Pony Party: Early Thoughts

Yeah, I have no thoughts this morning….

A couple of pictures though….

Poor wet birds….

DSC_0001

DSC_0010

View from the window…

DSC_0011

And who can resist self indulgent 80’s music????

Whatever. Please don’t rec pony party. Hang out, chit chat and then go read some real writers on the rec’d and recent list.

Docudharma Times Saturday Dec.1

This is an Open Thread: Chit chat is welcome

Headlines for Saturday December 1: Witness Names to Be Withheld From Detainee : Estimate of AIDS Cases In U.S. Rises: A ‘difficult day’ ends peacefully : In Iraq, U.S. shifts its tone on Iran: Jordan’s Spy Agency: Holding Cell for the CIA

USA

Witness Names to Be Withheld From Detainee

By WILLIAM GLABERSON

Published: December 1, 2007

Defense lawyers preparing for the war crimes trial of a 21-year-old Guantánamo detainee have been ordered by a military judge not to tell their client – or anyone else – the identity of witnesses against him, newly released documents show.

The case of the detainee, Omar Ahmed Khadr, is being closely watched because it may be the first Guantánamo prosecution to go to trial, perhaps as soon as May.

Defense lawyers say military prosecutors have sought similar orders to keep the names of witnesses secret in other military commission cases, which have been a centerpiece of the Bush administration’s policies for detainees at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.

Estimate of AIDS Cases In U.S. Rises

New Test Places the Rate Of Infection 50 Percent Higher

By David Brown

Washington Post Staff Writer

Saturday, December 1, 2007; Page A01

New government estimates of the number of Americans who become infected with the AIDS virus each year are 50 percent higher than previous calculations suggested, sources said yesterday.

For more than a decade, epidemiologists at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have pegged the number of new HIV infections each year at 40,000. They now believe it is between 55,000 and 60,000.

A ‘difficult day’ ends peacefully

Hostages taken at a Clinton office in N.H.

By David Abel and Scott Helman

Globe Staff / December 1, 2007

ROCHESTER, N.H. – A man wearing what looked like a bomb beneath his sweater and tie walked into Hillary Clinton’s campaign office yesterday, taking three staff members, a volunteer, and an infant hostage, forcing the closure of the senator’s campaign offices throughout Iowa and New Hampshire, and paralyzing this small city on the Maine border, authorities said.

After a 5.5-hour standoff, in which all the hostages were released, Leeland E. Eisenberg walked out of the office on North Main Street with his arms up, slowly removed his sweater, and pulled off the faux bomb duct-taped to his waist. Members of the New Hampshire State Police SWAT team ordered him to the ground and handcuffed him. He was charged with kidnapping, reckless endangerment, and criminal threatening, authorities said.

Middle East

In Iraq, U.S. shifts its tone on Iran

Officials have backed off the accusations of arms smuggling and agreed to talk. It could be each side needs the other.

By Tina Susman, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

December 1, 2007

BAGHDAD — Not long ago, U.S. military officials in Iraq routinely displayed rockets, mortars and jagged chunks of metal to reporters and insisted that they were Iranian-made arms being fired at American bases. Collaboration between Tehran and Washington on stabilizing Iraq seemed doubtful at best.

In the last two months, though, there has been a shift in U.S. military and diplomatic attitudes toward Iran. Officials have backed away from sweeping accusations that the Iranian leadership is orchestrating massive smuggling of arms, agents and ammunition. Instead, they have agreed to a new round of talks with Iranian and Iraqi officials over security in Iraq. The meeting is expected to take place this month.

Jordan’s Spy Agency: Holding Cell for the CIA

Foreign Terror Suspects Tell of Torture

By Craig Whitlock

Washington Post Foreign Service

Saturday, December 1, 2007; Page A01

AMMAN, Jordan — Over the past seven years, an imposing building on the outskirts of this city has served as a secret holding cell for the CIA.

The building is the headquarters of the General Intelligence Department, Jordan’s powerful spy and security agency. Since 2000, at the CIA’s behest, at least 12 non-Jordanian terrorism suspects have been detained and interrogated here, according to documents and former prisoners, human rights advocates, defense lawyers and former U.S. officials.

Europe

Blast shakes Ukrainian mine

KIEV, Ukraine – An explosion early Saturday shook the coal mine where 100 people died in a methane blast two weeks ago, injuring five miners but causing no deaths, an industrial safety official said.

All 385 people who were underground at the Zasyadko mine in Donetsk at the time of the explosion have been evacuated, said Marina Nikitina, a local officer of Gosgorpromnadzor, the country’s industrial safety agency. She said five miners were injured, two of them gravely.

The Nov. 18 blast at Zasyadko was the worst coal-mining disaster in Ukraine’s post-Soviet history.

Italy paralysed by worst strikes in 25 years

By Peter Popham in Rome

Published: 01 December 2007

Italy came to a standstill yesterday as the country’s biggest strike in a quarter of a century halted all public transport, in a protest demanding more investment by the government.

Metro and mainline stations were deserted, airports were silent, ferries remained tied up at the docks. Even driving was a challenge, with car hire companies and motorway toll booth operators joining the action and the state-run equivalent of the AA and RAC were not answering breakdown calls.

Getting away from it all on the ski slopes was not the answer as cable car operators were on strike too, as were the people who drive hearses for the nation’s undertakers.

Latin America

Lawyers: Cameraman held at Gitmo ill

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico – A TV cameraman imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay has developed kidney problems and was told by a doctor that he may have cancer, according to notes written by his lawyers and recently cleared for release by the U.S. military.

Sami al-Hajj, a cameraman for the Al-Jazeera TV network, underwent two medical scans but doctors did not determine what was causing blood in his urine, said the notes, which were taken by attorney Cori Crider in early November and released on Thursday.

Lawyers for al-Hajj, who was taken to Guantanamo in June 2002, say his physical and mental health have deteriorated as he continues a hunger strike that has lasted nearly a year.

Chavez urges reform for Venezuela

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has urged voters to approve constitutional changes in a referendum on Sunday.

Addressing tens of thousands of supporters at a rally in Caracas, he also threatened to stop oil supplies to the US if it tried to disrupt the vote.

The reforms include allowing abolishing presidential term limits and ending the autonomy of the Central Bank.

Africa

British peers in Sudan to seek teddy teacher’s release

KHARTOUM (AFP) – Two Muslim members of Britain’s House of Lords were in Khartoum on Saturday to seek the release of a British woman teacher jailed for insulting Islam after she named a teddy bear Mohammed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Lord Ahmed and Baroness Warsi, from the upper house of Britain’s parliament, were to meet with Sudanese officials in a bid to free Gillian Gibbons, 54, who was jailed for 15 days on Thursday for insulting religion.

“They’re on a private visit with the (Sudanese) government,” a British embassy spokesman told AFP. “We welcome any efforts to help in the case, but we’re not involved in their programme.”

Cameroonian gorillas arrive home

Four rare gorillas have been flown from South Africa to Cameroon, five years after they were illegally smuggled to Taiping Zoo in Malaysia.

The Malaysian authorities returned the four Western Lowland gorillas to South Africa in 2004 and they have since been kept at Pretoria Zoo.

The International Fund for Animal Welfare said the “Taiping Four” will now be taken to a wildlife sanctuary.

Asia

Bhutto launches election campaign

PESHAWAR, Pakistan – Former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto launched her election campaign in troubled northwestern Pakistan on Saturday, a day after unveiling her party’s platform despite calls from other opposition groups to boycott the Jan. 8 vote.

Bhutto traveled in a bulletproof black Mercedes under police escort from the capital, Islamabad, to Peshawar where she appealed for support from ethnic Pashtuns predominant in the border region assailed by Islamic militancy.

She was greeted by hundreds of flag-waving supporters of her Pakistan People’s Party who chanted “Long Live Benazir!”

Aids cover-up as Chinese PM visits village

Jonathan Watts in Beijing

Saturday December 1, 2007

The Guardian

People with HIV-Aids in Henan province were placed under house arrest yesterday in what they say was an attempt to stop them telling the truth about the epidemic to the Chinese premier, Wen Jiabao.

Wen made a rare visit to the province – one of the worst affected areas – in an apparent attempt to raise awareness about the virus. But Aids activists say his visit was stage-managed by local officials, who have long tried to cover up the scandal of entire villages being infected with HIV through the selling of unclean blood.

Transparency

You know, I’m actually a great believer in transparency.  On The Great Orange Satan I’m the one you turn to to explain how things really work and here I am not merely an Admin I am a-

Super Admin!

Super Duck

That story will be the punch line at the end.

Before this blog opened it was clear to me and several other Admins, Contributing Editors, and Guest Bloggers (afterwards referred to as Board Members) that we needed a private forum to discuss things like scheduling and site financing and discipline for dishonest posters and general nonsense.  While several others were more familiar than I with free forums it fell to me to set us up and I think it’s been fairly reliable so far.

As for private, squabbling is considered noise by many people; though like a mentor of mine, #933, I consider it just as much signal as anything else.  Unless even the stupid people can speak, how are you going to hear what they think?

Still, I am number nine and I saw most of it.  If you care to do the research you’ll find we did a fair amount of fighting in public before we decided to set up a room and let the heavyweights duke it out.

It’s not at all like a Swedish Knife Fight where there are two people linked at the wrist and there’s only one knife because that’s all you need (a metaphor for a flame thread if you are challenged).  This is a bloodbath.

You see I know what you want to hear about- discipline.

My name’s Zute, just Zute.

Some people will be surprised to find out that the most popular and contentious forum is scheduling.  Let me post the rules of the scheduling forum.

Please check here before publishing. Please leave a note that you ARE publishing. Please be ready to tend your essay for 90 minutes. Please give the previous author at least one hour at the top of the Front Page. If you have committed to a time please publish on time. If you are promoting an essay please note the time of promotion in the promotion comment. If content is lacking (especially morning/noonish) please consider the 9 am or noon Pony Party for promotion. Maximum Graphic Width 500. NOW WITH TIMED PROMOTION!

Today’s schedule-

6:00 AM Morning Muse (Robyn)

7:30 AM Docudharma Times (mishima)

8:00 AM

10:00 AM

12 Noon

2:00 PM

3:00 PM (exmearden) (tend)

4:00 PM 4 at 4 (Magnifico)

6:00 PM (Robyn)

8:00 PM (Nightprowlkitty)

9:00 PM

10:00 PM

12 Midnight (mishima)

3:00 AM (exmearden) (tend)

After that Board people are expected to announce their times or make their marks and you know what happens when they don’t?  Or when they don’t obey the rules for posting to the Front Page?

The Earth plunges headlong into the Sun and we all die while the Devil eats our souls.

Each Member of the Board has committed to publishing one piece of original content here per week.  That’s not the only qualification, but it is about the only obligation and we are in fact very willing to give people mulligans.

But nooo… you want spanking.

Board Members are not at all obligated to participate in discipline nor are any Users although they may.  Users are empowered through Community Moderation to control what is too hateful to be displayed AND regulate who is allowed to make those decisions (for the most part).

Still there is no denying that Board Members have a huge influence.

Let’s divide the process into software and wetware.

Software

For comments there are 2 methods of removal- hiding and deleting.  Deleted comments are gone.  Only Admins can do this.  Hidden comments have an average rating of < 1.00.  This means they must have been rated at least twice and with at least one TRUSTED_PEON or above thinking they should be hidden.

Essays can be deleted or hidden by anyone with editing privileges which includes both Board Members and Authors.

Only Admins can suspend users.

Users can be temporarily or permanently suspended (no posting or rating) by two procedures-

  • You can edit their role to BANNED (preferred)
  • You can change their password

Wetware

Regular Users and TRUSTED_PEONS should give hateful comments the lowest possible rating they can and contact a Board Member and alert them to the situation.

Have a nice day Mr. Hate Speech.  You are done.

And so are you brave Dharmaniac.  You have performed your civic duty and helped us take out the trash.  Want to ‘educate’ a little?  Be my guest but you’re on your own.

What Should Be Hidden

What kind of content do I think should be Hidden?

  • Hate speech, fighting words, comments intended to incite and inflame, either the Community as a whole or an individual User.
  • Visual obscenity, dirty pictures, pornographic images, racist iconography.
  • Pointless disruption, filibustering, Diary hijacking.

budhy says hiding should be very rare and it is.  A Hide should never be used for something that is just Wrong! and merely makes you question a poster’s motives or intellect.  Hiding is based on content, there are other penalties for ‘bad action’.

Responsibilities of Board Members

On receiving a complaint you should communicate it to the Board using the private forum.  There are subcategories for Discipline, Suspension, and Deletion.

If a Board Member sees someone who posted something hateful, you have a positive obligation to search the private forum in the subcategories of Discipline, Suspension, and Deletion and determine if there is already a Case File open on that user and read what it says.

If there is not a Case File open you should create one.

What Is A Case File?

Good question.  Literally dozens of people post here every single day with no problems at all.

I’m going to stop a moment and let you contemplate that…

Some people have problems adjusting, and you get marks in your record.

If you have a problem we start a file.  At mildest it goes in the Discipline folder, but rapid graduation to Suspension and Deletion is not unheard of depending on the severity of the offense.  Suspension and Deletion are ACTION! folders.  Admins are supposed to monitor them for problems that require Administrative power to correct.

Suspension

If someone is having problems and posting hateful and damaging things, the very best thing to do is prevent them from doing any more damage to themselves or others.  This is what I call an Administrative Suspension, but you can call it what you want.  Any Admin (Software) can change your user role to BANNED and temporarily suspend your privileges to post or rate.

Even though they don’t have the physical ability so can any Board Member and Admins are supposed to follow the same procedure-

If you see danger of a very serious nature you post the problem in the Suspension folder or wherever the case file is.  Links are very helpful.  Admins have the additional responsibility of immediate software response while the situation is evaluated.  They are expected to act first and think later and post the action they have taken.  I’ve been overruled many times and I don’t resent it.

Temporary Suspension can last up to 24 hours as all 30+ (or whatever subset choose to act) express their opinion and work out their recommendation to budhy.  This debate is a consensus not a democracy- there is no vote, budhy makes his choice and that’s it.

Frequently budhy will make additional attempts to work out disputes using email.  Anyone under current banishment has in fact resisted several overtures.

We have moderate sanctions here, when possible all exiles are temporary in the sense they can be reversed.  The preferred procedure for Admins is Manage Users/Search Users/Edit.  I’ve tried to encourage Disciplinary Suspensions of timed durations (2 days or a week), but frankly the  only candidates that turn up are those who have rejected almost every offer of mediation.

Deletion

We do almost everything possible here to avoid deletion, because it is very permanent.  With a stroke (and there have been mistaken ones) I can easily delete everything you’ve ever written here.

WE.  DON’T.  DO.  THAT.

Well, I do to my stuff that’s not up to snuff if no one’s paying attention to my spelling errors but, perks.

I’m a SUPER_ADMIN.

Super Admin!

Super Duck

Anyone with Essay Editing and Promotion privileges (which includes all the Board Members), as well as the Author have the ability to delete an Essay and turn off the comments.

Turning off the comments temporarily hides all of them (which may not be the intended effect), but prevents any future one (which probably is).  Deleting the diary puts it on the ‘Deleted Essay’ list FROM WHICH IT CAN BE RESURRECTED!

Hallelujah brothers and sisters.

Deleted Comments are dead Jim dead Jim dead.

We empower our Board here at DocuDharma-  If a whole damn Essay is so heinous that it needs to be hidden you go.

Post your outrage in Deletion (with link please) and the Board will decide how unhinged you are.  We can always change our collective hive mind.

Only Admins can delete comments.

Sadly the comments are dead Jim, which means that Admins SHOULD MAKE COPIES OF THEM IN DELETION unless of course they are too heinous.  I recall a picture of someone shitting and pissing at the same time I saw on dK.

If that should happen here Board Members should capture the link and post it to Deletion.  Admins taking action should copy the content and links (within content) and then delete.

Period.

The preference is for hide.  By posting to the User’s Case File, wherever it is- Deletion, Suspension, or Discipline, a Board Member can easily recruit at least enough Board Members to hide while consideration of their concerns take place.

Hides can be reversed and deletions can not.

This is why ‘moves’ are discouraged, however perfectly you duplicate the contents, even with no responses, you can not duplicate the threading.

Best to call for help in Discipline and wait for the cavalry to hide, but if you can’t the preferred place to paste is in Deletion for all content except that which reveals personal information.  For that your word is enough.

Posting content considered for deletion (NOT HIDING!  It’s worse than that, he’s dead Jim dead Jim dead) is in itself enough to nominate you for suspension, but not sufficient to require it without consensus.

Oh, SUPER_ADMIN…

Super Admin!

Super Duck

Well perhaps you have suffered enough.

For now.

Since the upgrade to Beta Soapblox we haven’t had to worry about discipline much at all.  Community Moderation was well able to handle most normal tasks.

When people began to take offense at words and feathers we discovered that our normal tools were not available.  As part of the diagnostic I boosted my role to SUPER_ADMIN.  Yup, I can do that.  Goku got nothin’ on me.  I can report with confidence that it has exactly two obvious effects- I get a button that goes nowhere  that says “Super-Admin” and I disappear from the list of Admins.

That’s it.

Hah!

asdf

adf

adfadfadf

Who Built Pakistan’s Bomb?

One might assume that that is a silly rhetorical question after all Pakistan built its nuclear weapons on their own didn’t they? Perhaps. But, where did the technical knowledge and equipment come from giving Pakistani scientists the ability to create the Islamic bomb. As they call it. A speech given by President Dwight D. Eisenhower deliver at the on December 8, 1953 called Atoms for Peace in which he laid a vision for the peaceful uses for atomic energy might be a good starting point as discussed in an article by Catherine Collins and Douglas Frantz which appeared in the November 29, 2007 issue of the Asia Times.  

Its their assertion that Pakistan’s bomb isn’t one which was produced ingeniously but was a cooperative of the worlds major industrial powers and the multinational corporations which provided the necessary infrastructure for the manufacture of the components not only for the atoms peaceful uses but for the weapons these countries felt were needed for their national defense. What effects did the Atoms For Peace program have?

Homi Sethna, chairman of the Indian Atomic Energy Commission, spelled out the program’s impact after his country tested its first nuclear device in 1974. “I can say with confidence,” he wrote, “that the initial [Atoms for Peace program] cooperation agreement itself has been the bedrock on which our nuclear program has been built”.

As we all know it was the development of not only of India’s nuclear weapons but its complete nuclear program which gave Pakistan the impedes for creating its own nuclear program and the weapons that finally came with it.

Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, the late Pakistani prime minister and father of Benazir Bhutto, first talked publicly about nuclear weapons in the early 1960s when he was Pakistan’s energy minister. In his 1967 autobiography, Bhutto wrote, “All wars of our age have become total wars … and our plans should, therefore, include the nuclear deterrent.” But Pakistan’s generals rejected his ideas, arguing that the cost of producing a nuclear bomb would cut too deeply into spending on conventional weapons. It wasn’t until after Bhutto became prime minister that he officially launched Pakistan’s nuclear weapons program in 1972.

A.Q. Khan is the father of Pakistan’s nuclear development program. Born in Bhopal India his family would emigrate to Pakistan in 1952. After graduating university in Pakistan A.Q. Khan would receive advanced degrees from the university of  Delft in the Netherlands and Catholic University in Leuven Belgium. Upon graduation he would return to the Netherlands to work at Physical Dynamics Research Laboratory (FDO) the year was 1972.

In May 1974, India carried out its first nuclear test, code named Smiling Buddha, to the great alarm of the Government of Pakistan. Around this time, Khan had privileged access to the most secret areas of the URENCO facility as well as to documentation on the gas centrifuge technology. A subsequent investigation by the Dutch authorities found that he had passed highly-classified material to a network of Pakistani intelligence agents; however, they found no evidence that he was sent to the Netherlands as a spy nor were they able to determine whether he approached the Government of Pakistan about espionage first or whether they had approached him. In December 1975, Khan suddenly left the Netherlands; he returned to Pakistan in 1976.[4].

The former Dutch Prime Minister, Ruud Lubbers, said in early August 2005 that the Government of the Netherlands knew of Dr. A.Q. Khan “stealing” the secrets of nuclear technology but let him go on at two occasions after the CIA expressed their wish to continue monitoring his movements

For the authors the development of Pakistan’s nuclear program is equal to what today is called globalization with the number of countries that provided Pakistan with technical and scientific assistance in their quest for a nuclear weapons. This is best expressed in letters they obtained written by A.Q. Khan discussing which countries are either providing equipment or actual guidance to help them meet their goal.

These are some excerpts from those letters

It was an exciting time for Pakistan’s fledgling nuclear program. On June 4, 1978, A Q Khan wrote to Aziz Khan, describing early tests of his centrifuge designs, referring to the process of substituting helium for uranium gas as putting “air in the machine”.

“June 4 is a historical day for us. On that day we put ‘air’ in the machine and the first time we got the right product and its efficiency was the same as the theoretical … As you have seen, my team consists of crazy people. They do not care if it is day or night. They go after it with all their might. The bellows have arrived and like this we can increase the speed of our work.”

Khan’s international nuclear shopping spree was soon on display as he wrote proudly to his Canadian friend just a week later to recount the trip made by a member of his clandestine procurement network to Japan to obtain some critical, though unexplained help. “Colonel Majeed is back from Japan and thanks God all the problems have been solved. Next month the Japanese would come here and all the work would be done under their supervision.”

   

So, who built Pakistan’s bomb? Just the major industrial and nuclear powers of the world all starting from a speech given by Dwight D. Eisenhower to the U.N in 1953.    

I am sick and tired of being sick and tired

No, those are not my words. This is not one of those essays where I declare my vast and eternal disenchantment with Blogtopia, the net roots, America, western civilization, the Democratic party, or french fries that aren’t crispy. When I need a break, I will take one. Until then, I need to engage in the tremulous task of saving my brain from impending calcification and trying to look for sources of inspiration.

No, those words were spoken by Fannie Lou Hamer, a brilliant, compassionate, and straight talking Black woman from Mississippi who was a grass roots civil rights activist and anti-poverty worker. She was born poor and she died that way. Americans all seem to want their political/historical struggles to have a happy ending, a conclusive convergence of harmony, perhaps so they can hang on to their myths.

A few other things Mrs.Hamer said:

Nobody’s free until everybody’s free.

There is one thing you have got to learn about our movement. Three people are better than no people.

With the people, for the people, by the people. I crack up when I hear it: I say with the handful, for the handful, by the handful, cause that’s what really happens.

If the white man gives you anything-just remember when he gets ready he will take it back. We have to take it for ourselves.

2038385748_c6b640ccaa

Here is a selection of biographical material about her if anybody is still intrigued after my inevitably inadequate introduction to her. Fascinating people just cannot be presented fairly in an essay.

Naturally there is no irony in the fact that Fannie Lou Hamer’s name was specifically attached along with Rosa Parks and Coretta Scott King to the Voting Rights Reauthorization Bill thus recognized and canonized but was so poor right before she died that she could not afford a post mastectomy prosthesis that she had to stuff socks in her clothing. When she died she and her husband had no money friends had to raise money for the funeral. She chose to stay in Mississippi and continue as an anti-poverty crusader rather capitalize financially through being recognized. It seems we love agitators most when they are gone and we merely tolerate them or seek to mold them when they are with us. We wish to harness the raw power of those who step beyond the the accepted battle lines in order to push our won agenda and then they are often discarded. Many Black women played crucial roles in the civil rights movement. Lynne Olson, an author who looks at the significant role women played in that era notes that Rosa Parks was often depicted as being very deferential when she was actually a careful planner who had put much thought and effort into her actions. And further once the Montgomery bus boycott was initiated, and Martin Luther King was involved, Parks was not allowed to speak at the first mass meeting.She asked to speak, and one of the ministers there said he thought she had done enough. It was time for the men to drive the movement apparently.

Fannie Lou Hamer recalled an impoverished childhood. She was one of twenty children born to sharecropper parents. She began working at age six going to school intermittently, and rarely having proper clothing or enough food to eat. She did not remember enjoying specific subjects but loved reading. She was a devout Christian and always drew inspiration from the Bible. Hamer contactedpolio which made it hard for her to work in the field. She worked for the same man for several years until 1962 because she was literate she did record keeping in addition to cooking and cleaning in the home of the landowner.

Fannie Lou Hamer married and discovered she could not have children. When she sought medical help her reward was what was called a Mississippi apendectomy… a hysterectomy that she did not consent to. It seems outrageous today, but merely illustrates the way in which black southerners were not considered human beings.

She indicated in an interview that she did not realize she could vote. She discovered she had this right at a church meeting. Hamer went to vote and was asked to copy and interpreted a section of the Mississippi. She was unable to do so and after she tried to register to vote a second time she and her husband were told to leave the farm where they worked. Hamer ultimately joined SNCC or “snick” as they were called. Activists from SNCC were heavily involved in voter registration all over Mississippi. Hamer and other activists were not allowed to participate in the local Democratic party and thus Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party was formed. They registered 50,000 voters and selected delegates to the 1964 National Democratic Party convention in Atlantic City.

It was at this convention that Fannie Lou Hamer shamed and horrified those present by detailing the systemic abuse she and other suffered when they attempted to register to vote. The entire speech can be read here.

Hamer gave that speech to the “credentials” committee at the convention.  President Johnson, sensing trouble gave a last minute press conference to try and undercut Hamer’s powerful words. The delegation was offered two seats as a “compromise” and the offer was rejected. Mrs. Hamer stated,We didn’t come for for no two seats when all of us is tired. They believed the entire delegation should be seated given the amount of work they had put into organizing and registering voters. She asked the ultimate question saying,if the Freedom Democratic Party is not seated now, I question America, is this America? The land of the free and the home of the brave?Where we have to sleep with our phones off the hook, because our lives are threatened daily? A good question for any activist to ask when they are threatened and critiqued for simply exercising rights. Though less physically dangerous, it is the same question we must ask when any of us are told we are lacking in patriotism for challenging the status quo. Which America do we live in?

In 1968, Fannie Lou Hamer, was a delegate as a member of the Mississippi Democratic Freedom Party, and received a standing ovation. Not much reward for a life of struggle and bravery, no doubt it was the applause of the ashamed and guilty.

She continued local activism and speaking for the rest of her life. Among her projects were freedom farms aimed at helping poor locals grow crops, start businesses, get educational assistance and social service assistance. Hamer is remember as somebody who liked to sing this little light is mine. She thought All in the Family was funny for its accurate depiction of a white bigot. She had compassion for the anger her husband felt at being denied opportunities. When an activist came to the house and helped with the dishes, her husband was mad that he was doing “women’s work.” She explained that her husband had few ways left of being a man.

Fannie Lou Hamer is an American hero, a testimony to guts, faith, and intelligence, a reminder that the best and brightest do not automatically go to the best schools or come from the elite classes.  Her status as a poor black woman is what keeps her from being considered among our great political leaders. She gained little and gave much. She helps to remind us that the poor and working classes are not always silent, are not destined to be so. Turns out inspiration isn’t all that hard to find at all.

Have You Noticed The Front Page?

After about 48 hours of food fights, pie fights, near and actual GBCW diaries and comments, and complaining to and about each other, this blog is still here.  And the stories on the front page are all really great.

I admit it. The past couple of days have been hell here. I missed most of yesterday’s events because of work.  I’m thankful for that.  And today there were plenty of very intense, often unpleasant exchanges, and at least two explicit treaties.  I thought about throwing myself and my keyboard through the window on a couple of occasions, and I also thought about leaving sans GBCW without turning the lights off.  I didn’t do those things. I wondered why I didn’t do them.  And then, all of a sudden, poof!! a front page that is precisely what imo makes this blog worth it.  That must’ve been why I stayed.

So, to all of you, thanks for sticking around, thanks for writing, reading, and commenting.  And especially, thanks for building such an incredible community.  And if you left and are reading this anyway, please consider coming back.

Discrimination

Discrimination is not a bad thing.

Discrimination (to distinguish or note differences, discernment) is useful. A finely tuned sense of discrimination can help you tell the difference between (for example) meaningful political discourse and a load of steaming inflammatory bullshit.

People will always make discriminations about characteristics that belong to some of the people around them and not others. Do you remember when you were a child? I remember quite well at the age of seven becoming aware that my friend’s black skin meant something more than its actual color to the adults around me.

The question is what people choose to do with the discriminations they make.

I tend to believe that racism, in the sense of appreciating the beauty of another whose beauty is unlike your own, is a discrimination that is part of being a sentient and esthetically aware human being.

Racism in the sense of exclusion and depriving of others of the best fruits of society on the basis of an arbitrary physical characteristic is a contingent result of history and economics. History cannot be changed, but economics can.

In American society, wealth (and the power that goes along with it) is the key factor to ending racism in the bad sense. The more steeply progressive the tax system, the more social and racial equality will result. GOP and libertarian low-tax schemes are inherently racist, in that they perpetuate the status quo.

The way to end racism is to eat the rich!!

What are you reading?

Just the usual list this week.  Suggestions for topics are welcome.

If you like to trade books, try BookMooch.

Just finished:

Moving Pictures by Terry Pratchett.  I had mostly forgotten this one, and it’s really

Continuing with

Causality by Judea Pearl.  Fascinating but deep.

Intro to Probability Theory by Hoel, Port, and Stone.  A good text.

The Elements of Statistical Learning by Trevor Hastie and Robert Tibshirani.  An in-depth look at a wide range of statistical techniques.  Beautifully produced.

The Politics of Congressional Elections by Gary Jacobson

Just started

Privacy in Peril by James Rule.  Oxford U. P. has been sending me books to review, and I am going to start with this one.  I am only 10 pages into it, but it looks very good indeed.  Well-reasoned and well-written.

Soul Music   “Music with Rocks In” comes to Discworld.  Features Death and his granddaughter Susan.

Pony Party! Gackt and Hyde! w/Poll!