Tag: George W. Bush

Mister Bush’s Sermon

Originally posted at The Crusty Polemicist.

1. Clermont on the Potomac

On November 27, 1095, at a religious council held in Clermont, Pope Urban II delivered

what is perhaps the most famous sermon ever composed. He informed the assembled

faithful that he had “come into these parts with a divine admonition for you”.  Urban’s

listeners, who probably expected a mundane, workaday bit of preaching, instead found

their faces burning with holy shame as their Pope cried out, “O what a disgrace if such a

despised and base race, which worships demons, should conquer a people which has the

faith of omnipotent God and is made glorious in the name of Christ!”  Urban was calling

Christendom to strike out at the “despised and base race” known as the Muslims, and

strike them down in the name of a vengeful and broad-shouldered God. Europe thrilled to

Urban’s depiction of it as the very sword-arm of Christ, and it promptly marched off en

masse to commence the long-lived folly we now call “The Crusades”.

This sort of militant Christian religiosity is viewed nowadays by most developed Western

nations as a quaint though bloody aspect of a long-ago period of de facto religious

insanity in Europe and the Middle East.  I say “most” because there is one glaring

exception: the United States, where precisely this sort of militant Christian religiosity is resurgent, rampant, and (as the American President assures us) “on the march”.  The American “War President” is totally engaged as a constant, zealous cheerleader for this sense of a unique Christian mission.  Mister Bush’s “war on terror” has been and will continue to be a war by a militantly Christian country against a predominantly Muslim part of the world, led by a President who genuinely believes he was called by God to this one great task.

Bush’s militant Christian zeal, and his deployment of the discourse of a distinctly American sermonizing in the service of war, simply confirms the worst suspicions of the rest of the world that America is indeed fighting a “Crusade” against Islam. Any European leader who spoke to his people in the language used by Bush would be sent packing to the sound of gales of laughter, but Europe adopts a condescending attitude towards Bush’s new Crusade at its peril. Bush’s followers may sound like classic religious loonies – indeed, as we shall see, many of them are – but they are also (for the moment) at the steering wheel of the world’s last remaining superpower. As such, they are very dangerous indeed, and it is worth the time to try to decipher the strangely hypnotic cadences that Bush uses to lift up his faithful to fight the   great Crusade.

We need to understand that George W. Bush is not a President. He is a preacher. He is only at home when he is delivering a sermon. Outside the familiar ground of the fundamentalist tent, Bush is testy, impatient, insecure, uncomfortable inside his own skin. But when he has worked himself up to the sort of pure, testifying eloquence that evokes a form of religious mania created and purified on dusty American back roads by sun-maddened itinerant preachers, the naked outpouring of almost devotion and affirmation from his congregation is a darkly terrifying thing to see. Bush the preacher knows something that his audience also knows, something that America alone in the world knows: Evil is real. The End Times are coming. The Devil is real, and waits for the unwary at every moonlit country crossroads. And America, alone among all the nations of the Earth, is called by God to accomplish the thing that has never been accomplished in the whole long, sad history of religion:  “to rid the world of evil.” We need to explore the history, the structure, and the passion of Mister Bush’s long and continuing sermon, if for no other reason than to conjure ways to blunt its dangerous influence in the world.

2. “God Speaks Through Me”

One can savor the irony of the famously messianic

chest-thumping of the atheist President Lincoln and of the vicious white supremacist

President Wilson, but we must understand that there has always been a strain of

what I have chosen to call “sermonic discourse” in the war rhetoric of American

Presidents.

For instance, in his address to the American Congress at the beginning of 1942, Franklin

Roosevelt stated unequivocally that “victory for us means victory for religion. And they

[the enemy] could not tolerate that. The world is too small to provide adequate living

room for both Hitler and God.” Roosevelt ends this amazing and little-known sermon using words that sound all too familiar today: “We are fighting to cleanse the world of ancient evils,  ancient ills.”

One can easily trot out example after example of this sort of sermonic discourse in the

history of the United States. It is really not surprising, given

that those settlers who first “tamed” the “New World” consisted of small sects (today we

would call them “cults”) composed of people whose religious peculiarities were considered too radical and dangerous to be allowed to remain in Europe

(no small feat, given the general religious madness infesting Europe at the time).  But —

and this cannot be emphasized too strongly — all of these sermonizing Presidents (with the

possible exception of Wilson) understood that their rhetoric was rhetoric, which gave

them the saving grace of a sense of proportion and distance.  George W. Bush is

another species of President. When Bush preaches, he is completely sincere. This is a

man  who delights in telling people that, were it not for the saving power

of Christ, he would be sitting at a bar somewhere in Texas instead of running the world.  

As head of the most overtly Fundamentalist administration in memory, Bush is utterly

convinced that “God speaks through me.”

George Bush’s single rhetorical gift consists in conveying this sincerity to large numbers of  Americans. He does this, not through a single  “call-to-arms” sermon, as Urban did at

Clermont, but rather by refining and amplifying the uniquely American sermonic

discourse, by using the cadences and imagery of the Baptist pulpit so that his every

speech becomes yet another passage in one long sermon, a sermon with the power to

hypnotize.

3. “Let he who has ears to hear, let him hear!”

One must be wary of conflating sincerity with transparency when unpacking the content

of the Bush sermon. Bush is utterly sincere and utterly obscure in his meaning – unless

you are one of the faithful. It is impossible to ever take a single word of the Bush sermon at face value. All of Bush’s speeches are sermons, and all of his sermons are parables. One can never understand Bush’s power over the faithful unless one learns the “code” he uses to give a wink and a nod to his fellow believers.

All due credit for crafting the ongoing discourse of the Bush sermon must be given to

Michael Gerson, Bush’s one-time chief speechwriter. Gerson, the man who gave us

the unforgettable phrase “Axis of Evil”, is a typical product of the American Midwest. He

is also a theology graduate, and as such is capable of manufacturing the perfect  Christian allusion to complement Bush’s often inarticulate passion. But we must never mistake the servant for the master. Bush dictates the content, Bush dictates the underlying message, and Bush is the master of the code.  Let us take a look at a few

examples of how the code is deployed.

In one of his annual “State of the Union” messages, Bush spoke of the “wonder-working

powers” of the “goodness and idealism and faith of the American people”. For a non-

American (or even a non-religious American, of which there are still a few), this

would seem like an odd, “quaint” sort of phrase for America’s highest elected

official to use. But a member of the Fundamentalist faithful would immediately recognize

the phrase as coming from the gruesomely-named hymn, “There is Power In The Blood”.

In the next “State of the Union” speech, Bush deployed vivid imagery that

contained words and echoes  guaranteed to resonate with Fundamentalists. When

he spoke of his belief that “History has called America and our allies to action”, he knew

that his followers, hearing the potent word “call”, would immediately make the necessary

substitution in their minds and hear “God” instead of “History”.  He sent the same

message in a speech to the Association of Religious Broadcasters when he stated that “we

must also remember our calling as a blessed nation to make the world better … and

confound the designs of evil men.”  Continuing, Bush claimed that “Freedom is not

America’s gift to the world. It is God’s gift to humanity. Therefore, the nation which

embodies freedom should bear this gift to every human being in the whole world.”

We need to step back and take a long look at this problematic word, “freedom”. Note

how often Bush uses the word “freedom” in his sermon, and how often it seems to stand

out as so “odd,” both in the context in which he uses it and against the realities of the Bush project. I have come to the conclusion that, when speaking of “freedom”, Bush is

employing the time-honored preacher’s tool known as the parable. When you hear a Bush

sermon, do a little thought experiment: every time he says “freedom”, mentally substitute

the word “Christianity.”  I have been going back over many of the components of

Bush’s long sermon, and the substitution works so precisely that I am forced to

conclude that this is no accident, that he is sending a nudge-nudge wink-wink to the

faithful. Let us try substituting the word “Christian” in place of “free” and “freedom” and see what happens.

“Christianity is not America’s gift to the world. It is God’s gift to humanity.”

“I believe that God wants everybody to be Christian.”  

Here is a longer example. Note that even in this extended passage, the substitution maps

perfectly.

“Christianity is both the plan of Heaven for humanity, and the best hope for progress here

on Earth. The progress of Christianity is a powerful trend. Yet, we also know that

Christianity, if not defended, can be lost. The success of Christianity is not determined by some dialectic of history. By definition, the success of Christianity rests upon the choices and the courage of Christian peoples, and upon their willingness to sacrifice.”

See, one can treat this as an entertaining intellectual parlor game – but a game with dark, sad  consequences.

For those who naively believed that Bush was not sincere, and that he

would drop the sermonic discourse in his second term, his 2004 inaugural address must

have been a chilling wakeup call. If you have never  read a transcript of this address, I invite you to do so. In this short address, he used the code word “freedom” 27 times (and the word “free” an additional 8 times). Many who lacked the ears to hear the parable

embedded in this sermon puzzled over this constant drumbeat of the word “freedom”.

Once one understands what the word “freedom” actually means to Bush and his

followers, the speech is terrifying.  Italy’s newspaper La Republica summed it up by

saying, “there is a sense of a man who considers the whole world as his own parish.”  I

personally felt a cold chill when Bush proclaimed to American that “we have

a calling from beyond the stars to spread freedom across the world.” In trying to shake

this disturbing invocation from my mind, I joked “well this proves it — he’s getting his

marching orders from alien space invaders from beyond the stars!” None of my friends

laughed.  Come to think of it, neither did I.

4. “Like Joan of Arc, You Must Be Brave”

If my suspicion is true, and Bush is sending “coded sermons” to American

Christian Fundamentalists, one would assume that every major denomination would be delighted to discover that one of their own holds the highest post in the

land. In fact, Bush’s relationship with the major denominations is problematic

at best. When I watch how Bush conducts himself in regard to the American religious

establishment, I am reminded of the great lyrics by Lene Lovich: “Like Joan of Arc, you

must be brave, and listen to your heart.” Like Joan, Bush is constantly being picked up and carried forward by voices in his head – voices that he believes come from God Himself.  There is no trace of irony or symbolism in his manner when Bush tells another head of  state, “God told me to strike at al Qaeda and I struck them, and then He instructed me to  strike at Saddam, which I did.” Imagine then the impact that this hardwired direct  connection to The Almighty has on those religionists who naively believe that Bush is “one of them”.

Amazingly, given his billing as “America’s most religious President”, Bush is the first

president not to have met with the leadership of any of the mainstream religious

organizations. The Rev. Fritz Ritsch, writing in the Washington Post,

complained,  “The president apparently believes that he can talk about theology from the

bully pulpit without talking to theologians.” The sense of anger and spite at having been

cut out of their traditional (and very lucrative) role as intermediary between the

Sovereign and his God is palpable among American religious leaders. This was felt

most keenly during the mad charge towards war in Iraq. In the weeks before the war

began,  a ranking member of the Council of Methodist Bishops sulked publicly over the

fact that his organization had spent several months in a fruitless attempt to obtain an

interview with Bush, himself a Methodist (at least,  on paper). “The President has not

been willing to hear the voice of his own church.” That lovely old Biblical phrase, “stiff-necked”, seems appropriate here. Bush, quite simply, does not need the religious hierarchy to fulfill his mission. He has his God. And he has his People.

5. Alibi

If George Bush’s sermon did not resonate with a significant portion of the American

people, his high-bandwidth line to The Lord and his apocalyptic discourse

would be of no more interest to us than the rants of some lunatic wandering the streets of

any major city in the world, proclaiming the reality of Evil and the imminent end of this

tired and dissolute old world. Unfortunately, the Bush sermon does resonate across large

stretches of America, and one is forced to confront the question: why?

First, though by no means most importantly, Bush is just like them. He’s a redeemed

sinner, he has seen the light, he has felt his heart moved and changed by a personal

encounter with Jesus Christ. Like so many Americans, he is convinced that he would

have nothing and would be nothing without his unshakeable faith in The Lord.

This view of the world echoes powerfully in the anachronistic backwater of George

Bush’s America. In contrast to the developed Western world, where religion is

withering away due to lack of interest, more than 90 percent of the American people

believe in a real, personal God. Eighty percent of Americans believe in miracles, with 40

percent of them stating that they had personally experienced or witnessed a miracle.  Half

the population of America attends church on a weekly basis, and 53 percent say religion

is a “very important” part of their lives. Amazingly, 43 percent of the American people

believe in the Devil, with horns and a tail. With Bush in the White House, the

nation’s capitol is now the heart of this Christian darkness. A few months ago, I was driving up the highway to give a presentation at a philosophical conference in Washington, DC. As I got closer and closer to Washington, tuning in to a series of fundamentalist rants that showed up and then faded away on my radio dial, I had the eerie sensation – for just a moment — that I was Marlow, coming up the Congo River to the place where Kurtz squatted, waiting.

Bush sermonizes with a finely crafted combination of soothing and inspiring praise

alternating with deep and unequivocal condemnation. America good. Evildoers bad

America battles Pure Evil, so any action America takes in that holy crusade is by

definition Good.   Bush hypnotically repeats the same phrases and cadences of love of

Country and love of God like the invocation of a powerful spell:

“We are the most peaceful country on earth.”

“Americans are a resolute people, who have risen to every test of our time. America is a

strong nation, and honorable in the use of our strength. We exercise power without

conquest, and sacrifice for the liberty of strangers.”

“This nation fights reluctantly….We seek peace. We strive for peace. And sometimes

peace must be defended. Adversity has revealed the character of our country, to the

world, and to ourselves.”

These elements of the Bush sermon are delivered with the utter conviction of passages

from Scripture. They are never questioned because they are beyond

question. The sermon tells the American people every sweet-sounding thing they want to

believe about themselves – and they love him for it. His most fervent supporters

often sound like disciples rather than supporters.  At any of his rallies (stage-

managed to the nth degree and always packed with an audience of loyalists), one gets the

real sense that these Americans believe they are in the presence of their savior (or

Savior). Bush has been told by God to lead this Crusade to rid the entire world of Evil.

He takes this charge from The Lord very seriously. The American people embrace his

certitude and, infused with their own equal measure of certitude, they line up to march off behind him.  Bush tells them that “this crusade, this war on terrorism is going to take a while”, and that’s just fine with his followers. They’ve never felt so alive, so vital, so sure of America’s place in the world, and of their own place in America. The American people understand that, in the words that Urban used at Clermont, “there remains still an important work for you to do”. Bush’s sermonic discourse, which resonates on such a deep level with the American people, echoes Urban’s call so many centuries ago:  “Now go against the infidels and end with victory this war which should have been begun long ago.”

Bush to the World: So long suckers!

If there was any doubt that George W. Bush was an asshole who couldn’t give a shit about the world, here’s further proof. From The Telegraph, At the G8 Summit, Bush: ‘Goodbye from the world’s biggest polluter’

The American leader, who has been condemned throughout his presidency for failing to tackle climate change, ended a private meeting with the words: “Goodbye from the world’s biggest polluter.

He then punched the air while grinning widely, as the rest of those present including Gordon Brown and Nicolas Sarkozy looked on in shock.

Hat tip MsLibrarian.

Kucinich bringing Impeachment Article in House (updated)

UPDATE:  Link to the Article text on AfterDowningStreet.  

Dennis Kucinich plans to read a single article of Impeachment on the House floor today around 4 PM Eastern.   The Article of Impeachment is titled:  Deceiving Congress with Fabricated Threats of Iraq WMDs to Fraudulently Obtain Support for an Authorization of the Use of Military Force Against Iraq.  

The text of the article will be released at a Press Conference at 2 PM (see above).

Uranium Found in Iraq!

It seems that on Saturday Brian Murphy of the Associated Press is reporting that the US has removed uranium from Iraq.


The removal of 550 metric tons of “yellowcake” — the seed material for higher-grade nuclear enrichment — was a significant step toward closing the books on Saddam’s nuclear legacy. It also brought relief to U.S. and Iraqi authorities who had worried the cache would reach insurgents or smugglers crossing to Iran to aid its nuclear ambitions.

Holy Cow!  WMDs!  Saddam’s nuclear arsenal!  Condi’s smoking gun!  I came across this story at redstate.com where they are taking this effort as validation of Bush’s invasion!

Of course, if you read the whole story from Murphy, it’s kinda funny, and kinda sad…

Broken Record Bush: The Same Hit’s Just Keep on Playin’ Over and Over

In talks with the Japanese Prime Minister prior to the G8 Summit next week on the Japanese island of Hokkaido, our National Embarassment and all around Shameless President, George W. Bush is either:

A.)  Having constructive talks with the Japanese P.M. on how to make positive economic and environmental changes for the betterment of the world population

B.)  Having destructive talks with the Japanese P.M. on how to shirk positive economic and environmental changes for the betterment of the world population

C.)  Saying the same ol’ shit over and over like a broken record

Now, I know there are a couple of choices there that are tempting, and one that is completely ridiculous on many levels.  However, the MOST correct answer is the one we are looking for here today.

The correct answer is C !!  Saying the same ol’ shit over and over like a broken record

For those of you who may or may not have been not fooled by the “shirk” question (which by the way is MOSTLY right), we will discuss this more in just a bit.

See me below.

Bush: Let The Games Begin! (Updated)

cross-posted from The Dream Antilles

Photobucket

Lost in the July 3 rush to start July 4th partying is the Commander Athlete in Chief’s announcement that he will support the athletes by attending the opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics.  This direct, single digit salute to people who care about human rights in China and who are concerned about the continuing genocide in Darfur, was delivered to avoid outcry.  Put another way, it reeks of cowardice.

The New York Times reports:

The White House said Thursday that President Bush would attend the opening ceremonies of the Beijing Olympics next month, a decision fraught with international political symbolism that quickly drew criticism from advocates for human rights.

The advocates have been pressing world leaders to boycott the Olympics or at least skip the opening ceremonies to protest China’s violent crackdown after riots in Tibet and its support for the government of Sudan, whose Darfur region remains enmeshed in violence.

The leaders of Britain and Germany have said they will skip the opening ceremonies. For some time, the White House has said that Mr. Bush will attend the Games, but has refused to provide further details.

That changed late on Thursday afternoon. With most of official Washington already gone for the Fourth of July holiday, the White House press secretary, Dana Perino, issued a simple statement outlining Mr. Bush’s August travel schedule, including the notation that he would go to the opening ceremonies.

The president’s press secretary mouthpiece, who gives frequent evidence of being both utterly tone deaf and unable to distinguish facts from opinions, explained in an interview:

“This is a decision by the president that he really wanted to go in support of our athletes,” Ms. Perino said in an interview. Asked if Mr. Bush was making a political statement, she said, “He does not look at it that way, but we recognize that others may.”

Where is the beef?

Something is missing beyond the spine of some Democrats in the rush to legalize warrantless wiretaps, end privacy, and reward corporations for betraying the public trust. Let’s call it the beef (or nicely textured soy protein for the vegetarians among us).

I am an empiricist at heart. I want proof in the form of sound evidence before I am willing to believe something is true. I am also deeply cynical and suspicious of politicians because too few decisions favor the common good. That cynicism has grown after our elected officials ‘misrepresented’ the threat posed by Iraq. In the uproar over the FISA revisions, now is a good time to point out there are some glaring gaps in the evidence at hand.  

Sen. Obama: Yes, You Can Keep Your Word To Hold Bush Accountable – Stop The FISA Bush Immunity

In April 2008, Attytood asked Senator Obama if he as President would hold former Bush administration officials accountable by seeking prosecution for crimes committed.  Obama promised that he would review the information to determine whether an investigation was required; and, if officials knowingly violated existing laws, Obama indicated that he would pursue prosecution.  

Based upon Obama’s standard, there should be an investigation and potential criminal prosecution of Bush and other officials for knowingly violating FISA. Bush has admitted publicly that he did not comply with FISA, which is a criminal offense.  

However, the FISA bill pending before the Senate may take this putative prosecution off the table by providing immunity to Bush while codifying his unitary executive theory.  In order for President Obama to keep his word that he would hold Bush officials accountable for clear, knowing criminal violations, Senator Obama needs to stop this FISA bill, or at least provide amendments which clearly eliminate any colorable argument of immunity for Bush.  

tom friedman: what a Real President would do

Ta dah……… another stunning assessment of George W. Bush, his policies, and what a real president would do from Thomas Friedman in today’s New York Time’s column. Yeah, the inescapable Tom Friedman: a cheerleader of the war in Iraq. A public intellectual and New York Times Columnist… part of that liberal media about which we hear so much.

You do remember Thomas Friedman? The man who brought us such great catch-phrases as the Arab street and Generation Q? Yes. It’s the same one. The exact same one who made the Iraq war sound grand in a 2005 talk:

This is not about oil. This is about something really noble, crazy noble. It is the first attempt in the modern history of the Arab world for Arabs in their own country to forge their own social contract, their own constitution.

Not only would democracy become rampant in the Middle East, but “a successful Iraq is our Iran reform policy.” In his droning, self-assured, and utterly annoying manner, he  told his audience that “The Shi’ite Muslims who will assume the majority of Iraq’s government posts are the same Shi’ites who live in Iran.” According to the newspaper account of the speech, Friedman said if Iraq succeeds it will ratchet up the pressure for democratic reform in Iran.

Well, today’s column is really a gas. And what I really loved about it, Mr. Bush, Lead or Leave (besides the side-splittingly funny lede), is it’s real he-man muscular language. Here’s  a sample…

What they need now is a big U.S. market where lots of manufacturers have an incentive to install solar panels and wind turbines . . . without subsidies.

That seems to be exactly what the Republican Party is trying to block, since the Senate Republicans – sorry to say, with the help of John McCain – have now managed to defeat the renewal of these tax credits six different times.

Of course, we’re going to need oil for years to come. That being the case, I’d prefer – for geopolitical reasons – that we get as much as possible from domestic wells. But our future is not in oil, and a real president wouldn’t be hectoring Congress about offshore drilling today. He’d be telling the country a much larger truth:

“Oil is poisoning our climate and our geopolitics, and here is how we’re going to break our addiction: We’re going to set a floor price of $4.50 a gallon for gasoline and $100 a barrel for oil. And that floor price is going to trigger massive investments in renewable energy – particularly wind, solar panels and solar thermal. And we’re also going to go on a crash program to dramatically increase energy efficiency, to drive conservation to a whole new level and to build more nuclear power. And I want every Democrat and every Republican to join me in this endeavor.”

That’s what a real president would do. He’d give us a big strategic plan to end our addiction to oil and build a bipartisan coalition to deliver it. He certainly wouldn’t be using his last days in office to threaten Congressional Democrats that if they don’t approve offshore drilling by the Fourth of July recess, they will be blamed for $4-a-gallon gas. That is so lame. That is an energy policy so unworthy of our Independence Day.

I loved how he slipped in the for geopolitical reasons that we get as much as possible from domestic wells while encouraging Bush, if Bush wanted to be a real president, to tell the country larger truths.

From what fucking planet is Thomas Friedman? Talking about George Bush telling truth to anybody is ridiculous. To try to appear like you’re a cool environmentally friendly liberal columnist guy and set us up for drilling the arctic is going a tad too far. And oh my god, you’re sorry to say John McCain is leading Republicans in defeating incentives for renewable energy.

More People Living Out of Their Cars – Welcome to Bush’s Vision of America

The economy sucks!  Yes, we are in a recession!  No, the fundamentals DO NOT look good for the economy to bounce back later this year (as per Bumbling Ben Bernanke).

As people over the past few years have lost their employment and due to that lack of income have also lost their homes, they have taken to moving into their cars, vans, RV’s, mobile camper trailers and anything up to and including a nicely appointed cardboard box.

Yes.  Even a person now living in their Camper-Van is not considered to be Homeless.  Their mobile vehicle is now considered to be a home.  Only in George W. Bushs’ America.

In George W. Bushs’ vision of America, this is OK. No problem.  Business as usual, you know.  We have the “HAVES” and the “HAVE NOTS” and never the twain shall meet, right? I mean, they will pull themselves up by their bootstraps if they REALLY want to re-join regular society.  Right?   (Insert much foul language directed at Neo-Con’s here).

Five Reasons Why FISA Bill May be Worse Than You Think

The House passed FISA bill is bad legislation for many reasons, but these are the five biggest problems I see.

Politically Unnecessary

When addressing a bill with so many substantive issues I hate to start out with the politics of the matter but in this case it seems necessary. There can be no doubt the Democrats who support this bill do so in the belief that their support will protect them from charges they are soft on terrorism. That belief is misplaced. In the upcoming election the only card the Republicans have to play is the fear card. Every Democrat will have to face the “soft on terrorism” charge irrespective of how they vote on this or any other piece of legislation. Why? Because the fear card is premised on a lie, and that lie will be repeated over and over again.

a few pieces of silver . . .

A man writes a book. About a culture of deception. And those enshrined in that culture wonder how that man, Scott McClellan, could go from . . .

“. . . a loyal and trusted staff member to an embittered person who makes biting accusations.”

          PhotobucketPhotobucket

Yesterday, in McClellan’s rather limp Mr. Smith Goes to Washington moment on Capitol Hill, the New York Times writes,

…the book, with Mr. McClellan’s lacerating criticism of his former colleagues, has generated a rich discussion about the obligations of political loyalty… The man who once regularly and seemingly by rote defended Mr. Bush in the White House press room was attacked by the committee’s ranking Republican, Representative Lamar Smith of Texas, who grilled Mr. McClellan as ferociously as any reporter had in his three years as press secretary.

I got a good laugh at that part… hahahahahahahahaha… the idea… bwahahahahahahahaha… that reporters had grilled anybody ferociously in… snort snort laughinginginginginging…. in seven plus years. To whom does the New York Times refer?  One can only… chortle giggle gha giggle… wonder.

Let me wipe the tears from my eyes… further, according to the New York Times…

…Committee Democrats, on the other hand, were much gentler, treating Mr. McClellan as if he were an author promoting a book in an interview.

Makes one dizzy doesn’t it? But this is what blew me away…

Rep. Smith said, “Scott McClellan alone will have to wrestle with whether it was worth selling out the president and his friends for a few pieces of silver.”

“What Happened: Inside the Bush White House and Washington’s Culture of Deception” was written by Scott McClellan for money. Huh. Now that is rich. Isn’t it??? Rep. Smith, a money grubbing, power mongering, lying, despicable Washington politician who shills ONLY for the interests of the monied and powerful deplores the greed of Scott McClellan. And double huh.

Load more