Tag: Democrats

Still ‘Undecided’, Obama vs Clinton

Still not decided on who you might cast your ballot, or whatever, for?

Well The Real News have a few interviews with Jonathan Schell on his take on the candidates and their possible Foreign Policy Directions.

Who is Jonathan Schell, if you didn’t already know:

Based in New York City, USA, Jonathan Schell is a renowned anti-nuclear activist, prolific journalist, lecturer and best-selling author. He is a frequent contributor to The Nation, The New Yorker, Harper’s Magazine and Atlantic Monthly. He is also the author of The Fate of the Earth, nominated for the Pulitzer Prize. Schell is a board member of IWT – The Real News.

Clinton, Obama Both Flawed On Health Care

In the middle of the mandate pie-fight (which just had a big ole can of gas dumped on it today by Paul Krugman), I think it’s important for folks to understand that – mandates aside – there’s still issues with both Hillary Clinton’s and Barack Obama’s health care plans that need to be addressed. I’m going to pick the big, blank area of each plan that leaves it open to attack, because my primary goal is to have a viable universal health care plan introduced by whoever wins the Democratic nomination (and then hopefully the presidency) as quickly as possible.

Looking for a New Party: The Libertarian Party.

I’m a Kucinich supporter, and I am fed up with the corporatized Democratic Party (c’mon now…who isn’t really?). As such, I’m looking at other parties other than the big two (Repugs? The party of Reagan, Bush, Bush, Cheney, etc.? No way.). In the first of three postings of this series, I’ve asked if Leftists and Progressives need a new party. I then looked at the Green Party and found them not too far from where I stand. The third posting was a look at the Contstitution Party, which has some interesting ideas but had at least one deal breaker.

Hillary, Obama and McCain: Who’d have thought it? w/poll

Well, now that JE has dropped out, on the Democratic side we’re down to HRC, BO and MG (!) (yes, he even outlasted JE).  So, I guess we do really have a choice amongst the Democrats right now, but I’ll continue on the basis that Mike is not going to get the nomination.  On the Republican side, we’re pretty much down to MR, JMcC and MH (unless RP does much better next week, which he probably won’t), with McCain holding the mantle of front runner, which he probably will be able to manage to win the nomination from.

“They’re murdering us here! Let’s move inland and get murdered!”

“They’re murdering us here! Let’s move inland and get murdered!”

Note: This diary may require a suspension of disbelief – or, more precisely, a willingness to believe, at least for a few  moments, that congressional Democrats want to achieve the same things you want for them to achieve. Maintaining that conceit for just a couple of minutes will make this exercise more bearable. Thanks in advance for your flexibility – o.h.

Democrats, having gained a toehold on the beachhead of Congress in thier assault on Fortress Federal Government, have been fearful to the point of paralysis about attacking Republicans head-on.  They have made noises about “the Democratic agenda,” fretting that if they appear “too combative” about the issue of holding the administration and various Republican members of Congress accountable for their crimes over the past 6 1/2 years, they will be unable to move “the Democratic agenda.”

The fallacy in this argument, of course, is that, irrespective of how “civil”, “bipartisan,” “nonconfrontational,” and “collegial” they are, or have been, the “Democratic agenda” is not move forward, because of Republican obstruction and, ultimately, the president’s veto.

“a cataclysmic fight to the death”

There are several possible explanations for the behavior of those Democrats elected to Congress in November 2006 since they took control.  One is that they believe that by being nice to Republicans, that the Republicans will not turn on them and ultimately destroy them and their agenda.  Any Democrat who truly believes this is naïve beyond hope.  All one has to do is look at the track record of the Republicans since the Democrats took control to see how nice Republicans are willing to play.  Remember the remark about the cataclysmic fight to the death made by an administration aide shortly after the November 2006 elections.

h/t to Airpower, whose comment inspired this diary

I think of what Brigadier General Coda did when I see our “leaders” in Congress who do not have one-tenth of the guts that he and so many others displayed on “Omaha” beach.  A year ago we went to the polls and took Capitol Hill.  I am still waiting for a “General Cota” in Congress with the courage to stand up and lead the impeachment of that sadistic, brain-damaged, drunken SOB from Texas who has caused so much harm to the reputation of the United States — reputation bought and paid for the the blood of young Americans who fought tooth and nail for what was right during some very dark times.

Trust and betrayal

Trust and betrayal

During Howard Dean’s keynote speech on Thursday night at YearlyKos, I was on my feet a great deal. Gov. Dean received many standing ovations, and I enthusiastically joined in every one.

But in the last few minutes of his talk, I found myself sitting on my hands. Gov. Dean had shifted gears, and in so doing, had put on display the same lack of fortitude and integrity that has tarred most of the Democratic leadership over the past 10 months.

During the presidential candidates’ forum on Saturday, I was impressed with the forthrightness shown by Sen. Chris Dodd – so much so that I chose to attend his breakout session afterward. But during that breakout session, when a question was put to him by Mike Stark, Sen. Dodd, too, jumped right on board with the yellow-bellied spineless talking points espoused by so many Democrats on one of the most important questions of our time.

And last week, in an astonishing display of cowardice, my own senator, Dianne Feinstein, betrayed me and every other American.

Howard Dean was wrapping up a rousing speech in front of one of the friendliest crowds he could possibly have faced: the 1,500 registrants at YearlyKos 2007. He

Feinstein – mcconnell promised

FreeFallin’s diary

http://www.dailykos.com/story/…

my runin with homeland security

http://www.dailykos.com/storyo…

dean’s talk

http://www.dailykos.com/storyo…

Don’t have enough time – but 6 mos. For fisa bill?

Bill Clinton attacks created backlash for Hillary.

Tonight’s victory of Barack Obama was a lot bigger than anyone expected. Most pollsters expected a victory of around 10 points; only one predicted a victory of 20 points. While they correctly predicted the uptick in support for Edwards, they did not predict the huge margin of victory that Obama would take.

The X Factor in this race was the attacks of Bill Clinton on Obama this week. However, it turned out that these attacks created a huge backlash against Hillary and led to Obama’s unexpectedly wide margin. Obama’s victory will undoubtedly give him momentum going into the next race; however, the big question is how much?

The reason that I ask this question is because the next battle will be totally different than the four battles that came before it. In the previous four battles, the winner was the candidate who could do the best at practicing retail politics — this was a turf that clearly favored Obama. With his huge gift for oratory and his ability to draw some of the largest crowds ever for political campaigns, Barack Obama was able to generate the kind of grassroots support that propelled him to convincing wins in Iowa and South Carolina, a narrow loss in New Hampshire, and a tie in Nevada.

But this will be a totally different battle than the one before it, because it will be decided on the airwaves. Stump speeches will be important, but the candidates will have to try to appeal to audiences much bigger than the small audiences that they appealed to before. The battle will be won and lost based on who can create the best commercials that appeal to voters. So, if Obama cannot give people flashes of his oratorical skills in 30 seconds, then he will be in even more hot water than he is already — he trails by double digits in the all-important state of California. And that is on top of the fact that he is still trailing the delegate count to Hillary.

Do we REALLY want change?

One of the key buzzwords of this Presidential race is change. The voices of change cumulated in a Democratic victory in 2006, and since then, the voices of change have only gotten louder and louder. Supposedly. And yet, when we look at the front-runners for the election, we see that the conventional candidates — Hillary Clinton and John McCain — are poised to take the nomination starting with Super Tuesday. A showing below 15% in South Carolina could doom John Edwards, while both Hillary and John McCain are leading by substantial margins in California. While the Republican primary is a lot messier than the Democratic primary, it seems that with his wins in South Carolina and Louisiana, Mike Huckabee’s home turf, it seems that McCain is an odds-on favorite to take over the Republican nomination.

This brings us to the question of change — do we really want change? The buzzword of this election has been change, yet we see the two establishment candidates, Hillary Clinton and John McCain, establishing themselves as frontrunners in the primary. It seems that people on both parties say that they want change, yet saying that they want change and actually having the courage to vote for change are two different things. It is a lot like a bad relationship — we say that we want to break up, yet when it comes time to actually do it, it is much more comfortable to stay in the relationship than it is to make a clean break and start over. We say that we don’t like where we are and want to move and make a fresh start; however, when it comes down to do it, we are more afraid of the unknown than we are of staying in a bad situation.  

It’s official! Dennis to introduce an impeachment resolution for W on Jan. 28! w/poll

Dennis Kucinich, the only presidential candidate to support the impeachment of Richard Cheney, has made it official on the floor of the House!  Perhaps W will talke about it during his State of the Union Speech later that evening!

Universal Health Care: HR 676 vs the Big Three! w/poll

The CBC/CNN debate in South Carolina is history.  One of the issues covered was that of Univeral Health Care.  The Big Three each have their plans, which are built upon some form of our current system of health insurance.  The other major plan is HR 676, The Conyers/Kucinich Plan for Medicare for All.

The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. the legacy remembered, the message that should not be forgotten

From Dennis Kucinich’s campaign site: http://www.dennis4president.co…

Kucinich wins presidential endorsement from key Mexican American organization and more! w/poll

From Dennis’ campaign site site:

Kucinich wins presidential endorsement from key Mexican American organization

Ohio Congressman and Democratic Presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich gained a significant endorsement today from the Mexican American Political Association (MAPA), a progressive advocacy organization based in California and well known for its work in the areas of civil and human rights.

Load more