(11 am. – promoted by ek hornbeck)
Last night Mike Malloy interviewed Mike Papantonio, who co-hosts the weekly radio program, Ring of Fire, along with Bobby Kennedy, Jr. Both are prominent trial attorneys, oftentimes representing plaintiffs in environmental damage suits. As one might imagine, they are probably not included on the holiday greeting card list for any of the companies in the Fortune 500.
The opening topic was the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. What follows are some bits and pieces that I can recall from that interview as well as my commentary.
Mike Papantonio is apparently the first U. S. based attorney, along with Bobby Kennedy, Jr., to have already filed a lawsuit against British Petroleum for the ongoing oil spill, which was apparently filed on Wednesday, April 28, 2010.
In the process of discovery, British Petroleum will be forced to disclose a significant amounts of information that they would most surely prefer to keep hidden from the public view.
Although this may seem to be a devastating blow to Big Oil, the corporate media no doubt is dutifully providing cover and will refuse to air the story, instead plying us with 24/7 coverage of the immigrant “crisis” in Arizona and the tabloid story du jour. One of the headlines on the minute-long hourly news flash last night was Tiger Woods shooting 7 under par, a rare occasion when he didn’t make the final cut for a golf tournament. Yes, there is evidently little else of importance to report.
Big Oil’s playbook for situations like this is to underplay the story of an oil spill in the initial stages, delaying the release of factual information until the evidence is so overwhelming that it can’t be denied. Remember the rather benign pronouncements about this spill during the first few days?
Rather than being a leak, this is an absolute gusher of oil, shooting geyser-like from the ocean floor, and from underwater has the appearance of a volcanic eruption. The damage that is visible on the surface of the water is only a small indicator of the total amounts released into the water. Think of an an iceberg, where only about 10% of the mass is visible above the water, only in this case, the differential is undoubtedly much greater.
In almost every other country in the world, except for a few third world countries that apparently don’t care (or are powerless) to enact environmental protections, oil companies are required to install emergency shut-off valves on those rigs (I’m not sure if I’m remembering the terminology correctly), which cost something like $500,000 per unit. Not to be outdone by those third world countries, the Bush-Cheney cabal choose to assure Big Oil that such protections were not necessary off our coastal areas. Of course, the cost of installing these “safety switches” would have a negative impact on Big Oil’s profits, a mortal sin to be sure.
If the oil gusher could have been halted completely as of last night, the damage would last for at least a decade, however, it appears that no appreciable relief will occur for at least several weeks.
My commentary…
If this writer recalls the figure correctly, this submarine gusher is apparently spewing something like 3/4 million gallons of crude oil per day. Although the properties of crude oil are no doubt somewhat different than those of used motor oil, please consider the following information regarding used motor oil disposal, found on the University of Georgia’s Cooperative Extension website…
Used Oil Disposal:
Small amounts of used oil, grease, antifreeze or any other such compounds can cause large problems when they enter water bodies. For example, some general facts about the pollution potential of oil are:
1-Used oil contains toxic substances such as zinc, benzene and lead,
2-Oil from one oil change (1 gallon) can ruin the taste of a million gallons of water
(1 part per million), enough to supply 50 people with water for one year,
3-One pint of oil when put in water can spread over a surface of one acre,
4-Oil dumped on land will reduce productivity of that land, and
5-Sewage treatment processes can be severely hindered if concentrations of
used oil are as low as 50 to 100 parts per million (50 gallons in 1 million
gallons).Usually oil-changing facilities will accept used oil for recycling. If there is no place to take used oil, then mix the oil with an adsorbent such as kitty litter. Make sure there is enough litter available so there is no free liquid after the oil and litter is completely mixed. Once mixed, dispose of the oil and kitty litter in a proper garbage receptacle.
If the same formula applies to crude oil released into waters, then the amount of oil being released is enough to create a sheen covering an area of 9,375 square miles per day. To conceptualize how large an area this is, think in terms of the total area of New Hampshire plus 25 square miles each and every day!
Back to the Papantonio interview…
While the Exxon-Valdez oil spill oocurred close to sandy beaches, where a significant amount of the oil washed up onshore, much of the Gulf area is comprised of swampy areas which in many cases extend as much as thirty miles inland. These areas are ultimately the primary source for much of the fresh water used in the Deep South. The impacts of this horrible, preventable debacle are most likely beyond our imagining.
Back to my commentary…
Estuaries are arguably one of the rarest ecosystems in the world. These are oftentimes swampy areas where salt water from the ocean and fresh water from the land mass mix with each other. These areas support a rich diversity of flora and fauna that does not exist elsewhere. These plants and animals must be able to tolerate periods of submersion in water, as well as dryness for several hours at a time. They must be adaptable to significant changes in salinity, depending upon the ratio of salt to fresh water at any given moment in time.
Although this writer has not been able to locate the data, it seems that estuaries cover something like only 0.1% of the earth’s land mass. Given the richness of these areas, it is likely no accident that 22 of the 32 largest cities in the world are situated in estuarian environments. Those areas, in addition to being some of the most valuable environmental areas on earth, are also among the most fragile. Barring a miracle, the estuaries along the Gulf Coast will undoubtedly suffer devastating losses that will continue throughout our lifetimes, and quite likely for several generations yet to come.
The following photo represents a small portion of our national treasure that is now threatened with utter devastation…
Papantonio’s description of what we are facing was very clear, cogent and convincing. One cannot doubt that Big Oil does not want to see him in front of a jury. The lawsuit against British Petroleum is slated to be one of the topics of discussion today on the weekly radio program, Ring of Fire, scheduled to air in most locations around the country later today and tomorrow. If you are interested in learning more, the following should be of assistance:
Here is a list of radio stations around the country and the air times this weekend.
And if you don’t reside within range of any of those stations, you can stream the program over the internet on these stations. If you reside in another time zone, you will want to take the time zone difference into account.
This writer is not sure if there is a way to access Malloy’s interview with Papantonio last night short of becoming a member on his website. If you wish to check him out, however, you can listen to his broadcasts streaming live on weekday evenings at these locations. If you haven’t heard him before, he is one of the most passionate progressive talk show hosts on the air today. Those who prefer the soothing, monotone quality oftentimes found on public radio stations may find his delivery to be a bit jarring. But if you enjoy listening to someone who absolutely does not pull any punches, you may wish to give him a try.
Please accept this writer’s apologies for the disorganized nature of this essay. Given time constraints and the importance of this matter to our entire nation, and perhaps the world as well, I feel compelled to get the word out as soon as possible so those who are interested can tune into Ring of Fire today and/or tomorrow.
As always, your questions, comments, criticisms or gripes are welcomed.
“You can fool some of the people all of the time and those are the ones you want to concentrate on.” — George W. Bush
18 comments
Skip to comment form
Author
is sitting on Trent Lott’s front porch along the Mississippi Coast, enjoying the view?
In fact, here is the quote from the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in 2005 by Cheney’s sock puppet, as reported on CNN…
Maybe the two could play in the sand, along with Laura and Patricia. Fun and frivolity on the beach?
Interesting bit of trivia: Some of us may recall that George W. Bush was a cheerleader during his school days.
Well, not to be outdone, the following from the wikipedia article about Trent Lott…
And I keep telling myself that there are no surprises left in this world. Foiled again!
If we have corporate personhood then we should have the corporate death sentence.
They shouldn’t be sued, they should be liquidated (heh), their owners and boards of directors imprisoned, their responsible managers imprisoned, their property seized, their holdings seized, and their assets sold off or shut down, and the assets paid into a fund used to compensate their victims, their American corporate charter revoked.
Then let Scalia and Roberts and Alito argue about cruel and unusual punishment .. for a non-living entity that is a person.
Author
I offered a rather extensive comment to you last weekend, but I think it was too late for anyone to see it. If you are interested in checking it out, you can find it here.
Good luck!
yikes.
just in my yahoo news, 10 minutes ago…. this
in most of the media, is that BP has started dropping chemical dispersants on the slick, so that it will break up and sink below the surface where it will invisibly poison the most productive fishery in the world with the oil based toxins that result from oil reacting with the dispersants, and kill off and mutate the bottom dwelling sea life.
Hi tech sweeping under the rug, courtesy of the “greenest” oil company in the world.
But in other news:
Author
on Friday evening has clearly been followed to the letter. The news of this disaster was seriously downplayed at the outset, with the unwavering cooperation of our corporate media. Expect the bad news already known to those in the know to slowly trickle out over the days, weeks and months ahead.
Much has been written about this debacle already. True to form, many of the more revealing stories, not suprisingly, originate from across the pond.
An April 30, 2010 article by Nick Clark, appearing in the Al Jazeera — The Americas Blog, entitled “They Saw It Coming” includes the following, which appears at the conclusion of the story…
A May 1, 2010 article on the Common Dreams website, written by Bill Quigley, entitled “on the Bayou: Non-Stop River of Oil Heads to Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida includes the following…
A May 1, 2010 article by Alok Jha apearing in The Guardian (UK) entitled “Deepwater Horizon: Conservationists Warn of ‘True Catastrophe’ for Wildlife” includes the following…
A May 1, 2010 by Randall Amster, appearing on the Common Dreams website, entitled “Was the Gulf Oil Spill an Act of War? You Betcha” explores some of the conspiracy theories launched in the aftermath of this unfolding distaster. Rush Limbaugh proves that his conspiracy theories are no less bizarre than those of the most radical purveyor of alternative explanations for events that befall us. To be sure, Halliburton does not escape notice as a likely suspect. Here is a sampling, only the first of several paragraphs devoted to Dick Cheney’s brainchild…
A May 2, 2010 article by Philip Sherwell, appearing in The Telegraph (UK), entitled “Louisiana oil spill may be five times bigger than previously thought” includes the following…
Many thoughts come to mind after perusing these articles, however several immediately come to mind…
1-If for no other reason than for appearance sake, why didn’t Obama travel to the area immediately after this occurred? It seems that he has created a public relations nightmare for himself. Unlike George W. Bush, he cannot count on the MSM to tamp down the negative stories that are sure to mount as the magnitude of this distaster becomes increasingly apparent to all.
2-Why doesn’t the United States require remote-control shut-off mechanisms, similar to almost every other First World nation? (This is a rhetorical question).
3-If a disaster of these proportions can take place in what would presumably be one of the safest regions in the world for such an event to occur, given the considerable resources and equipment nearby, then what are the risks for similar projects in far more remote, isolated areas of the world?
While I’m primarily grieving for the huge losses yet to be incurred by the innocents (flora and fauna), on a smaller, more personal scale, perhaps selfishly, I’m grieving for myself as well.
I have a frequent flier award that needs to be used within the next several months and had seriously considered a trip earlier this spring to see what was left of the Gulf Coast area. Although the lingering impacts of Hurricane Katrina is painfully visible in many areas to this day, I was/am convinced that the Obama Administration is not inclined to implement safeguards to ensure an improved response should another hurricane of similar magnitude strike.
This may be yet another missed opportunity that is lost forever, similar to my erroneous assumption three decades ago that Mount St. Helens would always be there.
The inevitable question we may prefer to avoid is “What Will Life Be Like on Planet Earth?” by the time that our unavoidable exit from this phase of our existence arrives at our doorstep.
Those of us who have entered that variously defined period known as middle age may recall the time of our high school graduation, when our commencement address extolled the limitless opportunity and promise that awaited us in the larger world, a hopeful message that was believed by most. Such was the legacy that was passed on to us. Can similar pronouncements during the graduations that lie just ahead be as credibly believed by its intended recipients?
Similar to the course that Barack Obama has seemingly taken so far during his administration, have we also squandered an unprecedented opportunity, to the grave detriment of those destined to follow in our path?
I continue to search in vain for a silver lining.