Crime Of The Century


Thursday afternoon we first heard
that there had been an agreement in principle struck by criminals and thieves masquerading as politicians in Washington to stick their greedy little fingers in your pocket and give Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke nearly a trillion dollars of your money to bail out their buddies on Wall Street.

We then later in the day heard that there had been a hastily arranged meeting in the White House with both presidential candidates invited by Bush in which John McCain had “destroyed” chances of an agreement in a desperate political stunt of an attempt to bolster his failing campaign. McCain’s involvement, in the words of House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank, was compared to “Richard Nixon blowing up the Vietnam peace talks in 1968.”

Country first my ass.

McCain’s stunt was not a stupid stunt. It was part of a shell game. A setup designed to con you. Designed to con you by giving top Democrats, Pelosi, Reid, et al a reason to support Bush’s plans to rob you blind while looking like they are saving you from a Republican plan to kill the bailout.

Think about that for a minute. Remember who passed all the Iraq Occupation funding bills for the past two years?

Oppose Bush my ass.

They are on his side. They are part of the scam. How clear does it have to be?

Now Wall Street financial analyst and historian Dr. Michael Hudson, Distinguished Research Professor at University of Missouri, Kansas City, cuts through all the crap to say bluntly that the proposed bailout is an empire buster likely to virtually destroy an already very shaky US and global economy, and is nothing more than a pyramid scheme, a blatant Once In A Century Rip-Off intended as a last ditch effort to save, at your expense, the finally and utterly discredited neocon “philosophy” of economics and governance, and George Bush and his criminal friends. The crooks attempting to steal every last cent they can bullshit you out of before republicanism and the disastrous presidency of George W. Bush finally go down in flames and ignominy. Taking you down with them.

If there is one overriding reason to oppose this “bailout” with everything in you, it’s this – it’s A Once In A Century Rip-Off.

A Once In A Century Rip-Off of… you.

September 26, 2008 – Once In A Century Rip-Off

Economist Michael Hudson: the bailout is a giveaway that will cause hyperinflation and dollar collapse

Bailout talks stall as Bush meets with Congressional leaders and Presidential candidates. German Finance Minister says US will no longer be the financial Superpower. French President Sarkozy says the days when “the all powerful market is always right are over”. The Real News Network spoke to economist and historian Dr. Michael Hudson who says that it’s not a “bailout” but a “giveaway” and will create a new kleptocracy of billionaires.

Dr. Michael Hudson is a Wall Street financial analyst and historian. Dr. Hudson was Dennis Kucinich’s Chief Economic Advisor in the recent Democratic primary presidential campaign, and has advised the U.S., Canadian, Mexican and Latvian governments, as well as the United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR). A Distinguished Research Professor at University of Missouri, Kansas City, he is the author of many books, including Super Imperialism: The Economic Strategy of American Empire and of Super-Imperialism and of The Myth of Aid .

The view around the world of the banking crisis and Paulson’s bailout proposal appears to be much less as panicky as closer to home, if at all, and more of recognition of the realities of the situation with a general attitude of encircling and isolating a cancer to keep it localized.

Paulson Plan Throws Oil On Fire



Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson
and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke

By Hossein Askari
  and Noureddine Krichene

Asia Times

With the creation of the so called Mortgage and Financial Institutions Trust (MFI), the unfolding financial crisis, considered by many to be the worst in over 60 years, has become ever-more dangerous.

While such an institution has not existed in any country, the MFI could prove to be disastrous for US public finance, economic growth, the dollar, relations with major foreign holders of dollars, the global financial system, and could ignite the worst inflation in the economic history of the United States and reverse globalization to levels not seen since the Great Depression.

The initial cost of the MFI, put at US$700 billion, could easily escalate to trillions of dollars. At the same time, the Congressional Budget Office had previously projected a record fiscal deficit of US$500 billion for 2009. The MFI will further blow up the deficit to an unprecedented level, exceeding US$1.4 trillion. US debt, jumping with the takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to 86% of GDP, has moved to an unsustainable level.

The financing of previous large fiscal deficits under the George W Bush Administration has already caused external deficits (current account) to widen to 5-7% of GDP, turned national savings negative, sent the dollar plummeting, and ignited rapid inflation, particularly in food, energy, and housing prices. Further financing of extraordinary large fiscal deficits, as required by the MFI, can only disrupt economic stability both in the US and world-wide. It will only further undermine the dollar, exacerbate widening external deficits, soaring energy and food prices, and rising unemployment.

Nonetheless, the main architects of the MFI, Messrs Henry Paulson and Ben Bernanke, Treasury Secretary and Federal Reserve chairman respectively, are determined to protect Wall Street. They have decidedly transformed the US budget and the US central bank into vehicles that only care for the welfare of Wall Street and divert public resources to bankers, under the guise of protecting the economy and averting systemic risk.



Albeit evidence of a systemic risk has not been established, vast public resources have so far been devoted to bailouts at the expense of growth-generating spending. The Fed has been pouring billions of dollars into financial institutions, buying worthless paper, and incurring huge losses. To quote Paulson “I am convinced that this bold approach [that is creation of the MFI] will cost American families far less than the alternative – a continuing series of financial-institution failures and frozen credit markets unable to fund economic expansion.”

Contrary to Paulson’s claim, domestic credit is still expanding at a fast rate, at 9% per year as of July 2008, and the notion of frozen markets cannot be supported by Fed’s published monetary data. Banks have excess liquidity and are still extending loans to safe customers. Certainly they are no longer in the mood of reigniting a new speculative euphoria by lending to speculator and impaired credit.

And contrary to Paulson’s belief, the MFI will in the end cost American families more than other alternatives.

[snip…]

All of this cannot but impair the global financial and economic reputation of the US. Just in a matter of days the dollar has declined from $1.39 to $1.48 to the euro, oil has climbed from $90 to over $120 (at one point rising by more than $20 in one day, September 22) and gold has jumped from $750 per ounce to over $900 .

The declining value of the dollar will adversely affect the value of foreign holdings in the US. China Investment Corporation (CIC) and a number of other sovereign wealth funds are major stakeholders in US financial and non-financial sectors, as holders of US government securities, debt of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and owners of manufacturing companies.

Asia and Persian Gulf oil exporters will no longer continue to trust the United States with their money. Financial trust, a needed but already a rare commodity in finance, will evaporate. Countries will withdraw from participating in the global financial system and autarchy will once again raise its ugly head. Moreover, oil exporters with large financial surpluses, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, may cut back their oil exports. Why would they want to sell their depleting oil reserves for worthless paper?

…………………………….

Hossein Askari is professor of international business and international affairs at George Washington University.

Noureddine Krichene is an economist at the International Monetary Fund and a former advisor, Islamic Development Bank, Jeddah.  

Read the entire article here… (it’s worth it)

56 comments

Skip to comment form

    • Edger on September 26, 2008 at 12:15
      Author

    • pfiore8 on September 26, 2008 at 14:02

    remember when we worried that the Russians, during the cold war, would plant an “Ivan” (an american born child indoctrinated by mother russia?) into the high levels  of our society (like that movie with Kevin Costner?)

    well. wall street has successfully planted its own ivans… this is just fucking incredible.

    • Edger on September 26, 2008 at 16:50
      Author

    speaking on the floor of the house this past Monday, Sept.22:

    From Glenn Greenwald two days ago:

    Wall Street and corporate America can’t lose in Congress — they never do — for one very simple reason: they own Congress and the “leaders” of it. Just listen to Rep. Marcy Kaptur; she’s been in Congress for 26 years and she knows how it works:

       

    To Wall St. insiders . . . you have perpetrated the greatest financial crimes ever on this American Republic. You think you can get by with it because you are extraordinarily wealthy and are the largest contributors to both presidential and Congressional campaigns in both major parties.

  1. the criminals are on both wings of the single corporate militarist financial party.  It’s midnight, and the masks are coming off, and both major party candidates have shown their one with the bosses!

  2. to get down to your local gardening store and buy some vegetable seeds? Seriously. They take up very little room in an emergency pack. Just saying, might need them some day, and hey they’re cheap.

    Tipped, rec’d, and hot listed for the urls, particularly the Marcy Kaptur piece, that will be going out to a few ostriches I know.

    Thanks again Edgar.  

  3. They are on his side. They are part of the scam. How clear does it have to be?

    BTW Edger, I’ve really been digging the Real News feed.  Thanks for tipping me to it.

    • OPOL on September 26, 2008 at 20:14
    • Edger on September 26, 2008 at 21:16
      Author

    orange flavor, too.

    • sharon on September 26, 2008 at 21:34

    to add a nyc annecdote – i was told last night at the corner deli that some shop owners in the village are accepting euros in their stores.  

    • Edger on September 26, 2008 at 23:27
      Author

    RawStory today…

    Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson resorted to literally begging Congressional leaders to approve a $700 billion Wall Street bailout as negotiations over his proposal fell apart Thursday. The New York Times reports Paulson kneeled before House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to plea for her support even as he acknowledged that Republican squabbles were torpedoing the bailout’s chances.

       Thursday, in the Roosevelt Room after the session, the Treasury secretary, Henry M. Paulson Jr., literally bent down on one knee as he pleaded with Nancy Pelosi, the House Speaker, not to “blow it up” by withdrawing her party’s support for the package over what Ms. Pelosi derided as a Republican betrayal.

       “I didn’t know you were Catholic,” Ms. Pelosi said, a wry reference to Mr. Paulson’s kneeling, according to someone who observed the exchange. She went on: “It’s not me blowing this up, it’s the Republicans.”

    She will sell you and your children for a couple of bucks if she can…

    • Edger on September 27, 2008 at 01:52
      Author

    Who do you want to believe? Bush and Paulson and Pelosi and Reid? The people who have been running the economy and the country into the ground for the past few years?

    Or the nations leading economists?

    A few minutes ago…

    Is the bailout needed? Many economists say ‘no’

    McClatchy Newspapers, Thursday, September 25, 2008

    WASHINGTON – A funny thing happened in the drafting of the largest-ever U.S. government intervention in the financial system. Lawmakers of all stripes mostly fell in line, but many of the nation’s brightest economic minds are warning that the Wall Street bailout’s a dangerous rush job.

    President Bush and his Treasury secretary, former Goldman Sachs chief executive Henry Paulson, have warned of imminent economic collapse and another Great Depression if their rescue plan isn’t passed immediately.

    Is that true?

    “It’s more hype than real risk,” said James K. Galbraith, a University of Texas economist and son of the late economic historian John Kenneth Galbraith. “A nasty recession is possible, but the bailout will not cure that. So it’s mainly relevant to the financial industry.”

    The Paulson plan will get some bad assets off the balance sheets of troubled Wall Street institutions and commercial banks. That may help thaw the lending freeze.

    But it wouldn’t reduce the crush of homes in or near foreclosure, said Simon Johnson, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. That’s a problem that will surely grow worse if the U.S. economy enters recession, leading to greater job losses, which feed a vicious downward spiral of even more foreclosures and defaults on car loans and credit-card debt.

    Americans are spooked by talk that financial Armageddon awaits.

    The global financial system nearly melted down last week when investors pulled out en masse from money market funds and the short-term debt markets that help corporate America fund its day-to-day needs.

    These traditionally have been viewed as safe investments for ordinary Americans, so the flight from them struck fear in the hearts of policymakers.

    Few economists, including Galbraith, are willing to discount completely the chance of a financial collapse, given the turmoil in credit markets and banking.

    “My sense is it will delay a disaster, given that you only have three months left in this administration. But it will not cure the problem in the (financial) industry or prevent the shakeout and downsizing of the industry,” Galbraith said.

    Many lawmakers also expressed skepticism.

    Coming out of the White House on Thursday, the ranking Republican on the Senate Banking Committee, Alabama’s Richard Shelby, held up what he said was a five-page list of economists opposing the rescue plan.

    “This is not me. This is economists at Harvard, Yale, MIT, University of Chicago, our leading universities,” an exasperated Shelby told reporters. He called the administration plan “flawed from the beginning.”

    More…

    There are laws against extortion. Will someone please go and arrest Bush, Paulson, Bernanke, Pelosi, Reid, McCain, and a few others.

    • TST on September 27, 2008 at 14:39

    with the financial bailout and election politics we were quietly being hit up for another $600 billion plus for the empire to make sure we achieve that “full spectrum dominance” that is so important to the ruling elite.

    Joshua Holland writing for AlterNet

    On Wednesday, the House passed a mammoth defense bill by a 392-39 vote. It’s expected to clear the Senate with little difficulty next week.

    It was part of a trillion-dollar stop-gap measure to keep programs running through next March, allowing lawmakers to skip town without passing a final budget. The Associated Press reports, “The legislation came together in a remarkably secret process that concentrated decision-making power in the hands of a few lawmakers.”

    In keeping with the tradition of recent years, Bush held a gun to his own head and threatened to pull the trigger if his demands weren’t met. According to the AP, “To earn President Bush’s signature rather than a veto, House and Senate negotiators dropped several provisions he opposed. They include a ban on private interrogators in U.S. military detention facilities and what would have amounted to congressional veto power over a security pact with Iraq.”

    In other words, Congress also maintained recent tradition, swearing not to give Bush a blank check and then whipping out their pens and signing a blank check…

    There’s more at the link above.

    And, as you write in your essay, except for a very small handful of ’em, they are not on our side. Another bad deal is done. How long until the next crisis hits? Might as well bend over and grab our ankles. There is no one with power or influence who represents us.

  4. …filled with information.  Michael Hudson’s “kleptocracy” depiction is spot on.

  5. Look.  Most of the talk about the “crisis” is macro, $700billion, purchases of securities, equity to the govt, etc etc.  The immediate problem, more specifically my problem and your problem, imo is micro, how does all of the spending on this, Iraq (which is off budget), and the borrowing that is necessary to do these things, show up in our little lives?

    I think it means that credit is far more expensive.  I think it means that prices are increasing rapidly, for fuel and food and other necessities.  I think it means that luxuries are increasing in price, too. I think wages and salaries are not increasing enough to keep up with these soaring costs.

    I think what we’re seeing is our $$ flowing upstream, from me and you to the largest of the investors, to the largest of the corporations.  I think what we’re experiencing is a redistribution of wealth away from what used to be the middle and lower classes to the wealthiest.  And I think the vehicle for this is Congress and legislation that has me and you pay for bad investment decisions of people who should lose their $$ now because they made bad investments.

    The cost to us, immediately, seems to be about $4,800/person.  That’s like taking the CEO of your regional bank out to dinner once a week for a year and having him/her order lobster and champagne and caviar ($100 worth of food).

    Oh I wish I wish I wish I were large enough, wealthy enough, important enough so that I could be bailed out.  So I could be taken out to dinner at somebody else’s expense.  But no such luck, apparently.  You and I, my friends, have to staunch a long, slow bleed of our wealth.  And while we’re doing that, we can see who precisely is receiving it.    

    • Edger on September 27, 2008 at 20:38
      Author

    “But I’ll tell you what they don’t want, They don’t want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don’t want well-informed, well-educated people capable of critical thinking. They’re not interested in that. That doesn’t help them. That’s against their interests. They don’t want people who are smart enough to sit around the kitchen table and figure out how badly they’re getting fucked by a system that threw them overboard 30 fucking years ago. You know what they want? Obedient workers – people who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork but just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly shittier jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours, reduced benefits, the end of overtime and the vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it. And, now, they’re coming for your Social Security. They want your fucking retirement money. They want it back, so they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street. And you know something? They’ll get it. They’ll get it all, sooner or later, because they own this fucking place. It’s a big club, and you ain’t in it. You and I are not in the big club.

    • jim p on September 28, 2008 at 02:39

    Pelosi

    Photobucket

    ==============================================

    Reid

    Photobucket

    ==============================================

    Dodd

    Get a load of this!!!!



    Photobucket

    ==============================================

    Frank

    Photobucket

    ==============================================

    Obama

    Photobucket

    The rational question is to ask our Democratic Representatives [sic] “Hey, what’s your price to get you to vote for our interests? Don’t be shy, just state it.”

Comments have been disabled.