Afternoon news and not closed thread.
-
Just in time for the 2008 presidential election, The New York Times triumphantly announces Relations Improve With a Shift in War Coverage For Pentagon and News Media! “The anguished relationship between the military and the news media appears to be on the mend as battlefield successes from the troop increase in Iraq are reflected in more upbeat news coverage… At the start of the Iraq war, decades of open hostilities between the military and news media dating from Vietnam were forgotten, if only for a brief and shining moment. One reason was the embed program for the Iraq invasion that placed hundreds of reporters from across the journalistic spectrum into combat units.” Great… because what American needs is more love between the press and
DefenseWar Department.The Independent obviously hasn’t gotten the memo. The newspaper reports Iraq death rate belies US claims of success. “The death rate in Iraq in the past 12 months has been the second highest in any year since the invasion, according to figures that appear to contradict American claims that the troop ‘surge’ has dramatically reduced the level of violence across the country.”
The Iraq Body Count (IBC) “found that between 22,586 and 24,159 civilian deaths were documented for 2007, with the vast majority of those killed between January and August… John Sloboda, the co-founder of IBC, said the figures “show beyond any doubt that civil security in Iraq remains in a parlous state… For some 24,000 Iraqi civilians, and their families and friends, 2007 was a year of devastating and irreparable tragedy”.
-
Meanwhile, all the cool newspapers are reporting a “confrontation“, as the NY Times puts it, between U.S. and Iranian ships in the Strait of Hormuz. The Guardian reports “According to Pentagon officials, US forces were about to fire at the boats, thought to be from the Revolutionary Guard, when the Iranians turned away at the last moment… The Iranian foreign ministry dismissed the confrontation as ‘something normal‘ that was resolved without incident.” The anonymous Pentagon officials, however, described the encounter as “significant” and “the most serious provocation of this sort that we’ve seen yet”. Spin Cheney! Spin!
-
But, then Bush’s handlers have been always about lowering the bar and minimizing expectations. McClatchy Newspapers are reporting that Expectations are low for Bush’s Mideast trip. “President Bush, who once had grand ambitions to transform the Middle East through democratic reform, begins his first extended presidential visit to the region Tuesday with his sights lowered and his ability to influence events fading fast… The official Arab view of Bush was summed up inadvertently by a diplomat from a major Arab state, who indicated disbelief that the president will use the trip to renew his drive for Middle East democracy. ‘Is that still on?‘ the Arab official replied sarcastically. He spoke on condition of anonymity because of diplomatic sensitivities.” And just for the curious, The Guardian adds More than 10,000 police will guard Bush during his Israel visit.
-
Finally, news from the road to the White House. The Los Angeles Times reports Supreme Court will hear voter ID case. Their ruling “could affect the outcome in some close contests this year and well into the future. At issue is whether states may require voters to show a driver’s license or a passport at their polling places.
Republicans say photo IDs are needed to prevent vote fraud by, for example, having ballots cast in the names of the dead or by those who are not legal voters, such as felons, noncitizens or nonresidents…
Democrats counter that the photo ID rules are a Republican-driven scheme whose real purpose is to deter voting by racial minorities, the poor and the elderly. They say that new voters are checked for eligibility when they register, and that there is no need for a photo ID check at the polling place…
And a surprisingly large number of legally registered voters could run afoul of a photo ID requirement. About 10% of the nation’s voting-age citizens — more than 20 million people — do not have a driver’s license or passport, according to studies and phone surveys presented to the high court.
Nothing like disenfranchising 10 percent of the electorate to rig a close election.
Talking Heads below the fold.