Welcome to the Future, Neo!

( – promoted by buhdydharma )

Slashdot has a quick blurb on a report in the TimesOnline. Micro$oft has just filed a very interesting patent:


Microsoft submitted a patent application in the US for a “unique monitoring system” that could link workers to their computers. Wireless sensors could read “heart rate, galvanic skin response, EMG, brain signals, respiration rate, body temperature, movement facial movements, facial expressions and blood pressure”, the application states.

Unique is right! Brain signals?! I wonder if they’re going to measure temperature rectally. I also wonder if the thing would know you hate it the minute you plug in. This is the kind of stuff they do with astronauts and pilots. I’m really glad there’s no diaper mentioned in the patent.

The Times continues:


The system could also “automatically detect frustration or stress in the user” and “offer and provide assistance accordingly”. Physical changes to an employee would be matched to an individual psychological profile based on a worker’s weight, age and health. If the system picked up an increase in heart rate or facial expressions suggestive of stress or frustration, it would tell management that he needed help.

Unions along with civil and privacy rights advocates are rightfully upset. Hugh Tomlinson, a data protection law expert at the suitably named Matrix Chambers tells The Times, “This system involves intrusion into every single aspect of the lives of the employees. It raises very serious privacy issues.” No shit! Do you doubt me know when I say that society and computers are merging? Maybe you just didn’t think it would be that much.

You might doubt that this stuff is achievable to any reasonable degree. In another blurb slashdot mentions a NYTimes article that Duke University has successfully used brain signals from a monkey to make a robot walk.


On Thursday, the 12-pound, 32-inch monkey made a 200-pound, 5-foot humanoid robot walk on a treadmill using only her brain activity.

She was in North Carolina, and the robot was in Japan.

It was the first time that brain signals had been used to make a robot walk, said Dr. Miguel A. L. Nicolelis, a neuroscientist at Duke University whose laboratory designed and carried out the experiment.

The head of the team doing the research, Dr. Nicholelis says that these experiments “are the first steps toward a brain machine interface that might permit paralyzed people to walk by directing devices with their thoughts.”

Well, that’s comforting. At least something good may come of it. Imagine the field day hackers might have with the computer/brain interface of their friends and enemies, especially High School hackers.

The monkey can do more with it that just stomp up and down:


The robot, called CB for Computational Brain, has the same range of motion as a human. It can dance, squat, point and “feel” the ground with sensors embedded in its feet, and it will not fall over when shoved.

She even learned how to control the robots legs separately from her own.


When Idoya’s brain signals made the robot walk, some neurons in her brain controlled her own legs, whereas others controlled the robot’s legs. The latter set of neurons had basically become attuned to the robot’s legs after about an hour of practice and visual feedback.

Idoya cannot talk but her brain signals revealed that after the treadmill stopped, she was able to make CB walk for three full minutes by attending to its legs and not her own.

The monkey has electrodes in it’s head and that is a bit touchy to humans. No problem. Functional MRI’s (fMRI) has the potential to lay bare the most intimate of cognitive processes. They are already being used in lie detection. An in depth article at Wired gives more details on the technology:


Functional magnetic resonance imaging – fMRI for short – enables researchers to create maps of the brain’s networks in action as they process thoughts, sensations, memories, and motor commands. Since its debut in experimental medicine 10 years ago, functional imaging has opened a window onto the cognitive operations behind such complex and subtle behavior as feeling transported by a piece of music or recognizing the face of a loved one in a crowd. As it migrates into clinical practice, fMRI is making it possible for neurologists to detect early signs of Alzheimer’s disease and other disorders, evaluate drug treatments, and pinpoint tissue housing critical abilities like speech before venturing into a patient’s brain with a scalpel.

It’s great for Big Brother as well!


Now fMRI is also poised to transform the security industry, the judicial system, and our fundamental notions of privacy. I’m in a lab at Columbia University, where scientists are using the technology to analyze the cognitive differences between truth and lies. By mapping the neural circuits behind deception, researchers are turning fMRI into a new kind of lie detector that’s more probing and accurate than the polygraph, the standard lie-detection tool employed by law enforcement and intelligence agencies for nearly a century.

I hate to quote so much, but I can’t say it any better, and you probably wouldn’t believe me:


For No Lie MRI founder Joel Huizenga, scanner-based lie detection represents a significant upgrade in “the arms race between truth-tellers and deceivers.”

Both Laken and Huizenga play up the potential power of their technologies to exonerate the innocent and downplay the potential for aiding prosecution of the guilty. “What this is really all about is individuals who come forward willingly and pay their own money to declare that they’re telling the truth,” Huizenga says. (Neither company has set a price yet.) Still, No Lie MRI plans to market its services to law enforcement and immigration agencies, the military, counterintelligence groups, foreign governments, and even big companies that want to give prospective CEOs the ultimate vetting. “We’re really pushing the positive side of this,” Huizenga says. “But this is a company – we’re here to make money.”

What was all that stuff about un-torture like water boarding being necessary when you know they can have as many of theses as they want. I suppose pulling out fingernails is more fun. Remember this next time the torture debate comes up.

As usual, Privacy Advocates and Civil Liberties groups were deeply concerned about all this. These expensive and bulky machines will doubtlessly drop in price and size as time and market forces dictate. Imagine this becoming portable and maybe even ubiquitous. The incentive for large corporations and governments to misuse this are incredible. It’s inevitable that it will be used on people without their consent or even their knowledge. Do you have any idea how our legal system, let alone our Constitution will handle this? Fuck it, how will we handle it?!

Welcome to the Future!tm

BREAKING!!!: Matthews Apologizes

Chris Matthews started Hardball tonight with a six minute apology to Hillary that focused mainly on his ‘she only got her Senatorship because of her husband’ remark.

I put up this to let you know so you can tune in the repeat at 7 pm.

I’m going to turn off comments so someone can do a more substantial essay when there is a transcript and video.

Pony Party… capoeira

.

Capoeira

I don’t know what made this jump into my head this morning (^.^)

I first heard this neat song in a movie my son was watching about capoeira. I loved the song immediately (it’s kinda catchy, isn’t it?) And so I looked into the capoeira thing. My son described it as ‘kinda like break-dancing and karate rolled into one, the slaves in Brazil made it up for defense,  but it’s really a game now.’

Huh!

With just a bit of digging we found:

There is contention as to whether the game arrived with enslaved Africans or whether Africans refined a preexisting Brazilian game. One catalyst for capoeira was the homogenization of African people under the oppression of slavery. Capoeira emerged as a way to resist oppression, secretly practice art, transmit culture, and lift spirits.

Ah! A dance of subversion…. of Revolution!!

The wiki definition says:

Capoeira (ka.pu.?ej.??) is an Afro-Brazilian blend of martial art, game, and culture created by enslaved Africans in Brazil during the 16th Century. Participants form a roda (circle) and take turns playing instruments, singing, and sparring in pairs in the center of the circle. The game is marked by fluid acrobatic play, feints, subterfuge, and extensive use of groundwork, as well as sweeps, kicks, and headbutts. Throughout the game, a player must avoid a sweep, trip, kick, or head butt that may knock him or her on the floor. Less frequently-used techniques include elbow-strikes, slaps, punches, and body-throws. Capoeira has evolved from one main form, known as “Capoeira Angola”, into two other forms known as “Capoeira Regional”, and the ever-evolving “Capoeira Contemporânea”.  

Wiki has a good overview of capoeira & a list of books. We got Ring of Liberation by J. Lowell Lewis when my son was interested. As I recall it was a very interesting book.

Here’s what capoeira looks like:

A game between masters:

So what paths did you go down, that you never would have investigated on your own… that only your association with or love for someone else led you to look further?


Thanks for stopping in….

Hang out and chit chat for awhile… and when you’re done

check out some of the excellent offerings on our recent and rec’d list.

O & Please don’t rec the pony party, another will trot up in a few hours.

(^.^)

Four at Four

News and open thread.

  1. Escalated bombing reminds me of another conflict 35 years ago. The Washington Post reports the U.S. boosts its use of airstrikes In Iraq. “The U.S. military conducted more than five times as many airstrikes in Iraq last year as it did in 2006, targeting al-Qaeda safe houses, insurgent bombmaking facilities and weapons stockpiles in an aggressive strategy aimed at supporting the U.S. troop increase by overwhelming enemies with air power… The U.S.-led coalition dropped 1,447 bombs on Iraq last year, an average of nearly four a day, compared with 229 bombs, or about four each week, in 2006… UNAMI estimates that more than 200 civilian deaths resulted from U.S. airstrikes in Iraq from the beginning of April to the end of last year”. The military predicts extensive use of bombs and missiles to continue this year.

  2. The Taser-wielding police have killed another person; this time in Minnesota. The Star Tribune reports Father wants answers in son’s death following Taser jolt. “Authorities are investigating the death of a 29-year-old Fridley man shot with a Taser by state troopers, who said he had become uncooperative after a rush-hour crash Tuesday evening. The victim was identified by his father as Mark C. Backlund. Gordon Backlund said his son was on his way to pick up his parents at the airport after they had taken a short trip to Florida.”

    In the United States, more than 290 people have died since June 2001 after being struck by police Tasers, according to the human rights group Amnesty International. It said in October that only 25 of the 290 were armed, and none had firearms.

  3. The Guardian reports Yangtze River reaches a 142-year low.

    The waters of the Yangtze have fallen to their lowest levels since 1866, disrupting drinking supplies, stranding ships and posing a threat to some of the world’s most endangered species.

    Asia’s longest river is losing volume as a result of a prolonged dry spell, the state media warned yesterday, predicting hefty economic losses and a possible plague of rats on nearby farmland.

    News of the drought – which is likely to worsen pollution in the river – comes amid dire reports about the impact of rapid economic growth on China’s environment.

    The government also revealed yesterday that the country’s most prosperous province, Guangdong, has just had its worst year of smog since the Communist party took power in 1949, while 56,000 square miles of coastline waters failed to meet environmental standards.

    China has more than demonstrated what happens when you have unbridled capitalism with no regard for your environment.

  4. According to The Telegraph, ‘Cunning’ squirrels pretend to bury their food. “Squirrels pretend to bury their nuts and acorns to protect them from would-be thieves, scientists say. Researchers who recorded how squirrels deploy the tactic more frequently when they are being watched say it shows they are more intelligent than previously thought… Grey squirrels create numerous stores, especially when food is scarce, by digging shallow pits with their paws, pushing items in with their mouths and filling the holes up with debris. They sometimes place leaves and other vegetation on top to further hide the sites. The whole process normally takes less than a minute.” Aw nuts.

One last thing: $300 to learn risk of prostate cancer.

Action: Support Domestic Partnerships in NM

Quickie action diary here, no filler:

The New Mexico state legislature is re-considering a bill to create domestic partnerships, a bill that failed by only one vote last time around.  From Equality New Mexico:

Couples who register would be entitled to most of the legal protections of marriage under state law. However, domestic partners get none of the federal protections of marriage.  Equality New Mexico does not contend that this legislation provides equality, and we will continue to fight until all New Mexicans are treated equally under the law.  However, this legislation goes a long way toward making sure all families have access to the basic protections all families deserve.

Keep in mind that New Mexico has already successfully passed a non-discrimination act covering both sexuality and gender, in 2003.  This is a state that has been pushing the progressive envelope, and activists there need our support.

What you can do:

* Check out latinleo’s diary at dailykos, which contains contact information for state legislators.  If you know anyone living in New Mexico, please pass the information on.  If you don’t know anyone in New Mexico… well, a friendly email or two couldn’t hurt, could it?

* Consider supporting groups like Equality New Mexico, who’ve been on the forefront of this fight for equality.

Cheers!

Peak Republican?

Why, by Hera’s Holy Hotpants, Are Republicans Still Credible?

Or are they?

Think of the words Republican and scandal together and you quickly realize that there really are just too many to remember comprehensively. From the stolen election 0f 2000 to Abramoff to Iraq to Katrina to Schiavo to Plame to Scooter to Foley, Vitter and Craig, to whatever the scandal du jour happens to be….and it is an amazing compilation, the seemingly never ending list of egregious offenses is stunningly large and is still growing. Not just Bush scandals, but the entire Republican party, at every level. And though we all know the Old Media and the Villagers are doing everything they can and have been for years to not cover it, to minimize it, deny it and cover it up….is it possible that the General Populace has finally caught on?

Have we reached Peak Republican?

Heck, they cannot agree on a standard bearer for their nomination!

The once lauded front runner is the poster boy for scandal…and is nearly out of the race. Is he the posterboy for the death of 9/11 based politics, of fear based politics as well?

Ad worst of all, sin of sins….and the possible death knell of the party for the immediate future….the economy is in the process of tanking big time, right before a critical election that WILL decide a new direction for the country….no matter who wins..

They are out of solutions and out of ideas….are they out of time as well?

Now I am not suggesting that they are no longer dangerous, not by a long shot! Even if the Gen Pop IS tired of the lies and the wars and the scandals, the media will still prop them up…as will the corporations and the now even more powerful MIC.  Really this is just a feeling…just the outliers of a feeling really, call it an instinct. What do you think?

.

.

Ps…PC problems! If this publshes I will be amazed!

While America sleeps, the endless war drags on

(6 pm – promoted by ek hornbeck)

Families gathered at the 5th Marine Regiment Memorial Park at Camp Pendleton, Calif.,(right) to spend their last few moments with loved ones before they left for Iraq. Regimental Combat Team 5 left Camp Pendleton on January 3 for their one year deployment to the Al Anbar province of Iraq.– USMC Photo.

While my old regiment ships out again,I have to ask:

Are we headed, as many in the antiwar movement have feared, into an Iraq-free zone during this election season?  Have the Dems decided to wait until next year to try to do anything?

Noah Feldman, in last Sunday’s NY Times magazine:  

What if the United States were at war during a presidential election – and none of the candidates wanted to talk about it? Iraq has become the great disappearing issue of the early primary season, and if nothing fundamental changes on the ground there – a probable result of current policy – the war may disappear even more completely in the new year…

… elections demand that candidates differentiate themselves, yet various plausible front-runners’ positions on Iraq are not all that far apart. There are subtle differences regarding the completeness and timing of withdrawal: John Edwards, for instance, says he would remove even the troops who are training the Iraqi Army and police. But basically, the leading doves say they want to leave, but not too fast; while the hawks claim they want to stay, but not too long.

This week’s Democratic debate in Las Vegas highlighted what Feldman said.  Clinton, Obama and Edwards all offered their nuanced positions, including this clarification of an old question about whether they would have all US troops out by 2013:

(Follow below the fold- ek hornbeck)

RUSSERT: In September, we were in New Hampshire together, and I asked the three of you if you would pledge to have all troops out of Iraq by the end of your first term.

All three of you said, you will not take that pledge. I’m hearing something much different tonight.

OBAMA: No, no, no. There’s nothing different, Tim.

(LAUGHTER)

I want to make sure…

(LAUGHTER)

OBAMA: No, no. I think this is important because it was reported as if we were suggesting that we would continue the war until 2013. Your question was, could I guarantee all troops would be out of Iraq. I have been very specific in saying that we will not have permanent bases there. I will end the war as we understand it in combat missions.

But that we are going to have to protect our embassy. We’re going to have to protect our civilians. We’re engaged in humanitarian activity there. We are going to have to have some presence that allows us to strike if Al Qaida is creating bases inside of Iraq.

So I cannot guarantee that we’re not going to have a strategic interest that I have to carry out as commander-in-chief to maintain some troop presence there, but it is not going to be engaged in a war and it will not be this sort of permanent bases and permanent military occupation that George Bush seems to be intent on.

CLINTON: It’s not only George Bush.

CLINTON: I just want to add here…

RUSSERT: But you both will have a presence?

CLINTON: Well, I think that what Barack is what John and I also meant at that same time, because, obviously, we have to be responsible, we have to protect our embassy, we do need to make sure that, you know, our strategic interests are taken care of.

But it’s not only George Bush. The Republican candidates running for the presidency are saying things that are very much in line with president Bush.

You know, Senator McCain said the other day that we might have troops there for 100 years, Barack.

I mean, they have an entirely different view than we do about what we need to have happening as soon as we get a Democrat elected president.

RUSSERT: Thirty seconds for Senator Edwards.

EDWARDS: I just want to say, it is dishonest to suggest that you’re not going to have troops there to protect the embassy. That’s just not the truth.

It may be great political theater and political rhetoric, but it’s not the truth.

EDWARDS: There is, however, a difference between us on this issue. And I don’t think it’s subtle. The difference is, I will have all combat troops out in the first year that I’m president, and there will be no further combat missions, and there will be no permanent military bases.

OBAMA: Look, I think it’s important to understand that either you are willing to say that you may go after terrorist bases inside of Iraq if they should form, in which case there would potentially be a combat aspect to that, obviously, or you’re not.

OBAMA: And, you know, if you’re not, then that could present some problems in terms of the long-term safety and security of the United States of America. So I just wanted to make sure that we got that clarification.

EDWARDS: My answer to that is, as long as you keep combat troops in Iraq, you continue the occupation. If you keep military bases in Iraq, you’re continuing the occupation. The occupation must end. As respects Al Qaida, public enemy number one, they’re responsible for about 10 percent of the violence inside Iraq according to the reports.

I would keep a quick reaction force in Kuwait in case it became necessary, but that is different, Barack, than keeping troops stationed inside.

EDWARDS: That is different than keeping troops stationed inside Iraq, because keeping troops stationed inside Iraq — combat troops — and continuing combat missions, whether it’s against Al Qaida or anyone else, at least from my perspective, is a continuation of the occupation. And I think a continuation of the occupation continues the problem, not just in reality, but in perception that America’s occupying the country.

OBAMA: Let me suggest, I think there’s a distinction without a difference here. If it is appropriate for us to keep that strike force outside of Iraq, then that obviously would be preferable.

The point is, at some point you might have that capacity, and that’s the — that’s the clarification I want to make sure…

WILLIAMS: Having come close to settling that, we’re going to take another one of our breaks.

When we come back, we’ll get to some more domestic issues, when we continue live from Las Vegas.

So the issue hasn’t vanished from the debate, at least not yet.  If their “distinctions without a difference” become the choice, and all are singing from more or less the same hymnal, the issue will fade away at least until the general election campaign against whichever pro-war candidate the Republicans nominate.

But it’s up to us to make sure the issue remains a live one, and to continue to press the candidates to clarify their commitments to withdrawal.

Otherwise, Feldman’s conclusion in the Times magazine will be prescient:

It is often noted that it can be hard for democracies to fight wars because of changing public opinion. The challenge we face now is what to do when the public has not even been asked what its opinion is. The presidential election is our one chance to put these issues to the democratic test. Otherwise we will be getting a war policy born of neglect – and that will be the policy that we deserve.

Friday is Iraq Moratorium #5.  Do something.

Pony Party… rain

Ummm… guess what it’s doing here!

I think I’ll go fix some hot chocolate, find a good book and go crawl under the covers…


Thanks for stopping in….

Hang out and chit chat for awhile… and when you’re done

check out some of the excellent offerings on our recent and rec’d list.

O & Please don’t rec the pony party, another will trot up in a few hours.

(^.^)

Thank You, G.

Dear G,

The writers’ strike goes on.  

In a TV comedy drought, your once-in-an-epoch, no-reason-for-it-but-sheer-hilarity jerk-hump of your own campaign has been pure gold.  Even asking your staffers to go without pay to continue the laughter.  We want you to know we appreciate it, G.

As your election prospects go down the drain, this post is in honor of you, from us, your adoring fans.

From arranging to have your wife call you during speeches to freaking out at voters on sidewalks, not a week has gone by in your comedy series without ineptness of Castanza-level imcomprehensibility.  

Unless Jason Alexander runs for President as a joke under the slogan “Master of America’s Domain,” we can expect no more inspired, who-could-have-thought-of-it comedy series this TV season.

You’ve continued it for sooo long, the stumbling drunk, screaming lunatic in the park persona.

“They hate you,” he says of the Islamic terrorists [whom the woman apparently didn’t ask about], bringing his hands up to his chest. “They don’t want you to be in this college, or you, or you – -.”

Photobucket

Mr. Giuliani wheels around and points toward another middle-aged woman in the front row, who looks momentarily startled. “And you can’t wear that outfit because you’re showing your arms.”

Some doubted you could keep it up, and keep it hilarious.  But you have never once flagged in your endless self-parody.

Let’s look at the numbers.  Neilson gold:

South Carolina: 5 (1/13 – 15/08), 5, 5, 5, 6, 8, 10, 9, 12, 12, 11, 16, 13, 17, 17, 17, 12, 23, 9, 19, 13, 26, 23, 19, 17, 16, 23, 20, 23 (9/6 – 10/07)

Rudy Giuliani: Republican primary.  Likely voters. 29 polls, most recent first.  January 15, 2008 to September 6, 2007.  Numbers from Pollster.com

This is awe-inspiring.  Anna Kournikova couldn’t tank a match like this.  But where we could chalk up Kournikova’s career arc to forgivable youth, in your case, we, your knowing fans, see the hidden message of your ass-plunge into porridge.  Sheer hilarity.

The willingness to sacrifice yourself for the sake of hijinks is truly admirable.

There was no other reason for it, G!  We get it!  A man with the slightest regard for his own public image would have played the dignity card at some point!  

Thank you.  

Some doubted your steely resolve and your ability to continually and needlessly turn yourself into an Aesop Fable about lack of self-awareness.  Journalists kept hoping you’d give it up.

Giuliani begins to move beyond Sept. 11

Candidate who had been 9/11 all the time, every time, broadens focus

By Matt Berger

NBC/National Journal Reporter

updated 1:20 p.m. ET, Tues., Dec. 4, 2007

MANCHESTER, N.H. – As Rudy Giuliani roamed around the stage at the New Hampshire Institute of Politics on Monday, you could almost forget that he was the mayor of New York City on Sept. 11, 2001.

But we, your knowing fans, saw the joke.  You didn’t even try in New Hampshire.  This was just a masterful feint, a manipulation of the media into playing straight-man to your Borat.  Soon enough:

Giuliani invokes 9/11 when asked about Hillary’s tears.  On MSNBC’s Morning Joe, Rudy Giuliani discussed Hillary Clinton’s “emotional moment.” “This is not something I would judge anyone on,” Giuliani said. He then quickly slipped in a reference to 9/11, pointing out that it was impossible for him not to feel emotion then:

The reality is, if you look at me, September 11 – the funerals, the memorial services – there were times in which it was impossible not to feel the emotion.

The delightful predictability of “The reality is”, no matter how pointless the context, was just the icing on the cake.   G, we didn’t doubt you for a moment.

And we responded.

Florida: 23 (1/13/08), 18, 19*, 24, 16, 28, 29, 25, 19, 21, 32, 30*, 26, 38, 29, 27, 36, 31, 36*, 34, 31, 30*, 27*, 29, 35, 29, 26, 24, 24, 21, 28*, 30, 34, 26*, 21, 22, 30*, 33, 27*, 30, 31, ,31*, 27, 32, 30*, 31, 31, 27, 32, 29*, 31, 38*, 31, 35*, 36, 38*, 28, 29*, 30, 46, 47, 45, 43, 42, 40, 39, 46* (5/22/06)

Rudy Giuliani: Republican primary.  Likely voters (except “*” for registered voters).  68 polls, most recent first.  January 13, 2008 to May 22, 2006.  Numbers fromPollster.com.

McCain taking the Florida lead on January 9, soon after your Hillary-tears-9/11 comparison?

Losing to John McCain?

Comedians will study you forever.

National: 13 (1/9 – 13/08), 9, 13, 12, 10, 15, 18, 20, 20, 20, 20, 27, 18, 23, 21, 21, 22, 24, 25, 22, 26, 23, 25, 22, 26, 23, 25, 22, 26, 24, 29, 33, 28, 25, 29, 29, 33, 28, 34, 23, 30, 27, 31, 31, 32, 24, 29, 32, 27, 30, 34, 23, 22, 30, 26, 32, 28, 34, 26, 24, 32, 28, 27, 34, 22, 28, 24, 27, 29, 32, 28, 28 (08/13 – 16/07)

Rudy Giuliani:  Republican primary.  No listing on voter status.  72 polls, most recent first.  January 13, 2008 to August 13, 2007) Boldface indicates Giuliani leads all Republican candidates. Real Clear Politics.

The mayor of New York City on 9/11, losing to Mitt Romney?  Losing to Mike Huckabee?  And all because you come off as such an incomprehensible fool?

G, no one is more of a fool than Mike Huckabee.

We get it.

You’re the man.

Anyone else, anyone else would have packed it in, called it a day, and started campaigning like an adult.  Any other human being would have let 9/11 speak for itself, and tried to take the Presidency by simply shutting up and letting the empty symbolism speak for itself.

But it is now obvious to all, as has been to your most devoted fans for some time, that you never intended to win the Presidency.  You intended to make us laugh and warm our hearts.  And for that we thank you, G.

As you head off into the sunset, tipping your hat, electoral prospects in the ass-heap of history, we thank you.

You done good.

What’s Next?

( – promoted by buhdydharma )

There has been much talk about a possible collapse of the American “empire”, or in more concrete terms, a likely economic collapse with all of the horrors that might be associated with such a collapse.

Virtually all scenarios for such a thing happening are predicated upon the exhaustion of oil and fossil fuel reserves around the world – the loss of the cheap energy needed to keep the US economy humming.

Pluto talks this morning at SanchoPress  about some of the things we’ll have to deal with if replacement energy sources cannot be developed in Ten Ways to Prepare for a Post-Oil Society + My Spin.

The “Washington Consensus”, both Democratic and Republican, seems to be narrowly focussed on only finding ways to appropriate remaining existing supply sources around the world, even on stealing and killing for them – witness the invasion and occupation of Iraq and the resulting deaths of more than a million Iraqis if the 10 years sanctions war is included, which in my view it should be.

So what do we do about it?

What economically and technologically realistic options exist for replacing fossil fuels as the energy base of society?

I’ve been doing a little bit of web searching this morning – only about ten minutes of it, as I was interested not only in what ideas are being worked on, but even more interested in how quickly I might find realistic options with a casual search.

I stopped searching after ten minutes because I was astounded at the range of possibilities I found, and also astounded at the fact that I’ve read virtually nothing about these in any mainstream media.

What follows is a series of quotes from sources that were all found with only ONE Google search on the words “replacing oil”.

I’ll leave any further commenting on them for the comments, rather than try to evaluate each one myself – except to say please keep in mind that these were all found in less than ten minutes, again with ONE google search – to my mind that leaves us with no excuses.

I’m sure many of you will have more ideas. I’m counting on it, as a matter of fact. 😉

What Can Replace Cheap Oil–and When?

Richard A. Kerr and Robert F. Service

Science Magazine, July 2005

The road from old to new energy sources can be bumpy, but the transitions have gone pretty smoothly in the past. After millennia of dependence on wood, society added coal and gravitydriven water to the energy mix. Industrialization took off. Oil arrived, and transportation by land and air soared, with hardly a worry about where the next log or lump of coal was coming from, or what the explosive growth in energy production might be doing to the world.

Times have changed. The price of oil has been climbing, and ice is melting around both poles as the mercury in the global thermometer rises. Whether the next big energy transition will be as smooth as past ones will depend in large part on three sets of questions: When will world oil production peak? How sensitive is Earth’s climate to the carbon dioxide we are pouring into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels? And will alternative energy sources be available at reasonable costs? The answers rest on science and technology, but how society responds will be firmly in the realm of politics.

There is little disagreement that the world will soon be running short of oil. The debate is over how soon. Global demand for oil has been rising at 1% or 2% each year, and we are now sucking almost 1000 barrels of oil from the ground every second. Pessimists–mostly former oil company geologists–expect oil production to peak very soon. They point to American geologist M. King Hubbert’s successful 1956 prediction of the 1970 peak in U.S. production. Using the same method involving records of past production and discoveries, they predict a world oil peak by the end of the decade. Optimists–mostly resource economists–argue that oil production depends more on economics and politics than on how much happens to be in the ground. Technological innovation will intervene, and production will continue to rise, they say. Even so, midcentury is about as far as anyone is willing to push the peak. That’s still “soon” considering that the United States, for one, will need to begin replacing oil’s 40% contribution to its energy consumption by then. And as concerns about climate change intensify, the transition to nonfossil fuels could become even more urgent (see p. 100).

If oil supplies do peak soon or climate concerns prompt a major shift away from fossil fuels, plenty of alternative energy supplies are waiting in the wings. The sun bathes Earth’s surface with 86,000 trillion watts, or terawatts, of energy at all times, about 6600 times the amount used by all humans on the planet each year. Wind, biomass, and nuclear power are also plentiful. And there is no shortage of opportunities for using energy more efficiently.

Of course, alternative energy sources have their issues. Nuclear fission supporters have never found a noncontroversial solution for disposing of long-lived radioactive wastes, and concerns over liability and capital costs are scaring utility companies off. Renewable energy sources are diffuse, making it difficult and expensive to corral enough power from them at cheap prices. So far, wind is leading the way with a global installed capacity of more than 40 billion watts, or gigawatts, providing electricity for about 4.5 cents per kilowatt hour.

That sounds good, but the scale of renewable energy is still very small when compared to fossil fuel use. In the United States, renewables account for just 6% of overall energy production. And, with global energy demand expected to grow from approximately 13 terawatts a year now to somewhere between 30 and 60 terawatts by the middle of this century, use of renewables will have to expand enormously to displace current sources and have a significant impact on the world’s future energy needs.

What needs to happen for that to take place? Using energy more efficiently is likely to be the sine qua non of energy planning–not least to buy time for efficiency improvements in alternative energy. The cost of solar electric power modules has already dropped two orders of magnitude over the last 30 years. And most experts figure the price needs to drop 100-fold again before solar energy systems will be widely adopted. Advances in nanotechnology may help by providing novel semiconductor systems to boost the efficiency of solar energy collectors and perhaps produce chemical fuels directly from sunlight, CO2, and water.

But whether these will come in time to avoid an energy crunch depends in part on how high a priority we give energy research and development. And it will require a global political consensus on what the science is telling us.

And the Post Carbon Institute provides this goldmine of links:

SPEAKING OF PARADIGM SHIFTS, FEAST YOUR MINDS ON WHAT’S REPLACING OIL!  MERRY CHRISTMAS!

These three companies are producing power from waves.

http://www.oceanpd.com/

http://www.oceanpowertechnologies.com/

http://waveenergy.no

http://www.nanosolar.com/.    “Nanosolar’s PV at  improved cost efficiency.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.greenandgoldenergy.com.au/   SUNBALL SOLAR ROOF $1500

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.physorg.com/news7499.htdrml   A car that makes its own fuel

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.enn.com/today.html?id=9263

Australian companies are looking to harness hot rock temperatures to unleash green energy.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/research/story/0,,1627657,00.html

Massachusetts Institute of Technology built a prototype power source that generates up to 1,000 times more heat than conventional fuel from water and w/o waste!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/11/02…

CANADIAN WIND ENERGY CABLED UNDERWATER TO BAY AREA

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://ve.ou.edu/weaver/mor/mor.htm

There is enough geothermal energy to supply the world’s needs for the next several hundred thousand years if not for millions of years by electrolyzing water to produce hydrogen.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ocean Renewable Energy Coalition

http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com/rea/market/business/view?cid=4809

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Water-driven Car

http://www.free-energy.cc/electrolysis.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Mass-produced, Meltdown-proof Nuclear Energy

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.09/china.html?pg=2&topic=china&top…

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Free Energy Machine

http://www.lutec.com.au/faq.htm

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.changingworldtech.com/what/problems.asp#energy   Energy alternatives

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.infinite-energy.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.shec-labs.com

World’s First Solar Hydrogen Production Station Using Landfill Methane

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2003/18mar_fuelcell.htm.

Toyota 250 miles per fill-up

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0321-02.htm

Remineralize soil with Volcanic Rock Dust

http://www.theaircar.com/

Cute as a button French car that runs

( IS running) on AIR.

I’ll stop here and turn over the rest of this to be expanded upon by the rest of you. My point was to show how easily information can be found, which is something all of us here know, but something that very few in the larger society seem to be aware of, perhaps as a result of the confusion sown in the population daily by corporate media?

Granted, few of these options will do much to save the oil companies or any of George Bush’s and Dick Cheney’s friends, but… so?

Pony Party….meh…

I’m tired.  

which tends to make me irritable….hard to get along with…and is upsetting to those around me

In case youre not a football fan, you might want to know that while the super bowl is being broadcast, the cable station animal planet runs a puppy bowl, complete with a kitten half-time show.  this year’s will be broadcast on feb 3rd.  

Im debating skipping the super bowl this year if new england gets through, which they probably will.  i just cant stand the hype any more…but since it’s the last nfl game of the year, ill probably watch just to get that last fix—with the sound off!!

~73v

New Hampshire Recount: Already worth it! w/poll