Climate: Who Is Stupider, Repubs or Dems?

Simulposted at Daily Kos

Climate change is here.

Weather patterns are altering, ocean levels are beginning to rise, there are food and water shortages across the globe, the number of climate refugees in Bangladesh is rising and major port cities around the world are making plans to protect themselves as the seas that will slowly…but not slowly enough….engulf their cities rise.

Glaciers, the source of much of the worlds fresh water supply, are shrinking at a truly astounding rate. There are no more glaciers in Glacier National Park.

Every credible scientist not in the pay of the oil and coal corporations agrees, the scientific evidence is overwhelming. Even the Pentagon has called Climate Crisis a threat to our national security.

Is that…”alarmist?” Well every, and I mean every model that scientists have come up with in the past 30 years has been wrong. EVERY model has been shown to be underestimating the scope and speed of Climate Crisis. At what point DO we get “alarmed?”

.

Trillions of dollars in real estate, buildings, infrastructure and port facilities are inevitably going to be lost if we don’t at least start to mitigate the effects of Climate Change. Billions of people are at direct risk and ALL of us are at some risk, no matter how far above sea level you are. The changes in weather, the economic changes and the changes to all societies that depend on shipping or farming for food, which is ALL societies, will be affected.

Not to mention the huge, but so far unforeseen hidden consequences that are sure to come as the delicate balances that preserve the fragile web of life on the only planet we have are affected or destroyed. It is as sure as the tides themselves.

And due too the feedback loops that will cause significant acceleration of the effects of Climate Change, this is not some far off event that we can ignore while using the Dems new favorite catch phrase of ‘we will fix it later.’

Climate Change, Climate Crisis…is here. Now.

But the Republicans, at the behest of those same oil and coal companies, are willing to sacrifice all of that. Are willing to sacrifice their children’s future and their children’s children’s future….all for a few more dollars in campaign contributions bribes.

This is NOT a political issue. This is not theory. This is not a Liberal Plot.

This is real. This is a planetary crisis that every society on the planet must address, a crisis that can only be ignored by willfully denying all scientific evidence. Which the political creatures in DC are apparently incredibly adept at. When it is to their political benefit.

And the Republicans are blocking even the meager attempts at mitigation of this inevitable crisis that the Dems have offered up.

That is, sacrificing all of that, and dooming your offspring to an uncertain but certainly perilous future for short term gain, is just plain stupid.

So it is undeniable that the Republicans are stupid, and perhaps at their stupidest when it comes to the issue of Climate Crisis, merely because of the stakes involved.

But at least the Republicans have the excuse of pretending that they do not “believe” in Climate Crisis.

The Democrats, who do profess to believe in the concept of science, have no such excuse.

And yet they are about to allow the Republican “majority” to block Climate Change legislation. Even though they KNOW that Climate Change is real….and here. Now.

So that leaves us with an interesting philosophical question, as we wait for the world to drown and wait for potentially billions of people to either die or become Climate refugees.

Is it stupider to pretend that science doesn’t exist as the Crisis accelerates? Or is it stupider to KNOW that the Crisis is real and do nothing…as the Dems are about to do?

13 comments

Skip to comment form

  1. Millions of people being uninsured, tens of thousands suffering medical bankruptcy, et. al. doesn’t sway them, when there is a Joe Lieberman to personally appease.

    Do you seriously think burning up the planet would?

    Politics is ALL.  When there’s a million dollar investment to throw out of the military because said serviceperson happens to want to sleep with people with the same plumbing, this is nowhere near as important as Sarah Palin’s hand scribblings.

    When illicit corporations throw people out of their homes by the bushelful, this simply does not matter, because we must, …. absolutely must .. think about the process of procurement and the attributes of the Obama family pet.

    People’s lives mean nothing when it comes to insider Washington scheming for advantage.  Why would the planet matter?

    Silly boy.

    • Edger on February 11, 2010 at 21:03

    what I think was the warmest January on record. Ever. Shirt and light jacket weather for most of the month, and February is about the same.

    I half expect the waterfront which is about 5 miles from my place to be a few blocks away by summer, and July August temps to be up in the low 200’s if not this summer then soon…

  2. There are two forces controlling the climate debate, and though it hasn’t gotten much play, some of the motives of the climate change deniers are strictly monetary and strategic.  It’s easy for them to ignore and downplay future disasters, when they are already involved in international wrangling to claim the Northwest Passage, and the natural resources that are becoming accessible with the melting of arctic ice.

    …the race for the “High North” – the scramble for territorial rights over the Arctic, which has been dubbed the new Cold War…Russia, with a third of its territory north of the Arctic Circle, has been noisiest in its claims… Britain, Canada, the US, China, Norway, Denmark and the EU all are preparing different claims. Canada doubled its funding for mapping the seabed last year and said that it would open an army training post at Resolute Bay, and a deep-water port. In the final weeks of his presidency, George W.Bush issued the US’s strategy for the region…

     

    Why?  Why are these nations battling for control of the arctic waters?  Mainly, it’s the money they think they, and their corporate sponsors, can make there:

    The retreat of the ice cap also offers the chance of extracting the huge oil and gas reserves believed to lie in fields around the North Pole.

    How many resources are we talking about?

    A U.S. Geological Survey assessment released in July estimated the Arctic Circle has 90 billion barrels of undiscovered, technically recoverable oil, as well as 30 percent of the world’s undiscovered natural gas.

    But, that’s not all, there’s the northwest passage:

    7,000 The number of kilometres ships would save if they used the Northwest Passage instead of the current Europe-to-Asia shipping route via the Panama Canal. (A link to a Discovery article that I can’t find said 3,000 miles would be saved by a NW passage route rather than a Tokyo to London route via the Suez Canal–& think of the advantages of avoiding the Suez Canal/horn of Africa route)

    But[–doesn’t the international community–and the Democrats & Republicans understand the potential massive consequences of ignoring or denying climate change? Maybe they do–but in the short term, there’s money to be made, and the time to stake their claims to arctic waters and their resources grows short:

    But it’s a race against time. Countries have 10 years from when they sign the treaty to submit their scientific data to a UN commission. Canada has just four years left – until 2013.

     

    Canada’s PM has pledged to spend “5.3 Billion Dollars to defend Canada’s arctic waters and NW passage”.  I haven’t seen the numbers on how much money the other nations, including the US, are spending to claim the arctic’s waters, but it’s certain to be a large sum.  

    So, while several of our politicians have in the past seemed to acknowledge the serious consequences of doing nothing about global warming–their corporate sponsors are at the same time waging a war to keep the arctic waters ice free and accessible to oil, and gas resources; and the benefits of saving corporate $$’s–by shortening the trade routes from Asia to Europe.  

  3. Death by swine vaccines

    Death by poverty

    Death by GMO frankenfoods

    Death by earthquakes induced by HAARP and chemtrails

    The key here is death, imminent death and the faster we get on with it the better off the few elite will be.

    Underground continutity of government bases included.

Comments have been disabled.