Tag: Propaganda

KO: Heroes and Speeches

Uggghhh. It is a sad day when people on the Left turn against Keith Olbermann for any reason.

KO is one of the sole voices pissing into the hurricane/tsunami of disinformation and neo-con propaganda from the Murdoch Empire and all Minions Fox and elsewhere… and people ask him to stop his Editorials.

Let Kieth be Kieth.

These are the same People who attacked Reverend Wright for speaking Truths in this country.

If Obama stayed Obama, a man who admired Rev. Wright, he would not be losing ground via handlers and media-whores.

Why is it that people are uncomfortable with Truths? Oh they claim to want Truth, as long as it doesn’t interfere with their TV pleasure viewing the Opening Ceremonies of the Olympic games, the grandiose hoopla and the shiny young athletes.

America likes its Public Service Announcements snuggled in minute sound bytes during the breaks of their obsessive American Idol episodes… it makes their guilty pleasure of being brainless hedonists ease up a little to be able to yell “Right On” at a commercial that says “Green Power”.. all while turning up their Air Conditioning and keeping the volume on their TV’s cranked up to Prime Numbers.

But WATCH a whole documentary or turn off the TV and read a book about it?  Too depressing, man. They don’t want a bowl of whole-grain truths, when they can sprinkle a little fiber on their processed Sugar Puffs.

More about real heroes below.

Propaganda, American style

http://www.baltimorechronicle….

http://www.consortiumnews.com/…

Sponsors Matter – 24 July 2008

Take two. Second night. Why do I feel like smashing a pale pumpkin? Drop it off a high-rise and YouTube it. The last thing to go through his mind would be his asshole. But wait! Given the seemingly permanent rectal-cranial inversion wouldn’t that…? I’d like to see that German victory phallic column shoved up next to his head.

I bet Laura Ingraham could deep throat it. Misspell/mispell on her book title. Should be “Power to the Poople”. Watching this is like the closing scene in Clockwork Orange where the main character is getting desensitized to porn. Tied down, toothpick propped eyelids, electro-shock feedback. Fuck the Arctic Ice Cap. I have some Hudson Bay shorefront I can sell you at a steal. Polar bear free, too. You’re all Arctic foxes in the dead of winter. Don’t forget to smile.

8:10

Nissan Altima   nissanusa.com

We   wecansolveit.org   ~OO~

Aqua Globes   buyaquaglobes.com 800 875 3459 (portable enema, Bill?)

Advair   advaircopd.com (Hey! I use that! The new low dose is a $50 co-pay. The old dosage is $20. I’m paying a lot more for a lot less. Can anyone explain how that works?)

Alexis Glick and Terry Keenan. Looks like BillO has some new phone-sex ‘bos on Fox Biz. Cute, BillO takes out MSNBCs trash on GE and Disney doing Iran biz. Immelt and Eisner are evil. Woo-hoo! And their companies and networks suck! GE and Disney stock are down. Coincidence?

8:20

Terminix   terminix.com   Now there’s a handy service we can use.

Merfeces-Benz   mbusa.com

Viagra   viagra.com   Happy 10th anniversary! See ad in Golf Magazine! patent7yrs2go

Erickson Retirement   erickson.com   800 883 1905

Cabot Cheese   shopcabot.com   Jeez! Always wanted to open up a wine and cheese shop – Cheeses H!

Megyn Kelly. I’m starting to see a pattern here. Blonde. Lots of make-up. Youngish. Porn! Blurred out boobs! Hustler cover. Wonder if it was Bill’s personal copy or if he got Fox to buy it for him. Random Fox – Sticky Fingers was a great album, wasn’t it?

Wild horseshit…

Let’s Look At The ‘surge’

I wasn’t planning on posting anything today, have too much to do and other thoughts on my mind.

But yesterday I watched, as many have seen by now, someone who should have a much better understanding, above that of its citizens, what this country’s policies are and their implementation.

McClatchy  has a couple of reports  that hit on a couple of the Points of the ‘surge’:

Sponsors Matter – 23 July 2008

I guess this is Episode I or Volume I or whatever. I don’t know about the rest of you but I’m well past outrage. That tank ran empty a ways back. I had hopes for Obama and the Constitution but I guess I’m just stuck with an over-fondness for basic human rights. Meanwhile, the propaganda machine goes on spewing its excrement everywhere and it’s gotten so that you just can’t avoid it anymore. Bottomline, like we used to say back in the day, there is some shit I will not eat!

I volunteered in an earlier response to an FP essay today to record O’Reilly tonight and compile a list of his sponsors with contact info. The idea is that we can share that input to output our feelings to the Uhmerican and otherwise corporations that pay Fox News Corpse and its deviant trolls to display their ignorance and arrogance whilst spewing their excremental effluence. (Run that one by BillO for translation.)

So, apologies for missing the first set of commercials (I’ll be taping the 11:00 re-run and will UPDATE if someone out there can pass along the secret of how to do that.) The commercials went like this:

8:12 EDT

DirectTV   directtv.com

ExxonMobil   exxonmobil.com

BMW   bmwusa.com

Capital One capitalone.com

Keep reading and writing and calling, please:

Mister Bush’s Sermon

Originally posted at The Crusty Polemicist.

1. Clermont on the Potomac

On November 27, 1095, at a religious council held in Clermont, Pope Urban II delivered

what is perhaps the most famous sermon ever composed. He informed the assembled

faithful that he had “come into these parts with a divine admonition for you”.  Urban’s

listeners, who probably expected a mundane, workaday bit of preaching, instead found

their faces burning with holy shame as their Pope cried out, “O what a disgrace if such a

despised and base race, which worships demons, should conquer a people which has the

faith of omnipotent God and is made glorious in the name of Christ!”  Urban was calling

Christendom to strike out at the “despised and base race” known as the Muslims, and

strike them down in the name of a vengeful and broad-shouldered God. Europe thrilled to

Urban’s depiction of it as the very sword-arm of Christ, and it promptly marched off en

masse to commence the long-lived folly we now call “The Crusades”.

This sort of militant Christian religiosity is viewed nowadays by most developed Western

nations as a quaint though bloody aspect of a long-ago period of de facto religious

insanity in Europe and the Middle East.  I say “most” because there is one glaring

exception: the United States, where precisely this sort of militant Christian religiosity is resurgent, rampant, and (as the American President assures us) “on the march”.  The American “War President” is totally engaged as a constant, zealous cheerleader for this sense of a unique Christian mission.  Mister Bush’s “war on terror” has been and will continue to be a war by a militantly Christian country against a predominantly Muslim part of the world, led by a President who genuinely believes he was called by God to this one great task.

Bush’s militant Christian zeal, and his deployment of the discourse of a distinctly American sermonizing in the service of war, simply confirms the worst suspicions of the rest of the world that America is indeed fighting a “Crusade” against Islam. Any European leader who spoke to his people in the language used by Bush would be sent packing to the sound of gales of laughter, but Europe adopts a condescending attitude towards Bush’s new Crusade at its peril. Bush’s followers may sound like classic religious loonies – indeed, as we shall see, many of them are – but they are also (for the moment) at the steering wheel of the world’s last remaining superpower. As such, they are very dangerous indeed, and it is worth the time to try to decipher the strangely hypnotic cadences that Bush uses to lift up his faithful to fight the   great Crusade.

We need to understand that George W. Bush is not a President. He is a preacher. He is only at home when he is delivering a sermon. Outside the familiar ground of the fundamentalist tent, Bush is testy, impatient, insecure, uncomfortable inside his own skin. But when he has worked himself up to the sort of pure, testifying eloquence that evokes a form of religious mania created and purified on dusty American back roads by sun-maddened itinerant preachers, the naked outpouring of almost devotion and affirmation from his congregation is a darkly terrifying thing to see. Bush the preacher knows something that his audience also knows, something that America alone in the world knows: Evil is real. The End Times are coming. The Devil is real, and waits for the unwary at every moonlit country crossroads. And America, alone among all the nations of the Earth, is called by God to accomplish the thing that has never been accomplished in the whole long, sad history of religion:  “to rid the world of evil.” We need to explore the history, the structure, and the passion of Mister Bush’s long and continuing sermon, if for no other reason than to conjure ways to blunt its dangerous influence in the world.

2. “God Speaks Through Me”

One can savor the irony of the famously messianic

chest-thumping of the atheist President Lincoln and of the vicious white supremacist

President Wilson, but we must understand that there has always been a strain of

what I have chosen to call “sermonic discourse” in the war rhetoric of American

Presidents.

For instance, in his address to the American Congress at the beginning of 1942, Franklin

Roosevelt stated unequivocally that “victory for us means victory for religion. And they

[the enemy] could not tolerate that. The world is too small to provide adequate living

room for both Hitler and God.” Roosevelt ends this amazing and little-known sermon using words that sound all too familiar today: “We are fighting to cleanse the world of ancient evils,  ancient ills.”

One can easily trot out example after example of this sort of sermonic discourse in the

history of the United States. It is really not surprising, given

that those settlers who first “tamed” the “New World” consisted of small sects (today we

would call them “cults”) composed of people whose religious peculiarities were considered too radical and dangerous to be allowed to remain in Europe

(no small feat, given the general religious madness infesting Europe at the time).  But —

and this cannot be emphasized too strongly — all of these sermonizing Presidents (with the

possible exception of Wilson) understood that their rhetoric was rhetoric, which gave

them the saving grace of a sense of proportion and distance.  George W. Bush is

another species of President. When Bush preaches, he is completely sincere. This is a

man  who delights in telling people that, were it not for the saving power

of Christ, he would be sitting at a bar somewhere in Texas instead of running the world.  

As head of the most overtly Fundamentalist administration in memory, Bush is utterly

convinced that “God speaks through me.”

George Bush’s single rhetorical gift consists in conveying this sincerity to large numbers of  Americans. He does this, not through a single  “call-to-arms” sermon, as Urban did at

Clermont, but rather by refining and amplifying the uniquely American sermonic

discourse, by using the cadences and imagery of the Baptist pulpit so that his every

speech becomes yet another passage in one long sermon, a sermon with the power to

hypnotize.

3. “Let he who has ears to hear, let him hear!”

One must be wary of conflating sincerity with transparency when unpacking the content

of the Bush sermon. Bush is utterly sincere and utterly obscure in his meaning – unless

you are one of the faithful. It is impossible to ever take a single word of the Bush sermon at face value. All of Bush’s speeches are sermons, and all of his sermons are parables. One can never understand Bush’s power over the faithful unless one learns the “code” he uses to give a wink and a nod to his fellow believers.

All due credit for crafting the ongoing discourse of the Bush sermon must be given to

Michael Gerson, Bush’s one-time chief speechwriter. Gerson, the man who gave us

the unforgettable phrase “Axis of Evil”, is a typical product of the American Midwest. He

is also a theology graduate, and as such is capable of manufacturing the perfect  Christian allusion to complement Bush’s often inarticulate passion. But we must never mistake the servant for the master. Bush dictates the content, Bush dictates the underlying message, and Bush is the master of the code.  Let us take a look at a few

examples of how the code is deployed.

In one of his annual “State of the Union” messages, Bush spoke of the “wonder-working

powers” of the “goodness and idealism and faith of the American people”. For a non-

American (or even a non-religious American, of which there are still a few), this

would seem like an odd, “quaint” sort of phrase for America’s highest elected

official to use. But a member of the Fundamentalist faithful would immediately recognize

the phrase as coming from the gruesomely-named hymn, “There is Power In The Blood”.

In the next “State of the Union” speech, Bush deployed vivid imagery that

contained words and echoes  guaranteed to resonate with Fundamentalists. When

he spoke of his belief that “History has called America and our allies to action”, he knew

that his followers, hearing the potent word “call”, would immediately make the necessary

substitution in their minds and hear “God” instead of “History”.  He sent the same

message in a speech to the Association of Religious Broadcasters when he stated that “we

must also remember our calling as a blessed nation to make the world better … and

confound the designs of evil men.”  Continuing, Bush claimed that “Freedom is not

America’s gift to the world. It is God’s gift to humanity. Therefore, the nation which

embodies freedom should bear this gift to every human being in the whole world.”

We need to step back and take a long look at this problematic word, “freedom”. Note

how often Bush uses the word “freedom” in his sermon, and how often it seems to stand

out as so “odd,” both in the context in which he uses it and against the realities of the Bush project. I have come to the conclusion that, when speaking of “freedom”, Bush is

employing the time-honored preacher’s tool known as the parable. When you hear a Bush

sermon, do a little thought experiment: every time he says “freedom”, mentally substitute

the word “Christianity.”  I have been going back over many of the components of

Bush’s long sermon, and the substitution works so precisely that I am forced to

conclude that this is no accident, that he is sending a nudge-nudge wink-wink to the

faithful. Let us try substituting the word “Christian” in place of “free” and “freedom” and see what happens.

“Christianity is not America’s gift to the world. It is God’s gift to humanity.”

“I believe that God wants everybody to be Christian.”  

Here is a longer example. Note that even in this extended passage, the substitution maps

perfectly.

“Christianity is both the plan of Heaven for humanity, and the best hope for progress here

on Earth. The progress of Christianity is a powerful trend. Yet, we also know that

Christianity, if not defended, can be lost. The success of Christianity is not determined by some dialectic of history. By definition, the success of Christianity rests upon the choices and the courage of Christian peoples, and upon their willingness to sacrifice.”

See, one can treat this as an entertaining intellectual parlor game – but a game with dark, sad  consequences.

For those who naively believed that Bush was not sincere, and that he

would drop the sermonic discourse in his second term, his 2004 inaugural address must

have been a chilling wakeup call. If you have never  read a transcript of this address, I invite you to do so. In this short address, he used the code word “freedom” 27 times (and the word “free” an additional 8 times). Many who lacked the ears to hear the parable

embedded in this sermon puzzled over this constant drumbeat of the word “freedom”.

Once one understands what the word “freedom” actually means to Bush and his

followers, the speech is terrifying.  Italy’s newspaper La Republica summed it up by

saying, “there is a sense of a man who considers the whole world as his own parish.”  I

personally felt a cold chill when Bush proclaimed to American that “we have

a calling from beyond the stars to spread freedom across the world.” In trying to shake

this disturbing invocation from my mind, I joked “well this proves it — he’s getting his

marching orders from alien space invaders from beyond the stars!” None of my friends

laughed.  Come to think of it, neither did I.

4. “Like Joan of Arc, You Must Be Brave”

If my suspicion is true, and Bush is sending “coded sermons” to American

Christian Fundamentalists, one would assume that every major denomination would be delighted to discover that one of their own holds the highest post in the

land. In fact, Bush’s relationship with the major denominations is problematic

at best. When I watch how Bush conducts himself in regard to the American religious

establishment, I am reminded of the great lyrics by Lene Lovich: “Like Joan of Arc, you

must be brave, and listen to your heart.” Like Joan, Bush is constantly being picked up and carried forward by voices in his head – voices that he believes come from God Himself.  There is no trace of irony or symbolism in his manner when Bush tells another head of  state, “God told me to strike at al Qaeda and I struck them, and then He instructed me to  strike at Saddam, which I did.” Imagine then the impact that this hardwired direct  connection to The Almighty has on those religionists who naively believe that Bush is “one of them”.

Amazingly, given his billing as “America’s most religious President”, Bush is the first

president not to have met with the leadership of any of the mainstream religious

organizations. The Rev. Fritz Ritsch, writing in the Washington Post,

complained,  “The president apparently believes that he can talk about theology from the

bully pulpit without talking to theologians.” The sense of anger and spite at having been

cut out of their traditional (and very lucrative) role as intermediary between the

Sovereign and his God is palpable among American religious leaders. This was felt

most keenly during the mad charge towards war in Iraq. In the weeks before the war

began,  a ranking member of the Council of Methodist Bishops sulked publicly over the

fact that his organization had spent several months in a fruitless attempt to obtain an

interview with Bush, himself a Methodist (at least,  on paper). “The President has not

been willing to hear the voice of his own church.” That lovely old Biblical phrase, “stiff-necked”, seems appropriate here. Bush, quite simply, does not need the religious hierarchy to fulfill his mission. He has his God. And he has his People.

5. Alibi

If George Bush’s sermon did not resonate with a significant portion of the American

people, his high-bandwidth line to The Lord and his apocalyptic discourse

would be of no more interest to us than the rants of some lunatic wandering the streets of

any major city in the world, proclaiming the reality of Evil and the imminent end of this

tired and dissolute old world. Unfortunately, the Bush sermon does resonate across large

stretches of America, and one is forced to confront the question: why?

First, though by no means most importantly, Bush is just like them. He’s a redeemed

sinner, he has seen the light, he has felt his heart moved and changed by a personal

encounter with Jesus Christ. Like so many Americans, he is convinced that he would

have nothing and would be nothing without his unshakeable faith in The Lord.

This view of the world echoes powerfully in the anachronistic backwater of George

Bush’s America. In contrast to the developed Western world, where religion is

withering away due to lack of interest, more than 90 percent of the American people

believe in a real, personal God. Eighty percent of Americans believe in miracles, with 40

percent of them stating that they had personally experienced or witnessed a miracle.  Half

the population of America attends church on a weekly basis, and 53 percent say religion

is a “very important” part of their lives. Amazingly, 43 percent of the American people

believe in the Devil, with horns and a tail. With Bush in the White House, the

nation’s capitol is now the heart of this Christian darkness. A few months ago, I was driving up the highway to give a presentation at a philosophical conference in Washington, DC. As I got closer and closer to Washington, tuning in to a series of fundamentalist rants that showed up and then faded away on my radio dial, I had the eerie sensation – for just a moment — that I was Marlow, coming up the Congo River to the place where Kurtz squatted, waiting.

Bush sermonizes with a finely crafted combination of soothing and inspiring praise

alternating with deep and unequivocal condemnation. America good. Evildoers bad

America battles Pure Evil, so any action America takes in that holy crusade is by

definition Good.   Bush hypnotically repeats the same phrases and cadences of love of

Country and love of God like the invocation of a powerful spell:

“We are the most peaceful country on earth.”

“Americans are a resolute people, who have risen to every test of our time. America is a

strong nation, and honorable in the use of our strength. We exercise power without

conquest, and sacrifice for the liberty of strangers.”

“This nation fights reluctantly….We seek peace. We strive for peace. And sometimes

peace must be defended. Adversity has revealed the character of our country, to the

world, and to ourselves.”

These elements of the Bush sermon are delivered with the utter conviction of passages

from Scripture. They are never questioned because they are beyond

question. The sermon tells the American people every sweet-sounding thing they want to

believe about themselves – and they love him for it. His most fervent supporters

often sound like disciples rather than supporters.  At any of his rallies (stage-

managed to the nth degree and always packed with an audience of loyalists), one gets the

real sense that these Americans believe they are in the presence of their savior (or

Savior). Bush has been told by God to lead this Crusade to rid the entire world of Evil.

He takes this charge from The Lord very seriously. The American people embrace his

certitude and, infused with their own equal measure of certitude, they line up to march off behind him.  Bush tells them that “this crusade, this war on terrorism is going to take a while”, and that’s just fine with his followers. They’ve never felt so alive, so vital, so sure of America’s place in the world, and of their own place in America. The American people understand that, in the words that Urban used at Clermont, “there remains still an important work for you to do”. Bush’s sermonic discourse, which resonates on such a deep level with the American people, echoes Urban’s call so many centuries ago:  “Now go against the infidels and end with victory this war which should have been begun long ago.”

Just Foreign Policy vs U.S. State Department Office of Propaganda

Yesterday, July 3, 2008, Robert Naiman of JustForeignPolicy.org posted a diary on DailyKos that meshed nicely with Jeffersons Bible’s essay, “Ignorance, Not Iran, Is the Enemy.”

Titled, “A Decent Respect for the Opinions of Mankind: Iran Literacy Quiz,” Naiman’s diary challenged readers to answer 11 questions about Iran, in these broad categories:

A. Have Iran’s leaders acted or declared their intentions to acquire nuclear weapons, arm and train Al Qaeda, destroy Israel, or “demand that God not inscribe the Zionist entity in the Book of Life.

B. Regarding nuclear weapons/nuclear enrichment, have Iran’s leaders declared that nuclear weapons are contrary to Islam; has Iran ever offered to negotiate nuclear matters with the West; do most Iranians support the notion that it is important for Iran to enrich uranium and reject the idea that Iran should pursue nuclear weapons?  

C. Who has what power in Iran’s government?

D. How has the U.S. behaved toward Iran in the past, were those behaviours legal or productive, and how is the U.S. behaving toward Iran today?  

Spoiler Alert:According to Naiman, here’s how Iran literati answer these questions:

A. Iran has repeatedly declared that it does NOT wish to develop nuclear weapons; there is no evidence that Iran trains Al Qaeda, rather, that would be contrary to Iran’s allegiances; Iran has never said it would attack Israel, other than in the event Israel attacks Iran first; and the stuff about the Book of Life is nonsense. In other words, all Category A. questions are correctly answered, False.

B.  All Category B. questions are correctly answered, True.

C.  In Iran’s complex governing system, Supreme Leader Khameini has ultimate power and authority over most decisions, including military and nuclear matters.  President Ahmadinejad does NOT have such power and authority.

D. Naiman summarised this complex category by referencing several short videos. His words are worth quoting, particularly since they contain an action item:

 10.  In 1953, the democratic government of Iran was overthrown in a coup organized by the US Central Intelligence Agency, after Iran’s parliament voted to nationalize the country’s oil sector, angering the British (cf. “jackboot,” above) who responded to the Iranian parliament’s action by imposing a naval blockade of the country to prevent it from exporting oil; just as today Representative Ackerman’s House Concurrent Resolution 362 seeks to prevent Iran from importing gas by “imposing stringent inspection requirements on all persons, vehicles, ships, planes, trains, and cargo entering or departing Iran,” suggesting a blockade, an act of war.  

   True

   False

True. On the US role in the coup, see, among others, the book by Stephen Kinzer; a short video tells the story here. The text of Ackerman’s resolution can be found [ here.] You can ask your Representative to oppose it here.

About a dozen people took Naiman’s quiz and posted their results in a poll; most respondants answered at least 85% of the questions accurately.

Take the leap:

On National Numbness

cross posted from The Dream Antilles

This morning’s Docudharma Times led off with a New York Times story about the interrogation of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed.  It’s worth reading all the way through.  I found it extremely disturbing, and I haven’t been able to get it out of my mind.  Hence, this essay is an expansion of this comment.

As Viet71 appropriately noted in the comments, the Times story

tries to put a “human face” on the CIA torture of prisoners by focusing on a CIA interrogator who doesn’t seem to be such a bad guy at all.

The writer displays absolutely no disgust for the topic about which he writes and paints a fairly calm picture of the CIA renditions and harsh methods.

There is no mention in the article of high-level administration approval of torture.

All in all, I believe this article is aimed at causing people to believe that what the CIA did in these renditions just wasn’t that bad.

In other words, the story appears to be propaganda for the acceptance of CIA behavior in extraordinary renditions illegal extraditions and harsh interrogation techniques torture.

I agree with the comment.  How, I wonder, can the arrest, detention in a secret prison in Poland, illegal extradition, and yes, torture, of Khalid Shaikh Mohammad not provoke outrage?  How, I wonder, did we end up with a story focusing on the “good cop” in the interrogation, and virtually ignoring the “bad cops”, the ones with whom the “good cop” was acting in concert in the interrogation, the “knuckledraggers” who admittedly, repeatedly abused the prisoner?  Do we just overlook the war crimes and human rights violations? Are we numb?

Shaming the Devil: Nolan’s Lippmann vs. O’Reilly’s Briskin

I was surprised to learn on Tuesday about the dismissal of Barry Nolan by Comcast for his quiet, persistent protest against the selection of Bill O’Reilly for the Governor’s Award by the Boston/New England Chapter of the National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences (NATAS), Boston/New England Chapter.

As fortune would have it, I was able to touch base with Nolan as well as read up on the events surrounding his dismissal. The result is a piece appearing over on ePluribus Media today called Newsman Fights Clown As Thieves and Pimps Look On.

Feel free to check it out over there. If you’d like to comment here, or learn where the title is derived from without having to go read the piece, make the jump below the fold.

The Day After Memorial Day

With all due respect to those who serve in the armed forces, we owe it to them to ask hard questions about the sacrifices demanded of them and their families.

It’s fine and good and perfectly appropriate for us to honor our dead, but if we allow ourselves to be whipped into a patriotic frenzy every time some yahoo waves a flag it can serve to legitimize the military enterprise – and that is the point I wish to make.  The military enterprise is not legitimate.

Who-Will-be-the-Last-to-Die-1

The White House Whines over Lack of Editorial Control of NBC and MSNBC

Cross posted from my blog, The Wild Wild Left

Ed Gillespie, Counselor to the President wrote this letter to Steve Capus, President, NBC News.

Amazingly enough they have no problem with O’raly’s Fox-step right bias but lay these complaints at the feet of NBC:

I’m sure you don’t want people to conclude that there is really no distinction between the “news” as reported on NBC and the “opinion” as reported on MSNBC, despite the increasing blurring of those lines. I welcome your response to this letter, and hope it is one that reassures your broadcast network’s viewers that blatantly partisan talk show hosts like Christopher Matthews and Keith Olbermann at MSNBC don’t hold editorial sway over the NBC network news division.

Capus, bless his heart, replied (in part):

“Just as the White House does not participate in the editorial process at the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal or USA Today, NBC News, as part of a free press in a free society, makes its own editorial decisions,” NBC said in a statement.

Pentagon’s Propaganda Documents Go Online

These documents were released to the New York Times regarding the Pentagon’s Military Analyst program.

Much more in Backtrack can be found at this link at PR Watch.org!

Load more