(10PM-ish EST – promoted by Nightprowlkitty)
“BP is responsible for this leak. BP will be paying the bill.”
Barack Obama, May 2, 2010
At the current rate, estimated at 200,000 gallons of oil a day, that would mean about 18m gallons of oil will escape, and make the Deepwater Horizon a significantly larger spillage than the Exxon Valdez disaster in 1989, when 11m gallons ended up in the Alaskan sea. uk guardian
I noticed this article this morning at alternet by Riki Ott, PhD, who is “a community activist, a former fisherm’am, and has a degree in marine toxicology with a specialty in oil pollution. She is also the author of Sound Truth and Corporate Myth$: The Legacy of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill.” This is a good read: Here’s How Exxon Tried to Avoid Paying for Its Massive Oil Spill — Let’s Not Allow BP to Do the Same
In Alaska, the killing did not stop in 1989. Twenty-one years later, buried oil is still contaminating wildlife and Prince William Sound has not returned to pre-spill conditions – nor, honestly, will it. The remnant population of once-plentiful herring no longer supports commercial fisheries and barely sustains the ecosystem.
While local efforts to boom Louisiana’s fragile coasts to keep the oil out will help people feel productive and empowered (and this is important), it is an unfortunate truth that the booms have limited utility and effectiveness. In even mild sea conditions, oil will wash over and under boom. Further, underneath the visible oil slick, there is an invisible cloud of toxic oil dissolved into the water column and this dissolved oil is deadly to shrimp and fish eggs and marine life.
Still, the Gulf spill has one advantage over the Alaska spill – hot weather and the relatively warm ocean will speed the work of bacteria to degrade the Louisiana crude. Even so, the initial toxic hit is likely to harm generations of wildlife, similar to what happened in Prince William Sound.
The oil industry has had over 40 years – since the 1967 Torrey Canyon tanker spill in England – to make good on its promise to cleanup future oil spills. This latest spill highlights the harsh truth that the industry has failed to live up to its promise. It is time for Americans to demand of our leaders accountability and closure of fossil fuel industries – as we transition to new energies.
Well guess who they had on Democracy Now this evening?
(Video embed success! thanks to edger!!)
Riki Ott
PLEASE NOTE: Rachel Maddow is set to air live from Venice, La tonight, 9PM Eastern, msnbc. I’ll update with video of that, if I deem it worthy. 😛
Why does all this remind me of this now famous quote?
But why should we hear about body bags and deaths, and how many, what day it’s gonna happen, and how many this or that or what do you suppose? Or, I mean, it’s not relevant. So, why should I waste my beautiful mind on something like that… Barbara Bush
29 comments
Skip to comment form
Author
Curious how their logo looks so much like it was inspired by an oil well drill bit instead of an environmental friendly flower, isn’t it?
Author
missed it but here
hat tip to slinkerwink today…
IOW, asked if the president’s thinking on the matter had evolved as the news of oil spilling in the Gulf has grown worse, Gibbs said:
Author
h/t to A Siegel at L’Orange who included this link … and Im glad b/c this has been nagging at me.
and
We need to stop referring to it as a ‘spill’. At this point, a spill is quaint in comparison.
that clean-up technology is still so primitive and ineffectual. They’ve turned drilling into a complex (obviously flawed) art form.
But where are sea-skimming tankers (think floating, oil-filtering sea surface scrapers/scoops)? Where are methods for causing the oil to clump into large, scoopable wads? Oil attractors? Oil vacuums? Giant “fishing net” type collectors, maybe dragged between two large ships with super booms? Effective barriers to corral the oil?
You’d think effective spill cleanup would be a growth, high-profit industry, worth some high-tech investment and research.
Obama playing his tough sherrif straight shooter role.
Seen it before, means n-o-t-h-i-n-g.
BP will spend a bunch of money, could be billions, but there is now way that this disaster will cause BP to go bankrupt, which is should. The BP CEO will not lose his job, in fact he will probably end up getting a large bonus after he successfully “socializes” most of the “losses”.
Author
very interesting, dont see that too often, eh?
Gulf Oil Spill: Government Regulator Downplayed Environmental Impact Of Spill