viagra generico 100 mg in farmacia senza ricetta pagamento online a Venezia When Obama was pressed on the question of Israeli nukes at the nuclear summit, he first hemmed, hawed, and balked:
http://maientertainmentlaw.com/?search=cialis-online-40mg “Initially you were talking about US behavior, and then suddenly we’re talking about Israel. Let me talk about the United States,” the president said. “I do think that as part of the NPT, our obligation, as the largest nuclear power in the world, is to take steps to reducing our nuclear stockpile. And that’s what the START treaty was about, sending a message that we are going to meet our obligations… source site as far as Israel goes, I’m not going to comment on their program.”
http://maientertainmentlaw.com/?search=effects-of-prednisone-20-mg Well, why not comment on their program http://maientertainmentlaw.com/?search=finasteride-long-term-how-to-get that they don’t even have?
“What I’m going to point to is the fact that consistently we have urged all countries to become members of the NPT. So there’s no contradiction there,” he said. follow link “And so whether we’re talking about Israel or any other country, we think that becoming part of the NPT is important. And that, by the way, is not a new position. That’s been a consistent position of the United States government, even prior to my administration.”
Kudos to the president. Wingnut heads will explode.
“The policy of ambiguity is the foundation of Israel’s security; it has always been and will continue to be. President Obama did not ask to change it in the current period,” Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon told public radio.
Nukes? What nukes? Israel who?