Bush: Buy Our Weapons or Iran will hit Paris with Nukes

Think the Bush Administration is done trying open new fronts in using scare tactics in the service of war profiteering?  Think again.

In yet another display of mindboggling display of fearmongering coupled with greed, the Bush Administration is now now telling Europe that it needs to buy American missile defense systems–or else.  From the Los Angeles Times:

With American officials working to close a deal on a missile defense system in Europe, the head of the U.S. program warned Thursday that Iran was within two or three years of producing a missile that could reach most European capitals.

“They’re already flying missiles that exceed what they would need in a fight with Israel. Why? Why do they continue this progression in terms of range of missiles? It’s something we need to think about,” Air Force Lt. Gen. Henry Obering III, director of the U.S. Missile Defense Agency, told a conference here on missile defense… [snip]

“Our short-range defenses could protect Rome and Athens,” Obering said, but he warned that London, Paris and Brussels would remain vulnerable “against an Iranian [intermediate-range missile] threat.”

That’s right, mes amis, meine Damen und Herren.  Unless you buy our preposterously expensive and utterly ineffectual Star Wars “defense” technology, dangerous terrorist Ahmadinejad and his merry band of clerics will unilaterally start a war with Israel, create a mushroom cloud over Tel Aviv, and use the expanded conflict to send your beloved Arc de Triomphe and Reichstag into the stratosphere.

The proposed U.S. plan is to build the Star Wars interceptor network in Poland (don’t forget Poland!) and the Czech Republic–both part of the New Europe that Bush and Rumsfeld find so much more attractive than dirty Old Europe.  There are two possible reasons the Bushies want to build this silliness in Eastern Europe: either Western Europe will have none of it, or the Administration simply wants to jab a fork in Russia’s eye for the fun of it.  As the L.A. Times says:

Malcolm Chalmers, a onetime foreign policy advisor to former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, said the decision to locate the system in former Warsaw Pact nations may have sparked opposition in Moscow that otherwise “would be much less vociferous.”

“Did we only deploy it there because that’s the only place available?” said Chalmers, who is now a fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, which sponsored Thursday’s conference.

Some Europeans have questioned whether Iran represents a genuine threat to Europe, and have accused the Bush administration of undermining existing arms control agreements by proceeding unilaterally on missile defense.

“This is firstly and foremostly an American choice and should be taken as such,” said Yves Boyer, deputy director of the Foundation for Strategic Research in Paris. “It has not been requested by any European state and . . . it does not answer the critical need for Europeans to process their own assessment of strategic capabilities.”

To say nothing of the fact that the Czech government would be acquiescing to Washington’s request against the protests of its own people.

Congress cut this fantasy plan out of last year’s defense budget because it was such an outrageous waste of money and needless pointy stick in the eye of Russia.  Besides, even if the defense system did work, it would only work against one or two low-tech dumb missiles sent without decoys; who would possibly believe that Iran would attempt such a move and simply wait for the world’s retaliation?  But the Bush Administration was never one to be deterred by facts, and is desperately trying to get this missile shield built regardless of the U.S. Congress, scientific consensus, coherent military stragetic planning, or diplomatic intelligence.  And all for what?

$310 million dollars, that’s what:

The Pentagon’s Missile Defense Agency (MDA) requested $310 million in 2008 for a missile defense site in Eastern Europe, supposedly to defend Europe and the United States from Iranian missiles. However, Czech citizens and the Russian government strongly oppose a Czech Republic site. While Russian President Vladimir Putin proposed several practical alternatives, President Bush is pressing ahead with the European site, eager to pour concrete before his term is up.

$310 million dollars.  At the rate we are spending money in Iraq ($222,222 per minute), the profit from selling this boondoggle to Europe wouldn’t even cover the cost of occupying Iraq for a single day.  But the wheels of the military-industrial complex must be greased, no matter what the cost.

One has to ask oneself what the overall military strategy of the Bush Administration seems to be, even if one grants moral or strategic legitimacy to the Bush Doctrine of pre-emption, torture and abrogation of disarmament treaties.

They invade Iraq ostensibly to protect the world of terrorists’ acquiring control of chemical, biological and even nuclear weapons.  They push for the bombing of alleged Iranian nuclear sites and for the invasion of Iran to ensure that Hezbollah does not acquire weapons of mass destruction.  Ostensibly focusing on the clandestine terrorist threat, they bungle diplomacy with North Korea, allowing them to develop nuclear technology coupled with ranged missiles.  They also allow Pakistan, a country a few heartbeats away from radical Islamist government, to acquire even more sophisticated nuclear missile technology.  But they also want to spend insane amounts of money defending against the very missile-based technology that they have allowed to proliferate while allegedly focusing on clandestine WMD threats–even if it means infuriating the rest of the world, escalating an arms race, and making the planet a more dangerous place from a diplomatic point of view.  Exxon-Mobil doesn’t even get the prospect of more oil out of the bargain.

Call me a conspiracy theorist, but it seems to me that the Bush Administration simply wants to spend money on war, regardless of its purpose, strategic coherence or realpolitik considerations, to further the interests of its corporate cronies in the military defense establishment.

And that’s the problem with laissez-faire government of the corporate interests, by the corporate interests, and for the corporate interests: not even the warmongering makes sense anymore, even from an imperial perspective.  Much as the Bush Administration might try to emulate them in political tactics and warfare technology, not even the Empire from the actual Star Wars movies would be so strategically inept: at least Darth Vader built the Death Star in order to expand Imperial power, rather than as an ultra-expense boondoggle to enrich a few of the Emperor’s corporate cronies.  Anyone who has seen the extraordinary documentary Why We Fight knows that the conservative military-industrial complex in America is too greedy create the military dominance worth of a true imperial regime.

The Bushies just hope there are enough Polands and Czech Republics out there to buy into the game before they figure out that the Emperor has no clothes.

DN EXCLUSIVE – The Three Trillion Dollar War:

This should be heard/watched by Many!

Nobel Laureate Joseph Stiglitzand Harvard Economist Linda Bilmes on the True Cost of the US Invasion andOccupation of Iraq

read/watch/listen to more | digg story

Their book: The Three Trillion Dollar War: The True Cost of the Iraq Conflict

One week after President Bush rejected charges the war in Iraq has hurt the

US economy, a new book puts a conservative estimate of the war¹s cost at $3

trillion so far. In their first national broadcast interview upon their

book¹s publication, Nobel laureate and former chief World Bank economist,

Joseph Stiglitz, and co-author Linda Bilmes of Harvard University say the

Bush administration has repeatedly low-balled the cost of the war‹and even

kept a second set of records hidden from the American public.

Friday Philosophy: Perspective

On Monday I read Learning to Count Past Two…with a few updates as asides…to a Women’s Studies class called Changing Women’s Lives.  My partner Debbie is coordinator of the Women’s Studies Resource and Empowerment Center (WSREC)  and teaches that class.  It would be great if it were a faculty line, and hence a full time position, but that is not the case.  She’s rather considered more of a hybrid staff/adjunct faculty person (i.e. she gets no benefits, except as my spouse).

Let’s not even talk about adjunct compensation.  It’s one of the things our society should be ashamed of.

I’ve presented that piece live a time or two before.  It was, in fact, written to be presented to a Psychology of Women class at the University of Central Arkansas.  The professor who invited me to lecture her classes several times didn’t get tenure.  That’s an observation, not a conclusion.

But it is true that many, many people think that teaching about people like me to college or high school students is beyond the pale.  And I leave open the definition of “people like me.”

The chapter the students were in the midst of studying was on gender.  Debbie is disenchanted with the book she chose.  It turns out the authors/editors are more stuck in the 70s with regard to gender than she initially thought.  I only skimmed the gender chapter, but I have to agree.

How simplistic is it to present “gender is entirely a social construct” as a given?

I mean, they did include reference to Anne Fausto-Sterling re: intersex issues and to Les Feinberg, Kate Bornstein and Judith Butler about gender, but there seemed to me to be an undercurrent of disapproval about transfolk.  More Old School, if you will, and Old School didn’t understand us and attacked whatever they didn’t understand.

Les was allowed to contribute an essay.  And I enjoyed the essay very much.  But I do note that it was the very last essay at the end of the chapter.  And I did make a mental note of the fact that almost all feminist text books I’ve seen, if they do deign to include something written by a transperson, it is almost always something written by a transman.  Why is that?

Some of the students had read some of the essays, but few, if any, had read the Feinberg piece.

After I got a chance to say my piece (which they were also provided a copy of in BlackBoard), I asked for questions.  This impromptu portion is actually what I enjoy most.  I’m not comfortable as a speaker…which is why I rather call myself a writer.  That way I get to sit while I interact.  I rarely hear a new question anymore and I have stories to illustrate answers to just about every question imaginable.  Most of those stories have been included in other writings hear and there.

In reference to a question about the reaction of my friends and family, I got to talk about that, but also about how it feels to become a topic of conversation in six states almost overnight and about having religious folks want to chase me out of town.  And I also got an opportunity to talk about turning what could be a liability into an opportunity.

I was asked about whether or not I had ever been assaulted, and I got to talk about the mixed feelings a transwoman would have when hit in the neck by a baseball-sized rock by a group of high school kids who were screaming, “Dykes!  Dykes!” outside of the Women’s Coffeehouse at Vino’s in Little Rock.  And about how the cops didn’t care.  And further about how straight men needed to get over the need to beat and/or kill transsexual women…and the faster the better.  Thinking that results in the thought that transsexual women are responsible for that sort of interaction and deserve what they get is another of the shames of this society.  We wonder when someone is going to recognize that.

And I also got to speak a little about personal self-defense, though I’m always quite uncomfortable doing so, for personal reasons.  Being an MP was not the best time of my life.

Another common question, though it often takes awhile for people to get comfortable enough to ask, is whether sex feels to me like it does to someone born with factory-installed equipment.  In short, “Are your orgasms female orgasms?”  Honesty is the best policy:  “How can I know?  How can I know what anyone else’s orgasm but my own feels like?  I’m a woman.  My orgasms are therefore a woman’s orgasms.”

What else is there to say?

Back in December, I wrote The Observer.  Even in the midst of an event like that on Monday, I am an observer.  An examined life, and all that…

I hope Socrates had this right.

So I’m sitting there watching myself interact with these students, and with Debbie since we also brought up our civil union…oddly, the students didn’t ask about that.  And I’m remembering what it was like at that first time and in that first place that I presented the piece.  And I’m reflecting on the differences between the two classes.  Back in Arkansas, most of the women in the class were conservatively Christian, southern, white women.  The audience Monday was all women of color who live in or near Newark, NJ.

I’m also forced to remember then in other respects.  There have been so many alterations on the fabric of the environment in which the speaker exposes the words.  The world changes…slowly.

And the speaker has changed in many subtle ways.  But that’s harder to measure.  Heisenberg applies…or if you prefer, The Observer Effect.  The act of observation necessarily changes what is being observed.  And it also changes The Observer.  All we can ever know is an approximation to what is.

And if you ask me to go beyond observing the changes in The Observer, my brain starts becoming mushy.  I’m sure there is a there there, but something prevents me from doing more than stepping quickly and lightly into and out of that space.

I mostly feel the need to nap after visits.  That doesn’t encourage writing about them.  So I write poor approximations to what I think I can remember myself thinking.  Life is complicated.

People often express their concern for me when I have reported what it’s like to be me.  One of the students present wrote me a letter.  She is in one of my classes as well as Debbie’s class.  I told her on Thursday I would write back to her this weekend.  She’s the woman who asked about whether I had ever been assaulted.  I asked for a couple of days to develop a frame of reference.  

It’s all about perspective.  Viewing me now from the point of view of the me who existed in 1992, there is no question:  it’s a good life.  

Mathematically speaking:  Even if sometimes the acceleration has been negative, the velocity has always been positive.  I increase.

Not bad for someone who is basically lazy.


Cyanide

On Being Lazy

The bad part about laziness

is the guilt that insists I

accomplish things in order

to hide that facet

The paradox is that if I

became free to be lazy

I suspect I would get

much more accomplished

–Robyn Elaine Serven

–February 29, 2008

Pony Party: Moving… and Looking for Home…

Go confidently in the direction of your dreams! Live the life you’ve imagined. As you simplify your life, the laws of the universe will be simpler.

Henry David Thoreau

I’m reading lots of stories about journeys. nlob on his new farm; victory coffee looking for home, Edger filling a friend’s SUV with his belongings to set out on yet another adventure. buhdy left San Francisco months ago, i’m moving to the Netherlands. RiaD just returned to her beloved farm, and H2D is making Portland home. We’ve all lost loved ones to the great field trip that is death. And, it seems, all of us are on some one or another philosophical/metaphysical/existential Lewis and Clark-like expedition.

Here’s to our journeys then… those inward and those outward. Mostly, to finding home::: how we imagine it, remember it, and dream of it.

Don’t rec the pony. But do chit chat and make nice stories… and remember to be excellent to each other.

Help veterans, call your Congressmen about H.R. 5448

http://tomallen.house.gov/inde…

Rep. Tom Allen Praises VA Decision to Change Rule on Proving PTSD is Service-Connected

Tuesday February 19, 2008

Says passage of the Full Faith in Veterans Act is still necessary “to ensure that our veterans receive the highest quality of care”

Portland, Maine (February 19, 2008) — U.S. Representative Tom Allen today issued the following statement in response to the Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA) decision to no longer require combat veterans diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) while on active duty to provide written documentation that they witnessed or experienced a traumatic event during their service that caused their PTSD.  On February 11th, Representative Allen unveiled H.R. 5448, the Full Faith in Veterans Act at an Augusta press conference with veterans and representatives of veterans service organizations.  

 

“I am pleased with the VA’s decision to drop the requirement that some veterans must provide additional written documentation to prove that their PTSD is connected to their service,” Representative Allen said.  “I am disappointed that this rule change only applies to service members diagnosed while on active duty.  We can and we must do more.  The new procedure will require only a diagnosis of PTSD during a medical examination for some veterans, while a change my bill, the Full Faith in Veterans Act, would apply to all veterans.”

“This change is a step in the right direction towards easing the process for veterans seeking care and compensation for PTSD,” Representative Allen said.  “However, my legislation is still necessary in order to enact this change into law, so that the VA cannot reverse this decision in the future, and to ensure that it applies to all veterans, not only combat veterans.  This legislation is necessary to ensure that our veterans receive the highest quality of care, which they have earned and deserve.”

The Full Faith in Veterans Act also requires the VA to review and update its diagnosis and treatment procedures for PTSD, traumatic brain injury, and other mental health disorders. It stipulates that VA employees responsible for rating disability compensation claims involving PTSD must successfully complete a certification program that incorporates best practices issued by the VA’s National Center on PTSD.  It directs the VA to audit the examinations Department of Veterans Affairs mental health professionals conduct for veterans who submit claims for PTSD disability compensation to ensure that such employees take sufficient time necessary to diagnose and accurately rate the severity of the disorder.  Representative Allen’s legislation also requires that the documents mental health professionals consider when evaluating for PTSD and raters rating the claims must include the veteran’s records from VA Vet Centers along with written opinions of any medical professional providing mental health care.  

Four at Four

  1. Ruh-roh. The Financial Times reports Bernanke predicts bank failures. “Some small US banks are likely to fail as a result of the housing crisis, Ben Bernanke said yesterday, warning that his country faced a more difficult situation than in the aftermath of the dotcom bust in 2001. ‘There will probably be some bank failures,’ the Fed chairman told the Senate banking committee in his second day of biannual testimony to Congress. He said the banks at risk were ‘small and in many cases de novo [new] banks that are heavily invested in real estate in localities where prices have fallen’.”

    And seven years of conservative economic policies and governance has left the United States in a “weaker position to respond to the negative growth shock today than it was in 2001.” The U.S. had one war in Afghanistan in 2001, it has two today. The dollar was strong in 2001, it is weak today. The price of oil was $20 a barrel in 2001, it is is over $100 a barrel today. George W. Bush, the Republicans, and former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan have destroyed the U.S. ecnonomy. Don’t worry about them though, they’re making out like bandits. Oh, and when those small banks fail, guess who will be doing the bailout? Yup, poor and middle class taxpayers.

  2. Another result of conservative military policy under George W. Bush. The Guardian reports that the Afghanistan mission is close to failing.

    After six years of US-led military support and billions of [dollars] in aid, security in Afghanistan is ‘deteriorating’ and President Hamid Karzai’s government controls less than a third of the country, America’s top intelligence official has admitted.

    Mike McConnell testified in Washington that Karzai controls about 30% of Afghanistan and the Taliban 10%, and the remainder is under tribal control…

    A big injection of foreign troops has failed to bring stability. The US has almost 50,000 soldiers in Afghanistan and – twice as many as in 2004 – while the UK has 7,700, mostly in Helmand. Another 2,200 US marines are due to arrive next month to combat an expected Taliban surge.

    Nato commanders paint the suicide bombs and ambushes as signs of a disheartened enemy… But analysts believe the Taliban is successfully adapting the brutal guerrilla tactics that have served Iraqi insurgents so well.

    Earlier in the week Sen. Joe Biden warned of failure in Afghanistan. Biden called on NATO to bail out the Bush administration’s failed policy in Afghanistan. “NATO must be ‘fully in the fight’ in Afghanistan – nothing less than the future of the alliance is at stake, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee told a luncheon crowd at the Council on Foreign Relations. ‘Many of our NATO allies thought they were signing up for a peacekeeping mission, not counter-insurgency operations,’ said Biden, D-Del. ‘Many are fighting with incredible bravery in the south. But the so-called ‘national caveats’ are making a mockery of NATO – and the notion of a unified mission.'” If Bush didn’t have the military distracted in Iraq, things would have gone differently in Afghanistan.

  3. The New York Times reports Turkey withdraws troops from Northern Iraq. “Turkey’s military announced it had withdrawn all of its troops from northern Iraq by Friday morning, bringing an eight-day ground offensive against Kurdish guerrillas to a close… Reports differed on the extent of the withdrawal, with an American military official in Iraq and a representative for the Kurdish fighters saying some troops were still in the country. The Turkish military… said that the ground campaign in which 24 Turkish soldiers and as many as 243 Kurdish fighters were killed had simply run its course as its goals had been met.”

There are bonus stories about space soot and Maya blue beneath the fold.

  1. The Discovery of space soot casts doubt on dark energy theory, reports The Guardian. “Researchers revealed yesterday that limitless stretches of space are strewn with interstellar soot, making it harder to see very distant objects such as exploding stars or supernovae.

    “The finding, reported in the US journal Science, is more than a matter of cosmic cleanliness. Proof of the existence of space soot raises serious questions about the mysterious ‘dark energy’ that is thought to drive the expansion of the universe… The latest study suggests that space soot might be to blame, at least in part, for making distant stars appear more faint than expected.”

    “We’re not saying this explains dark energy, but we’re saying this stuff is out there and like dust in front of a lens, it might make these objects appear dimmer than they are,” said Andrew Steele at the Carnegie Institution for Science in Washington DC.

  2. The New York Times reports on The grim story of Maya blue.

    Here is a swatch of Maya blue:

    The vibrant sky color can be seen on pottery, murals and other artifacts produced by the Maya people of Central America centuries ago and the unusual, durable pigment remains vibrant today long after other colors have faded away.

    It was also the color of Chaak, the rain god, and of human sacrifice…

    The composition of Maya blue, first used around 300 A.D. and which is almost impervious to age, acid, weather and even modern solvents, remained a mystery until 1960s when chemists deciphered its chemical components: the dye indigo and a clay mineral known as palygorskite, which can be melded together by heat to produce the pigment.

    What remained unknown was where and when the Maya made Maya blue…

    An answer comes from a bowl that has been sitting in the Field Museum in Chicago for decades, Dr. Arnold and colleagues from the Field Museum and Northwestern University, report in the journal Antiquity.

Buckle up . . . .

Here we go again!  Only this time it’s not anthrax, it’s ricin!

Ricin has been found in a motel room in Las Vegas.

Feb. 29 (Bloomberg) — Seven people were hospitalized, one of them in a coma, after a substance believed to be the deadly toxin ricin was discovered yesterday in a Las Vegas hotel room. . . .

The FBI, which is cooperating with the inquiry, said there is no reason to suspect terrorism. Ricin is made from castor beans and has no antidote. Alternative uses include experimental cancer treatments. . . .

Federal officials have warned police departments to look out for ricin, which could be deadly in the hands of terrorists. It may be used to contaminate air-conditioning systems, drinking water or lakes, the FBI has said. . . .

Traces of ricin were also found five years ago in a London apartment during a British-based counterterrorism raid.

But not to worry!  Bush has already taken action!!!!!!



President Bush and Homeland Security Director Michael Chertoff speak in regards to emerging Las Vegas ricin incident.

Washington, DC (Rotters) – President Bush, appearing with Homeland security Director Michael Chertoff early this morning at a White House press conference, officially elevated the national terror alert system to the color code Orange, representing a high probability for terrorist activities. The elevation came in response to the presumed discovery of the highly toxic chemical ricin at a Las Vegas motel late yesterday.

“Perhaps this might turn out to be a case of premature ejac… er… exaggeration,” stated President Bush in regards to the terror alert,” but we have been simply left with no alternative. I take my duties to protect America very seriously. It is possible that the substance in question might turn out not to be ricin, but without warrantless wiretapping thanks to the Democrat controlled Congress’ inability to pass a bipartisan measure, it may be too late to spread panic before we know for sure.”

Homeland security Director Michael Chertoff seconded the president’s concern. “The reality is that we are ramping up for more of these terror warning elevations, both justified and false alarms, because the truth of the matter is we just don’t know.”

Chertoff went on to say that Homeland security had swung into high gear, and would be investigating nationwide every level of America’s castor bean production, and was considering a national recall of castor oil. Tests later today would likely clarify the identity of the compound and possibly its origins, but Chertoff stated that this would come too late to amplify the necessary initial sense of panic needed.

“I think it’s very ironic that this incident surfaced in Nevada,” concluded Bush. “I hope it will send a message to Senator Reid and other like-minded individuals in Congress that the telephone companies must have immunity so that we’re able to know everything that’s going on in this country ahead of time.”

Satire very close to “home.”

[See the website for the real picture shown — it is priceless.]

 

Antiwar movement could roar like a lion in March

[AUTHOR’S NOTE:  I retitled this and edited a bit to make it sexier (or should I say more alluring?) Hope that’s kosher.]

Maybe we shouldn’t complain about the news media’s lack of coverage of the antiwar movement. They don’t even cover the issue when it’s debated for two days in the US Senate.

Senate Democrats, failing to pass anything this week, promise to try again in April, when an appropriations bill comes up.  House Democrats are in a “wait til’ next year” mode.

All the more reason to turn up the heat in March.  And there are plenty of opportunities to take action — in Washington or in your hometown — as the 5th anniversary of the invasion approaches on March 19.  

The two proposals to change course in Iraq failed, predictably, this week, perhaps providing an excuse for the media’s lack of interest. (Depending, of course, on whether the chicken or the egg came first.) But what was taking place was nothing less than a matter of life and death, for US service members and Iraqi military and civilians alike.

The number of American service members who have given their lives in Iraq is nearing 4,000. Nearly 30,000 more have been wounded, and countless others have suffered permanent physical or psychological damage that will haunt them, their loved ones, and this country for decades to come. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have died, and 4 million more have been displaced from their homes and become refugees.

Was the debate front page news? Hardly. It was hardly news at all. Here’s a brief CQ report, in case you missed the news entirely.

That’s all the more reason that the vast majority of Americans who want this senseless bloodshed to end must continue to speak out and act out, at every opportunity.

The sponsors of the two measures which were shelved again in the Senate, Sens. Russ Feingold and Harry Reid, say they will try again in April when appropriations for the war come up, even though House Democrats seem to have adopted a “wait til’ next year” strategy on Iraq.



Between now and then, let’s turn up the heat.

There are plenty of opportunities to do so in March.

Iraq Veterans Against the War will hold Winter Soldier hearings Mar. 13-16 in Washington, DC, modeled on the 1971 hearings held by Vietnam Veterans Against the War.  Here’s how IVAW describes the event:

The four-day event will bring together veterans from across the country to testify about their experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan – and present video and photographic evidence. In addition, there will be panels of scholars, veterans, journalists, and other specialists to give context to the testimony. These panels will cover everything from the history of the GI resistance movement to the fight for veterans’ health benefits and support.

You’ll be able to follow live audio and video links on the web, and some groups are now making plans to screen the hearings in public places across the country, too.

The next week, March 19, is the 5th anniversary of the invasion of Iraq.  Will we ever forget the shock and awe when we learned we had been duped about the reasons to invade?   United for Peace and Justice, the nation’s largest antiwar coalition, is planning to mark the day:

March 19th will mark the beginning of the 6th year of the U.S. occupation of Iraq. Enough is enough! We are organizing creative, nonviolent acts of civil disobedience in Washington DC to interrupt business as usual for those promoting and profiting from war and empire building. Focusing on the pillars of war, our actions will take place at multiple sites, demonstrating the real costs of war and offering visions for a more just and sustainable world, a world at peace.

Actions are bring planned in local communities as well to mark the anniversary.  

Friday, March 21, is Iraq Moratorium #7, a day to take individual or collective action to call for an end to the war and the occupation.  The Moratorium, a national grassroots movement, asks people to do something on the Third Friday of every month to disrupt their normal routine and call for an end to the war.

You’ll find lots of ideas for actions on the Moratorium website , along with a list of events on March 21 and reports, videos and photos of previous actions.  There have been more than 600 group actions under the Iraq Moratorium banner since September.

So, march in March.  Or do something, anything, besides waiting for the election.  Unless we keep the pressure on, a Democratic president and Congress may not make this a priority, either. If you doubt that, ask Nancy Pelosi what she’s doing to end the war.    

The most important thing about being a Democrat: vetting our candidate.

Matt Gonzalez over at BeyondChron.org wrote a brilliant exposé on Barack Obama that must be shared.  The hardest part of trying to get Democrats elected to power is vetting them, especially during election years in which people are so desperate for someone who can deliver on a promise of change that they fail to look past the campaign rhetoric to see the truth.  I’ve explained on other blog sites that Barack Obama is a DLCer in progressive’s clothing.  Mr. Gonzalez hammers the point home.

It has been claimed by uncritical supporters that Obama’s record in the U.S. Senate is progressive, but this is far from the truth (a fact easily verified by going to GovTrack.us and doing some homework).  It is undeniable that the senator from Illinois has consistently voted to fund the Iraq war, with the sole exception being that he was shamed by Christopher Dodd of Connecticut into voting against last Summer’s appropriations bill.  Matt Gonzalez writes:

Since taking office in January 2005 he has voted to approve every war appropriation the Republicans have put forward, totaling over $300 billion. He also voted to confirm Condoleezza Rice as Secretary of State despite her complicity in the Bush Administration’s various false justifications for going to war in Iraq. Why would he vote to make one of the architects of “Operation Iraqi Liberation” the head of US foreign policy? Curiously, he lacked the courage of 13 of his colleagues who voted against her confirmation.

The senator from Illinois has been less than enthusiastic in advocating for a full withdrawal from Iraq.  Obama has also, as Gonzalez points out, voted to re-authorize the USA PATRIOT Act — one of the more heinous attacks on civil liberties in this decade — in stark contrast to his prior work as a civil rights attorney.  Somewhere along the way, Obama was either corrupted on the issue of civil liberties, or else he has been fooling people on where he actually stands from the beginning.  Either way, his record on the occupation of Iraq and on civil liberties are not consistent with his rhetoric on the campaign trail.

On class action lawsuits, Gonzalez writes:

In 2005, Obama joined Republicans in passing a law dubiously called the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) that would shut down state courts as a venue to hear many class action lawsuits. Long a desired objective of large corporations and President George Bush, Obama in effect voted to deny redress in many of the courts where these kinds of cases have the best chance of surviving corporate legal challenges. Instead, it forces them into the backlogged Republican-judge dominated federal courts.

And on credit interest rates:

Obama has a way of ducking hard votes or explaining away his bad votes by trying to blame poorly-written statutes. Case in point: an amendment he voted on as part of a recent bankruptcy bill before the US Senate would have capped credit card interest rates at 30 percent. Inexplicably, Obama voted against it, although it would have been the beginning of setting these predatory lending rates under federal control. Even Senator Hillary Clinton supported it.

Are you seeing anything to suggest that Obama is a progressive, yet?  I’m not.  I’ve written about this before, but it’s worth repeating: health care “reform”.  Given Obama’s record of gutting actual health care reform in the Illinois state senate, one can’t help but nod in agreement when Matt Gonzalez explains:

Obama opposed single-payer bill HR676, sponsored by Congressmen Dennis Kucinich and John Conyers in 2006, although at least 75 members of Congress supported it. Single-payer works by trying to diminish the administrative costs that comprise somewhere around one-third of every health care dollar spent, by eliminating the duplicative nature of these services. The expected $300 billion in annual savings such a system would produce would go directly to cover the uninsured and expand coverage to those who already have insurance, according to Dr. Stephanie Woolhandler, an Associate Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and co-founder of Physicians for a National Health Program.

Obama’s own plan has been widely criticized for leaving health care industry administrative costs in place and for allowing millions of people to remain uninsured. “Sicko” filmmaker Michael Moore ridiculed it saying, “Obama wants the insurance companies to help us develop a new health care plan-the same companies who have created the mess in the first place.”

And as Gonzalez points out, Obama went to bat for Joe LIEberman for re-election in 2006 against challenger Ned Lamont (whom blog web sites such as Daily Kos supported) and referred to the turncoat as his mentor.  Yeah, real “progressive” of Obama to try to prop up a party traitor who has consistently enabled the Bush-Cheney regime at every opportunity, and who endorses Republican John McCain for president.

I realize Obama supporters don’t like to read the truth about their candidate, and who can blame them?  After eight years of destructive Republican policies, the desperation for some actual change — even if it is only an illusion — is certainly understandable.  But it is because desperation can lead to making serious mistakes in an election year critical to America’s future that it is important for Democrats to know exactly who it is we’re prepared to hand the nomination to.  Barack Obama simply is not a progressive, he’s just another DINO who has somehow managed to fool a lot of people.

Hope is not lost, however.  We can and should focus our efforts to get true Progressives elected to Congress, so that a (we hope) Democratic president may be pushed in the correct direction on issues such as getting out of Iraq and passing true health care reform.  It’s still early in the year, and we still have a chance to be the change we want to see in this country.  It’s not enough to simply get Democrats elected to power; the failures of the last year have proven that.  We must work to get the right Democrats — Progressive ones — seats in the Legislature and in state offices across the country.

Only then can we expect to succeed in pushing Barack Obama, should he win the nomination and become president, to achieve actual change.

In the interests of full disclosure, BeyondChron.org reports that Gonzalez has been chosen as Ralph Nader’s running mate.  Which means the Nader-haters shall dismiss anything and everything he has to say, no matter that it’s true.  But I thought it only fair, in the interest of telling the whole truth, to let you know about this.

From Strom to Barack

Strom Thurmond ran for President in 1948 as the segregationist States Rights Democratic Party candidate. The Dixiecrat Party…

a segregationist, populist, socially conservative splinter party of the Democratic Party in the mid-20th century determined to protect what they saw as the Southern way of life against an oppressive federal government.

In other words, blatant racists and righteous believers in the myth of White Superiority to, well….everybody. He did have the decency to become a Republican in 1964. In response, of course to the Civil Rights Act, which he opposed with the longest filibuster in the history of the Senate. He died (finally) in 2003, the year before Senator Obama was elected to the same body.

Senator Robert Byrd, a product of the same southern culture and society still serves, as the longest tenured and oldest Senator we have today. Senator Byrd was once a member of the Ku Klux Klan Unlike Thurmond, though…

“I know now I was wrong. Intolerance had no place in America. I apologized a thousand times … and I don’t mind apologizing over and over again. I can’t erase what happened.”

The span of these two long Senatorial lifetimes encompasses and illustrates the changes that we have gone through as a nation in regards to race. Barack Obama, the only black man in the Senate, and quite possibly the next President of the United States, serves with a former member of the Klan.

As recently as 2002, Senator Trent Lott, recently retired (scandal nipping at his heels) Lost his leadership position for remarks supporting Thurmond:

“When Strom Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him. We’re proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn’t have had all these problems over the years, either.”

It doesn’t get much more blatant than that, in our ‘polite’ society of today, not in public anyway.

.

Major Danby has written about a phone call he received as a volunteer phone banking for Obama, in case we needed any proof that this same strain of racism is alive ad well in these United States today. A line from his essay struck me and inspired this one.


The world is turning, and it’s about to roll over the likes of him.  I know it, and I think he does too.

The question has been asked many times during this campaign…sometimes honestly, and sometimes with less pure motives, if America is ‘ready’ for a black President. Well, as far as I can see….it damn well better GET ready…because from everything I am seeing, as well as my instincts, and haha, my hopes…we are about to get one.

Now, I am not immune to political rhetoric, especially if it trumpets “change,” But neither did I just fall of the turnip truck. My political cynicism is hard won, and I hold it dear. So when Barack eloquently rhapsodizes about “change.” I don’t just drop my knickers. Words are just words, no matter how nicely shaped and intoned. But.

There is no denying …anything Obama says or does or doesn’t do aside…..that having a black President will indeed be a change!

Racism, prejudice, bigotry of any sort….does NOT exist in a vacuum. It is a behavior and a belief that needs some sort of reinforcement or agreement to continue…to flourish. Very few people are completely secretly racist. Racism exists…despite logic and fact etc. …because society, or at least segments of society, or taken all the way to the base level, interpersonal communication and reinforcement……..allows it to exist.

The conditions that allow it and encourage it have steadily changed since Thurmond ran for President on a platform of segregation and white superiority just 60 years ago. The majority of young people today, one of Obama’s main constituencies, are FAR less likely to judge or pre-judge solely on the basis of race. Our society HAS changed, is evolving away from this aspect of its horrid past.

As we prepare to take this next step (hopefully) what do you think the ramifications will be on our society in general….and on the attitudes of the remaining, dwindling, but still large….population of both the casual and the more vehement racists in our nation as….

“The world is about to roll over them?”

 

If We Weren’t All Crazy, We Would Go Insane

Throughout my whole life since I ran away from home for the first time when I was 12 years old with my bicycle, three dollars, the clothes I was wearing, and my transistor radio, through the second time when I was 14 years old and with my friend and one dollar between us we managed to make it nearly two thousand miles towards the west coast hitchhiking, to the final departure at seventeen, I’ve always traveled light with as few attachments to “stuff” and the material world as I could.

Today, at 55, I’m moving once again. I woke up at 6 AM to start packing. It’s now 8 AM. I’m nearly done packing, but the surprising thing is that once again I’ve thrown into the garbage can as much as I’ve packed, with it has gone some of the cobwebs in my mind that I find once again have collected and I don’t need, and still what’s left will barely fit into my friends SUV about an hour from now.

The strange, mysterious, and what I think shouldn’t be but always is surprising thing is that an old familiar friend who hides right in front of my nose has just suddenly re-appeared that I sometimes forget about for long periods while living in any one particular place, and looking around the living room at the stack of boxes I again feel wonderfully light on my feet with anticipation of the umpteenth new start in my life!

I’m going to shut down this computer in the next hour, but I should be back up online within a day or so, and I might even drop in via a friends computer this afternoon.

Pony Party, Phone it in Friday

Shaggy’s Hope…

yes…i know…skinny puppy isnt for everyone….but here’s ‘smothered hope’ anyway

fruit on the bottom, hope on the top..

csn, ‘helplessly hoping’…always appropriate..

amongst my hopes is that you will have a wonderful weekend…

~73v

Load more