the Judicial Branch/Supreme Court, seems a bit lost in its purpose in a 21st Century world. IMO, to look back at the founders intent in 1789, seems absurd, as we look at a country with 300,000,000 more people, 37 more states and severely depleted resources etc.
However the one thing that I think is very clear is the heightened and poisonous influence on the exective from the “inside” (as mentioned supra). Until WW2, presidents pretty much acted alone in consultation with their White House advisors as far as military decisions were concerned. Now it seems that generals can make calls that presidents used to make: The subversive notion that presidents can’t know all the facts is frightening.
To know whether Obama has had a chip put into his brain to be controlled remotely or that he is actually in control of his own faculties is problematic. In any case, his principal goal seems to just hold the status quo together. And that means facilitating the momentum toward a global capitalism, even if it means destroying the last vestiges of American Liberalism, that short lived period of optimism that made the average working man/woman feel growing empowerment and optimism, that 30 year period in the middle of the 20th century (from FDR to LBJ).
The pendulum now swings back to the worst days of the Robber Barons, but with a player that basically didn’t exist then, the Military Industrial Complex. In 1900, the Lobbyists owned every Legislative Branch in the Country, including the Federal one, and the Supreme Court knew who they must favor. But now we have a third player of immense power and influence. IMO, I don’t see how our standard of living can do anything but slowly decline along with the hope of a more Perfect Union.
I’ve never been so pessimistic. The people are asleep.
Obama has literally destroyed Liberalism by abdicating his role as a leader for the people at one of the most important crossroads in American History. This “fierce urgency of now” can only be seen as a rhetorical gimmick to win the White House and serve his real masters.
Seriously, the guy stumbles through a bad Dubya warmonger cover (complete with mushroom cloud reference) and people cheer him like he’s the second coming of Gandhi.
Beware of false prophets indeed.
I will say one thing though, not everybody over at Big O thinks O is The One, and I for one applaud all the folks over there with fortitude to keep speaking up for the real Red Pill.