Apr 27 2008
We just celebrated Earth Day–ooooo we–a whole day to celebrate the earth, now there is something Americans can get into. They do not have to give up anything, just listen to a few speeches and such. then go back to 364 days of polluting and such.But we were gonna talk about organic foods, so I will jump down off my soapbox on Earth Day.
Large food conglomerates are buying out organic brands. Hain Food Group, for example, owns such brands as Health Valley, Celestial Seasonings, Bearitos and Garden of Eatin’. And who are some of the principal investors in Hain Food Group? ExxonMobil (gasoline, oil spills and global warming); Philip Morris (tobacco); Monsanto (genetically modified foods and hormones); and Lockheed Martin (weapons of mass destruction). What does this mean?
Clearly, as large corporations continue to take control of the organic industry, ethical and safety standards are falling. Free range, for example, does not necessarily mean that the chickens or cows are spending much, if any, of their time in bucolic bliss. And from an environmental perspective, an organic artichoke from California might avoid pollution through pesticides, but it uses a great deal of fossil fuel pollution to arrive at your front door. As Stephen Hopp, points out, “Americans put almost as much fossil fuel into our refrigerators as our cars.”
But that isn’t the only thing we should be worried about. For example, There are only six corporations control 98 percent of seed sales around the world. Some of these companies genetically modify their seeds so that you must buy their expensive fertilizers to make the seeds germinate. These companies also promote growing limited varieties of plants, which is troubling from a biodiversity standpoint.
My point is that, if you go to the store and buy organic foods….you may be mislead.
Apr 25 2008
Did I fall asleep and miss something? The media keeps saying that Clinton won Pennsylvania and will be a boost to her nomination attempt. OK, she won and won pretty darn good, but she only get a bit more finds, not an automatic nomination,–the math does not favor her–well real math not that new math that the Clinton camp uses.
Just looks like the media is determined to keep her in the race, of course she will not bitch about it. And the media gives her every avenue to use her “new” math and make her appear to have a fighting chance–she does not, unless Obama has a complete meltdown. I realize that she is hoping that will be handed to her on a silver platter.
My problem with the reporting is that all I saw and read was telling me she should win Pennsylvania by 7-12 points. She won by 10, but all the reporting seem to indicate that she won by a landslide or that she somehow had pulled off another upset.
Look at MSNBC, they use Harold Ford, Jr as a panel person, he is a Clinton supporter but also beyond that he is the chairman of the DLC a group that is strongly behind Clinton. I just thought that Obama had gained the lead and somehow lost it. But all reports of the primary were as predicted, so where was the excitement?
Ok, I have a problem with the media reporting on this election cycle. IMO, they are in the tank for Clinton. To use Clinton supporters as neutral analysis is not giving the voter a good overall view of the campaign.
Apr 22 2008
This is a re-post from my word press blog and just wanted to see if anyone wanted to predict the future.
A Japanese oil tanker was damaged Monday when it was attacked by a small boat in Middle Eastern waters off the coast of Yemen, the tanker’s owner said. Word of the attack helped to drive world oil prices to a new record.
The attack rattled the nerves of global energy traders, sending the price of benchmark light, sweet crude to a record $117.40 per barrel. Oil prices had also briefly touched $117 per barrel last week, after rebels attacked a pipeline in Nigeria, Africa’s largest oil producer.
Okay this is a daily occurrence, but now I want to start a prediction that oil will hit $125 a barrel by July 4th. Anybody else want to join in? Come on what you got to lose?
Apr 16 2008
That is the question
Whether to suffer the slings and arrows of a mad banker
Is the only consideration.
Bush has said that the Olympics are a sporting event not a political event. Actually it is an economic event. Why? How much of our economy does China control? Oh God, does it control. So if you were heavily indebted to a banker and he invited you to his wedding, you would go to keep him happy. So Bush will go to China to keep his lender happy. There will be NO boycott of the opening ceremony.
Even thought China has a horrible human rights record and it is killing and maiming Tibetans, who just want their country returned to them, but none of that is important to Bush. The borrower must keep the lender happy at all times.
Apr 12 2008
from the very beginning Hillary has had the women’s vote and it has been her staunchest supports. But wait! She seems to be losing that part of the electorate, at least in Pennsylvania. Clinton’s strongest core of support – white women – is beginning to erode in Pennsylvania, the site of the critical April 22 Democratic presidential primary, and a loss here could effectively end her White House run.
A Quinnipiac University survey taken April 3-6 in Pennsylvania found that Clinton’s support fell 6 percentage points in a week among white women. Nationally, a Lifetime Networks poll of women found that 26 percent said they liked Clinton less now than in January, while only 15 percent said they liked her more.
But why would she be losing their support? It is best summed up by a 50 something voter from Pennsylvania, “I do not like the way Hillary Clinton has run her campaign”. Thjis has got to be a concern to the campaign. She entered into Pennsylvania with a 17 pt lead over Obama and now she has only a 6 pt or so lead.
I realize that polls are like anuses (?) everyone has one. But, IMO, if she does not win big in Pennsylvania, then North Carolina and Indiana become make or break. I really do not see her making it past those, no matter how much bravado she exhibits.
Apr 08 2008
His anyone read this story? It seems that there is NO exit from Iraq. The plan is temporary, but will the next president honor it?
A confidential draft agreement covering the future of US forces in Iraq, passed to the Guardian, shows that provision is being made for an open-ended military presence in the country.
The draft strategic framework agreement between the US and Iraqi governments, dated March 7 and marked “secret” and “sensitive”, is intended to replace the existing UN mandate and authorises the US to “conduct military operations in Iraq and to detain individuals when necessary for imperative reasons of security” without time limit.
The authorisation is described as “temporary” and the agreement says the US “does not desire permanent bases or a permanent military presence in Iraq”. But the absence of a time limit or restrictions on the US and other coalition forces – including the British – in the country means it is likely to be strongly opposed in Iraq and the US.
It will be interesting to see if this is addressed by the candidates on their stump speeches about Iraq.
Apr 07 2008
I have heard all the pundits that have been saying that Hillary should just drop out of the race, so that the Party can get to work on McCain. Also we have heard that this back and forth between Clinton and Obama is good conversation. IMO, I do not see the campaigns as a conversation, more like he said, she said petty argument.
But let us look at the problems that face Clinton:
1–Penn had to resign.
2–The Ohio hospital story
3–The sniper mis-speak
4–$109 million income for the last several years. Hard to say you speak for those making $35,000 or less.
5–The super delegate trickle toward Obama.
6–Michigan Dem voters say no do-over
7–Lagging delegate count and popular vote
8–Her support for NAFTA before she opposed it
This list is not everything, but it is the must quoted. My question is can she truly get the nomination with these problems. Will a squeeker in Pennsylvania, will she be pressured to drop out? Can she survive without a large win in Pennsylvania?
Just would like to hear what you guys think.
Apr 04 2008
I know that a month ago Obama’s pastor said somethings that have the media just cannot move past. They say how appalling it is that an American would say such negative things about their country. They especially have a hard on for his statement that the US brought the attack on themselves. Of course, that would be a no-no to the corporate media and they just cannot understand why he would say such a thing.
Please, these people are idiots! we are observing the 40th anniversary of the death of Martin Luther King and his accomplishments. as we should, there is not a more deserving person than he. I know you want to know where this is going…
A year before his death the Rev. Martin Luther king, jr, made a speech on the war in Vietnam, in that speech he said “….that he felt he must speak out against the biggest purveyor of violence in the world…..my own government…” (this a paraphrase}. So my point is that even MLK made speeches about the policies of the US. His words were different than those of Rev. Wright, but none the less the sentiment is the same.
So may I suggest unless the media wants to degrade an American hero, then let the speech go, on both of these men. The country is trying to move pass the crap of the media, but there are some that want to keep beating a dead mule. This is no longer newsworthy, it is no bordering on propaganda.
Apr 01 2008
Bush and McCain have been telling the American people for weeks and even months just how well things are going in Iraq. But then all hell blows up in their faces. But the good news is that it is being handled by the Iraqis. well not exactly, it is US air support and US Special Forces that are holding the whole thing together in Basra. Shortly after McCain leaves Iraq it blows up into a massive situation killing 100s.
But now the good news is that there will be a ceaefire called by al-Sadr. Iraqi PM Maliki has praised the guy for his influence in stopping the violence. Are we that stupid? Who do you think called for the violence? His a/hole is just flexing his muscle to show that he can do anything he wants and the the US and Maliki must deal with him and him alone. He is a power broker and anything pertaining to Iraq will have to go through him.
There is little progress that would indicate that there is any way that we can be out of Iraq in 16 months. Something a couple of candidates are saying. The Iraqis have no Air Force and the US will be there to provide that for them for as long as I am alive. I hate to admit it, but it looks like McCain is the only one of the candidates telling the truth–and his 100 year scenario looks like a done deal. God, I really hate to admit to that!
Voters need to know this kind of stuff. Will their candidate really produce what they promise as far as Iraq goes?
Mar 31 2008
It looks like a lot of people are calling for Hillary to quit the race so that the dems can concentrate of beating McCain. Most of the calls are coming from Obama supporters like Leahy.
I saw NO, but only if the candidates concentrate on the issues and the differences between them and McCain. But if the candidates are going to continue to focus on the negative, with more attacks and insults, then they both should bow out. The constant manure slinging is doing little to help the Dems and could very well assist McCain in his campaign.
But it appears that some if not all are running for president, for that reason only, everything else seems to be secondary. In Obama’s case, this could very well be his only shot at the presidency and sometimes it appears that everything else is secondary.
The issues should be the focus. The American people need answers to their questions on how to help solve their dilemmas. Negativity is not help the Dems gain more votes, if anything it could be driving some away and towards that other party.
Mar 28 2008
I was just wondering what everyone thinks about Nader in the presidential mix? I am not oo thrilled with him, but not for the reasons that some democrats have. He is blamed for Gore’s loss, I hold no grudge on that matter. I, however, have a problem with him because of his constant running for office. While I hold must of his issues close to my heart, I do not like the fact that he seems to be a perpetual candidate. But in the years between the elections he has little to say. But then he revs up and all hell breaks lose.
I would like my candidate to be there even in the “off season’ fighting for the progressive agenda, not just show up every 4 years and spout some left leaning agenda and expect people like me to support him. Nader does have a wide range of progressive stands and some are very appealing, but I just have a hard time throwing my support in his direction.
I would like to hear others thoughts about his candidacy.
Mar 27 2008
You remember him? He was that other candidate that the media marginalized. I guess he will be best remembered for his reading of the Pentagon papers into the Congressional record back in the ’70’s. Granted he was never high on anyone’s list of candidates, but now he has finally made news and changed party affiliation.
His announcement yesterday.
“I’m joining the Libertarian Party because it is a party that combines a commitment to freedom and peace that can’t be found in the two major parties that control the government and politics of America,” Gravel said in a prepared statement. “My libertarian views, as well as my strong stance against war, the military industrial complex and American imperialism, seem not to be tolerated by Democratic Party elites who are out of touch with the average American.”
While I am not a supporter by any means, he does have a point. But it is not just the Democratic Party that is out of touch with average Americans; it is ALL politicians. I do not foresee this move giving him any more clout than he had within the Dem Party, but maybe he will get a bit more publicity than he did before. After all, is that not the goal of every politician?