Framing a Terrorist for Veteran’s Day

( – promoted by buhdydharma )

Fort Hood is not an end story. Nor is it a beginning. It is the dead middle of a planned story. It is a story about division and fear tactics, patsies and martial law. Its a story about raising the frog’s bathwater incrementally to boil.

That our Muslim citizens are becoming all suspect is no less devious than the beginnings that created our ability to inter the Japanese, or what created Nazism.

Lets move back to April of 2009, when the US Homeland Security Department reclassified Right Wing American Veterans as potential Terrorists. Wow, this incident conveniently creates an atmosphere for keeping surveillance on the only people who might protect us, should a military coup create havoc in our country.

But further back in the way-back machine is the story about Northcom being deployed as of October 2008 on US soil effectively killing Posse Comitatus, for the express reasons of:

“They may be called upon to help with civil unrest and crowd control,” said the Army Times when it first reported on it. These duties would be in addition to dealing with “potentially horrific scenarios such as massive poisoning and chaos in response to a chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear or high-yield explosive, or CBRNE, attack.”

Nothing happens in a vacuum, and these taken together weave quite a pattern. The newest incident justifies ever less freedoms for security.

I would refer you to the Brasscheck TV link from a few days ago, reiterating my initial position on the Ft. Hood horror, posted live that night and expounded on Friday past on WWL Radio, but that video is no longer up.

Instead, I will quote the email from the creator of that site:

ONE guy shooting a hand gun killed HOW many people – and on a military

base? Are you serious?

And the one shooter is now in a coma?

And, as of now at least, there’s no surveillance camera footage?

And he’s a Muslim who also happens to be a serviceman with a mental disorder involving gunplay who did it with privately owned weapons?

This thing could not have been scripted or casted better if Hollywood had produced it.

Let’s see:

1. Private gun ownership demonized – check

2. Muslims demonized – check

3. Military personnel demonized – check

4. Base dwelling troops at home terrorized

by a fellow American – check

5. Yet another chance to distract the public – check

If this really happened the way it’s been spun, there have to be a lot of social engineers

high fiving each other at their good luck.

And what about the logic of the gunman?

He was afraid of being deployed to a combat zone…so he created one at home so he could be killed sooner? I realize the man was “crazy” but come on.

(I wonder what prescribed medically-endorsed pharmaceutical substance(s) he was one. We’ll

never know because it would violate his privacy. Score another one for Big Pharma.)

13 killed and 30 wounded by one man with two pistols.

Nearly a 50% kill rate.

Ever fired a handgun? Ever tried aiming and firing two at a time? Under pressure? Ever reload a handgun under pressure? There were people shooting at him. That’s

a little pressure.

We’re talking about yet another superhuman performance by a “lone gunman” who is conveniently not conscious to tell the tale.

Caliber doesn’t matter and the bogus non-fact that these were “automatic”

pistols is bullshit as well.

Meanwhile, we’re being drowned in flags, memorials and interviews with the victims’ families – and a total absence of any information that makes sense.

“But the government would never do such a thing to its own troops!”

Uh, excuse me. It’s putting thousands of them through a meat grinder in a pointless, unwinnable charade of a war as we speak – in two countries, while gearing up for two more (Iran and Pakistan.)

Do you think the dead and wounded from overseas are any less dead and wounded victims from Fort Hood?

Assume the gunman was crazy. What does that make the Bush-Bama regime?

Here’s a news report about another mass shooting by a lone gunman with two pistols that sneaked its way onto the air before it was pulled off and never replayed.

Reality please, just a little reality.

No one asked about friendly fire, either.

The news is now “leaking” all kinds of information claiming that the alleged shooter was radicalizing, and had poor reviews.

The Right is beefing up its “We need to be safe from Muslim Terrorists” right around the Flag-waving celebration of our War Culture that is Veterans Day. Not to insult Veterans of any sort; plenty of well-intended, brave and honorable men and women have served in our armed forces. It is merely that this authors opinion that many of these were lied to, indoctrinated and used as pawns in wars of aggression, wars of hegemony, and wars for profit; justified in the name of “Patriotism.” Patriotism, a word that has become the Manchurian trigger for committing any act whatsoever Globally in order to serve the interests of the vested Elite Class.

Worse? Any one questioning the story is being branded as naive or misguided by many on the Left, who INSIST that this man, should he have committed this impossible act against his own, MUST have been guided by Religious Ideology.

“Muslim Extremism and Terrorists are REAL,” they say, “and I cannot believe Liberals would defend this filthy murderer, because they think the US sucks or something.”

Check: Extremists exist in every religion. Bomb the US back to the Stone Age, destabilize our governments to the point of non-existence, and see what the Clinic Bombers and Palienites create. There would be extremist groups of Christian soldiers killing and torturing in the name of their one true God. Heck, some already do. Look at how the Jewish Religious extremists act in Israel, recently beating a female journalist for daring to use a camera on the Sabbath.

We real Liberals who question this story are not in denial.

We are, however, capable of the logic and reason that tells us this man could not have possibly shot that many people no more than a magic bullet made turns and shot Kennedy from the front of the neck, while making a quick detour through the wrist, then chest of Connelly in the front seat.

We are also painfully aware that the US government is capable of scapegoating patsies and creating evidence to create a bias against a group of people by proxy: Remember the Cuban-commie that was Oswald?

I listened live, and wished I had recorded the TV coverage. When Military Personnel take down a shooter, and confirm kill live, I tend to believe them. When Military Personnel name at least three shooters, I believe their ability to count. When Military Personnel claim to have one dead, and two in custody, and then claim they are still taking sniper fire, I assume that after many deployments, taking live action and gunfire, they are quite capable, if not experts at assessing a situation, in facts are EXPERTS at such assessments.

There were in fact heinous murders at Fort Hood. Tragic, sad murders. Murders more likely caused by a bunch of brave young soldiers put at wits end, victims of PTSD gone untreated that the Army is pushing its medical staff not to diagnose.

“I am under a lot of pressure to not diagnose PTSD” (another anonymous army psychiatrist)

Even was this Nidal Hasan involved, I would think that this fact should at least be given consideration before people jump on the “Evil Islam” bandwagon.

But, even having listened live to the trained soldiers reporting live at Ft Hood, no one dare question the official story, one man, one Muslim, in a coma. A doctor not combat veteran, shoots forty people with 12 bullets and none of the brave, trained combat soldiers could take him down.

There was a great deal more journalism alive in Kennedy’s day, and far more openness to question the “evil commies” than today’s transcribers have to grant a populace increasingly closed to the idea that “Islam” is not inherently evil.

The so-called enemy came from within. So now our own troops will be increasingly suspect, increasingly pressured to denounce any religion but Christianity, and Judaism to a lesser degree. They will be pressured to act as though they have no complaints with the Military, for any criticism nowk, could be used as future condemnation as a traitor.

In the American view, in this the new American Fascist State, intense paranoia serves them well.

In this, the land of increasing desertion, suicides and friendly fire (fragging) incidents, both the Military and our Citizenry just suffered a wake up call.

Be Afraid. Always be afraid. Toe the Line.

This incident was horrific, and my heart bleeds for the dead and wounded, bleeds for their loved ones.

I have no idea who the shooters were, we will never know their mindset or their reasons.

But on this day, I support our Veterans by doing the most Patriotic thing a Citizen can do. I QUESTION.

I question the what the Truth is behind the story, I question the timing as 40k+ more troops are being sent by President Obama to kill Muslims, I question why Hillary is claiming a group of 100 or less is imminent threat.

I question our very reason for these wars.

Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people.

The best way to support our troops is to question war itself.

“The President is merely the most important among a large number of public servants. He should be supported or opposed exactly to the degree which is warranted by his good conduct or bad conduct, his efficiency or inefficiency in rendering loyal, able, and disinterested service to the Nation as a whole. Therefore it is absolutely necessary that there should be full liberty to tell the truth about his acts, and this means that it is exactly necessary to blame him when he does wrong as to praise him when he does right. Any other attitude in an American citizen is both base and servile. To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or any one else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else.”

Theodore Roosevelt