( – promoted by buhdydharma )
Apparently the fairly graphic representation of the agonies of The Cross
were “upsetting the children” and was, in theirwords, a “put-off.” Now, I’ll admit I’ve been away from Mother Church for awhile, but as a good Irish Catholic boy,
I seem to recall being told over and over again that the unimaginable agonies of Jesus on The Cross were the point of Christianity; his agonies and suffering were what redeemed humanity. Silly little bake-sale Christians; when they say things like “we need a more uplifting and inspiring symbol than execution on a cross,” we realize that they’ve lost any reverence for — hell, any understanding of — the broken, tortured body that for 2000 years was the central truth of their faith.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worl…
A statue of the crucifixion has been taken down from its perch on a church in Sussex because it was scaring local children and deterring worshippers, a vicar admitted today.
…snip…
Souter, formerly a cell biologist, said: “The crucifix expressed suffering, torment, pain and anguish. It was a scary image, particularly for children. Parents didn’t want to walk past it with their kids, because they found it so horrifying.
“It wasn’t a suitable image for the outside of a church wanting to welcome worshippers. In fact, it was a real put-off.
“We’re all about hope, encouragement and the joy of the Christian faith. We want to communicate good news, not bad news, so we need a more uplifting and inspiring symbol than execution on a cross.”
13 comments
Skip to comment form
Author
…by the statue of a gay man being stoned to death.
in the NYT titled Who Would Jesus Smack Down?.
Seems that this guy is making a killing preaching the “horrific.” Who knew that would work?
There’s a picture at http://rmadisonj.blogspot.com/… with an article by Loudon Wainright.
More from Loudon on religion:
…is an old idea.
But I wasn’t sorry to hear it will be donated to a museum. They can put all the gory crucifixes in museums. Sooner the better 🙂