Occupying Christmas

Photobucket Okay, so yesterday was Christmas and much merriment was had by all. Except, as the media were determined to remind us, by Palestinian Christians suffering persecution by Muslim extremists. While the persecution certainly exists, it is plainly a sideshow to the Israeli occupation, which not only persecutes but kills Palestinians of all religious persuasions. It’s perfectly egalitarian in that sense: men, women, children, Muslims, Christians – no Palestinian is safe. But that story doesn’t fit with the “evil Muslims taking away Christmas” or the “war on terra” memes, and has therefore been marginalised.

In any event, ’tis the season to be jolly, so let’s look at the bright side: this will all be over within a year, as agreed upon at Annapolis. Both sides will work tirelessly and sincerely to achieve a final settlement. The Palestinian Authority will make real attempts to crack down on militant groups while Israel will freeze all settlement construction and dismantle all outposts, and will in no way attempt to use the structure of the roadmap to delay and obfuscate progress, as it has done in the past. Good, now that’s sorte – huh?:

“Israel has expanded plans to build new homes in a disputed East Jerusalem neighborhood as well as in a nearby settlement, according to the Housing Ministry’s proposed budget for 2008.

Israel angered Palestinians and drew criticism from the United States earlier this month when it announced plans to build 307 new apartments in the East Jerusalem neighborhood of Har Homa.

However, the proposed budget includes funding for the construction of 500 apartments in Har Homa as well as 240 apartments in the nearby settlement of Ma’aleh Adumim.”

Fucksake! This latest Israeli effort to unilaterally prejudice any future peace settlement by stealing (“annexing”) Palestinian land is so flagrant in its contempt for the “peace process” that even the U.S. was forced to voice its ‘concern’, although it appears to have subsequently changed its mind. More recently, the Israeli Housing Minister announced plans for the construction of a whole new settlement in the Atarot area of East Jerusalem, before withdrawing them hastily in the face of international criticism. Olmert and Abbas are due to meet Thursday to resolve what Ha’aretz mystifyingly calls the “Har Homa spat” (is it a “spat” when a thief openly steals your property and refuses to return it, or is it just plain robbery?), but even if the move is ultimately suspended in the face of U.S. pressure, it has served to make Israeli intentions clear: we’re not going to withdraw from the occupied territories, so you’d better stop holding out for a just settlement and give in to our demands.

In Gaza, Hamas offered a truce that would involve the cessation of hostilities against Israel by all Palestinian factions in Gaza in exchange for an end to Israeli hostilities, including the blockade. History has shown that Hamas can generally be trusted to keep to a ceasefire, far more than can Israel, as when it self-imposed a unilateral truce to which it largely kept, in the face of numerous Israeli provocations, for well over a year. The Israeli government has flatly rejected the offer, opting instead for a “true war” against the defenceless population of Gaza. Naturally, it was careful to stress that this “war” would avoid any humanitarian impact on Gazan civilians – for an evaluation of this absurd claim, consider that the Israeli siege has already led to conditions (.pdf) in which Gaza’s “vital services are in danger of complete collapse” and in which supplies of 91 out of 416 essential drugs and about a third of essential medical supplies (including most children’s antibiotics) have run out.

Check out the UN OCHA’s most recent update (.pdf) on the humanitarian situation in the Occupied Territories. Among other things, it confirms that the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians continues apace:

“Numerous small communities located in Area C throughout the West Bank have received multiple eviction and demolition orders and, therefore, are at risk of forced displacement. In Southern Hebron, residents of the Am Al Kher community have received a number of eviction orders. These orders affect two groups within the community from the Hethaleen family, numbering 16 families (some 150 people). They have been residing for over 45 years in their current location, immediately adjacent the fence surrounding Karmel settlement (established in 1981). They are 1948 refugees from the Eastern Negev area and state that they have no alternative land. Five new eviction orders were issued on 26 November with a one week appeal period. Six houses were demolished on 14 February 2007…

The Southern Hebron communities of Zanuta and Susiya are similarly at risk. Together with the Hethaleen, these three communities have a combined population of some 600 Palestinians, who depend on sheepherding for their livelihoods and own some 5,500 sheep. Eviction from their homes and land would prevent herding and, therefore, destroy their livelihood practices.”

Meanwhile, the victims of previous expulsions continue to suffer. In November, Israeli soldiers forcibly evicted 37 Palestinian families numbering 272 people by, quite simply, demolishing their village. (Imagine Hamas demolishing an entire Israeli village – the very idea brings the whole concept of Israel’s “war against terrorism” into absurd relief). The displaced families are now completely dependent upon friends, family and the Red Cross for shelter, water and food. “Since 1948 we never asked for anything from the [UN and aid] agencies,” said one shepherd. “Now we need help”. One of the victims describes how the expulsion affected his family:

“My daughter, she is nine, all of sudden now she wakes up in the middle of the night. My other children started to wet their bed,” said a concerned father. His wife, three months pregnant at the time of the eviction, miscarried the next day, he said.”

Such is Christmas in occupied Palestinian territory.

Cross-posted at the The Heathlander

Three Years Ago Today

Cross-posted from THE ENVIRONMENTALIST

Three years ago today, in what scientists refer to as the Great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake, the resultant tsunami caused more than 225,000 deaths in eleven countries along the shores of the Indian Ocean.

The 2004 tsunami has since been estimated as the ninth worst natural disaster in modern history, which deserves (at least) 225,000 moments of silence and reflection.  

For the people of Java, Indonesia, however, which has again been hit by rising waters, the monsoon rains that have impacted their region on the tsunami’s third anniversary don’t leave time for reflection as they run from landslides that are forcing thousands from their homes:

At least 80 people have been killed or are reported missing after floods triggered landslides in the central Java region of Indonesia.  Local officials say they fear the death toll could rise. Thousands have been forced to seek shelter after their homes were buried or washed away.  Landslides and floods are regular in Indonesia and many blame deforestation.

More below the jump…

Also devastating, but receiving less notice, was Cyclone Sidr in Bangladesh last November. The reason it received less notice?  The Bangladeshi Government acted responsibly and evacuated their citizens. But >3000 people still died and a great part of their coastal region was wiped out in a harbinger of damage that rising sea levels may cause in the future.  

This was because Cyclone Sidr was supposed to have been just another strong cyclone in cyclone season in a low lying country that had been devastated by cyclones in the past. But it wasn’t like those other cyclones. This was a cyclone that sped up as it approached the shore, resulting in a storm surge that emulated a tsunami; which raises the question: What new kind of weather events will climate change bring in the future?

Bangladesh gives us a prescient view:

As I walked into Rajashwer village in southern Bangladesh, the only sign of human habitation was tarpaulins strung up along the river bank. The heart of the village looked as though it had been through a tumble dryer.  Possessions were knotted into the branches of fallen trees, corrugated metal roofs and wooden walls were scattered and smashed beyond repair.

The last time I saw such scenes was three years ago, in the aftermath of the 2004 Indian ocean tsunami. Accounts of survivors from Cyclone Sidr bear striking similarity to those of the tsunami survivors.

Searching amongst the debris in Rajashwer village was an older man, sifting though a pile of twisted metal roofing. Kanchan Ali Khan, 70, spent the night of November 15, 2007 clinging to a tree, having been swept up by a tidal surge of water that was 15 feet (4.5 meters) high.

A fifteen foot storm surge from a cyclone on a sea level coastal region.  It was not caused by an underwater earthquake, but another kind of earthquake.  The kind that we have to ask if we’ll see more of, especially those who live in coastal areas at or near sea level with unstable storm seasons over warming waters.

Like Bangladesh.  It was the Bangladeshi Government’s efforts that kept the death tool low.  They deserve a great deal of credit for that.  The situation for the people since then?  Dire, though help has been arriving (the U.S. sent naval vessels with aid and helicopters to deliver to blocked inland regions).  

For the ’04 tsunami victims, much has been done, more is needed.  Three years on, progress has been made in Indonesia, though those who lost loved ones (and there were so many) must still be reeling from the shock of the Boxer Day disaster.  

In Sri Lanka, also devastated by the tsunami, the fighting between the rebels and the government has resumed.

And the villagers in Thailand who found that their homes that were washed away by the waves were replaced, in some cases, by new hotels and developments…

Which means the cliché: the more things change the more they stay the same, will not change.

My Link Spilleth Over