Nov 03 2007

Asian News For The Week Of October 29

Monday October 29
Japan, Korea

Japan seeking unpaid rent from U.S. Embassy
10/29/2007
THE ASAHI SHIMBUN

Japan may consider suing the U.S. Embassy over 10 years of unpaid rent on state-owned land in the heart of Tokyo, sources said.

The embassy had paid the Japanese government an annual 2.5 million yen ($21,897) for the 13,000-square-meter plot in the Akasaka district of Minato Ward in the central part of the capital.

But in 1998, the Japanese government proposed to gradually raise the rent to around 10 times that level.

Washington strongly objected, and has since refused to pay anything.

UNDP says document proves Lee involvement in BBK scam
October 29, 2007
Attempting to prove that Lee Myung-bak was involved in a controversial company that went bankrupt after a stock price manipulation scandal, a United New Democratic Party lawmaker released a copy of a bank document yesterday saying that Lee is the actual owner of BBK, the company in question.
Lee, the Grand National Party presidential candidate, has denied having any relationship to the company, whose president fled to the United States after allegedly embezzling nearly 38 billion won ($42 million) from BBK. The executive, Kim Gyeong-jun, who was a business partner with Lee in another firm, is expected to return to Korea this month due to an extradition request.
His political opponents have claimed that Lee must have been involved in BBK because of the fact that Kim and Lee jointly established another firm, LK-e Bank around the time that BBK went bankrupt in 2000.

Tuesday October 30
Indonesia, Philippines

Women learn their rights thanks to PEKKA

Irawaty Wardany, The Jakarta Post, Jakarta

They are not super women and nor do they have any special powers — but they have the will to improve their quality of life without depending on others.

Maemunah, 40, was an ordinary housewife until the day her husband left her to find a job in Jakarta three years ago.

“My husband left our village because his clothing business collapsed,” Maemunah said.

“I was frustrated at that time because I thought he would not come back.

Polls generally peaceful with

A total of 23 people were killed in the run-up to Monday’s barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan (SK) polls, which government claims is low compared to the deaths in last May’s national elections and the village polls held in 2002.

“Except for isolated incidents of violence and killings, it was generally peaceful compared to the 2002 barangay and SK elections,” Commission on Elections (Comelec) Acting Chairman Resurrecion Borra said.

The Philippine National Police (PNP) reported a total of 42 election-related incidents since September 29, when police went on alert for the polls. The violence statistics from this year’s village polls is small compared to the 2002 barangay elections, where there were 159 violent incidents and 75 deaths. In the May national elections, 121 people were killed from 229 violent incidents.

Wednesday October 31
India, Pakistan

Deportation plane was ordered by PM, court told

By Nasir Iqbal

ISLAMABAD, Oct 30: Foreign Secretary Riaz Mohammad Khan on Tuesday informed the Supreme Court that he had been asked by Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz by telephone to arrange a special aircraft which was used to take former prime minister Nawaz Sharif to Jeddah on Sept 10.

The claim about the prime minister’s verbal orders was endorsed by chief of protocol for foreign affairs Nazir Ahmed and PIA chairman Zafar A. Khan, and also by the principle secretary to the premier. The instructions were followed by a Sept 9 letter to the chief of protocol to keep the VVIP aircraft ready with double cabin crew, though it carried no information about the destination of the plane.

Right from Sept 6, arrangements were being made to violate the decision of the Supreme Court in the Nawaz Sharif case by none other than the prime minister himself, said Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry, who is heading a seven-member SC bench hearing a contempt of court petition involving the deportation of Mr Sharif.

In his statement, which was appreciated by the chief justice, the foreign secretary said he had been directed by the prime minister by phone on Sept 6 to arrange with the help of PIA a VVIP aircraft.

As the proceedings were going on inside the courtroom, a large number of PML-N leaders, workers and supporters gathered outside the Supreme Court.

Prime Minister’s integrity unquestioned: Karat
NEW DELHI: Notwithstanding his stiff opposition to the Indo-US nuclear deal, CPM leader Prakash Karat has hailed Prime Minister Manmohan Singh for his “unquestioned integrity” and disagreed with suggestions that he resign.

Karat said the Left parties have respect for Singh and “there is no reason why the UPA government should not complete its full term”.

Thursday November 1
China, Taiwan

3 in 10 graduates yet to find work
By Wang Ying (China Daily)
Updated: 2007-11-01 07:23

Almost 30 percent of this year’s university graduates had failed to find a job by the end of September, a spokesman for the Ministry of Education said Wednesday.

Five million students graduated this year, but 1.44 million of them are still unemployed, Wang Xuming said.

The number of unemployed graduates has been increasing year by year, according to ministry statistics. In 2001, there were 340,000, last year there were 1.24 million.

For those who have found a job, 40.7 percent work for private or foreign-funded companies, while 0.4 percent had set up their own companies.

“Many university leavers have chosen to work at grassroots level because of government policies such as waiving the debts of graduates willing to work in the country’s rural and western regions,” Wang said.

Taiwan’s Ma sticks with one-China policy, despite party move
Thursday, November 1, 2007
By PETER ENAV, AP

TAIPEI, Taiwan — The presidential candidate of Taiwan’s main opposition party said Thursday he still supports the idea of a single China that includes Taiwan, despite a party decision to strike the plank from its annual platform.

The comments by Ma Ying-jeou came amid efforts by the ruling Democratic Progressive Party to emphasize Taiwan’s separateness from the mainland, from which it split amid civil war in 1949.

On Wednesday a key Nationalist decision-making body struck out a reference to pushing the “1992 Consensus” from its list of core tasks for the coming year.

Nov 03 2007

I’m doing this for your own good.

Memo to Netroots: Now do you understand?

Democrats are caving on Mukasey, and they will next cave on telecom amnesty.  This comes on the heels of several other colossal capitulations.  I hope you get it now: Democrats are no longer on your side.  They no longer cooperate.

I have been  arguing lately that the best way to get cooperation from Democrats is to treat them as co-equals, that is, when they play NICE, you play NICE, and when they play NOT VERY NICE AT ALL, you play NOT VERY NICE AT ALL.  Always playing NICE or NOT NICE never wins.  Furthermore, cooperation breaks down under these conditions, because there is no incentive to cooperate.  If you are going to vote for Democrats no matter what they do, they will take your vote gladly right before pooping on you.  Is there any strategy that is dumber than that?

The much, much smarter strategy is a variable strategy, one that makes intuitive sense, and one that has proven to be virtually unbeatable in professional contests.  This variable strategy is called TIT-FOR-TAT.  Here are some brief rules for playing this strategy:

Step One:

Never be the first to defect.

So far, so good.  We got Democrats into power in 2006.  We played nice.

Step Two: :

If another player defects, punish them at the very first opportunity.

Oops.  Democrats have pooped on us.  Repeated betrayals.  They continue to pile on the betrayals into a giant poop pile. Democrats are playing NOT VERY NICE AT ALL.  When is our next opportunity to punish them?  2008.  How do we do it?  Take away their seats of power.  Don’t vote for them.  Your vote is all you have to influence them, and it is powerful..  Incumbents don’t care about your money, your canvassing, or words of support.  They have plenty of corporate donors. Save your love for the new progressive blood, the primary challengers.  Just vote the incumbent  bastards out.  And just the bastards, not incumbent cooperators.  There is plenty of defection to go around.  Nancy Pelosi (my district) comes to mind.  Further, although this strategy has little to do with influencing Republicans, consider voting Republican.  Why?  You want to make sure that your punishment works.  Make the punishment hurt (and losing to Republicans due to your base’s defection will triple-smart).  I guarantee, losing to Republicans in 2008 will leave marks.  Deep ones. Make sure they understand why they got punished , in case they are too dumb to figure it out.  Tell them why, and tell them in advance.  The advantages are plenty.  You exert pain without violence.  It’s legal.  Plus, the surprise value alone will sear it into memory.  Finally, by telling them about your intentions now, it could prompt cooperative action by Democrats prior to 2008, thus vitiating the need to vote for slimy Republican.  I will discuss some drawbacks below, after discussing Step 3.

Step 3: :

Forget about it.  Go back to Step One.  Next time you have an encounter with Democrats, resume playing nice.  Give them an opportunity to show what they have learned about cooperation.

Oh sure, they will be pleading for succor at the next election.  They will be begging for relief.  And we will give it to them.  Then we will watch what they do.  They won’t make the obvious, gratuitous mistakes again.  They will think hard before slapping us in the face, knowing that we slap back, hard, like we mean it.  Meanwhile, we continue primary-ing the dogs.  Same rules.

Objections to slapping back hard like we mean it

All objections are based on fear of Republicans.  First, I am no longer afraid of Republicans.  This experiment is going down the shitter anyway.  I’m more afraid of Democrats who act like Republicans, because they are our last hope.  Republicans will NEVER cooperate with you.  They are constant, so put them out of the equation entirely.  Ignore the constants, and focus on the variables, the part of the equation that can change, the Democrats.  The Democrats need your vote.  They NEED IT, like Gollum needs the ring of power.  Watch him closely as he leads you into Mordor, but drop the paralyzing fear, and get punitive.  Start slapping these fuckers back hard.  Clap them upside the head until they’re growing cauliflower ears.

The Supreme Court has always been the main problem with this idea.  Here’s the solution (via Gooserock): Vote for a Democratic President.  The President will act as a firewall on the Supreme Court until we get better-behaved Democrats into Congress.  An added value is this: If we cannot trust our own Democratic nominees to defend and restore the Constitution now (and who anymore believes we can?), why would we trust them in 2008 with the full backing of a Democratic Congress?  Having a Republican Congress will serve as a strong check on any potential abuses of power pioneered by BushCo, and enabled by Democrats. 

You know, I’m beginning to think the Founders were more ingenious than ever before.  This system is more flexible than I expected.  The Democrats will not forget their time in the wilderness they so richly deserve.  Only when they realize your power and will, will they adjust.  Bottom line: I’m doing this for your own good.

Nov 03 2007

Kucinich Lends Hand To Manufacturing Workers