(9AM EST – promoted by Nightprowlkitty)
He’s a vocal opponent of current policy. He says the government is keeping secrets from you and lying to you.
His conservative opponents are apoplectic with anger. They are calling for his head. He has been investigated for imaginary federal crimes.
But most of all, his opponents are attacking his character. They are accusing him of being a sexual deviant.
No, I’m not talking about Julian Assange in 2010. I’m talking about Scott Ritter in 2002.
I’m only mildly interested in the documents that Wikileaks have published.
Like the Pentagon Papers that Daniel Ellsberg released in 1971, the documents that Wikileaks are giving the news media aren’t all that shocking to most of the thinking public.
The real story here is the official reaction, whether it was Ellsberg in 1972, Ritter in 2002, or Assange in 2010.
Forget the details of the documents for a moment and look at the government reactions.
The Anti-Neocon
Let’s start with Scott Ritter. A 12 year veteran of the Marines, he was chief inspector of the weapon inspectors team in Iraq from 1991 to 1998.
In a 2000 documentary Ritter claimed that Iraq no longer had WMD’s and opposed the policy of trying to remove Saddam Hussein. He predicted a disastrous occupation of Iraq in 2003.
To make matters worse, he also opposed the policy of removing the Taleban from Afghansitan in the days after 9/11.
Ritter was the anti-Republican. The messenger had to be assassinated.
They accused him of taking money from Iraq. They called him the “New Jane Fonda”.
The FBI investigated him for being an agent of Iraq. They also investigated his wife for being an agent of the KGB.
Then there was the reaction from the foot soldiers of the right wing. The Weekly Standard called him a liar, even though it turned out that he was telling the truth. CNN questioned his loyalty.
When Ritter still wouldn’t STFU then the big guns came out.
Ritter was arrested in 2001 in sex stings with under-age girls, except that the charges were dropped because Ritter didn’t know they were under-age, and never actually met the girls. Even though the records were sealed, somehow they made it out to the news media.
Ritter’s only real crime was telling the truth when no one wanted to hear it. He compounded his crime by not shutting the Hell up when the powers that be wanted him to.
Wikileaks Takedown
Now compare this to Julian Assange.
He’s a physics and mathematics student, computer programmer and an outspoken proponent of free speech. He help found the award winning, whistleblower website Wikileaks in 2006.
Wikileaks was created after Sin Tao was sentenced to 10 years in jail after publishing a Chinese government email.
Over the years Wikileaks has released embarrassing information about various governments, banks and organizations all over the world. They include Guantánamo Bay procedures, the membership list of the far-right British National Party, Bilderberg Group meeting reports, and the 2008 Peru oil scandal, among others.
The governments of the world mostly tolerated it until this past year.
China, Thailand, and most of the Arab middle east began blocking access to Wikileaks. Members and staff have been harassed, monitored and even threatened. It’s website hosting has been shut down and been the target of denial-of-service attacks.
The Justice Department is considering prosecuting him under the Espionage Act, despite the fact that he isn’t an American and doesn’t live in America. The Australian Government is investigating him for breach of national security.
Like the Ritter experience, the right-wing has gone bat-shit crazy.
* “Why can’t we use our various assets to harass, snatch or neutralize Julian Assange and his collaborators, wherever they are?” – Bill Kristol.
* “Why isn’t Julian Assange dead?” – Jonah Goldberg.
* “I won’t think twice if Julian Assange meets the cold blade of an assassin.” – Donald Douglas.
The reaction isn’t limited to America.
Despite nearly the entire world governments out to get him, Assange hasn’t backed down. So, like with Ritter, his character needed to be assassinated.
Sweden has issued rape and sexual harassment warrants for Assange.
Like Ritter, Assange is a being portrayed as a sexual deviant. Like Ritter, the charges look suspicious.
In both cases, no one denies that the incidents with Assange started out as consensual sexual encounters with adults. Like Ritter, the charges against Assange have already been dropped.
Shortly after the investigation opened, however, chief prosecutor Eva Finné overruled the prosecutor on call the night the report was filed, withdrawing the warrant to arrest Assange and saying “I don’t think there is reason to suspect that he has committed rape.”
The warrant was revived after Assange had already met with police in Sweden.
It’s also worth noting that Sweden has not actually charged Assange with a crime. In fact, the “crime” he is being accused of is literally sex without a condom. One of the women went out and got him breakfast after sex.
Some Perspective
When Daniel Ellsberg, another patriotic Marine, released the Pentagon Papers many people on the right considered him to be a traitor. They accused him of endangering the war effort. It made no difference that he told the truth. They questioned his sanity. The FBI wiretapped him. He was arrested and tried under the Espionage Act. The Nixon Administration broke into his therapist’s office in order to dig up dirt on him.
Republicans in 2001-2004 couldn’t stand Scott Ritter. It made no difference that he told the truth. It didn’t matter to them then, and it doesn’t matter to them now.
And now we have Assange. His organization has angered the most repressive governments in the world, as well as democracies. His organization has embarrassed huge multinational corporations. Regular people of the world should be at least modestly supportive of him for no other reason than because he’s poked a finger in the eye of their natural enemies.
His crime is telling the truth. Now he’s being hounded and slandered.
What I find so surprising and disturbing is how many regular citizens hate people telling them the truth. The government and the corporate media has told us that it is dangerous for us to learn what they are doing in our name, and for some unfathomable reason people believe it. The government says that these leaks are endangering people, but never even attempt to back up the claims. Yet so many people take the government’s word at face value, as if they have forgotten all those lies about Iraq and the War on (some) Terror. Right-wingers, who claim to detest and distrust the government, are the first to rush to its defense when threatened by the truth.
It’s as if people are scared of freedom.
40 comments
Skip to comment form
Author
We can never have enough truth.
The right isn’t against government – they’re all for all the apparatus’ of fascism — they’re just against social services and a social safety net.
It really can’t be said enough how depraved calling for assassination (murder) really is. Reagan let this cat out of the bag, when he bombed Gaddafi’s children in 1986, and the right (in which I include Clinton in the Sudan and Obama in Pakistan) has been justifying these sorts of killings ever since.
whom I remember so clearly on NPR touting our invasion of Iraq and how it would make the ME so much better – why couldn’t the antiwar groups see this – I’m sure he’d have preferred to neutralize us as well.
Well, we’re pretty much neutralized by a messenger of hope supposedly – took a little longer and was a bit more subtle –
Ah, Bill – you guys are winning again, aren’t you? Wonder what it feels like to be on a winning team. I wouldn’t know being working class, Democrat, old female, etc.
So, good luck to Assange and those like him – now that’s what I call hope.
they’ve moved to
http://213.251.145.96/
on facebook BTW.
The whole segment on Wikileaks was about dressing up Julian Assange as a sex criminal. It was if the segment was produced by the Obama administration.
Typical dark propaganda.
who was officially airbrushed from existence by the propaganda organs. If anything shows conspiracy it’s the actions by the government (I include most of the media when I say “government”) when confronted by someone like Ritter. There are several reasons for the kind of draconian actions they take. This is part of a general trend in the U.S. establishment to discourage and criminalize whistle-blowing which has now become very dangerous business. People wonder why more people don’t speak out about crimes and conspiracies within government and now we know why.
They will find a way to destroy you one way or the other. They prefer not to assassinate you but if they can keep you off the air, that’s enough. The Assange story will be interesting to follow–he’s a bit more wily than Ritter.
who was an enemy of our enemies –
I notice with sadness that he came in the door to the right of the studio on CNN. (Perhaps I haven’t watched enough – but that is my early impression.)
He was suitably neutered like my male cats. As enough people will not be able to watch cable – will they be the only group watching themselves – our cable gossipmasqueradingasnews people.
surprised of weapons of sexual slander. In our culture, violence and sexuality complement each other quite well. This isn’t new in Western History, but in the hands of the Madison Avenue Cultural Complex, we now have around the clock reminders of what’s really cool and hip, and what’s a no-no. And if people forget what they’re supposed to think, they’ll always be reminders from experts: There’s bad violence and good violence, bad sex and good sex, bad secrets and good secrets, bad drugs and good drugs and bad words and good words etc. etc. etc.
to get people to consider it from a different point of view.
it is not only the sex thing. these masters of the universe have just the right knack to make their fuck ups so bad that the only option we seem to have is to live in continued and unabated denial. yeah.
Their unfathomable immaturity and greed is not up for review. Their epically bad decision making is not up for review. Because WE allow these people to walk around, invincible and untouchable. The issue isn’t whether they are at fault… the issue is: do we really want to deal with the mess they’ve made?
we can wrap our heads around an issue like abortion. or gays in the military. or terrorists. But hundreds of thousands of documents that expose just how third rate American politicians really are… well that, Dorothy, is a horse of another color. because somewhere in this mess, the rest of us are implicated. and one of the genius things about these rats is their hellish ability to recast blame… it isn’t us… it’s the mexican immigrants or muslim terrorists or god knows… it’s the rethugs or the progressives. good god.
we have an opportunity here. we need to get beyond the obvious bullshit and hypocrisy.
how do we redefine this? how do we redirect this conversation, thhis story? and really, how do we deliver it in bite size chunks…
every dog has its day. this is a day begging for us to see the opportunity here.
hey CF, what will we do with it?
I am citing this essay tonight on wwl radio… the link is in my essay in the sidebar if you want to call in.
I think your comparison is totally dead on, and righteous… its the real story – how the oligarchy protects itself by any means necessary.
Assange, in reality, is a mere messenger of information that has been provided his organization over time. The audacity of him to provide “truth” to citizens everywhere! Of course, our government and all the war criminals are not happy with him — and, of course, all the hackneyed, typically, Republican maneuvers against him, for sexual misbehavior and gawd knows what all, have and will be thrust upon him and if all that fails, will he become the “suicidal” individual, such as Gen. or Col. Westerlung, and others?
As was mentioned on the Thom Hartmann show yesterday, one of the things that showed up on the new revelations of documents that Wikileaks provided, was the absolute incessant effort of the Republicans to stall (now, we must include Hillary Clinton), stop all efforts by the Spanish government to cease it’s efforts as to the suit against six American war criminals, and then, to minimalize the efforts of those of Spanish citizenship, who were held in Guantanamo, and tortured — and even a kinda’ outage of Judge Baltasar Garzon (all of which efforts were done before changes to the “universal jurisdiction” that Spain was legally able to utilize)! It seems that all such efforts to hold war criminals accountable (ours) have been put in abeyance, or, simply, outside the limits of “consideration.” You have to wonder WHAT ON EARTH was the Spanish government threatened with, n’est que c’est pas? Do WE, our government, somehow, have a total stronghold on the entire world?
In addition to Amazon having shutdown Wikileaks’ server, PayPal has closed out its donation site for Wikileaks:
and the latest from Reuters: