(10AM EST – promoted by Nightprowlkitty)
From Waxman’s letter to Hayward of today (June 14th) :
We are looking forward to your testimony before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations on Thursday, June 17,2010, about the causes of the blowout of the Macondo well and the ongoing oil spill disaster in the Gulf of Mexico. As you prepare for this testimony, we want to share with you some of the results of the Committee’s investigation and advise you of issues you should be prepared to address.
The Committee’s investigation is raising serious questions about the decisions made by BP in the days and hours before the explosion on the Deepwater Horizon. On April 15, five days before the explosion, BP’s drilling engineer called Macondo a “nightmare well.” In spite of the well’s difficulties, BP appears to have made multiple decisions for economic reasons that increased the danger of a catastrophic well failure.
In several instances, these decisions appear to violate industry guidelines and were made despite warnings from BP’s own personnel and its contractors. In effect, it appears that BP repeatedly chose risky procedures in order to reduce costs and save time and made minimal efforts to contain the added risk.
The whole thing is a blast at BP :
32 comments
Skip to comment form
Author
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/
Have you trumped even the entire CT community news network?
Or is this another false flag we did not pick up on.
And no I do not mean this in that ultimate evil way.
Interesting! BP was well aware of the “faultiness” so long before a few days before the worst catastrophic environmental/ecological criminally negligent disaster we could ever imagine. They were aware of the Federal and their own internal violations, but their choice was not to attend to repairs of any of it. That was a CHOICE by BP. Afterall, their profits were just not great enough to warrant any expenditure for repairs, such as 2009, 1st quarter PROFITS of $6.8 billion; and:
We need to mention their profits non-stop — of late, I’ve been hearing “poor mouth” for BP — what?
Have you seen this one, wilberforce, yes, it’s about the same subject, but note that there is an attempt to completely exonerate Halliburton!
The thing that I find somewhat, if not a lot, interesting, is the accounting by Mike Williams (who appeared in a two-part segment of “60 Minutes”), wherein he told of the many problems and all that happened to him before he took a “plunge” of almost 100 feet below the rig. His story, to me, was irrefutable! Did no one in the WH listen to this man?
No matter, however, what is said, BP had a responsibility to “maintain” this rig in a manner that was safe for the “waters” and for the “workers.” THEY DIDN’T CARE — FINAL ANSWER!
concerned. The private law suits will drag on until the plaintiffs (what remains of them) say uncle and the lawyers have taken most of the money. It won’t matter anyhow as BP will have recouped whatever they pay from huge spikes in profits and gas at $5 a gallon. Heck, Obama has probably told them our oil purchases will even increase and not to worry about cost, wink wink.
Author
from TOD, suggesting that BP is by no means alone:
Author
Up again.
sheeeeet.