In Afghanistan: ‘Security Deal’ Means US Occupation Forever
Sarah Lazare, staff writer Common Dreams
Published on Tuesday, November 19, 2013
Days before the so-called bi-lateral security agreement heads to an Afghan council of elders and political leaders for a final decision, the U.S. is attempting to force through a stipulation that would allow U.S. troops to continue raiding Afghan homes, in addition to measures giving U.S. troops and contractors immunity from Afghan law and extending U.S. military presence far beyond Obama’s 2014 pullout date.
…
The U.S. is pushing for the right to enter Afghan homes over the apparent objection of Afghan negotiators. “We believe it is not only the violation of the Afghan sovereignty, but also of the basic rights of the Afghan people,” said President Hamid Karzai’s spokesperson Aimal Faizi on Monday, referencing the U.S. demand to be allowed to enter Afghan homes.This latest sticking point comes after attempts on the part of U.S. negotiators to ram through immunity for U.S. troops and independent contractors from Afghan law. According to (t)he Washington Post, the U.S. appears to have succeeded in including this immunity in an accord reached Saturday.
…
The Washington Post reports that a draft text of the agreement does not specify how many U.S. troops will be allowed to remain in Afghanistan, giving the U.S. unilateral power to determine this number. Furthermore, the document does not prohibit the U.S. from using Afghan territory to launch drone strikes against nearby Pakistan.
Leaked Draft Points To Endless War In Afghanistan
By: DSWright, Firedog Lake
Tuesday November 19, 2013 10:42 am
Despite constant public promises by President Obama and his administration that US forces were leaving Afghanistan in 2014 a draft of a US-Afghan security deal details plans for endless war in Afghanistan. Support for the war in Afghanistan is non-existent among the American public which rightly sees it as a waste of blood and treasure. The only ones benefiting at this point are opium dealers in Kabul and war profiteers in Washington.
…
This draft stands in stark contrast to public commitments Obama made to the American people wherein he declared “as our coalition agreed, by the end of 2014 the Afghans will be fully responsible for the security of their country.”
…
15,000 American troops indefinitely? That is the Afghans taking “full responsibility?” And how much will that cost since President Obama keeps searching for a Grand Bargain to cut even more spending on the backs of seniors and the poor. Currently the Afghanistan War is costing $1.7 billion a week – it’s the age of austerity for everything but pointless wars.It is becoming increasingly obvious that the Obama Administration’s lack of imagination is only surpassed by its dishonesty. A war that is pointless even by American imperial standards will seemingly go on forever until strong enough opposition can be mustered here at home to stop this senseless killing and profligate spending.
The loya jirga which must ratify this agreement starts meeting on Thursday. Hamid Karzai has indicated he will lobby in favor of immunity for US Troops and CIA and DOD Mercenaries but is unalterably opposed to allowing random home invasions.
7 comments
Skip to comment form
Author
knowledge in re Afghanistan.
The MIC and “supporters” is not about to give up on Afghanistan, probably, ad infinitum! Afghanistan, a most impoverished nation with young death rates, a “war” that won’t stop, its citizens constantly placed in harms way and endless onslaught to its nation, drones and poor infrastructures a la grace of the U.S. Why? Because Afghanistan is a country so rich in natural resources as to not be believed, though the Afghans have obviously not had the means to exploit the wealth beneath their feet (and, maybe, they never wished to even if they could). See: The Natural resources of Afghanistan. This article is among many, mahy such articles. And, then, think about the Caspian Sea, absolutely rolling in oil and natural gas. The U.S. has, for all these years now sought to build the natural gas pipeline from the Caspian Sea to Afghanistan . . . . China has, as well. The U.S. is determined that IT will build that pipeline, and, seems obvious, we won’t leave until that goal is accomplished. For this, and other reasons, might these be the reasons that Afghans have been killing U.S. military personages?