What happened in New Orleans on August 29, 2005 was not a result of global warming. It was a result of human fuckery. It was the result of the Army Corps of Engineers’ lack of competence in building and maintaining the levees.
Never forget that.
Too many people have forgotten that, or never knew to begin with.
It’s important.
The G Bitch Spot’s post from last year’s anniversary (this year, her only comment is “I don’t even want to talk about it.”) explains:
The day before The Disasterversary, I got an email asking me to sign onto a climate-related petition. Even though I have stopped myself from doing this – I have a long history of rabid letter-writing – I had to email the folks sponsoring the petition:
Though I can’t blame you for using the anniversary of the flooding of New Orleans [also known as “Katrina”] to get attention for climate legislation, your organization is doing New Orleans, yourselves, and the country a disservice by basing this campaign on a lie. Katrina the hurricane did not flood New Orleans. Katrina was a weak 3 when she hit New Orleans; Katrina DID devastate the Mississippi Gulf Coast and the southernmost parts of Louisiana. New Orleans flooded because the Army Corps of Engineers built levees they knew were faulty. Those levees failed after the hurricane passed and flooded over 80% of the city.
Why does this point of distinction matter? Because many US citizens live near some kind of Army Corps of Engineers project, if not near levees and dams built by ACoE. The faulty thinking and contracts behind the disaster in New Orleans are also involved in every other ACoE project in this country.
Coastal restoration-yes! Armored, fortified levees-yes! Katrina flooded New Orleans-NO!
(emphasis in original)
“Many US citizens live near some kind of Army Corps of Engineers project …”
Remember. Please.
6 comments
Skip to comment form
Author
just last year …. gha!
…. and choosing which projects to fund.
Appropriations Committee in the House
Dept of the Interior
Bureau of Reclamation
Check out all the committees your Congressperson is on, your Senator is on, and then whether or not your local projects get funding in times of need. Pay particular attention if you’ve got a wing nut who is not only a climate change denier (as in, it’s not happening, or it’s caused by sunspots) but if you’ve got a Blue Dog who was funding stuff in other districts and neglecting his or her own.
Here in Northern CA we have idjiots still merrily shunting our state’s money to the red states nearby (or to nice big new projects in Utah) and trying to ignore our needs when the state capitol sits at the Confluence of the American and Sacramento Rivers and is massively prone to flood risk- #2 after NOLA. Yet the local Republicans are constantly trying to put new dams up stream where they don’t have the water rights available, or other hokey projects instead of funding levee maintenance. They’re also specifically targeting any pro enviro Dems and the state’s energy bill they passed, to replace then with anti regulation pro destruction business shills like Fiorina- I cannot imagine that puffpiece taking any of this seriously.
Prevention isn’t sexy or popular but it beats the alternative.
callous sob which said that allowing the levees to not be fixed was the best way to get a face lift for new orleans….
and it is a matter of public record….
Scientists had been warning for years and years that the levees were in a sad state of repair — Bush was fully aware. So, the already inadequate funds that had been set aside for the levees, Bush defunded further (I have the article on this tucked away somewhere). (Here’s a google!)
The levees were never ever properly repaired, but now five years later, they are being repaired.
And in August, of 2009, an expert who warned the levees would burst, was fired from his job, as Deputy Director of the Louisiana State University Hurricane Center.
And still they suffer, with BP added to their already sad state of affairs!
Thank you for this, NPK. I know how impacting . . . . !